LENR is similar to the pharmaceutical industry were the value of the
material that comprises the product is very small, but the worth of the its
intellectual capital is very large.
When Jed says that the cost of the power derived from LENR is almost zero,
he is inferring that the people who
Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
LENR is similar to the pharmaceutical industry were the value of the
material that comprises the product is very small, but the worth of the its
intellectual capital is very large.
I do not think it will cost much to develop cold fusion into a practical
I wrote:
Even if we paid Rossi $10 billion today for his discovery, in a few years
you would be paying only a few dollars extra per car or a few dollars per
year for electricity to reimburse him.
That is not to say cold fusion devices will be cheap at first. You will pay
a tremendous
On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
The patents will have to expire. The knowledge of how to make them will
have to spread.
I have been wanting to get to the patents before too long. I know very
little about patents at this point. But I would not be
Jed’s concept of the LENR product line evolution is sadly limited to energy
products. With the money that LENR based firms make from energy production
and products, they will reinvest in the transmutation technology where
cheap material like waste, junk, silicon, carbon, and oxygen are transmuted
http://arstechnica.com/science/2013/08/nasa-test-fires-3d-printed-rocket-parts-low-cost-high-power-innovation/
NASA test-fires 3D printed rocket parts: low cost, high power innovation
Today, NASA can build a rocket engine using 3 D manufacturing.
On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 3:14 PM, Axil Axil
Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
I have been wanting to get to the patents before too long. I know very
little about patents at this point. But I would not be surprised if the
existing patents are all encumbered by details that will invalidate them.
I know little about patents.
Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
Jed’s concept of the LENR product line evolution is sadly limited to energy
products.
That is nonsense. My book describes far more than that, including
transmutation.
With the money that LENR based firms make from energy production and
products, they
*And they will make money from that technology as well. The cost of that
RD will also soon be recovered. What is your point?*
You stated that power produced from LENR will be virtually free, to cheap
to even meter. If all the existing industrial infrastructure is immediately
trashed by LENR,
You guys got it all wrong. This brane we live on attracts way too much
dark matter. It is off to space for the human race with our vacuum energy
devices else we all follow the path of the dinosaurs
On Sunday, September 8, 2013, Axil Axil wrote:
*And they will make money from that technology
Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
*And they will make money from that technology as well. The cost of that
RD will also soon be recovered. What is your point?*
You stated that power produced from LENR will be virtually free, to cheap
to even meter.
I said that would happen eventually. It
The IBM Personal Computer, commonly known as the IBM PC, is the original
version and progenitor of the IBM PC compatible hardware platform. IBM
developed their first PC in 1981. It was created by a team of professional
computer engineers and designers under the direction of top engineering
Its a simple matter of capital write-off. If the operation and maintenance
costs are all you have to service, and you can still make a profit, then
you can't afford to abandon that infrastructure.
My calculations show that even if you write off the entire capital cost of
a coal plant, Rossi's
I have heard that for nuclear power plant the worst cost is building, not
even dispantling.
fuel like with LENr is negligible.
Mantenance is expensive.
maintaining a fission reactor a decade more is quite cheap...
is it cheaper that LENR ?
if not this mean that the fission reactors will be
Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.com wrote:
I have heard that for nuclear power plant the worst cost is building, not
even dispantling.
Dismantling. Decommission. They have not decomissioned many of them so the
cost is unclear. The cost of decommissioning Three Mile Island and
Connecticut
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Maintenance is expensive. Because the fuel is cheap but the equipment is
expensive, nuclear power plants have to be run 24 hours a day for baseline
generation. Otherwise they are not cost effective.
They can be
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
No. LENR will be far cheaper than any other source. Eventually it will be
thousands of times cheaper.
Some history on the phrase too cheap to meter
http://media.cns-snc.ca/media/toocheap/toocheap.html
Harry
H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
No. LENR will be far cheaper than any other source. Eventually it will be
thousands of times cheaper.
Some history on the phrase too cheap to meter
LENR will not be too cheap to meter. It will be free. The cost will be so
close to zero it will be
18 matches
Mail list logo
