Hello,
If I have a Java servlet that gets a session variable from an http
request as follows:
protected void doGet(HttpServletRequest request, HttpServletResponse
response) throws ServletException, IOException {
HttpSession session = request.getSession();
How might I go
Thank you! That was it!
/Fredrik
4 jul 2006 kl. 15.49 skrev Mike Schrag:
JSONRPCBridge uses classes from Servlets, so make sure you have
servlet.jar in your /Library/Java/Extensions folder (or /Library/
WebObjects/Extensions).
ms
On Jul 4, 2006, at 9:16 AM, Fredrik Lindgren wrote:
When
JSONRPCBridge uses classes from Servlets, so make sure you have
servlet.jar in your /Library/Java/Extensions folder (or /Library/
WebObjects/Extensions).
ms
On Jul 4, 2006, at 9:16 AM, Fredrik Lindgren wrote:
When trying Davids sample on a MacBook with I get this error:
http://192.168.0.3:4
When trying Davids sample on a MacBook with I get this error:
http://192.168.0.3:49378/cgi-bin/WebObjects/TacowAjaxDemoX.woa
[2006-07-04 14:48:43 CEST] null
[2006-07-04 14:48:42 CEST] Waiting for requests...
[2006-07-04 14:48:45 CEST] socket=null> Throwable occurred: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundEr
On May 23, 2006, at 12:54 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
Contributions of any kind are welcomed ... My goal recently with
the framework has been to provide all the Ajax capabilities that
Ruby brags of, but in the WO-way. I know you aren't a component-
action fan :) ,
Actually, I LOVE component
On 23 May 2006, at 18:49, Pierce T. Wetter III wrote:
The first problems arise with the following statements:
dojo.require("dojo.widget.Button2");
The problem here was because the OP copied it directly (with errors)
from the dojo wiki tutorial page.
Instead, forget completely about WO.
Contributions of any kind are welcomed ... My goal recently with the
framework has been to provide all the Ajax capabilities that Ruby
brags of, but in the WO-way. I know you aren't a component-action
fan :) , but that's been my focus with the framework recently -- so
that it's not just a
On May 23, 2006, at 11:21 AM, Mike Schrag wrote:
For the record, I'm only one of about three people who have worked
on Wonder's Ajax framework ... Don't want too much credit
attributed :)
Ah, then there shouldn't be any issues if I make additions to it,
as long as I follow my own advice
For the record, I'm only one of about three people who have worked on Wonder's Ajax framework ... Don't want too much credit attributed :)msOn May 23, 2006, at 1:49 PM, Pierce T. Wetter III wrote:Mike's toolkit ___
Do not post admin requests to the list.
So exactly what problems are you having with dojo/wo? Consider that
the problem may be dojo, not WO in particular. You could easily
create a WODynamicElement for every new dojo tag, collect them in
components, and have something much easier to use then straight dojo.
I have tried to run the sam
On May 23, 2006, at 1:05 AM, Anjo Krank wrote:
Am 23.05.2006 um 08:25 schrieb Mike Schrag:
I put up some initial docs on the components available in Wonder's
Ajax framework to try to address some of the "documentation gap".
Brrr. What a pompous asshole... I thought about writing something
On May 22, 2006, at 11:25 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:I put up some initial docs on the components available in Wonder's Ajax framework to try to address some of the "documentation gap". It's just the initial pass, and there's obviously more that can be done. Anything that is explained in Scriptaculous
Am 23.05.2006 um 10:05 schrieb Anjo Krank:
Am 23.05.2006 um 08:25 schrieb Mike Schrag:
I put up some initial docs on the components available in Wonder's
Ajax framework to try to address some of the "documentation gap".
Brrr. What a pompous asshole... and to think I pointed him towards
th
Am 23.05.2006 um 08:25 schrieb Mike Schrag:
I put up some initial docs on the components available in Wonder's
Ajax framework to try to address some of the "documentation gap".
Brrr. What a pompous asshole... and to think I pointed him towards
the iTunes store... I thought about writing som
Pierce, thank you for the informative response.
I'm lucky that i (WO newbie) have the opportunity to communicate with an
AJAX && WebObjects expert.
> So exactly what problems are you having with dojo/wo? Consider that
> the problem may be dojo, not WO in particular. You could easily
> create a W
I put up some initial docs on the components available in Wonder's Ajax framework to try to address some of the "documentation gap". It's just the initial pass, and there's obviously more that can be done. Anything that is explained in Scriptaculous or Prototype docs, for instance, is not further
Thanks Pierce --http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Programming:WebObjects/Alternative_Technologies/Ruby_on_RailsI'll link it off the Ajax pages when those go up too.On May 19, 2006, at 1:48 PM, Pierce T. Wetter III wrote: Easy enough, I've been doing a lot of this lately. Warning, its going to be long, b
WOW! Thanks Pierce.
I vote for inclusion of this on the WikiBook.
It will be -- it made my "interesting post" list, I'm just not up to
current yet :) But if someone wants to put it in there before me,
that's fine too ... There's a top level Ajax entry that's empty at
the moment.
ms
___
On May 19, 2006, at 11:53 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
Pierce, thank you. That was superb! One small edit and a note:
On May 19, 2006, at 10:48 AM, Pierce T. Wetter III wrote:
Reality: WebObjects is actually a better framework for use with
WebObjects then Rails because it has a better compone
I read your earlier "WebObjects on Rails" post with much interest
and started to throw together a small sample application that used
EZ... classes. I slowed and stalled because I had to fill in a lot
of the gaps -- I'm not adverse to doing that, but time is money/
precious and I'll have t
Pierce, thank you. That was superb! One small edit and a note:
On May 19, 2006, at 10:48 AM, Pierce T. Wetter III wrote:
Reality: WebObjects is actually a better framework for use with
WebObjects then Rails because it has a better component system then
Rails.
Think this should read Re
On 19-May-06, at 1:48 PM, Pierce T. Wetter III wrote:
Hi Mike,
I'm primarily interested in general widgets and form widgets.
I'm tired of trying to bring together WO and Dojo, so wanna give
up. I think
WebObjects clashes with AJAX. It doesn't make sense to use AJAX with
WebObjects.
If any
Hi Mike,
I'm primarily interested in general widgets and form widgets.
I'm tired of trying to bring together WO and Dojo, so wanna give
up. I think
WebObjects clashes with AJAX. It doesn't make sense to use AJAX with
WebObjects.
If anybody wants to convince me of the opposite, i'm willing ..
, 2006, at 9:29 AM, Tokalak, Ahmet. D-IT2 wrote:
-- Weitergeleitete Nachricht
Von: "Tokalak, Ahmet. D-IT2" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Datum: Fri, 19 May 2006 14:40:48 +0200
An: Mike Schrag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Betreff: Re: AJAX WebObjects Integration
Hi Mike,
I'm primarily
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Datum: Fri, 19 May 2006 14:40:48 +0200
An: Mike Schrag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Betreff: Re: AJAX WebObjects Integration
Hi Mike,
I'm primarily interested in general widgets and form widgets.
I'm tired of trying to bring together WO and Dojo, so wanna give
ak, Ahmet, D-IT2" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Betreff: Re: AJAX WebObjects Integration
Incidentally, which features of Dojo are you specifically interested
in?
On May 19, 2006, at 4:48 AM, Tokalak, Ahmet. D-IT2 wrote:
Hi Mike,
If you have worked with Dojo can you tell how you integrated it
"Tokalak, Ahmet, D-IT2" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Betreff: Re: AJAX WebObjects Integration
>
> Incidentally, which features of Dojo are you specifically interested in?
>
> On May 19, 2006, at 4:48 AM, Tokalak, Ahmet. D-IT2 wrote:
>
>> Hi Mike,
>>
>&
"Tokalak, Ahmet, D-IT2" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Betreff: Re: AJAX WebObjects Integration
>
> Incidentally, which features of Dojo are you specifically interested in?
>
> On May 19, 2006, at 4:48 AM, Tokalak, Ahmet. D-IT2 wrote:
>
>> Hi Mike,
>>
>&
-- Weitergeleitete Nachricht
Von: "Tokalak, Ahmet. D-IT2" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Datum: Fri, 19 May 2006 14:40:48 +0200
An: Mike Schrag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Betreff: Re: AJAX WebObjects Integration
Hi Mike,
I'm primarily interested in general widgets and form widge
I have been looking at Dojo and actually have a couple Dojo things
wrapped (the rich text component, for instance) in my local
Ajax.framework to try them out. I have not been as impressed with
Dojo when I compare its cross-browser support to, say, Scriptaculous,
but they have a HUGE set of
On 18-May-06, at 9:36 AM, Wolfram Stebel wrote:
Am 18.05.2006 14:23 Uhr schrieb "Tokalak, Ahmet. D-IT2" unter
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi,
I want integrate AJAX in my WO apps, but i'm facing big problems. The
biggest problems i see is the stucture of a WO application.
Has anybody gained experien
Am 18.05.2006 14:23 Uhr schrieb "Tokalak, Ahmet. D-IT2" unter
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> I want integrate AJAX in my WO apps, but i'm facing big problems. The
> biggest problems i see is the stucture of a WO application.
>
> Has anybody gained experience of WO-AJAX integration ? (I wanna w
On 18-May-06, at 8:23 AM, Tokalak, Ahmet. D-IT2 wrote:
Hi,
I want integrate AJAX in my WO apps, but i'm facing big problems. The
biggest problems i see is the stucture of a WO application.
Has anybody gained experience of WO-AJAX integration ? (I wanna
work with
the DOJO Toolkit, but the
Hi,
I want integrate AJAX in my WO apps, but i'm facing big problems. The
biggest problems i see is the stucture of a WO application.
Has anybody gained experience of WO-AJAX integration ? (I wanna work with
the DOJO Toolkit, but the tookit is not important)
Cheers
__
34 matches
Mail list logo
