entangelment ...
Just to note, I have a few issues with Mills CQM.
1. Transients seam to not be covered by the theory, only the eigen states
2. I don't know how you do combinations of eigenstates, QM is a linear L^2
theory, I cant't
find any references if Mills can combine solutions as in QM and
From: Stefan Israelsson Tampe
entangelment ...
Just to note, I have a few issues with Mills CQM.
1. Transients seam to not be covered by the theory, only the
eigen states
2. I don't know how you do
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 10:14 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
This
emphasis on Aspect is the perfect example of this lack of competence. QED.
g Cute.
Hello Jed
The theory of R.Mills corrects a crucial flaw in the current atomic model.
In R.Mills theory the electron is not described as a pointsource but as an
extended current which flows
in such a way that stable solutions of the Maxwell equations arise which
correspond to the normal quantum
From: pjvannoorden
As a consequence of this new atomic theory of R.Mills all the strange effects
in the current quantum theory (like spooky action at a distance… disappear.
Everything becomes calculable.
What? Please explain how quantum entanglement is fully explained by Mills’
theory.
pjvannoor...@caiway.nl wrote:
The theory of R.Mills corrects a crucial flaw in the current atomic model.
In R.Mills theory the electron is not described as a pointsource but as an
extended current which flows
in such a way that stable solutions of the Maxwell equations arise which
PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: BLP picks up another 11 M from investors
pjvannoor...@caiway.nl wrote:
The theory of R.Mills corrects a crucial flaw in the current atomic model.
In R.Mills theory the electron is not described as a pointsource but as an
extended current which
and photons are different all the
predicted strange quantum effects disappear and
the results of every experiment can be explained classically.
Peter
From: Jones Beene
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2014 6:27 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Re: BLP picks up another 11 M from investors
energy in the most recently developed system
is released in the form of light.
Peter
*From:* Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
*Sent:* Monday, August 11, 2014 8:10 PM
*To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Re: BLP picks up another 11 M from investors
pjvannoor...@caiway.nl wrote
Hello Peter,
I have to chuckle that you would quote Mills’ GIGO presentation of Aspect here
as if there was any validity to it at all. Mills should have removed this from
his book years ago. It is shockingly wrong.
First, the Aspect experiment is old, flawed and long since upgraded, and
From: Jones Beene
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2014 9:52 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Re: BLP picks up another 11 M from investors
Hello Peter,
I have to chuckle that you would quote Mills’ GIGO presentation of Aspect here
as if there was any validity to it at all. Mills should
for the quantum entanglement.
Peter
From: Jones mailto:jone...@pacbell.net Beene
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2014 9:52 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Re: BLP picks up another 11 M from investors
Hello Peter,
I have to chuckle that you would quote Mills’ GIGO
In reply to pjvannoor...@caiway.nl's message of Mon, 11 Aug 2014 20:38:07
+0200:
Hi,
[snip]
I agree that the development of a device which can work continously has
similarities with the development of the IC engine.
Remarkable is that almost all energy in the most recently developed system is
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 1:47 PM, pjvannoor...@caiway.nl wrote:
The whole thing boils down to the stucture of the electron and photon. If
the electron/photon are is described as a point particles
no classical explanation can be given for the quantum entanglement.
Photons and electrons are
14 matches
Mail list logo
