Hi ZedroS,
you could check out the wicket pastebin at
http://developer.berlios.de/projects/wicketpastebin/ which uses wicket
and spring.
I personally think using only the interfaces in your code is usually a
good idea. If you want to avoid XML and don't mind dabbling with
experimental code then yo
Hello ZedroS,
You ask very difficult questions which are not easy to answer. The
ability to answer comes with years of practice and learning. I can
recommend reading some books on design patterns.
I /can/ provide some very rough guidelines:
- put similar things in the same place (do not constru
Hi all
As said earlier, I'm beginning with Spring and I find it a bit hard to
know how to design my application with it.
Let me give an example : in order for the end user to register, I've a
registration form. Up to now, I've a registrationBean which isn't
managed by Spring. On the form submit,
it is mostly the same
instead of form.add(new textfield("name"));
you do
new TextField(form, "name");
thats all there really is to it
-igor
On 3/8/07, aozster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I know how to do it with 1.x (actually already done some of them in
previous
project) , but I don't k
On 3/8/07, David Leangen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is actually something I'm kinda struggling with.
In our model, the "biz logic" is the query. So, for instance, if I have
two radios and a group of checkboxes:
( ) Any colour
( ) Choose colours
[ ] Blue
[ ] Red
...
I
I know how to do it with 1.x (actually already done some of them in previous
project) , but I don't know how to do it with 2.x constructors, can you give
me a clue if I want to create something like that?.
igor.vaynberg wrote:
>
> feel free to go ahead and do that. looking forward to your anal
feel free to go ahead and do that. looking forward to your analysis.
-igor
On 3/8/07, aozster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--> before voting we should compare them by given usecases and construct
it
with 1.x and 2.x constructors.
I prefer
1 rich internet application
2 highly personalized user
--> before voting we should compare them by given usecases and construct it
with 1.x and 2.x constructors.
I prefer
1 rich internet application
2 highly personalized user interfaces for portal
3 CMS
to be our usecases.
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
>
> We've gathered a lot of opinions by now (more a
my point is that we are a framework and we already provide what is needed to
make this and the entire superset of these kinds of things possible. our job
is to provide functionality needed for 90% of usecases and leave the other
10% possible. this falls into the 10%.
-igor
On 3/8/07, cowwoc <[E
The point *was* that onWire should get called whenever the parent
changes (i.e. when moving a component to another parent). If one wishes
to listen for hierarchy changes one could implement some event listener
mechanism to that effect by overriding onWire() of the ancestor nodes
and have t
Great! Thanks for this. Very helpful!
This does give a lot of ideas, indeed. If my understanding is correct,
this would indeed provide a very elegant solution to what we're trying
to do.
One precision:
> you have to decide what is clearly "business logic" vs "ui logic". the
> business logic sh
prototype beans are not supported just yet, there is a patch for that and a
vote to apply to 1.2.x
-igor
On 3/8/07, Jonathan Cone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Using Wicket 1.2.5 / Spring 2.0.2
Is it possible (or reasonable) to inject Page model implementations with
the
@SpringBean annotation?
Using Wicket 1.2.5 / Spring 2.0.2
Is it possible (or reasonable) to inject Page model implementations with the
@SpringBean annotation? I've tried this with prototype-scoped beans. The
problem is that if I submit a form with an injected model object and leave
the page, then come back later, the
here are my short answers :) ask more if you need something explained in
detail
On 3/8/07, David Leangen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
First Question: Controller Logic
The idea sounds good, but I'm wondering if this is even necessary. It
was suggested to me that
Hi!
Two design questions for experienced wicket users... Mail is a bit long.
I apologise for this, but I wanted to explain the situation well.
We have been using wicket now for a while, and I think it's time to try
to finally clean up our code a little. With that in mind, I have two
questions fo
> It looks like quite a few people, more than I expected in fact,
> weren't that crazy about the constructor refactor in the first place,
> though some people like it better in general (me being one of them
> though I see disadvantages as well, but also
> http://www.mail-archive.com/general@lists.o
what happens when you move the component to another parent? will onWire be
called again? and if not can we have a method that will please? and then
another method if the component's hierarchy changes - a components ancestor
is moved.
point being only a small percentage of wicket components care a
That's why I used the terminology onWire() as opposed to onAdd(). My
point was that you should shift the burden of isInitialized() away from
the end-user over to Wicket. When a component's ancestors (all the way
up to the top-most component) are connected the first time or changed at
some
or do you need to have each tab have it's own form?
And if each tab has it's own form, does the user need to save their data
before switching tabs?
Would the submit button be on each form, on each tab, or outside the tabs
entirely?
Thanks.
-
Just dropping into the conversation (sorry, if its off topic): if you
need to get the value of a single cell, you can use (a variation of) the
code attached to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-176. I use
it to validate just one field.
Regards,
Erik.
Nathan Hamblen wrote:
> Spe
Speaking of, is AjaxFormSubmitBehavior broken in the current 1.x
snapshot, or is it just me?
Nathan
Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> see AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior
>
> AjaxEventBehavior doesnt send over the value of the form component, just
> triggers a roundtrip
>
In Wicket 2 thete is a thing called AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior
"A behavior that updates the hosting FormComponent via ajax when an event it is
attached to is triggered. This behavior encapsulates the entire form-processing
workflow as relevant only to this component so if validation is s
youre welcome
-igor
On 3/8/07, Jason Roelofs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ok, that did it. Thanks again Igor.
Jason
On 3/8/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> see AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior
>
> AjaxEventBehavior doesnt send over the value of the form component, just
> trigg
Ok, that did it. Thanks again Igor.
Jason
On 3/8/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
see AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior
AjaxEventBehavior doesnt send over the value of the form component, just
triggers a roundtrip
-igor
On 3/8/07, Jason Roelofs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wel
All things equal I prefer the 1.x add() syntax, however I don't have a
good feel for the advantages/disadvantages that add() vs. new provide.
What I really want is generics/models.
Scott
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence
the behavior checks if it or the component it is attached to implement
IAjaxIndicatorAware. what it then does is display:; to show whatever dom
element has the id returned by IAjaxIndicatorAware when the ajax request is
initiated, and then display:none; when the ajax request is finished.
also see
Who will build the first vote engine using wicket so we will not have to
vote in the mailling list directly? :)
On 3/8/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We've gathered a lot of opinions by now (more are still welcome
though!) and I think we should let this sink in for a bit.
There
see AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior
AjaxEventBehavior doesnt send over the value of the form component, just
triggers a roundtrip
-igor
On 3/8/07, Jason Roelofs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well, the model never actually gets changed. I must be missing something,
the new value of the field n
Well, the model never actually gets changed. I must be missing something,
the new value of the field never gets back to the server. Anyone know why
this would be or if there's a better way to do this?
Jason
On 3/8/07, Stefan Lindner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Try something like
startDate
We've gathered a lot of opinions by now (more are still welcome
though!) and I think we should let this sink in for a bit.
There are a couple of projects being built on 2.0 (see the replies in
this thread, but also
http://www.mail-archive.com/general@lists.ops4j.org/msg00240.html),
but so far, peo
the advantage is that the error points you to the place in java code where
the problem is instead of a place in markup.
-igor
On 3/8/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have been using 1.2.4 for some days. I think the current construct
works
> well. If there is no overwhelming
this wont work.
-igor
On 3/8/07, cowwoc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How about a hybrid system?
Is there a clear-cut way to know up-front which components have an
immutable parent versus others that might require it to change during
rendering time? If so, couldn't you require
how about a jira issue with a patch? :)
-igor
On 3/8/07, David Robison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
When selecting a item from the autocomplete drop down, the onchange event
handler on the input is not called. The wicket-autocomplete.js needs to be
modified to call the onchange function explic
WebMarkupContainer adminSpan=new WebMarkupContainer("admin-span") {
public boolean isVisible() { return getsesion().getuser().isadmin(); }}
if you have a lot of components in that span and you dont want the overhead
of creating them make the span a panel or a fragment and add it or an empty
web
Hey all,
I've got a custom component (drop down of AjaxLinks) which extends
Panel. I would like for this component to be able to use an ajax
indicator. How can I do this? Can I just have that component implement
IAjaxIndicatorAware? When I use the indicatorAppender as part of this,
it does
Try something like
startDate.getModelObject()
or address the form's model
vacationForm.getModelobject.get
Stefan LIndner
<>-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay pa
havent looked at your code but here is how i would do it
class mypanel extends panel {
private String value;
//getter+setter
public mypanel() {
TextField tf=new TextField("tf", new PropertyModel(this, "value"));
Label l=new Label("l", new propertyModel(this, "value"));
To summarize this: it's really only the constructor change that is in
question here. Whatever happens, the other features including generics
support will be in a version of Wicket, whether we call that 1.4 or
again 2.0.
The constructor change is the main reason why it is difficult to
maintain the
The problem with that is that the 2.0 constructor actually forced the
whole parent hierarchy to be in place, while add in 1.x just means it
is added to the parent without any guarantee the parent is added to
the parent yet. So even if we would provide onWire (though onAdd would
be better then) it w
When selecting a item from the autocomplete drop down, the onchange event
handler on the input is not called. The wicket-autocomplete.js needs to be
modified to call the onchange function explicitly. the changes should include:
case KEY_ENTER:
if(selected>-1){
Alternatively:
1) Components are POJOs. Users can define whatever constructor they want.
2) Users always use add() to associate a parent with a component but you
move the component wiring out of the constructor and into a onWire()
method. Now, whenever the hierarchy/parent changes onWire
How do I get the value of a text field when I'm not submitting a form? I'm
currently using AjaxEventBehavior("onChange"), which does throw me the event
when i want it, but I cannot figure out how to get the value from the text
field. My current code:
Account acct = ...;
Form vacationForm = new
> > > going the other way 2.0->1.x should be trivial
> >
> > This is true. At least it should be a lot easier.
>
> I wouldn't be so confident. In 1.x very often we need to refrain
> doing things in the constructor, and have to override onAttach()
> to access the parent. So it's not just
Hey all,
I've got a custom component (drop down of AjaxLinks) which extends
Panel. I would like for this component to be able to use an ajax
indicator. How can I do this? Can I just have that component implement
IAjaxIndicatorAware? When I use the indicatorAppender as part of this,
it does
> I have been using 1.2.4 for some days. I think the current construct works
> well. If there is no overwhelming reason, I prefer preserve the old style.
> Why wicket team choose SWT style construct for 2.0? To prevent mistakes like
> forgetting to add component to component tree?
The reasons are
> How about a hybrid system?
>
> Is there a clear-cut way to know up-front which components have an
> immutable parent versus others that might require it to change during
> rendering time? If so, couldn't you require the use of constructors that
> take a parent for components whose
This only works in 1.3/ 2.0, but let your component implement
IMarkupResourceStreamProvider and IMarkupCacheKeyProvider. Then, let's
getCacheKey return null and your markup will never be cached.
Eelco
On 3/8/07, Scott Lusebrink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> is there a way to tell a markup to not
override the last modified time of the IREsourceStream you make
and return always the System.currentMillis()
johan
On 3/8/07, Scott Lusebrink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
is there a way to tell a markup to not go into the MarkupCache. I'm
overloading newMarkupResourceStream which will change
is there a way to tell a markup to not go into the MarkupCache. I'm
overloading newMarkupResourceStream which will change on every page but it
is being put in the cache and never getting run again. There is
MarkupCache.clear() but that seems to much just to remove one
markupcontainer. can i use
On Thursday, 08 March 2007 01:24 am, Eelco Hillenius escreveu:
> Did you look at the examples project? Plenty of examples on repeaters.
Yes, but I don't see one that changes the column style that uses
PropertyColumn. That doesn't mean there isn't one, I just haven't seen one.
I think
On Thursday, 08 March 2007 01:23 am, Eelco Hillenius escreveu:
> The big question there is whether you know all items beforehand or
> not. If yes, integrating with any javascript library is easy. If not,
> you need a tree, and probably can best look at that component or
> navmenu
> (https://svn.sou
I have been using 1.2.4 for some days. I think the current construct works
well. If there is no overwhelming reason, I prefer preserve the old style.
Why wicket team choose SWT style construct for 2.0? To prevent mistakes like
forgetting to add component to component tree?
Hailong Zhang
On 3/7/
Hi,
In my form,
I have provided radio choices r1,r2,r3,etc based on whose selection I have to
change a panel's(id is p1) model object and display the panel corresponding to
that in UI.
I have used components RadioGroup, Radio to implement this.
I need to do this using Ajax.
Taking hint from,
h
I have an HTML document where I want to conditionally include (or exclude)
based on the type of user. For example, I might have a span that contains a
link to an administrator page that I only want shown of the user is an
"administrator" user. Is there a convenient way to only include the span
How about a hybrid system?
Is there a clear-cut way to know up-front which components have an
immutable parent versus others that might require it to change during
rendering time? If so, couldn't you require the use of constructors that
take a parent for components whose parents a
I had also hoped that the new Constructor in 2.0 would have been useful.
But, I have been using the following solution in 1.2 / 1.3 to overcome not
having the parent at Component construction time. Then, all of my Panels
extend this Panel instead of the core Panel. It has been working for me fo
This is what I like to hear: One path forward and generics in a released
version this decade.
Drop that constructor change, and whatever else you need, to make this
happen.
/Anders
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
>> if we do provide a new generified version, then lets make that 1.4 and make
>> 1.3 the
Hi,
I'm trying to get working a panel containing a TextField and a Label.
The label contains the hex value for the TextField content. The
TextField is Ajaxed so that it updates the label on each key press.
Unfortunalty, I cannot retrieve the value from the TextField, it always
returns a null.
... and having two active development branches seems like a really bad
idea. /Anders
Anders Peterson wrote:
> I don't care about (understand) the pros and cons regarding the
> constructor change. What Wicket needs is parameterized models
> (generics). I think you should do what ever it takes t
Yes, that's the problem! But it looks even worse on my computer... I think I
have installed a bad font or something..
On my laptop it looks fine (yesterday I told it didn't but after I checked
again it really did!) so I will compare the font list tonight and let you know.
The problem was solved
I don't care about (understand) the pros and cons regarding the
constructor change. What Wicket needs is parameterized models
(generics). I think you should do what ever it takes to support this in
a released version as soon as possible.
/Anders
Gabor Szokoli wrote:
> On 3/7/07, Korbinian Bach
Same here, having rolled out a 1.2.3 project with no need for updating,
and currently in the final stages of a 1.2.5 project, which will
eventually update to 1.3 if it comes out. Never did any tests beyond 1.2.
Regarding the constructor change:
the 1.x way of compiling the hierarchie via add() me
FWIW there is a JIRA issue for this already:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-346
Nathan Hamblen's suggestion to have a fallback font is good:
font-family: 'Lucida Sans', 'Helvetica', 'Sans-serif', 'sans';
Where shall we change that?
--
Jean-Baptiste Quenot
aka John Banana Qw
* Eelco Hillenius:
> > going the other way 2.0->1.x should be trivial
>
> This is true. At least it should be a lot easier.
I wouldn't be so confident. In 1.x very often we need to refrain
doing things in the constructor, and have to override onAttach()
to access the parent. So it's not
Hello,
We're running into a problem that is probably not in wicket itself, but
perhaps someone here has also run into it.
We have a form with a TextField which has a validator. When the user
leaves the field, the validation is of the field is called though AJAX.
On our development/testing setu
I know this is very low-tech, but I just arrange my links into a nav-looking
structure. Since they will auto-disable if they link to self (same page),
they form a kind of menu where you can see where you are. This has been
good enough for most of what I do, without hardly any coding (as a resul
On Mar 7, 2007, at 7:31 AM, Ryan Sonnek wrote:
> Just my 2 cents, but considering the *massive* API changes in other
> opensource projects when releasing a major version, i don't think
> providing users with an easy "upgrade path" is that important.
>
> Look at struts for example. version 2.0 is
I have tried to use dropdown menu in one of my projects. NavMenu has been
broken in that time (and I didn't figure out how to patch it) and my effort
in integrating TigraMenu wasn't succesfull either. Finally I have used the
approach which uses a pure CSS menu which is based on the :hover class. T
On Mar 6, 2007, at 2:12 PM, Eelco Hillenius wrote:
> 1) Who uses 2.0 for serious projects?
We're using 1.2.x for now.
>
> 2) What do you think of the constructor change? Do you prefer 1.3's
> add style or 2.0's style of passing in the parent construction time.
Absolutely prefer the 1.3/1.2 style.
Hey,
yes I know, but Firefox 1.5 and better 2.0 can do svg quite good. 3.0 even
better. I tried that out, much faster. All non-firefox users are simply not
my problem! Sounds arrogant? Hehe.. its just a study project!
Martin.
Al Maw wrote:
>
> Martin Dames wrote:
>> Hmm... I want to embedd i
No, that would mean magic from the Wicket side, which we try to
minimize as much as possible. Wicket doesn't know your intentions with
the markup or the designers intentions. If you look at the html file
in a browser directly you would see the same thing. This
previewability would be lost if we wou
Hi,
I'm using wicket1.2.jar
Recently I noticed that giving no type attribute inside input tag of a
Wicket Button
results in the Button being displayed as textfield.
The same is true for textfields, but it doesnt really matter in that case
:).
I guess this could be corrected in java code so that
Martin Dames wrote:
> Hmm... I want to embedd into my HTML template some svg graphics. This is
> just only for Firefox, or IE users with the adobe plugin. That means, I need
> that Firefox turns on its XML parser, so I would need to use XHTML, because
> if the file has the file extension html it do
Ok, I've figured it out!
using xml as Markup Type will do everything I need!
Thank you for the tips!
Martin.
Martin Dames wrote:
>
> Ok, thank you.
>
> Hmm... I want to embedd into my HTML template some svg graphics. This is
> just only for Firefox, or IE users with the adobe plugin. That
Dear wicket users,
in my opinion the current discussion has 3 core themes
1. wicket 2 constructors vs. wicket 1.x constructors
2. generics at java 1.5 at all
3. the 2.0 model handleing vs. 1.x model handling
Now i want to summarize the current discussion for each topic
1. Only one person ment
Ok, thank you.
Hmm... I want to embedd into my HTML template some svg graphics. This is
just only for Firefox, or IE users with the adobe plugin. That means, I need
that Firefox turns on its XML parser, so I would need to use XHTML, because
if the file has the file extension html it doesnt render
You are using 1.2.x? To me it sounds like a bug that WicketTester or
MockWebApplication does not look into the application properties file
as a normal "Application" does. We should simply look at the config of
normal application and copy the one line of config into WicketTester.
Juergen
On 3/7/07
77 matches
Mail list logo
