Re: [vpp-dev] [infra-steering] Something wrong with the CentOS repo?

I tried a 'recheck' and the error is still there so likely is really broken? On Fri, 2018-02-16 at 13:34 +0100, Marco Varlese wrote: > Hi, > > I am not sure whether this was just an hiccup or something "more serious" so > just letting you know... > > Please, see t

[vpp-dev] Something wrong with the CentOS repo?

Hi, I am not sure whether this was just an hiccup or something "more serious" so just letting you know... Please, see the logs below which happened on the build for CentOS: 09:58:32 REPO_URL: https://nexus.fd.io/content/repositories/fd.io.master.centos7 09:58:33 Loaded plugins: fastestmirror,

Re: [vpp-dev] Congrats to Marco Varlese on his election as a vpp project committer

Thank you Dave, the whole group of committers and the TSC for giving me this opportunity! Look forward to great developments in VPP!!! Cheers,Marco On Thu, 2018-02-08 at 23:24 +, Edward Warnicke wrote: > Woot! > Ed > On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 8:57 AM Dave Wallace wrote: >

[vpp-dev] SCTP coverity-scan warnings addressed

Hi Chris, Just to update you that I took care of the action item which came up during the VPP project-meeting on Tuesday. The patch https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/10433/ addressing the warnings (8) re SCTP was merged. Cheers, -- Marco V SUSE LINUX GmbH | GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard,

Re: [vpp-dev] Supporting vpp releases besides N and N-1

On Fri, 2018-01-26 at 19:40 +, Ed Warnicke wrote: > I think you've hit on the right metric: retire those streams which are no > longer supported. +1 What do others think? Ed On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 3:53 PM Ed Kern (ejk) wrote: Id like to clean up jenkins ‘stream’ in the

Re: [vpp-dev] VPP 18.01 Release artifacts are now available on nexus.fd.io

Great news! Congrats everybody!!! On Thu, 2018-01-25 at 00:23 -0500, Dave Wallace wrote: > > Folks, > > > > The VPP 18.01 Release artifacts are now available on nexus.fd.io > > > > The ubuntu.xenial and centos packages can be installed following > the

Re: [vpp-dev] Build triggering on a simple commit message update?

about the current situation and the proposed change of direction? > > > > Ed Cheers,Marco > > > > > On Jan 24, 2018, at 4:13 AM, Marco Varlese <mvarl...@suse.de> wrote: > > > > > > > > All, > > > > > > > &g

[vpp-dev] Build triggering on a simple commit message update?

All, I noticed that when a patch is updated solely for the commit message (and pushed to gerrit), gerrit triggers a complete new build. I wonder if it is possible (on the gerrit backend) to catch that a patch has been submitted with only the commit-message being updated hence skipping the full

Re: [vpp-dev] openSUSE build fails

to:vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io] > On Behalf Of Gabriel Ganne > > Sent: Friday, December 15, 2017 8:42 AM > > To: Billy McFall <bmcf...@redhat.com>; Marco Varlese <mvarl...@suse.de> > > Cc: Damjan Marion (damarion) <damar...@cisco.com>; vpp-dev <vpp-.

Re: [vpp-dev] openSUSE build fails

Folks, On Fri, 2017-12-15 at 11:15 +0100, Marco Varlese wrote: [NIP] > Ok, so just summarizing our conversation on IRC for others too. > > That issue is connected to the different versions of INDENT (C checkstyle) > installed on the different distros. > > openSUSE runs 2.

Re: [vpp-dev] openSUSE build fails

On Fri, 2017-12-15 at 08:52 +0100, Marco Varlese wrote: > Damjan, > > On Thu, 2017-12-14 at 16:04 +, Damjan Marion (damarion) wrote: > > Folks, > > > > I'm hearing from multiple people that OpenSUSE verify job is failing > > (again). Would it be possible t

Re: [vpp-dev] openSUSE build fails

Dear David, On Thu, 2017-12-14 at 10:01 -1000, David Cornejo wrote: > I'm a newcomer to this list, so treat my opinion with suspicion... > I think that there's a governance policy involved. I don't think that the > committers should feel obligated to support something that is not in their >

Re: [vpp-dev] openSUSE build fails

Damjan, On Thu, 2017-12-14 at 16:04 +, Damjan Marion (damarion) wrote: > Folks, > > I'm hearing from multiple people that OpenSUSE verify job is failing (again). I haven't heard (or read) anything over the mailing list otherwise I would have looked into it. Also, if you hear anything like

Re: [vpp-dev] How to Wipe vpp!

Mostafa, On Thu, 2017-12-14 at 11:39 +0330, Mostafa Salari wrote: > Hi > I installed vpp on real hw! Which command did you run when you built and installed VPP? On which distro?The build process likely installed an RPM/DEB (depending on your distro) on your system so you could simply use the

Re: [vpp-dev] Jenkins jobs not starting from a "clean" state?

Thomas, On Thu, 2017-11-30 at 10:24 -0500, Thomas F Herbert wrote: > > > > > > [SNIP] > > > > Maybe "unhappy" is a little too strong :) :) :) > > > > > > > > I feel that being DPDK such an important piece in the VPP > >

Re: [vpp-dev] Jenkins jobs not starting from a "clean" state?

Dear Ed, On Wed, 2017-11-29 at 18:57 +, Ed Kern (ejk) wrote: > > > > > On Nov 29, 2017, at 3:09 AM, Marco Varlese <mvarl...@suse.de> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Ed, > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed,

Re: [vpp-dev] vpp-verify-master-opensuse build failure triage

Dear Dave, By the look of it is seemed to have been an hiccup with the download or that something spurious was left on the filesystem... === 12:08:13 Bad Checksum! Please remove /w/workspace/vpp-verify-master- opensuse/dpdk/dpdk-17.08.tar.xz and retry 12:08:13 Makefile:267: recipe for target

Re: [vpp-dev] vpp-verify-master-opensuse build failure triage

Dear Dave, By the look of it is seemed to have been an hiccup with the download or that something spurious was left on the filesystem... === 12:08:13 Bad Checksum! Please remove /w/workspace/vpp-verify-master- opensuse/dpdk/dpdk-17.08.tar.xz and retry 12:08:13 Makefile:267: recipe for target

Re: [vpp-dev] vpp-verify-master-opensuse build failure triage

rg/rel/dpdk-17.11.tar.xz > > > $ openssl md5 dpdk-17.11.tar.xz > > > MD5(dpdk-17.11.tar.xz)= 53ee9e054a8797c9e67ffa0eb5d0c701 > > > > > > > Though I agree that if the "recheck" button made the build pass, there must be > something wrong on my

Re: [vpp-dev] vpp-verify-master-opensuse build failure triage

> > > > -- > > > Gabriel Ganne > > > > > > > From: vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io <vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io> on behalf of > Marco Varlese <mvarl...@suse.de> > > Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2017 9:19:37 AM > > To: Dave Wallace

Re: [vpp-dev] Can't run tests (ImportError: No module named bier)

tch... > > Regards, > Klement Cheers, Marco > > > -Original Message- > > From: vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io [mailto:vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io] On > > Behalf Of Marco Varlese > > Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2017 4:30 PM > > To: vpp-dev <vpp-dev@

[vpp-dev] Can't run tests (ImportError: No module named bier)

Hi, I just took latest master and cannot run tests anymore... Adding tests from directory tree /home/mvarlese/repo/vpp/test Traceback (most recent call last): File "run_tests.py", line 146, in discover_tests(d, cb) File "/home/mvarlese/repo/vpp/test/discover_tests.py", line 27, in

Re: [vpp-dev] Please Call DigSafe...

ill kick off the verify jobs. I wonder > if one could remove "fd.io JJB" quickly enough to keep that from happening. Somehow, I cannot remove the "fd.io JJB" job at all on my patch submission... :( > > Thanks... D. Cheers, Marco > > -Original Message- > Fr

Re: [vpp-dev] Please Call DigSafe...

Hi Chris / Dave, Few thoughts inline... On Fri, 2017-11-17 at 13:51 +, Luke, Chris wrote: > Hi Dave, > > After spending a few minutes to work out that you were talking about a > proposed patch and not something any of us had merged (and, especially not > that I merged!), I see that what we

Re: [vpp-dev] VPP with DPDK external build

On Tue, 2017-11-14 at 12:45 +, Shachar Beiser wrote: > > > > > > > > From: Marco Varlese [mailto:mvarl...@suse.de] > > Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2017 1:29 PM > > To: Shachar Beiser <shacha...@mellanox.com>; vpp-dev@lists.fd.io > >

Re: [vpp-dev] VPP with DPDK external build

It looks like you didn't build the dpdk plugin (dpdk_plugin.so) in VPP... The first command you ran > root@kickseed:/home/shacharbe/vpp.dlopen# sudo > ./src/bin/vpp -c ${PWD}/src/vpp/conf/startup.conf is correct but the DPDK plugin is not loaded (I can't see it listed in the

Re: [vpp-dev] dpdk external

ymbols: Bad > value > > collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status > > Makefile:1613: recipe for target 'dpdk_plugin.la' failed Cheers,Marco > > > > > From: Marco Varlese [mailto:mvarl...@suse.de] > > Sent: Thursday, November 9, 2017 6:12 PM > > To:

Re: [vpp-dev] dpdk external

Dear Beiser, I currently build (and actually create a package for SUSE distro) for VPP 17.10 compiling against a shared DPDK installation without any issues. First of all, I apply the below patch:--- build-data/platforms/vpp.mk.old 2017-08-21 16:05:45.202038250 +0200+++

Re: [vpp-dev] FD.io Notification: VPP openSUSE jobs

Thank you Vanessa :) On Mon, 2017-10-30 at 16:32 -0500, Vanessa Valderrama wrote: > > What: > > > > The openSUSE image issues have been resolved. The jobs > are passing on the sandbox. I will be enabling openSUSE for VPP > in production tomorrow. Please feel

Re: [vpp-dev] gerrit 8872 centos validation failure (stable/1710)

Confirmed; I had exact same issue and rebasing sorted that out. On Wed, 2017-10-18 at 14:00 +, Klement Sekera -X (ksekera - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) wrote: > I think I saw an email a few days ago that this is resolved by rebasing > the patch. > > HTH, > Klement > > Quoting Dave

Re: [vpp-dev] vpp-verify-master-centos7 failure -> rebase patch

On Wed, 2017-10-11 at 11:07 -0400, Dave Wallace wrote: > Folks, > > > > The patch, https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/8722/, in master has created > a new dpdk rpm version. > > > > If your patch is failing vpp-verify-master-centos7 with the > following

Re: [vpp-dev] Test failing

54:53 Build step 'Execute shell' marked build as failure > > Thanks, > Klement > > Quoting Marco Varlese (2017-10-11 12:28:48) > > Hi Jan, > > > > Thanks for pointing to the correct TEST failure. > > However, what I'd like to mention is that it's literally impos

Re: [vpp-dev] Test failing

t: Timeout exception. > 08:07:42 Current contents of stdout buffer: > 08:07:42 Current contents of stderr buffer: > > It seems that there was VPP restart during execution of this test. > > Regards, > Jan > > -Original Message- > From: Marco Varlese [mai

Re: [vpp-dev] Test failing

- and failed test is > > TEST TC01: Route IPv4 packet through LISP with Bridge Domain setup. > > Where no running VPP was detected (no VPP pid returned) during the test case > setup phase. > > Regards, > Jan > > -Original Message- > From: Marco Varlese [mailto:

Re: [vpp-dev] Dependency on libsubunit ? (and failing to run tests)

g fine. For now though, that's still in the Jenkins sandbox... Having said that, if you take a look at the top-level Makefile, the vagrant scripts, etc. you'll see quite some work has gone through to support building/testing VPP on SUSE distros... > > Klement Cheers, Marco > > Quoting Marc

Re: [vpp-dev] Dependency on libsubunit ? (and failing to run tests)

USE... > I am testing a patch for cherry picking into stable/1710 now that > straightens this out. > > I will add you (Marco) to the review. Thanks. > > > > > Thanks, > > Klement > > > > Quoting Marco Varlese (2017-10-10 16:

Re: [vpp-dev] Dependency on libsubunit ? (and failing to run tests)

6:35 +, Klement Sekera -X (ksekera - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) wrote: > Hi Marco, > > as you can see in your review build failure, removing -lsubunit breaks > existing stuff... > > Thanks, > Klement > > Quoting Marco Varlese (2017-10-10 16:46:13) > >

Re: [vpp-dev] Dependency on libsubunit ? (and failing to run tests)

gt; Thanks, > Klement > > Quoting Marco Varlese (2017-10-10 16:00:00) > > Hi all, > > > > As of last week I could happily run tests (e.g. make test) on my > > distribution > > (openSUSE). > > > > When I tried again today - with latest master - I couldn't any

Re: [vpp-dev] Dependency on libsubunit ? (and failing to run tests)

his issue is already being investigated by Tom Herbert. Strange thing > is that check requires subunit. I wonder if it works if you install > check only. Could you try removing -lsubunit from test/ext/Makefile? > > Thanks, > Klement > > Quoting Marco Varlese (2

[vpp-dev] Dependency on libsubunit ? (and failing to run tests)

Hi all, As of last week I could happily run tests (e.g. make test) on my distribution (openSUSE). When I tried again today - with latest master - I couldn't anymore: make[2]: Entering directory '/home/mvarlese/repo/vpp/test/ext' cc -o /home/mvarlese/repo/vpp/build-root/vapi_test/vapi_c_test

Re: [vpp-dev] Test failing

> From: vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io [mailto:vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io] On > Behalf Of Ed Kern (ejk) > Sent: Friday, October 06, 2017 17:07 > To: Marco Varlese <marco.varl...@suse.com> > Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io > Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Test failing > > could you t

[vpp-dev] Test failing

Hi all, I have seen this many times these days... I wonder if it's a infra hiccup or something is really broken? The "recheck" is becoming the norm to get a clean +1 Verified... :( 14:32:52 14:00:32 TC04: VPP doesn't send DHCPv4 REQUEST after OFFER with wrong XID :: Configure DHCPv4 client on

Re: [vpp-dev] Problem with new c api patch commit 8f2a4ea merged on September 19

Thanks for the thorough explanation Klement!Based on that, I think (2) is still the better option for the current situation... Tom, how would that sound to you? >>> "Klement Sekera -X (ksekera - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)" >>> <ksek...@cisco.com> 0

Re: [vpp-dev] Problem with new c api patch commit 8f2a4ea merged on September 19

Hi Klement, >>> "Klement Sekera -X (ksekera - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)" >>> 09/25/17 9:33 AM >>> > At the time of creating this patch, epel was part of Makefile and > python34 was installed as dependency from that repo. > (see

Re: [vpp-dev] [discuss] FD.io Jenkins : 2017-09-21 @ 0430 UTC (9:30am PDT)

ilures on the sandbox and ensure > the job is passing before we make the change in production again. > Thanks, > > Vanessa > > > > On 09/22/2017 07:39 AM, Marco Varlese > wrote: > > > > > > > > >

Re: [vpp-dev] [discuss] FD.io Jenkins : 2017-09-21 @ 0430 UTC (9:30am PDT)

planation. Understood and it sounds like a perfect idea. > > > What I don’t know is if we decided it was possible or not. Ok; let's see what Vanessa says. > > > Chris. Thanks,Marco > > > > > From: Marco Varlese [mailto:marco.varl...@suse.com] > > Sen

Re: [vpp-dev] [discuss] FD.io Jenkins : 2017-09-21 @ 0430 UTC (9:30am PDT)

it I thought I saw somewhere this is what they ought to be), but it seems it > was removed from the trigger entirely. > > Chris. > > > > > From: vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io [mailto:vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io] > On Behalf Of Marco Varlese > > Sent: Friday,

Re: [vpp-dev] [discuss] FD.io Jenkins : 2017-09-21 @ 0430 UTC (9:30am PDT)

Hi Vanessa, Did this happen yesterday? I can see VPP being built on CentOS and Ubuntu only. Can you please advice? Thanks,Marco On Thu, 2017-09-21 at 10:57 -0500, Vanessa Valderrama wrote: > I'll be enabling openSUSE minions for VPP in Jenkins shortly. > I'll be monitoring VPP builds

Re: [vpp-dev] VXLAN tunnel setup on single host?

rco > > -Original Message- > From: vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io [mailto:vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io] On > Behalf Of Marco Varlese > Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2017 2:51 AM > To: vpp-dev <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> > Subject: [vpp-dev] VXLAN tunnel setup on single hos

Re: [vpp-dev] CANCELED - Re: FD.io Enabling Jenkins openSUSE : 2017-09-13 @ 0830 UTC (1:30pm PDT)

Hi Vanessa / Florin, Is this something which can proceed now? Thanks,Marco On Wed, 2017-09-13 at 15:29 -0500, Vanessa Valderrama wrote: > Canceling change due to API freeze. > > > > Thank you, > > Vanessa > > > > On 09/13/2017 03:19 PM, Florin Coras > wrote: >

[vpp-dev] VXLAN tunnel setup on single host?

Resending this since it looks like it was never handled by the mail server... :( On Wed, 2017-09-20 at 16:42 +0200, Marco Varlese wrote: > Hi, > > I am wondering if it's possible to have a VXLAN setup using a single host > environment. > > I thought to use two bridges; each

Re: [vpp-dev] SIGSEGV when bootstrapping

Cheers, Marco On Tue, 2017-08-29 at 13:29 +0200, Marco Varlese wrote: > Dave & all, > > I was suggested by some compiler guys to turn on the gcc option > -fsanitize=undefined since the error (and the actual way I used to > fix it) might be caused by unaligned memory. >

Re: [vpp-dev] SIGSEGV when bootstrapping

ding a "load/store of misaligned address". I wonder if this is something we can address? I did submit a fix to gerrit but - as suggested - it may only be a way to workaround the underlying rootcause. Cheers, Marco On Tue, 2017-08-29 at 08:50 +0200, Marco Varlese wrote: > Hi Dave, >

Re: [vpp-dev] SIGSEGV when bootstrapping

ch if you find a workaround? Sure, I filed the bug and the link is https://jira.fd.io/browse/VPP-964 I keep digging and hopefully find the solution soon! :) > > > Thanks, > > -daw- Cheers,Marco > > > On 08/28/2017 12:22 PM, Marco Varlese &

Re: [vpp-dev] SIGSEGV when bootstrapping

, Marco Varlese wrote: > And a even more complete BT with sources below: > > [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] > Using host libthread_db library "/lib64/libthread_db.so.1". > vlib_plugin_early_init:356: plugin path /usr/lib64/vpp_plugins > load_one_plugin:184:

Re: [vpp-dev] SIGSEGV when bootstrapping

Marco On Mon, 2017-08-28 at 15:10 +0200, Marco Varlese wrote: > Hi, > > I'm running the tip of master branch and I get a segmentation fault > when launcing "vpp -c /etc/vpp/startup.conf" > > My startup.conf is very simple, I don't even map dpdk interfaces, &

[vpp-dev] SIGSEGV when bootstrapping

Hi, I'm running the tip of master branch and I get a segmentation fault when launcing "vpp -c /etc/vpp/startup.conf" My startup.conf is very simple, I don't even map dpdk interfaces, etc. since I am using in a virt environment. I wonder if by any chance a new setting/parameter was introduced

Re: [vpp-dev] Issues building latest master

On Mon, 2017-08-14 at 09:50 +0100, Sergio Gonzalez Monroy wrote: > > On 14/08/2017 09:46, Marco Varlese >   wrote: > > > > >    > >   On Mon, 2017-08-14 at 09:37 +0100, Sergio Gonzalez Monroy > > wrote: > > > &

Re: [vpp-dev] Issues building latest master

ilverman wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > After updating my nasm, I am seeing the very same problem Marco is seeing. On openSUSE 42.3. Not seen on CentOS 7. Not seen on

Re: [vpp-dev] Issues building latest master

Hi Sergio, I tried on a different machine and I got this: libdir: ${exec_prefix}/lib64 Thanks, Marco >>> Marco Varlese 08/14/17 10:04 AM >>> >>> Sergio Gonzalez Monroy <sergio.gonzalez.mon...@intel.com> 08/14/17 9:17 AM >>> >>&g

Re: [vpp-dev] Issues building latest master

ut I obviously missed some cleanup. > > Thanks, > Sergio On 11/08/2017 20:25, Burt Silverman wrote: > After updating my nasm, I am seeing the very same problem Marco is > seeing. On openSUSE 42.3. Not seen on CentOS 7. Not seen on my VyOS > system. > > Burt > > On Fr

[vpp-dev] Issues building latest master

Hi, I am having troubles building the latest code off the master branch. The commands I always use are: > make bootstrap > make build I get this error: cp: cannot stat '/home/marco/vpp/build-root/build-vpp_debug-native/dpdk/isa- l_crypto-2.18.0/install/lib/libisal_crypto.a': No such file or

Re: [vpp-dev] Bind / Unbind of ACL

From: Andrew Yourtchenko [mailto:ayour...@gmail.com] > > > Sent: Friday, June 16, 2017 17:51 > > > To: Luke, Chris <chris_l...@cable.comcast.com> > > > Cc: Marco Varlese <marco.varl...@suse.com>; vpp-dev@lists.fd.io > > > Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Bind / Unb

Re: [vpp-dev] Bind / Unbind of ACL

On Fri, 2017-06-16 at 15:12 +0200, Andrew  Yourtchenko wrote: > On 6/16/17, Marco Varlese <marco.varl...@suse.com> wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2017-06-15 at 14:22 +0200, Andrew   Yourtchenko wrote: > > > > > > After a bit more thinking - there is a way that s

Re: [vpp-dev] Bind / Unbind of ACL

gical that this is the > > > same > > > behavior as when matching falls off the end of the ACL. > > > > > > Chris. > > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io [mailto:vpp-

[vpp-dev] Troubles with multiple-threads

Hi, I am seeing repeatedly issues when configuring VPP with worker threads. My platform is a multi-socket one (NUMA) so I want to PIN the VPP threads where my NIC card naturally belongs too (Node 3, first core is #48). The problem I see is: Anytime I enable the worker-threads VPP core-dumps

Re: [vpp-dev] Bind / Unbind of ACL

On Fri, 2017-06-09 at 14:27 +0200, Andrew  Yourtchenko wrote: > Hi Marco, > > On 6/9/17, Marco Varlese <marco.varl...@suse.com> wrote: > > > > Hi Andrew, > > > > On Fri, 2017-06-09 at 13:53 +0200, Andrew   Yourtchenko wrote: > > > > >

Re: [vpp-dev] Bind / Unbind of ACL

ffect hence freeing the interfaces from the previous behaviour, things would have a 1:1 mapping between what you see in configuration (acl_dump) with the flows you see on the network. > > --a Cheers, Marco > > On 6/9/17, Marco Varlese <marco.varl...@suse.com> wrote: > > > &g

[vpp-dev] Bind / Unbind of ACL

Hi, I am trying the ACL functionality and I found a "strange" behaviour. The steps I follow to use an ACL are: * I create an ACL to deny SSH traffic between VMs (via the 'acl_add_replace' function) * Set that ACL to the interfaces involved (via the 'acl_interface_set_acl_list' function) After

Re: [vpp-dev] Problem with ACL plugin

I managed to solve this by adding running VAT as follow: # vpp_api_test plugin_path /usr/lib64/vpp_api_test_plugins  Cheers, Marco On Thu, 2017-06-08 at 13:51 +0200, Marco Varlese wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to use the ACL plugin but I am encountering some difficulties. > >

[vpp-dev] Problem with ACL plugin

Hi, I'm trying to use the ACL plugin but I am encountering some difficulties. I start the VPP daemon and the output shows that the ACL plugin should be loaded correctly: # vpp -c /etc/vpp/startup.conf vlib_plugin_early_init:356: plugin path /usr/lib64/vpp_plugins load_one_plugin:184: Loaded

Re: [vpp-dev] GCC7 to build VPP

I actually submitted a fix for this to gerrit. It should keep gcc5/6 happy and work with gcc7 too. On Wed, 2017-05-31 at 11:45 +0200, Marco Varlese wrote: > Hi all, > > Is anybody using GCC7 to build the VPP source code?  > > I'm seeing this: > > [  297s] /home/abuild/rpm

[vpp-dev] GCC7 to build VPP

Hi all, Is anybody using GCC7 to build the VPP source code?  I'm seeing this: [  297s] /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/vpp-17.07/build- data/../src/vnet/policer/xlate.c: In function 'sse2_pol_convert_hw_to_cfg_params': [  297s] /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/vpp-17.07/build-

Re: [vpp-dev] [csit-dev] Cryptodev "issue"

ilto:csit-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io] On > Behalf Of Sergio Gonzalez Monroy > Sent: Monday, May 29, 2017 5:21 PM > To: Marco Varlese <marco.varl...@suse.com>; vpp-dev@lists.fd.io; csit-dev@list > s.fd.io > Subject: Re: [csit-dev] [vpp-dev] Cryptodev "issue" > > On 29/05

Re: [vpp-dev] Cryptodev "issue"

On Mon, 2017-05-29 at 16:20 +0100, Sergio Gonzalez Monroy wrote: > On 29/05/2017 15:54, Marco Varlese wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2017-05-29 at 15:35 +0100, Sergio Gonzalez Monroy wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I have not seen that behav

[vpp-dev] Cryptodev "issue"

Hi all, I pulled the latest code from master branch last week and I'm seeing something new and related (possibly) to the Cryptodev support in VPP/DPDK. The issue is that it now takes much longer for VPP to initialize... eventually printing out the message: "not enough Cryptodevs, default to

Re: [vpp-dev] VPP has no interfaces after update from 1704 to 1707 master

You say the ports are "down"... not sure how to interpret that but it might mean that are still being binded to the kernel drivers. Did you try and see if those ports are still binded with the Linux kernel drivers? What is "dpdk-devbind.py --status" reporting? What driver are you using in

Re: [vpp-dev] VPP unable to link external .so libs

Hi Devendra, Did you try to look at src/plugins/dpdk.am ? Cheers, Marco On Thu, 2017-05-18 at 15:42 +0530, devendra rawat wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to run VPP on an arm64 processor. I am using DPDK v16.11. > > My board is having a non-pci ethernet interface I have added a PMD for that > >

Re: [vpp-dev] CSIT borked on master

t;   > > > > > > Hi Marco, > > > > > >   > > > > > > I’ll restart the jobs once we’ve got them passing again. > > > > > >   > > > > > > > > For your reference, you can do it manually b

Re: [vpp-dev] CSIT borked on master

Hi Damjan, Once you're patch is merged, is it possible to kick off the builds which currently are all marked as Verified-1 so to have a clean state on them? If I could do that manually I would do it at least for mine. Thanks, Marco On Mon, 2017-05-15 at 10:54 +, Damjan Marion (damarion)

Re: [vpp-dev] Add support to CI for openSUSE

: > > Vanessa,     Could you get Marco access to the ticketing system and where do we stand on getting the OpenSuse VM? > > Ed > > > > On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 1:35 AM, Marco Varlese <marco.varl...@suse.com> > > wrote: > > > >    > >

Re: [vpp-dev] Add support to CI for openSUSE

t; > > > > > > > > > > > What do we need to do to get OpenSuse Jenkins Minions > >   going? > > > >      > > > > > > > > Ed

Re: [vpp-dev] Build failure with latest VPP

_file/network/dpdk/dpdk.spec?expand=1 You should be able to access it; in case you can't, please, let me know so I can send it to you... I'm going to try your suggested steps and will let you know how it goes. > > Thanks, > > Damjan Thanks, Marco > > > > > > On 1

Re: [vpp-dev] Build failure with latest VPP

op level Makefile for RPM_DEPENDS and make certain they are pulled in, manually if needed. I think I saw a request for SUSE recently -- maybe Ed Warnicke knows if there is a plan to support it. > > Burt > > > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 5:33 AM, Marco Varlese <marco.varl...@suse.com> > >

[vpp-dev] Build failure with latest VPP

Hi, I am facing a build issue with the latest VPP and not sure if others have seen the same? (I'm copying/pasting the errors below) It appears to be broken for both "shared dpdk" and using the "in-repo" dpdk source code. Both compilation mode worked just fine for me using VPP 17.01 so not sure

[vpp-dev] Add support to CI for openSUSE

Hi, I would like to ask if it is possible to add openSUSE distribution in the CI for FD.IO/VPP. We are currently packaging it and I think it would be extremely beneficial to have the CI running on our distribution too. Is it at all possible? If so would you please advise what would you require

Re: [vpp-dev] Build VPP for thunderx platform

I'm on a stripped Ubuntu rootfs > > on this platform > > > > - Them switch to VPP, but using an already installed DPDK: within vpp.mk, > > you have the possibility to override the default values (ie external dpdk) > > > > > > Christophe &

Re: [vpp-dev] Build VPP for thunderx platform

.. > > Christophe > > > -Original Message- > > From: vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io [mailto:vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io] On > > Behalf Of Marco Varlese > > Sent: mercredi 4 janvier 2017 17:36 > > To: Rami Rosen <roszenr...@gmail.com>; Burt Silverman &g

<    1   2