On 9/12/07, Reg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Dave, Deb Drew :):) This is exactly the type of help we
were hoping to receive. :):):):):):)
We'll take a look at those headers and see what we can do.
Should page content titles be coded as H1 level and the side bar
heading.at what
Drew -- thanks for this tip! I think it just
might solve several of our problems.
At 06:10 AM 9/13/2007, you wrote:
On 9/12/07, Reg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Dave, Deb Drew :):) This is exactly the type of help we
were hoping to receive. :):):):):):)
We'll take a look at those
On 9/11/07, Reg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We've finally taken the plunge and attempted to create fully CSS page
layout templates for our website. We have over 8,000 pages to
convert to the new template, too. So, we are asking for help finding
potential problems before we get too far into the
Reg wrote:
We've finally taken the plunge and attempted to create fully CSS page
layout templates for our website. We have over 8,000 pages to convert
to the new template, too. So, we are asking for help finding potential
problems before we get too far into the process. Unfortunately, we do
PBC Web Design wrote:
Here are two places you can go to check your work in all the browsers:
http://browsershots.org/
http://www.browsercam.com/
The first one I believe is free, the second one may have a trial and is
costly for a one-on-one account but they take groups and you divvy up
the
At 12:17 p.m. 12/09/2007, you wrote:
We've finally taken the plunge and attempted to create fully CSS
page layout templates for our website. We have over 8,000 pages to
convert to the new template, too. So, we are asking for help
finding potential problems before we get too far into the
At 12:17 p.m. 12/09/2007, you wrote:
We've finally taken the plunge and attempted to create fully CSS
page layout templates for our website. We have over 8,000 pages to
convert to the new template, too. So, we are asking for help
finding potential problems before we get too far into the
At 12:17 p.m. 12/09/2007, you wrote:
We've finally taken the plunge and attempted to create fully CSS
page layout templates for our website. We have over 8,000 pages to
convert to the new template, too. So, we are asking for help
finding potential problems before we get too far into the
Thanks David! We appreciate your comments. I see what you mean about
the three-column design. We've decided to convert all of the
existing 3-column layout pages to 2-column pages with the old
right/left columns stacked on the left. A classic case of what made
perfect sense to us not being
Looks like it's working here. I don't know that
I'd give copyright to Google, though g
Here are two places you can go to check your work in all the browsers:
http://browsershots.org/
http://www.browsercam.com/
The first one I believe is free, the second one
may have a trial and is costly
From: Peter MacGregor
I'd appreciate comments on www.healthandsafetyformicrofirms.com
if anyone has time.
There is no checkout at the moment and we're still uploading
data and tidying up some of the data but some initial reactions
please. You need to register to get inside the site but at
On 8/21/07, PBC Web Design [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Peter,
Well, my first look says wa to busy
looking.
My feeling when I view it is governmental so if
that's what you're shooting for then in my opinion you hit the mark.
Have to agree with Deb it is both busy looking and
Thanks, Deb. Appreciate your comments.
At 04:34 22/08/2007, you wrote:
Hi Peter,
Well, my first look says wa to busy
looking. I think maybe there's to much of the
same look all over. Perhaps if you break it up
a little bit by saying putting a bg color in the
right or left cells? I
Should have said UK Government Health and Safety
Site which is at www.hse.gov.uk.
Peter
At 04:34 22/08/2007, you wrote:
Hi Peter,
Well, my first look says wa to busy
looking. I think maybe there's to much of the
same look all over. Perhaps if you break it up
a little bit by saying
At 10:56 22/08/2007, you wrote:
Peter,
If you are part educating to the fact of responsibility should the
first line of text to meet the eye be:
'Are you meeting your legal Health and Safety responsibilities? Your
answers are here.'
Good point - I'll revise text
What the hell is a
At 14:33 22/08/2007, you wrote:
Have to agree with Deb it is both busy looking and governmental. And
that is probably the effect you want on the home page. But maybe a
little less busy on other pages might be good?
You've probably seen my response to Deb by now - aiming to freeload
of the
Hi Peter,
Well, my first look says wa to busy
looking. I think maybe there's to much of the
same look all over. Perhaps if you break it up a
little bit by saying putting a bg color in the
right or left cells? I don't think I'd go w/red
but maybe - I'd have to play w/it. Just seems to
Joseph - I've looked using Firefox 1.0.6 under
Windows XP and the only thing I've found is that
the 'more' link at the bottom of every page I
tried gave a 404. Maybe because these are only
samples - but thought you should know.
Otherwise, loads fast and didn't spot any
problems - through
: Peter MacGregor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wdvltalk@lists.wdvl.com
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 4:20 PM
Subject: Re: [wdvltalk] site check please -
http://www.Looperman-is-ready.com
Joseph - I've looked using Firefox 1.0.6 under
Windows XP and the only thing I've found is that
the 'more' link
Hi Stephen
As I'm at home to visit me mother for Mother's Day
I've just acquired my stepdad's old G3 iMac (shame
it's red not blue to match my glowing blue P4) but
it's more than enough to do my Mac testing on.
I will annoy the chief at work some more to get a Mac
mini or cheap iMac or SOMETHING
Hi Ross,
Tested in Firefox 1.0 on Linux.
Looks *very* nice, very clean and professional. Nice use of Flash too. I
really like some of the effects in the Flash bit, especially when you do the
full view which lists each item.
I like the rounded corners on all the boxes.
On first sight, the
Dave:
On the 'Our Services' page, I think the big space to
the left of each
paragraph looks wrong - it looks like there should
be something there that's
missing.
That's because there is something missing! I forgot to
upload the images that go with each service.
On the left nav, I feel
Joseph:
The site came up quickly on FF (Xphome) but the image is taking for ever
to
load (56 dial-up).
Yeah I forgot to mention that I've not done any image optimisation at this
point so the images that teh Flash movie loads in are around 100k each -
sorry for all you dial-up testers at this
All the other pages come up very fast and there is a consistent clarity. I
particularly like the way you've done the login page.It's the log in
windows that really seem more inviting than most, even though the blue is
slightly cold.
Joseph
Joseph:
The site came up quickly on FF
MOU, you have 70 validation errors. They are in two principal groups. One is
the no such attribute problem. The other is the entity issue in the php
links. There is one error that seems to indicate you've used an id twice --
to the tower with ye!
Many of the attribute issues have to do with xhtml
Hi all
The new site is nearing completion so I thought I'd better ask you
wonderful people for a once over. Not a lot of the site actually has
any content yet (for example the Flash widget has temporary graphics
and the portfolio has test documents) but you should be able to see
the structure.
At 08:18 PM 3/3/2005, you wrote:
http://www.themmen.co.uk/newsite/
Comments on a postcard to the usual address.
Hi Ross,
I really like your FLASH =) I think overall it looks very sharp. There are
2 things I would change. 1) it's very narrow - I would widen it out a bit
- I'm thinking to
I looked at it for a sec from home last night and it
took right at 30
seconds to pull up the page on DSL (1.5mbps) then an
additional 17
seconds for the flash to load.
I still need to do a lot of image optimisation to do
on the site to speed things up a bit and this will be
most noticable
Drew
MOU, you have 70 validation errors.
Thanks for the check I've not done a proper XHTML
Strict validation yet so I'm aware I'm going to have
to tweak things.
There is one error that seems to indicate you've
used an id twice -- to the tower with ye!
Please spare me this once I have been
Screen grabs would be good Franni thanks along with
system spec and browsers tested!
MOU
P.S. I am reliant on you Mac guys at this stage -
we're Macless in the office (a big bug bear of mine
for cross-platform Director development too).
Send instant messages to your online friends
Deb
I really like your FLASH =) I think overall it looks
very sharp.
Glad somebody likes it lol!!! Trust me guys it will be
better when it's finished...
There are 2 things I would change. 1) it's very
narrow - I would widen it out a bit
- I'm thinking to 700'ish px or so
Just goes to show
Screen grabs would be good Franni thanks along with
system spec and browsers tested!
MOU
P.S. I am reliant on you Mac guys at this stage -
we're Macless in the office (a big bug bear of mine
for cross-platform Director development too).
Screenshot on its way offlist - MacOs X, IE5.5 is where the
The site looks great, Ross, very crisp and clean, easily navigated, and
professional. I might change the wording for the Open Full View button on
the Flash control (which I like, BTW, especially the texture) to View Menu
or something. When I first moused over it I had the idea at first that it
Send them out forthwith to procure an Mac and do not let them re-enter
the building without one.
Seriously.
Mac Mini's are cheap-a-cheap-a and pack a hell of a wallop... so long
as you're not doing sound or video *editing* on them... then again a
powerbook can easily handle that sort of thing,
Ross,
The site came up quickly on FF (Xphome) but the image is taking for ever to
load (56 dial-up). Now it is all visible it looks attractive and holding -
the title graphic is interesting without being demanding.
Unless it is for strong selling I am not sure the flash part helps; it
Yes Peter, blank in IE with this source:::
!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN
HTMLHEAD
META http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html;
charset=windows-1252/HEAD
BODY/BODY/HTML
Blank in Firefox with this source
htmlbody/body/html
Blank in Opera with no source at all
It comes blank.
Amrit
- Original Message -
From: Peter MacGregor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wdvltalk@lists.wdvl.com
Sent: Friday, February 18, 2005 4:10 PM
Subject: [wdvltalk] Site Check please
Can someone please check the following:
Thanks Joseph - it's definitely old age!
Did the upload in a hurry for the client and now realise I uploaded it to
the wrong folder! Now fixed - but if you have a minute just check again
please www.smugglers-at-sompting.co.uk
Click on Clubs in menu bar.
Ta ever so
Peter
At 11:08 18/02/2005,
Yes it is looking good in IE, page comes up, club link works. - but now
neither opera nor firefox will open, looks like Revenge of the Bill.
Joseph (Alas, I know what you mean about wrong folder!!!)
Thanks Joseph - it's definitely old age!
Did the upload in a hurry for the client and now
Joseph Harris wrote:
Yes it is looking good in IE, page comes up, club link works. - but now
neither opera nor firefox will open, looks like Revenge of the Bill.
Joseph (Alas, I know what you mean about wrong folder!!!)
Comes up fine in FF1.0 and O7.54 for me
The WDVL Discussion List from
Thanks Stephen
Peter
At 15:42 18/02/2005, you wrote:
Joseph Harris wrote:
Yes it is looking good in IE, page comes up, club link works. - but now
neither opera nor firefox will open, looks like Revenge of the Bill.
Joseph (Alas, I know what you mean about wrong folder!!!)
Comes up fine in FF1.0
Thanks Franni - if you want a van like that I believe there may be still a
few available. They were a special make for South Africa by Citroen (?) I
think and then the firm that ordered them didn't take them (Think they went
bust).
Peter
At 16:07 18/02/2005, you wrote:
Can someone please check
42 matches
Mail list logo
