Re: [Wengophone-devel] G772 and P2P SIP/SIMPLE

2008-02-27 Thread Ralf Schlatterbeck
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 02:22:46PM +0100, Vadim Lebedev wrote: > Ralf, > > I've integrated your patch and the code to actually USE > getSipChatWithoutPresence > in model/contactlitst/ContactProfile.cpp First of all: Tests with presence of two clients @ my location (desktop/laptop) and with D

Re: [Wengophone-devel] G772 and P2P SIP/SIMPLE

2008-02-27 Thread Vadim Lebedev
Ralf Schlatterbeck wrote: On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 10:19:46PM +0100, Ralf Schlatterbeck wrote: I'm getting the feeling that my whole advanced config stuff isn't working, (the dialog *is* working but it seems the values there aren't used by wengo) any idea if this could be the case? That would

Re: [Wengophone-devel] G772 and P2P SIP/SIMPLE

2008-02-27 Thread Ralf Schlatterbeck
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 10:36:16AM +0100, Ralf Schlatterbeck wrote: > > Note that this time while I had wengo running I had a pop-up that asked > me to authorize presence info for a remote (unknown) party. So there > seems some support of p2p presence working. I'll now re-test with > several clien

Re: [Wengophone-devel] G772 and P2P SIP/SIMPLE

2008-02-27 Thread Ralf Schlatterbeck
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 10:19:46PM +0100, Ralf Schlatterbeck wrote: > I'm getting the feeling that my whole advanced config stuff isn't > working, (the dialog *is* working but it seems the values there aren't > used by wengo) any idea if this could be the case? That would explain > that sip.chat.wi

Re: [Wengophone-devel] G772 and P2P SIP/SIMPLE

2008-02-26 Thread Ralf Schlatterbeck
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 06:38:21PM +0100, Vadim Lebedev wrote: > Ralf, > > I've fixed the spelling error (it should be > *sip.chat.without.presence*) and added the the item into config.xml Ah, didn't notice the spelling error, sorry > And here it appears in advanced config as item nr 72 Wor

Re: [Wengophone-devel] G772 and P2P SIP/SIMPLE

2008-02-26 Thread Vadim Lebedev
Ralf Schlatterbeck wrote: On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 04:02:41PM +0100, Ralf Schlatterbeck wrote: On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 03:41:03PM +0100, Vadim Lebedev wrote: Vadim Lebedev wrote: I've just commit fix to syntax error you mentionned before. Try the latest version whule activaiting sip.chat

Re: [Wengophone-devel] G772 and P2P SIP/SIMPLE

2008-02-26 Thread Ralf Schlatterbeck
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 04:02:41PM +0100, Ralf Schlatterbeck wrote: > On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 03:41:03PM +0100, Vadim Lebedev wrote: > > Vadim Lebedev wrote: > > I've just commit fix to syntax error you mentionned before. > > Try the latest version whule activaiting sip.chat.without.prsenece > > a

Re: [Wengophone-devel] G772 and P2P SIP/SIMPLE

2008-02-26 Thread Ralf Schlatterbeck
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 03:55:06PM +0100, Vadim Lebedev wrote: > > > >Hmm, I didn't have any conflicts on update, did you already commit that > >chat-code (seems it wasn't fully implemented as indicated in my last > >patch where I had to remove that config-option). I'm happy to test your > >changes

Re: [Wengophone-devel] G772 and P2P SIP/SIMPLE

2008-02-26 Thread Ralf Schlatterbeck
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 03:41:03PM +0100, Vadim Lebedev wrote: > Vadim Lebedev wrote: > I've just commit fix to syntax error you mentionned before. > Try the latest version whule activaiting sip.chat.without.prsenece > advanced config option Compiles but throws an exception: debug/wengophone (fa

Re: [Wengophone-devel] G772 and P2P SIP/SIMPLE

2008-02-26 Thread Vadim Lebedev
Ralf Schlatterbeck wrote: On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 03:36:50PM +0100, Vadim Lebedev wrote: With the following patch I'm able to chat via ekiga.net although wengophone thinks my party (myself :-) isn't connected (you'll want to remove my debug output and tie the behaviour of hasIM to a config op

Re: [Wengophone-devel] G772 and P2P SIP/SIMPLE

2008-02-26 Thread Ralf Schlatterbeck
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 03:36:50PM +0100, Vadim Lebedev wrote: > >With the following patch I'm able to chat via ekiga.net although > >wengophone thinks my party (myself :-) isn't connected (you'll want to > >remove my debug output and tie the behaviour of hasIM to a config > >option) the idea of th

Re: [Wengophone-devel] G772 and P2P SIP/SIMPLE

2008-02-26 Thread Vadim Lebedev
Vadim Lebedev wrote: Ralf Schlatterbeck wrote: On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 02:48:04PM +0100, Vadim Lebedev wrote: No revert is the wrong thing... Maybe hg udpate 0 Ok that did it -- revert seems to do the same but deletes local changes. I've built r0 and still don't get presence with eki

Re: [Wengophone-devel] G772 and P2P SIP/SIMPLE

2008-02-26 Thread Vadim Lebedev
Ralf Schlatterbeck wrote: On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 02:48:04PM +0100, Vadim Lebedev wrote: No revert is the wrong thing... Maybe hg udpate 0 Ok that did it -- revert seems to do the same but deletes local changes. I've built r0 and still don't get presence with ekiga.net. So either they

Re: [Wengophone-devel] G772 and P2P SIP/SIMPLE

2008-02-26 Thread Ralf Schlatterbeck
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 02:48:04PM +0100, Vadim Lebedev wrote: > No revert is the wrong thing... > Maybe hg udpate 0 Ok that did it -- revert seems to do the same but deletes local changes. I've built r0 and still don't get presence with ekiga.net. So either they changed something or I'm missing

Re: [Wengophone-devel] G772 and P2P SIP/SIMPLE

2008-02-26 Thread Vadim Lebedev
Ralf Schlatterbeck wrote: On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 12:48:23PM +0100, Vadim Lebedev wrote: Ralf Schlatterbeck wrote: I'd like to revert to an older version (maybe to the one when you moved to hg) -- can you give me a short intro how I can revert to the start of the hg version of the 2.2 b

Re: [Wengophone-devel] G772 and P2P SIP/SIMPLE

2008-02-26 Thread Vadim Lebedev
Andreas Schneider wrote: Vadim Lebedev wrote: you can do hg update -r 0 command to get intial version of repository which should be the same wengophone_2.2 on SVN Does hg have a bisect function? I haven't found somthing like git-bisect. -- andreas Yes http://www.selenic.com/mercuria

Re: [Wengophone-devel] G772 and P2P SIP/SIMPLE

2008-02-26 Thread Ralf Schlatterbeck
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 12:48:23PM +0100, Vadim Lebedev wrote: > Ralf Schlatterbeck wrote: > >I'd like to revert to an older version (maybe to the one when you moved > >to hg) -- can you give me a short intro how I can revert to the start of > >the hg version of the 2.2 branch, then I re-test ekiga

Re: [Wengophone-devel] G772 and P2P SIP/SIMPLE

2008-02-26 Thread Andreas Schneider
Vadim Lebedev wrote: you can do hg update -r 0 command to get intial version of repository which should be the same wengophone_2.2 on SVN Does hg have a bisect function? I haven't found somthing like git-bisect. -- andreas signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___

Re: [Wengophone-devel] G772 and P2P SIP/SIMPLE

2008-02-26 Thread Vadim Lebedev
Ralf Schlatterbeck wrote: On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 06:17:57PM +0100, Vadim Lebedev wrote: Ralf we did a lot of fixes to presence stuff Please try latest version Hmm, I've just compiled & tested without much further news: - When turning on p2p presence, it still doesn't work for our

Re: [Wengophone-devel] G772 and P2P SIP/SIMPLE

2008-02-25 Thread Ralf Schlatterbeck
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 06:17:57PM +0100, Vadim Lebedev wrote: > Ralf we did a lot of fixes to presence stuff > Please try latest version Hmm, I've just compiled & tested without much further news: - When turning on p2p presence, it still doesn't work for our infrastructure - ekiga.net is st

Re: [Wengophone-devel] G772 and P2P SIP/SIMPLE

2008-02-19 Thread Vadim Lebedev
Ralf Schlatterbeck wrote: On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 10:18:56PM +0100, Ralf Schlatterbeck wrote: With the old version (2.2 before move to HG) I got grey bubbles for my contact @ekiga.net and a green bubble if I added myself as a contact. In addition I tested with a colleague against an older ver

Re: [Wengophone-devel] G772 and P2P SIP/SIMPLE

2008-02-19 Thread Ralf Schlatterbeck
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 10:18:56PM +0100, Ralf Schlatterbeck wrote: > > With the old version (2.2 before move to HG) I got grey bubbles for my > contact @ekiga.net and a green bubble if I added myself as a contact. In > addition I tested with a colleague against an older version of 2.2 and > also

Re: [Wengophone-devel] G772 and P2P SIP/SIMPLE

2008-02-19 Thread Ralf Schlatterbeck
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 08:54:34PM +0100, Vadim Lebedev wrote: > Vadim Lebedev wrote: > >Thanks for the info... > >I never paid attention to the warnings from osip_dialog.c i'll look > >into it... > >The item in advanced dialog is called sip.p2p.prsence and is FALSE by > >default it is stored

Re: [Wengophone-devel] G772 and P2P SIP/SIMPLE

2008-02-19 Thread wengophone-devel-bounces
Hi Vadim, thanks for looking into this. Any reason why your response didn't go to the mailinglist (my post had a CC)? OK if I also bounce my answer to the list? On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 06:53:28PM +0100, Vadim Lebedev wrote: > >- I'm *not* seeing a sip.p2P_presence in the (advanced) config dialog >

Re: [Wengophone-devel] G772 and P2P SIP/SIMPLE

2008-02-19 Thread Vadim Lebedev
Vadim Lebedev wrote: Ralf Schlatterbeck wrote: On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 05:52:36PM +0100, Vadim Lebedev wrote: Folks, I've commited on 2.2 G722 codec support and P2P presence support. To acitivate P2P presnece in set sip.p2P_presence to TRUE in advanced config dialog It is not really

Re: [Wengophone-devel] G772 and P2P SIP/SIMPLE

2008-02-19 Thread Vadim Lebedev
Ralf Schlatterbeck wrote: On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 05:52:36PM +0100, Vadim Lebedev wrote: Folks, I've commited on 2.2 G722 codec support and P2P presence support. To acitivate P2P presnece in set sip.p2P_presence to TRUE in advanced config dialog It is not really well tested but seems

Re: [Wengophone-devel] G772 and P2P SIP/SIMPLE

2008-02-19 Thread Ralf Schlatterbeck
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 05:52:36PM +0100, Vadim Lebedev wrote: > Folks, > > I've commited on 2.2 G722 codec support > and P2P presence support. > > To acitivate P2P presnece in set sip.p2P_presence to TRUE in advanced > config dialog > > It is not really well tested but seems to work Hi Va