I have been going through the posts on the Prometheus Yahoo
site and I came across this one from a "true believer",
to wit, Dave Squires, which I thought was a good basis for
further discussion.
=
I already know that OU is real. There is
so far out ..considering the
3D graphics software available.
Richard
- Original Message -
From: "Grimer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, May 13, 2005 11:56 PM
Subject: RE: non-looping smot
At 06:48 pm 13-05-05 -0400, Keith wrote:
I hadn't really thought of that...a
Keith,
I have had a look at Emil Hartman's 1980 patent (US4215330)
http://l2.espacenet.com/dips/bnsviewer?CY=ch&LG=
fr&DB=EPD&PN=US4215330&ID=US+++4215330A1+I+
and it appears from the drawing that i
At 06:48 pm 13-05-05 -0400, Keith wrote:
> I hadn't really thought of that...a funny image, that.
>
> All the same, it seems clear from experiment that
> multiple ramps can be joined in a line. Perhaps as
> you say, after many such ramps the ball will peter
> out, hooking somewhere between the exi
Original Message-
From: Grimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 13, 2005 6:56 PM
To: vortex-L@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: non-looping smot
At 04:09 pm 13-05-05 -0400, you wrote:
>Frank writes:
>>I don't think one has to go as far as having a circle of
>>ramps. If
At 04:09 pm 13-05-05 -0400, you wrote:
>Frank writes:
>>I don't think one has to go as far as having a circle of
>>ramps. If the steel ball could transit a straight line of
>>100 SMOTS, say, that would be pretty convincing.
>
>What's the difference between 2 and 100? Nothing, IMHO.
Well if it wi
Frank writes:
>I don't think one has to go as far as having a circle of
>ramps. If the steel ball could transit a straight line of
>100 SMOTS, say, that would be pretty convincing.
What's the difference between 2 and 100? Nothing, IMHO.
The challenge is curving the line back on itself. I have
no
At 11:10 am 13-05-05 -0400, Keith wrote:
> Hi Frank,
>
> You should be aware that back in the mid 90's, _many_ people
> were encouraged by Greg to build and test these devices. I
> was not one of them, preferring my own insanity to others,
> but some are still on Vo. These devices started with Emi
Is C of M true as well?
Harry
Keith Nagel at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi Frank,
>
> You should be aware that back in the mid 90's, _many_ people
> were encouraged by Greg to build and test these devices. I
> was not one of them, preferring my own insanity to others,
> but some are still on
Hi Frank,
You should be aware that back in the mid 90's, _many_ people
were encouraged by Greg to build and test these devices. I
was not one of them, preferring my own insanity to others,
but some are still on Vo. These devices started with Emil
Hartman as far as I can tell, and they do work as d
At 09:33 pm 12-05-05 -0400, you wrote:
>
>
>not used account wrote:
>
>>For some reason, even the non-looping smot is still a
>>little interesting...
>>
>
>Yeah, especially if you can get 1.5 G for one!
>
>http://www.butlerlabs.com/2ftmagnapulsion.htm
&g
not used account wrote:
For some reason, even the non-looping smot is still a
little interesting...
Yeah, especially if you can get 1.5 G for one!
http://www.butlerlabs.com/2ftmagnapulsion.htm
The SUPERSMOT! I had not heard of butler before I visited SONS.
gt; you got there!
>
>
For some reason, even the non-looping smot is still a
little interesting...
Joe
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Read only the mail you want - Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
13 matches
Mail list logo
