[wdvltalk] RE:SoBig

2003-08-21 Thread Gerenday, Perry (P.)
Until this morning, I've completely ignored all the posts about SoBig. I had no idea the virus has been such a problem. We use MS Outlook at work (I'm using it right now) and I haven't receive a single email that I wasn't suppose to get. I don't know what our network people are doing but it must be

[wdvltalk] How I Survived Internet 'Hell Week' - Unscathed!

2003-08-21 Thread Cyberspace Publishing
I've posted a new article entitled "How I Survived Internet 'Hell Week' - Unscathed!" at: http://www.internet-marketing-forum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2534 I hope you find it both entertaining and educational! :) Cheers, Tom Fosson Let me give you a free ISP business to compliment you own!

[wdvltalk] RE: SoBig

2003-08-21 Thread Peter MacGregor
I was implying I'd be dead from exhaustion deleting these damn things - I've had about a dozen more since I wrote the first post in this thread! Not getting any work done either - so maybe will die of starvation due to lack of income (I'm self-employed like Cheryl and many others here!) Peter M

[wdvltalk] RE:SoBig

2003-08-21 Thread Cheryl D. Wise
Every once in a while I get fed up with something that Outlook does/does not do and go looking at other email programs. Over the years I've tried dozens but keep ending up back with Outlook because I need the PIM integration not separate email clients, contact managers and calendars. Best program

[wdvltalk] RE:SoBig

2003-08-21 Thread Peter MacGregor
Damn right they're doing what's right! They are obviously protecting you from all this trash as it comes through their port into the company! (But that after all is what they are paid their stupendous salaries for!) Those of us on stand-alones and who are self-employed in our wind-swept garret

[wdvltalk] RE:SoBig

2003-08-21 Thread Cheryl D. Wise
Well, I could filter it out at the level of the Exchange server, provided I got around to installing Exchange. Actually rebuilding my developmental server is something I'm in the process of doing in my "spare" time. Just over a week ago my server decided to do a spontaneous reboot twice. On the s

[wdvltalk] RE:SoBig

2003-08-21 Thread Jurgen Haug
Hello Peter, i know that this won't help against SoBig, but since she has problems configuring her Outlook to sort her mail according to whatever attachements, well there's emailer that do that :-) Jürgen Thursday, August 21, 2003, 4:18:20 PM, you wrote: > Change of email client won't hel

[wdvltalk] OT: Tom Fosson or whoever posted the email cloaking link

2003-08-21 Thread puterbug
Hi, I'm told I missed what could be a very important post, a link to a script for cloaking email. My source tells me she thinks it's Tom Fosson who posted it. Would whoever did, please repost it for me? Pretty please? Thanks, Deb • The WDVL Discussion List from WDVL.COM • To Join

[wdvltalk] thank you for the email cloaking link

2003-08-21 Thread puterbug
Hi, I got 3 responses to my previous post, THANKS TO ALL and no more are needed :) Deb • The WDVL Discussion List from WDVL.COM • To Join wdvltalk, Send An Email To: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Send Your Posts To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To set a personal password send an email to [EMA

[wdvltalk] RE:SoBig

2003-08-21 Thread Robert M. Teague
>but I fear you _need_ Outlook specifically, right? > > -- > Regards, > Jurgen > Outlook 2003 is a really great email program Robert M. Teague Kaneohe, HI • The WDVL Discussion List from WDVL.COM • To Join wdvltalk, Send An Email To: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Send You

[wdvltalk] RE:SoBig

2003-08-21 Thread Robert M. Teague
I have second you about Win 2003. It's a really great piece of software, we are in the process of migrating all our database and web servers to is (we now do all our development in .NET). I would feel pretty confident about SBS 2003, the base underlying it, Win2003 is solid. Robert M. Teague Kaneo

[wdvltalk] RE:SoBig

2003-08-21 Thread Abigail Marshall
On Thursday, August 21, 2003, 7:52:46 AM, Peter MacGregor commented: PM> Those of us on stand-alones and who are self-employed in our wind-swept PM> garrets have to deal with it ourselves and try and meet deadlines for that PM> world-beating project that will make us rich enough to employ an IT

[wdvltalk] MailWasher (was: RE: SoBig)

2003-08-21 Thread Cyberspace Publishing
At 08:52 AM 08/21/2003 -0500, Cheryl Wise wrote: May have to break down, get and install mailwasher. I've been thinking about doing it anyway for my 5th grader's computer so his would have only whitelist mail get through. Cheryl D. Wise Cheryl, I just upgraded to MailWasher Pro a few weeks ago. I

[wdvltalk] RE:SoBig

2003-08-21 Thread Cheryl D. Wise
What I can't quite figure out is why the spam filters caught approx. half of the SoBig emails but left the other half to go into my inbox. On the whole Outlook 2003 is a much better program than 2002. Cheryl D. Wise Microsoft MVP WiserWays, LLC 713 353-0139 www.wiserways.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC

[wdvltalk] RE:SoBig

2003-08-21 Thread Perfecta smra
Outlook can be configured to only download headers and lets you delete messages from the server much like Mailwasher. However, I don't know how to do that so I can't instruct you. Original Message Follows From: "Robert M. Teague" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL

[wdvltalk] Re: OT: Tom Fosson or whoever posted the email cloaking link

2003-08-21 Thread David Blakey
I'm told I missed what could be a very important post, a link to a script for cloaking email. My source tells me she thinks it's Tom Fosson who posted it. Would whoever did, please repost it for me? Pretty please? By coincidence, I have been asked to look at a client's new site, and there are

[wdvltalk] Re: MailWasher (was: RE: SoBig)

2003-08-21 Thread Abigail Marshall
On Thursday, August 21, 2003, 12:21:06 PM, Cyberspace Publishing commented: CP> Before you shoot yourself in the foot with it, though, you might CP> want to read my article "Am I Dumb Or Dumber?" posted at CP> http://www.internet-marketing-forum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2344 CP> where I explain h

[wdvltalk] Re: OT: Tom Fosson or whoever posted the email cloaking link

2003-08-21 Thread Cyberspace Publishing
At 08:46 AM 08/22/2003 +1200, you wrote: I'm told I missed what could be a very important post, a link to a script for cloaking email. My source tells me she thinks it's Tom Fosson who posted it. Would whoever did, please repost it for me? Pretty please? By coincidence, I have been asked to lo

[wdvltalk] RE:SoBig

2003-08-21 Thread Abigail Marshall
On Thursday, August 21, 2003, 12:20:56 PM, Cheryl D. Wise commented: CDW> What I can't quite figure out is why the spam filters CDW> caught approx. half of the SoBig emails but left the CDW> other half to go into my inbox. Because the exact text of the subject and message varies somewhat. Whatev

[wdvltalk] RE:SoBig

2003-08-21 Thread Jan
Who names these viruses? Forgive me for saying, but the names sound like they belong to a porno site much more than a name for viruses! Wait..come to think of it, I guess it's apropos! Jan www.jdvisions.com Website Design and Development Abigail Marshall wrote: On Thursday, August 21, 2003,

[wdvltalk] Re: email cloaking link

2003-08-21 Thread Heather Laidlaw
There's also a little tool which does the same thing that you can load onto your machine. Someone here mentioned it ages ago and I've been using it ever since... http://www.codefoot.com/software/ It's called e-cloaker 2.0. Heather Laidlaw Internet Manager Seattle Repertory Theatre [EMAIL PROTECT

[wdvltalk] Re: MailWasher

2003-08-21 Thread Cyberspace Publishing
Abigail, I would tend to agree with you except for one fact that I cannot ignore - since I changed the "From:" address for the bouncing, my spam has *noticeably* decreased! Some email addresses that were deluged with spam only have a few coming in now. This is my own *real* personal experience -

[wdvltalk] Re: email cloaking link

2003-08-21 Thread Cyberspace Publishing
Heather, I used to use e-cloaker 2.0, myself, (I think I even got the link for it from here, too,) but it doesn't do URL encoding, if I remember correctly. The HTML code I posted is not much more than 1k and runs from your browser - offline - so you always have it handy while you're working on you

[wdvltalk] Re: OT: Tom Fosson or whoever posted the email cloakinglink

2003-08-21 Thread Jan
Tom Thanks so very much for your free code. I've been using an email cloaking program that uses Javascript, and even though it works, the code looks horrible. Your program is great, it works, and it's not long like the other one. Also, the URL cloaking is a wonderful PLUS. Jan www.jdvisions.com

[wdvltalk] Need Recommendations for Linux-Apache-MySQL-PHP Training

2003-08-21 Thread purkers
What I'm looking for is a training course for LAMP. It would have to be quite in-depth, especially for the setup and maintenance of the above. Personally, I prefer a 5-day crash course, but a good 8-week on-line course with a lot of student/teacher interaction would be a close 2nd (maybe even 1st

[wdvltalk] Re: Need Recommendations for Linux-Apache-MySQL-PHP Training

2003-08-21 Thread purkers
Doh! I forgot to mention that I'm in Carson City, Nevada (close to Sacramento, CA). Scott • The WDVL Discussion List from WDVL.COM • To Join wdvltalk, Send An Email To: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Send Your Posts To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To set a personal password send an email to

[wdvltalk] RE:SoBig

2003-08-21 Thread Abigail Marshall
On Thursday, August 21, 2003, 2:30:23 PM, Jan commented: J> Who names these viruses? The viruses get named by whoever discovers them first. The first incarnation of Sobig (Sobig.A) always came from the email address "[EMAIL PROTECTED]", so that may be the origin of the word "big". The viruses re

[wdvltalk] RE:SoBig

2003-08-21 Thread Jan
Abigail Thanks for the info. You really have a wealth of knowledge. I admire and respect that in people. Jan www.jdvisions.com Website Design and Development === Abigail Marshall wrote: On Thursday, August 21, 2003, 2:30:23 PM, Jan commented: J> Who names these viruses? The viruses get named by w

[wdvltalk] Re: MailWasher

2003-08-21 Thread Abigail Marshall
On Thursday, August 21, 2003, 2:59:15 PM, Cyberspace Publishing commented: CP> Abigail, I would tend to agree with you except for one fact that CP> I cannot ignore - since I changed the "From:" address for the CP> bouncing, my spam has *noticeably* decreased! I do REAL bouncing at the server leve

[wdvltalk] Re: OT: Tom Fosson or whoever posted the email cloaking link

2003-08-21 Thread Cyberspace Publishing
Thanks, Jan! I'm glad you found it useful! :) Cheers, Tom At 03:23 PM 08/21/2003 -0700, you wrote: Tom Thanks so very much for your free code. I've been using an email cloaking program that uses Javascript, and even though it works, the code looks horrible. Your program is great, it works, and

[wdvltalk] Re: MailWasher

2003-08-21 Thread Cyberspace Publishing
Before anyone gets the wrong idea from my last response to Abigail, I have the greatest respect for Abigail and her skills, knowledge, and integrity. On most points, she and I are generally of the same opinion. I may disagree with her on this particular point, but we are looking at it from two en

[wdvltalk] RE:SoBig

2003-08-21 Thread Cheryl D. Wise
None of the attachments come through in a form that can be executed. Even if they weren't being quarantined by Zone Alarm, et. al. Outlook 2002-2003 all put pif, exe, dll, com, mdb (that one kills me) under security level I (which means they show up but can't be opened) by default. You have to eith

[wdvltalk] more ms patches needed....(3) this time!

2003-08-21 Thread michael ensor
Security MS releases unholy trinity of security fixes IE flaws du jour - and more http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/55/32451.html www.WellingtonLive.co.nz --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.512

[wdvltalk] RE:MailWasher

2003-08-21 Thread Jurgen Haug
Hello Abigail, Friday, August 22, 2003, 1:25:10 AM, you wrote: > On Thursday, August 21, 2003, 2:59:15 PM, Cyberspace Publishing commented: CP>> Abigail, I would tend to agree with you except for one fact that CP>> I cannot ignore - since I changed the "From:" address for the CP>> bouncing, my