the emissivity was used, it was not the blackbody equation but is not that
the greybody equation (correct term?) ?
anyway what have to be the sensitivity error to explain the apparent COP ?
naively I assume that the emissivity during the calibration have to be much
much higher than assumed and
A calibration curve will bend down. It never bends up.
this mean that temperature grow less than the power ?
this mean that when you increase the power, and if temperature grows much
more that before, something anomalous is happening ?
Either excess heat, or some external blanket effect
: Minimum COP assuming worst mistakes possible
A calibration curve will bend down. It never bends up.
this mean that temperature grow less than the power ?
this mean that when you increase the power, and if temperature grows much more
that before, something anomalous is happening ?
Either excess
To: Vortex List vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wed, Oct 15, 2014 12:59 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:E-cat : Minimum COP assuming worst mistakes possible
A calibration curve will bend down. It never bends up.
this mean that temperature grow less than the power ?
this mean that when you increase the power
Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.com wrote:
A calibration curve will bend down. It never bends up.
this mean that temperature grow less than the power ?
Right.
this mean that when you increase the power, and if temperature grows much
more that before, something anomalous is happening ?
is
generating a major amount of power during the test.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Jack Cole jcol...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wed, Oct 15, 2014 3:19 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:E-cat : Minimum COP assuming worst mistakes possible
I agree David. You can verify
Message-
From: Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.com
To: Vortex List vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wed, Oct 15, 2014 12:59 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:E-cat : Minimum COP assuming worst mistakes possible
A calibration curve will bend down. It never bends up.
this mean that temperature grow less than
for what they
actually were able to accomplish.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thu, Oct 16, 2014 12:18 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:E-cat : Minimum COP assuming worst mistakes possible
You might say I am splitting
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 9:43 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
It would be a miracle to find that the temperature exactly matched what is
expected according to the Stephan-Boltzman equation.
I get that the preconditions for the Stephan-Boltzman equation were not
met, technically,
Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.com wrote:
- is there a simple way , with minimal assumption, to be sure that the
COP1
Look at the color. If it is dull red, it may be around 750°C which is
where you would expect it to be in a straight line extrapolation
calibration up to 800 W. If it
[mailto:jedrothw...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2014 1:10 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:E-cat : Minimum COP assuming worst mistakes possible
Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.com mailto:alain.sep...@gmail.com wrote:
* is there a simple way , with minimal assumption
The fact that the 100 watt input power increase yielded a calculated(and
assumed) output power increase of 700 watts does indeed prove that the COP is
greater than unity. My model shows that this is the general behavior that is
expected from any device that has internally generated power. I
12 matches
Mail list logo
