On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 19:16:43 -0400 Dennis Schridde
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Am Donnerstag, 21. September 2006 01:04 schrieb Christian Ohm:
>> On Wednesday, 20 September 2006 at 18:36, Christian Vest Hansen
>wrote:
>> > Forgot to mention that I think this:
>> > >The readme says: "provided as is
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 18:25:15 -0400 Christian Ohm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>What I meant was the whole data. If we are not allowed to modify
>and
>distribute that, this project is over (then there is nothing to
>resurrect, just to conserve - and who wants the role of a
>curator?).
>
Did this no
Am Donnerstag, 21. September 2006 01:04 schrieb Christian Ohm:
> On Wednesday, 20 September 2006 at 18:36, Christian Vest Hansen wrote:
> > Forgot to mention that I think this:
> > >The readme says: "provided as is with no guarantees."
> > >Can't we use that as a license?
> >
> > sounds like the ob
On Wednesday, 20 September 2006 at 18:36, Christian Vest Hansen wrote:
> Forgot to mention that I think this:
>
> >The readme says: "provided as is with no guarantees."
> >Can't we use that as a license?
> sounds like the obvious thing to do, provided it is GPL compatible.
Why GPL compatible? The
Am Donnerstag, 21. September 2006 00:32 schrieb Christian Ohm:
> On Wednesday, 20 September 2006 at 19:43, Dennis Schridde wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, 20. September 2006 19:06 schrieb Christian Vest Hansen:
> > > 2006/9/20, Ari Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > > On 9/20/06, Christian Vest Hansen <[EM
On Wednesday, 20 September 2006 at 19:43, Dennis Schridde wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 20. September 2006 19:06 schrieb Christian Vest Hansen:
> > 2006/9/20, Ari Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > On 9/20/06, Christian Vest Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > 2006/9/20, Dennis Schridde <[EMAIL PROTE
*g* Too funny...
pgpkCXtxWDRgN.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Warzone-dev mailing list
Warzone-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/warzone-dev
On Wednesday, 20 September 2006 at 12:33, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 08:15:26 -0400 Christian Ohm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Wednesday, 20 September 2006 at 1:36, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> If not OK, then what, fork the SP & MP/skirmish so we don't have to
> >> deal
On Wednesday, 20 September 2006 at 19:02, Christian Vest Hansen wrote:
> 2006/9/20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >I really doubt that Eidos/pumpkin (who are now Pivotal)--
> >http://www.pivotalgames.com/index.php?content=warzone&cat=support
> >care, but I think the new person to contact
On Wednesday, 20 September 2006 at 23:30, Dennis Schridde wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 20. September 2006 23:17 schrieb Christian Ohm:
> > Don't know what I was doing when making that patch. Thinking can't have
> > been involved. In script.h, the 'inline' has to be removed, not the
> > 'extern'. Fix attac
On Wednesday, 20 September 2006 at 16:59, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On IRC:
> # [Wed 01:36:09pm] Does that archive also offer a free
> way to compile that code and play the videos?
> # [Wed 01:36:56pm] wz source?:P devurandom, one thing I
> don't understand, why does everyone keep telling that w
Am Mittwoch, 20. September 2006 23:17 schrieb Christian Ohm:
> Don't know what I was doing when making that patch. Thinking can't have
> been involved. In script.h, the 'inline' has to be removed, not the
> 'extern'. Fix attached.
Interesting. I wonder why devurandom.brain() and both GCC and MSVC d
Don't know what I was doing when making that patch. Thinking can't have
been involved. In script.h, the 'inline' has to be removed, not the
'extern'. Fix attached.
--
"I never spared heretics and have always done my utmost so
that the enemies of the Church should also be my enemies."
On IRC:
# [Wed 01:36:09pm] Does that archive also offer a free
way to compile that code and play the videos?
# [Wed 01:36:56pm] wz source?:P devurandom, one thing I
don't understand, why does everyone keep telling that wz can't
playback rpls?
# [Wed 01:37:13pm] Troman: Can it?
# [Wed 01:37:17pm]
On 9/20/06, Dennis Schridde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 20. September 2006 19:06 schrieb Christian Vest Hansen:
> 2006/9/20, Ari Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On 9/20/06, Christian Vest Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > 2006/9/20, Dennis Schridde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > >
Am Mittwoch, 20. September 2006 18:03 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 05:42:03 -0400 Dennis Schridde
> The legal limbo we are in. Until that is solved to be GPL safe,
> then we are stuck not doing anything for the original content that
> was given in the original archive. They d
Am Mittwoch, 20. September 2006 17:56 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 05:31:02 -0400 Dennis Schridde
> >I must admit that I would not like such a official "what the devs
> >said last summer [about Mr. Bush]" logs...
>
> Mr. Bush? Don't get all paranoid. :p
When it comes to him I a
Am Mittwoch, 20. September 2006 19:06 schrieb Christian Vest Hansen:
> 2006/9/20, Ari Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On 9/20/06, Christian Vest Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > 2006/9/20, Dennis Schridde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > > Who owns the copyright on a file of sourcecode when the f
2006/9/20, Ari Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 9/20/06, Christian Vest Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2006/9/20, Dennis Schridde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Who owns the copyright on a file of sourcecode when the file has been
written
> > by dozens of people? Is it shared between all of them?
2006/9/20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
We just don't know what "as is with no guarantee" means in the
legal sense, and if that conflicts with GPL in any way at all?
Is this not also one of the reasons Rodzilla & Grimandmandy &
Charun & Henrivee & Qamly & Kevin & ?? left the project to
On 9/20/06, Christian Vest Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2006/9/20, Dennis Schridde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Who owns the copyright on a file of sourcecode when the file has been written
> by dozens of people? Is it shared between all of them?
I think I know this one: all of the people who have
Forgot to mention that I think this:
The readme says: "provided as is with no guarantees."
Can't we use that as a license?
sounds like the obvious thing to do, provided it is GPL compatible.
And since it impose no restrictions that the GPL does not impose,
chances are that it is GPL compatible
2006/9/20, Dennis Schridde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Who owns the copyright on a file of sourcecode when the file has been written
by dozens of people? Is it shared between all of them?
I think I know this one: all of the people who have code in the file,
have copyright. If, for instance, the file is
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 08:15:26 -0400 Christian Ohm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>On Wednesday, 20 September 2006 at 1:36, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>wrote:
>> If not OK, then what, fork the SP & MP/skirmish so we don't have
>to
>> deal with GPL restrictions that make no sense for this game
>since
>> eve
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 05:49:00 -0400 Dennis Schridde
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Am Mittwoch, 20. September 2006 11:42 schrieb Dennis Schridde:
>> Am Mittwoch, 20. September 2006 07:36 schrieb
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>> > Or was it just that since it can't be played on linux, they
>dropped
>> > it? C
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 05:42:03 -0400 Dennis Schridde
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Am Mittwoch, 20. September 2006 07:36 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>> No, it isn't the one you all think it is. :p
>>
>> The original archive also has all the required .dlls
>> Dec130.dll , edec.dll, winsdec.dll, winstr.d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 05:31:02 -0400 Dennis Schridde
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Would be nice if the main WZ site could put up a bot in both
>rooms and
>> > have a archive section in the main WZ site, so we can see what
>all is
>> > going on. Ther
Yes, i read the dev-mlist, more or less.
Sure, i can setup such a bot, but not yet.
I need some time to do some other things :)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
>
>> Would be nice if the main WZ site could put up a bot in both rooms and
>> have a archive section in the main WZ site, so we can see what
On Wednesday, 20 September 2006 at 1:36, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> If not OK, then what, fork the SP & MP/skirmish so we don't have to
> deal with GPL restrictions that make no sense for this game since
> everything *should* be covered by GPL, but we can never be 100%
> sure, since we can't co
Am Mittwoch, 20. September 2006 14:00 schrieb Christian Ohm:
> On Wednesday, 20 September 2006 at 5:06, Roman wrote:
> > >The attached patch fixes g++ compilation broken by Troman's commit. The
> > >removed casts inspired a new SVN rule: "ALWAYS do 'svn up' before 'svn
> > >diff' (and fix conflict
On Wednesday, 20 September 2006 at 5:06, Roman wrote:
> >The attached patch fixes g++ compilation broken by Troman's commit. The
> >removed casts inspired a new SVN rule: "ALWAYS do 'svn up' before 'svn
> >diff' (and fix conflicts, if necessary)."
>
> That's the rule of thumb I follow. What did i
Am Mittwoch, 20. September 2006 11:42 schrieb Dennis Schridde:
> Am Mittwoch, 20. September 2006 07:36 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> > Or was it just that since it can't be played on linux, they dropped
> > it? Can I reinsert the code that was dropped ? What about convert
> > the .dlls via wine to
Am Dienstag, 19. September 2006 23:43 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Was said in IRC log:
> # [Sun 06:50:56pm] reason i ask, is i want to put back the
> full briefings, at least in text-only form, with rewording if need
> be - as it stands right now, i'm trying to get a friend into
> warzone, and the
Am Mittwoch, 20. September 2006 07:36 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> No, it isn't the one you all think it is. :p
>
> The original archive also has all the required .dlls
> Dec130.dll , edec.dll, winsdec.dll, winstr.dll and of course the
> code to play the .rpl files. I assume the people that did
>
Am Mittwoch, 20. September 2006 09:44 schrieb Christian Vest Hansen:
> 2006/9/19, Christian Ohm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > :) Too bad that we can't clear this up once and for all. It would be
> > >
> > > a huge problem if Eidos or Pumpkin started to send out C&D notices
> > > because of something
Am Dienstag, 19. September 2006 22:29 schrieb Christian Ohm:
> (Just to mention it again, I am not a lawyer, so take the legal stuff
> with a grain of salt.)
>
> On Tuesday, 19 September 2006 at 16:02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > We know that the source code itself is GPL, but in the source code
>
Am Dienstag, 19. September 2006 22:23 schrieb Ari Johnson:
> On 9/19/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Doesn't releasing the whole thing under GPL mean everything in the
> > archive is GPL also?
>
> This might be the case, but the GPL probably only applies to
> copyrighted materi
Am Dienstag, 19. September 2006 19:53 schrieb Christian Ohm:
> Some comments on the current discussion on RTS.net (
> http://www.realtimestrategies.net/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1266 , my login
> there doesn't work anymore, thus I'll answer here. Perhaps someone with
> a working RTS.net account can po
Ok, here comes my crazy idea:
The readme says: "provided as is with no guarantees."
Can't we use that as a license? Similar ot the zlib license?
Simply let others care what it means exactly... This way we won't break any
license if that "as is" means it is under a certain license.
Anyway, I have
2006/9/19, Christian Ohm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I also wonder where did they first upload the warzone2100.rar file?
> Or was it packed by someone else?
To some RTS.net member's FTP server, I think.
Quite right. We gave Alex McLean a list of FTP servers he could use,
and chose the one in the UK
Am Dienstag, 19. September 2006 23:55 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Saw in the logs:
> # [Mon 01:54:51pm] btw the damn Partition Magic erased the
> partition where I had all my newest source modifications, ack
> # [Mon 01:55:33pm] I will have to start from scratch, unles
> I can recover the data som
Am Mittwoch, 20. September 2006 00:26 schrieb Christian Ohm:
> On Tuesday, 19 September 2006 at 22:38, Dennis Schridde wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, 19. September 2006 22:05 schrieb Christian Ohm:
> > When you have a look at the first waf script I sent, then you'll see that
> > the warnings don't appear
Am Dienstag, 19. September 2006 23:05 schrieb Christian Ohm:
> Hm, I wouldn't have changed 'ip', as that name is used in other places
> as well, but OK.
Maybe change those other places, too then? ;)
I had quite some difficulties imagining what "UWDORD*ip" could be, till Troman
told me that it is a
43 matches
Mail list logo
