Eelco Hillenius wrote:
Yep. We could just strip the first nbr + '.'. That's not a big problem.
nbr + ':' ;)
Great. Thanks for quick and positive feedback.
-Matej
Eelco
On 9/5/05, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but the problem is this code:
protected void
Okay, still missing something basic.
I was looking at the Library in wicket-examples, and it failed. (I have
no idea why, and am downloading the lastest beta of examples.) But when
it failed -- after log-in -- Wicket presented me with a nicely formatted
error report listing the stack-trace,
so you always get a internal one?
that is strange because if you are in development mode:
if (development.equalsIgnoreCase(configurationType))
{
setResourcePollFrequency(Duration.ONE_SECOND);
setComponentUseCheck(true);
setStripWicketTags(false);
Isn't it possible that this is due to the web.xml url pattern '/'
instead of '/*' ?
Martijn
Johan Compagner wrote:
so you always get a internal one?
that is strange because if you are in development mode:
if (development.equalsIgnoreCase(configurationType))
{
I was just thinking..
Why are we using the complete path as the name?
Is that really needed?
Why not just the name itself?
Because now the paths can be come very very very long.
(if you have a form that is inside a view markup containers...)
i think we can do this:
protected void
Ah, yes :)
Do you want to start a vote as a new message? It seems that votes are
only picked up by people when there is a large VOTE: in the subject.
Eelco
On 9/6/05, Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
Yep. We could just strip the first nbr + '.'. That's not a big
We don't need the page id (I think). But we do need the rest in order
to support arbitrairy nesting, like including ListViews etc.
Ee;lco
On 9/6/05, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was just thinking..
Why are we using the complete path as the name?
Is that really needed?
Why not
Johan Compagner wrote:
so you always get a internal one?
that is strange because if you are in development mode:
if (development.equalsIgnoreCase(configurationType))
{
setResourcePollFrequency(Duration.ONE_SECOND);
setComponentUseCheck(true);
we don't need the rest
we only need from the form (not included) to the component.
And if people are sure that id is also unique (what i know with servoy)
then we can just
put the id in it.
Because now the names are to long. PDA browsers have problems with it.
johan
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
My web.xml contains this:
.url-pattern/admin/*./url-pattern
Every time I've tried to use /* I ended up with some problem. I've
never had the time to spend trying to figure out why, but maybe I should.
-- Scott
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
Isn't it possible that this is due to the
I didn't want vote, just your opinions :)
-Matej
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
Ah, yes :)
Do you want to start a vote as a new message? It seems that votes are
only picked up by people when there is a large VOTE: in the subject.
Eelco
On 9/6/05, Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eelco
I also think that it good for the component names not to be prepended by
form path. The rest of the path is always unique for the components in form.
-Matej
Johan Compagner wrote:
we don't need the rest
we only need from the form (not included) to the component.
And if people are sure that
Hello people,
We would like to introduce ourselves to the community. We are two
students from the Saxion Hogeschool Enschede (Netherlands), currently in
our graduation internship. Our assignment will be to develop a limited
component-set for Wicket. Most probably this will consist of
Hi,
(nitpicking, sorry) it seems to me, that the boolean value in the
Button.setDefaultFormProcessing has inverted logic. The default processing
is to validate, so I expect, that the default value is
setDefaultFormProcessing(*true*);
Regards, Jan
i just committed the change to cvs.
FormComponent has now a getInputName()
where the path of the component is generated from the form to the
component itself (form itself not included)
I also made that method non final so you can override it if you want
even a smaller name (if you know for
or the exception page is erroring itself..
You could try to debug it start in RequestCycle.internalOnRuntimeException()
johan
Scott Sauyet wrote:
Johan Compagner wrote:
so you always get a internal one?
that is strange because if you are in development mode:
if
Agreed.
Eelco
On 9/6/05, Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I also think that it good for the component names not to be prepended by
form path. The rest of the path is always unique for the components in form.
-Matej
Johan Compagner wrote:
we don't need the rest
we only need from
the default == true!
Jan Bares wrote:
Hi,
(nitpicking, sorry) it seems to me, that the boolean value in the
Button.setDefaultFormProcessing has inverted logic. The default processing
is to validate, so I expect, that the default value is
setDefaultFormProcessing(*true*);
Regards, Jan
I did not looked into the sources. You are right, but javadoc is wrong:
Sets the defaultFormProcessing property. When true (default is false), all
validation and formupdating is bypassed ...
Jan
the default == true!
---
SF.Net email is
I could ask my employer to host the wicket wiki on one of our (test)
servers. That would speed up the wiki thing. I'm -1 on JIRA and
confluence. I don't want to keep switching constantly between wiki's.
We have decided for mediawiki, and I like to stick with it, until a
/real/ technical or
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
I could ask my employer to host the wicket wiki on one of our (test)
servers. That would speed up the wiki thing. I'm -1 on JIRA and
confluence. I don't want to keep switching constantly between wiki's.
We have decided for mediawiki, and I like to stick with it, until
A simple submission flow:
PageA - submit - PageB
When a user clicks Back Button to back PageA,
How to prevent PageA to re-submit and redirect to expired Page for the user ?
I know every page has version but can't figure out how to do that
Thanks in advance.-- Ingram ChenJava [EMAIL
Hi Eelco,
i think setDefaultFormProcessing is a very good name.
I show exactly what the method is doing.
I don't know any reason why we should change the name again...
Cu,
Dave
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
More nitpicking... I still think 'immediate' was a better name. I
don't recall voting for
No, I'm not proposing that either. Just expressing that I think there
should have been a vote. Nitpicking.
Eelco
On 9/6/05, David Liebeherr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Eelco,
i think setDefaultFormProcessing is a very good name.
I show exactly what the method is doing.
I don't know any
Versioning should work out-of-the-box and roll back changes. A lot of
times this is not what you want though. Your best option then is to
turn off versioning, by overriding method isVersioned and let it
return false (e.g. on your Page). This additionally has the effect
that your url won't change,
I've been thinking about the whole versioning thing longer actually:
wouldn't it be a better (certainly more efficient) default to turn it
off? If you really want the rollback behaviour, you can easily turn it
on.
Eelco
On 9/6/05, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Versioning should work
Okay, I don't see a point of this discussion unless it's a vote, but I
just liked setImmediate more :)
It's less verbose and it seemed clean to me that it bypasses validation
and model updates.
-Matej
David Liebeherr wrote:
Hi Eelco,
i think setDefaultFormProcessing is a very good name.
I
yes somebody .. did change that name but didn't update the docs ! :(
i updated the javadoc.
johan
Jan Bares wrote:
I did not looked into the sources. You are right, but javadoc is wrong:
Sets the defaultFormProcessing property. When true (default is false), all
validation and
then by default the back button doesn't work out of the box.
I do like to have it by default on component changes. (add/remove or
internalstate change)
but model change is a thing i can live without by default.
Because most of the time it is db data.
And if you alter an object and then go back
The nice thing - which we didn't have in the past - of turning it off,
is that the backbutton won't even take you to the former version of
the page, as the URL is the same.
Eelco
On 9/6/05, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
then by default the back button doesn't work out of the box.
I
Yep. Which is the case with form submissions :)
Eelco
On 9/6/05, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
as long as it is the same page...
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
The nice thing - which we didn't have in the past - of turning it off,
is that the backbutton won't even take you to the
doesn't have to.
What is the redirect page after you submit a form?
That can be another page. Then the back button is used to go back
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
Yep. Which is the case with form submissions :)
Eelco
On 9/6/05, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
as long as it is the
Ok, ok, you win :)
Eelco
On 9/6/05, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
doesn't have to.
What is the redirect page after you submit a form?
That can be another page. Then the back button is used to go back
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
Yep. Which is the case with form submissions :)
hm It is a little hard for me to image your discussion...
anyway, I tried to override isVersioned() to return false but
it doesn't work at all
After dig into the source code, I found that all pages are registered
in session and it's possible to remove page directly:
add(new
yes that is the way to go
Ingram Chen wrote:
hm It is a little hard for me to image your discussion...
anyway, I tried to override isVersioned() to return false but
it doesn't work at all
After dig into the source code, I found that all pages are registered
in session and it's
-Original Message-
From: Dieter Wimberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 02, 2005 4:13 PM
To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Wicket-user] Wicket and OSGi
I have started an evaluation of Wicket, specifically with the
idea to drop it into an OSGi
On 8/31/05, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yes but this doesn't really work.
Because if you guys are going to use wicket-extentions.jar
Don't you have the same problem then?
There is not only one wicket.properties. There can be multiple (in every
wicket component jar file there is)
On 8/31/05, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yes but this doesn't really work.
Because if you guys are going to use wicket-extentions.jar
Don't you have the same problem then?
There is not only one wicket.properties. There can be multiple (in every
wicket component jar file there is)
I've had that with a bunch of Struts/ Maverick apps too. That's really
Tomcat in fault imo.
Eelco
A minor problem is that after some reloading of the web app Tomcat
goes out of memory...
---
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software
All,
Does anybody experience nasty popup's and other ad like stuff on the
wicket frontpage? We use a page counter in order to track who came from
where (great way of finding new blog entries on Wicket), but that
counter has been taken over by an advertising company.
Apparently there have been
I removed the setStartIndex() and setViewSize() from dataview and
setcurrentpage() simply ignores the page if paging is disabled instead of
throwing illegalstateexception.
I also introduced the populateitems(int first, int count), Chris let me know
if that's what you wanted.
I noticed there is a
I also removed PageableDataView instead of keeping it deprecated because it
would no longer compile with the changes in DataView.
-Igor
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Igor Vaynberg
Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2005 11:29 AM
To:
I don't know what it's called, but there is a widget you see in any
number of applications (especially thick client ones, but some
brower-based ones as well) that allows the user to move items between
two lists. The lists are usually side-by-side with left and right
arrows between to move
Yeah, as a matter of fact there is... It was contributed by Igor
Vaynberg and lives in Wicket Stuff as wicket-contrib-palette. CVS only
at this time.
I was thinking, if some people would like to review it, and Igor
agrees, we could move it to wicket-extensions. Looks like a good place
for it.
what kind of error do you get?
Igor Vaynberg wrote:
I removed the setStartIndex() and setViewSize() from dataview and
setcurrentpage() simply ignores the page if paging is disabled instead of
throwing illegalstateexception.
I also introduced the populateitems(int first, int count), Chris let
Path not found. Might be something weird that the dataview is doing, im just
not seeing it.
-Igor
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Johan Compagner
Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2005 12:58 PM
To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
That would be great, but it really needs to be tested first. It works for my
very basic usecase, outside of that I havent had much time to fully test it.
-Igor
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Eelco Hillenius
Sent: Tuesday,
is there an example where i can see this?
Igor Vaynberg wrote:
Path not found. Might be something weird that the dataview is doing, im just
not seeing it.
-Igor
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Johan Compagner
Sent: Tuesday,
Hi,
some questions came upon me while working with Wicket the last days.
I couldn't find anything about this in the resources online... Thanks
for any help!
- when having a page using a CompoundPropertyModel which has a form
using a CompoundPropertyModel, how do I get the form's model to
I need to build a simple drop-down time component that allows the user
to select an hour, minute (in 5-minute increments) and AM/PM.
Ideally, the calling code would look something like:
TimeSelector ts = new TimeSelector(myModelName, myModelObject);
add(ts);
So the TimeSelector class would have
Nick,
Is the problem already solved?
from what I can see (and what Juergen is referring to) is that the
span wicket:id=border needs a wicket:body tag in the markup.
So:
span wicket:id=border!-- bunch of markup -- wicket:body / !--
other bunch of markup --/span
Martijn
On 9/2/05, Nick
Martijn:
No, it's not solved yet. Here's what I don't understand: I use
that same page multiple times throughout my application and there is
only one place where it fails. I'll try dropping in the
wicket:body/ tag in my Page markup and see if it works. On 9/6/05, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL
Didn't work. So I have a Border component with the following markup:
wicket:border
wicket:body/
/wicket:border
Then I have a Page with the following markup:
span wicket:id=border
span wicket:id=eventSummaryPanel/
/span
And the error is: There must be exactly one wicket:body tag
for each
Yes, the paging example in the dataview examples...
I noticed there is a problem with the back button support in the
paging example. If you go to page 2 and then use the back
button to go
to page1 and click a link, you get an error. Any ideas
why this is
happening? I thought the
On 9/6/05, Ralf Ebert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,- when having a page using a CompoundPropertyModel which has a formusing a CompoundPropertyModel, how do I get the form's model to mapto a property of the page's model? (the pages model is bound tohouse, and I want the form's model to be bound to
Hava a look at the attatched see if they help with (1). Basically,
there's an example of 'absolute' addressing and an example of
'relative' addressing.
I'm not sure if it's the best way, but it works...
/Gwyn
On 06/09/05, Ralf Ebert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
some questions came upon me
Could you please elaborate more on what you mean by user sessions? And what you mean by managing?
It seems to me that you are asking something about a http session,
which is managed by your web application server, and Wicket and your
application uses that to store information regarding the
http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples
is down...
Shows
Proxy Error
The document has moved here.
---
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development
With the following code snippet, I'm getting internal error message with
no stack traces.
(I'm using wicket 1.1 b4)
If I do this
1. Browse to the main page
2. Click on pow link (which is inside a listview)
3. Hit the browser back button
3. Click on on the pow or wow link inside the listview.
59 matches
Mail list logo
