e
> to "Garbage" stage, or reject with "Nvidia cards works fine"? I don't think
> either is fine, so I come to the list for help.
>
Unless there's some other reason to reject the report (insufficient detail,
internal inconsistency, etc.), it's a valid
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 8:57 PM, Felix Yan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm maintaining Spore 1.0, and it works correctly in wine for over a year on
> Nvidia video card with closed-source nvidia driver - but I do noticed with
> Intel cards with open source drivers, the game is nearly not playable -
> missi
Hi,
I'm maintaining Spore 1.0, and it works correctly in wine for over a year on
Nvidia video card with closed-source nvidia driver - but I do noticed with
Intel cards with open source drivers, the game is nearly not playable - missing
texture and more problems.
Today comes in a new test resul
zilla? If we post a link to
>> the results on the forum, we could ask users to help clear the backlog.
My other mails seem to be in moderation, so i'll try it without attachment, but
with an URL...
>> So this is just with no link in "Show Apps affected by this bug"?
I don't seem to have saved the (crappy) script.
There is something similar at
https://code.google.com/p/winezeug/source/browse/#svn%2Ftrunk%2Fappdb-mashup
and it wouldn't be too hard to whip something up again for somebody
who is motivated. Please do throttle the scraping script to avoid
overlo
Deleting test results because the Wine version is old? What the Hell is
the plan there?
Original Message
Subject: [AppDB] Submitted test data deleted
Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2013 15:48:43 -0500
From: AppDB
Reply-To: AppDB
To: appdb-nore...@winehq.org
Submitted test data deleted
t; in any activity any manner which is less than whole-heartedly
>> willingly, sounds wrong.
>>
>
>Nobody's trying to make anyone volunteer. I doubt anyone will.
>
>> There is no reason why the AppDB shouldn't work that way. i.e. just deal
>> with t
dy's trying to make anyone volunteer. I doubt anyone will.
> There is no reason why the AppDB shouldn't work that way. i.e. just deal with
> the persistent ones, and let the individual readers skip over the occasional
> rest as they come.
And who do you propose should "de
--- On Thu, 2/5/13, Frédéric Delanoy wrote:
From: Frédéric Delanoy
Subject: Re: [AppDB] version: Only display comments section in case version has
maintainers
To: "Rosanne DiMesio" , "André Hentschel"
Cc: "Wine Devel"
Date: Thursday, 2 May, 2013, 18:53
, based on close to 5 years experience as an active AppDB admin
> and maintainer, is it will inconvenience a few people, but overall do far
> more good than harm, for reasons that go beyond simple spam control. The
> number of unmaintained apps with an active community of commenters is
&
ot;.
> > Isn't that sufficient already?
> >
>
> How exactly is that going to prevent spam in comments?
This won't prevent it, but I'm not sure hiding/disabling comments won't do
more harm than good.
In other words, my objection was just that we shouldn't throw
On Thu, 2 May 2013 11:35:28 +0200
Frédéric Delanoy wrote:
> That seems a bit harsh: you probably can't expect users to follow
> workarounds scattered across associated bugs, can you?
>
I do it every day.
> Furthermore, there's already a comment telling sthg along the lines of
> "this program w
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 1:49 AM, Rosanne DiMesio wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Apr 2013 18:47:25 -0400
> Christopher Cope wrote:
>
> > I understand the premise, but I disagree. A lot of apps that I use don't
> have maintainers. However, the comments are typically helpful. I believe
> this should be approac
Hi list,
> Forced moderation of comments could work for apps with maintainers
> who are doing their job, but most of the spam I recently deleted was
> in unmaintained apps.
This will be the first step towards a better maintained AppDB!
> My suggestion would be to block comments
>
> > So volunteer to be a maintainer.
> >
> >
> That is all good and well, but most of the time I check the wine page
> before I buy a game. If there are no maintainers and this is active,
> there will be no comments, I will be unsure about the likelihood of it
> working. Reports would still be
On Sun, 28 Apr 2013 18:47:25 -0400
Christopher Cope wrote:
> I understand the premise, but I disagree. A lot of apps that I use don't have
> maintainers. However, the comments are typically helpful. I believe this
> should be approached differently.
>
So volunteer to be a maintainer.
--
Ro
I understand the premise, but I disagree. A lot of apps that I use don't have
maintainers. However, the comments are typically helpful. I believe this should
be approached differently.
"André Hentschel" wrote:
>Am 28.04.2013 18:57, schrieb Rosanne DiMesio:
>> Forced moderation of comments coul
On Sun, 28 Apr 2013 02:02:18 +0200
Joerg Schiermeier wrote:
> I just saw again a lot of spam posted into the AppDB.
> Thanks to Rosanne who deleted this senseless and useless mails
> rapidly.
> But isn't there a real solution for this problem?
> OK, to kill this guys may
Hi list,
hello Rosanne,
I just saw again a lot of spam posted into the AppDB.
Thanks to Rosanne who deleted this senseless and useless mails
rapidly.
But isn't there a real solution for this problem?
OK, to kill this guys maybe the best way, but than I will get seriously
problems. :-) So p
Hi list,
hello Rosanne,
I just saw again a lot of spam posted into the AppDB.
Thanks to Rosanne who deleted this senseless and useless mails
rapidly.
But isn't there a real solution for this problem?
OK, to kill this guys maybe the best way, but than I will get seriously
problems. :-) So p
Hi list,
again a spammer used the AppDB for his nasty activities:
1.)
> Comment for 'Adobe Photoshop CS3 (10.0)' added by tokoku12345
> ---
> To reply to this email please use the link provided below.
> DO NOT reply via y
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Joerg Schiermeier
wrote:
>
> Hi list,
>
> again a spammer used the AppDB for his nasty activities:
>
> 1.)
> > Comment for 'Adobe Photoshop CS3 (10.0)' added by tokoku12345
> > --
Hi list,
again a spammer used the AppDB for his nasty activities:
1.)
> Comment for 'Adobe Photoshop CS3 (10.0)' added by tokoku12345
> ---
> To reply to this email please use the link provided below.
> DO NOT reply via y
On 08.04.2013 21:26, Rosanne DiMesio wrote:
On Mon, 8 Apr 2013 11:04:39 -0700
Austin English wrote:
I've deleted the comment, but trying to delete the user from the admin page
just refreshes the page..
I think the ability for admins to delete users was taken away when the AppDB
On Mon, 8 Apr 2013 11:04:39 -0700
Austin English wrote:
> >
>
> I've deleted the comment, but trying to delete the user from the admin page
> just refreshes the page..
>
I think the ability for admins to delete users was taken away when the AppDB
and Bugzilla were hac
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 9:41 AM, Joerg Schiermeier <
n...@schiermeier-software.de> wrote:
> On Monday, April 8, 2013 at 07:49:47 an anonymous spammer wrote into the
> AppDB:
>
> > Comment for 'Microsoft Outlook 2007' added by bayu
> >
> http://appdb.winehq.
On Monday, April 8, 2013 at 07:49:47 an anonymous spammer wrote into the
AppDB:
> Comment for 'Microsoft Outlook 2007' added by bayu
> http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=version&iId=7533#Comment-84637
(...garbage killed...)
Could someone of AppDBs admin plea
¡Hola!
In AppDB I got a problem, exactly with one of my maintained
applications:
some days ago someone filed a test about the mail program 'The Bat!'.
This test has this URL:
<http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=version&iId=23662&iTestingId=75937>
So AppD
On Wednesday, October 3, 2012 at 17:13:21
Rosanne DiMesio wrote:
> My Preferences screen has an option to "Disable global e-mail
> notifications (only send for maintained apps)", but I'm not sure if
> that's something only admins have.
I (just) filed this under the bug #31880 in wines Bugzilla.
email notifications' with 'yes' and
'no'.
Maybe a reason to file a 'bug/missing function in AppDB' in wines
Bugzilla? (Or a patch ;)
Will do it later to hold this point in mind.
Thanks for your respond.
--
Kindly regards
Joerg Schiermeier
Bielefeld/Germany
On Wed, 3 Oct 2012 16:24:54 +0200
"Joerg Schiermeier" wrote:
> Hello André,
>
> AH> In the meantime you could change your preferences in the appdb (Send
> email notifications)
>
> Than I'm in peace - that's right.
>
> But this have a side-ef
Hello André,
AH> In the meantime you could change your preferences in the appdb (Send email
notifications)
Than I'm in peace - that's right.
But this have a side-effect:
I also will not be informed by AppDB if someone add a new test or a
comment in my attended applications: the ma
sily just
> create a new account.
couldn't you simply reset the spammers password?
So if his account is powned he will have to get a new one.
> We really do need some sort of moderation for
> AppDB comments similar to what's on the forum.
In general this is a good idea.
--
Regards
Joerg Schiermeier
Bielefeld/Germany
Am 03.10.2012 05:01, schrieb Rosanne DiMesio:
> On Tue, 2 Oct 2012 23:48:22 +0200
> "newsletter [at] Schiermeier-Software"
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Please Rosane, help us...!
>>
>> Thanks a lot!
>>
>
> I'd love to, but if the AppDB has
On Tue, 2 Oct 2012 23:48:22 +0200
"newsletter [at] Schiermeier-Software"
wrote:
>
> Please Rosane, help us...!
>
> Thanks a lot!
>
I'd love to, but if the AppDB has a way to ban users, I don't have access to
it. I've already deleted the comments f
Hello everybody,
could someone of the AppDB admin team please block this UCE-Mails
which comes via AppDB-notifications?
I'm speaking about this:
1.) Tue, 02 Oct 2012 04:58:05 -0500
<http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=version&iId=2631#Comment-80287>
2.) Tue, 02 Oc
2012/6/18 André Hentschel :
> http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30820
> ---
> xinha/Xinha.css | 229 +-
> xinha/XinhaCore.js |12107
> ++--
> xinha/contrib/php-xinha.php | 29 +-
> xi
On Mon, 28 May 2012 16:00:49 +0200
André Hentschel wrote:
> Am 28.05.2012 15:26, schrieb Rosanne DiMesio:
> > As of the release of 1.5.5, 1.4 has dropped off the list of Wine versions
> > for which AppDB test reports can be submitted.
> >
> > Can someone please a
Am 28.05.2012 15:26, schrieb Rosanne DiMesio:
> As of the release of 1.5.5, 1.4 has dropped off the list of Wine versions for
> which AppDB test reports can be submitted.
>
> Can someone please add it to the list of stable releases that are always
> available in the dropdown l
As of the release of 1.5.5, 1.4 has dropped off the list of Wine versions for
which AppDB test reports can be submitted.
Can someone please add it to the list of stable releases that are always
available in the dropdown list? Until it's put back, users will not be able to
submit new
On Fri, 18 May 2012 14:52:28 -0600
James Eder wrote:
>
> With the current system, rating is open to ambiguity and misuse.
> Users often use it as an indicator of how much they like the
> application or how excited they are that it works with Wine.
Yes.
> If we
> generate the rating for them
IMO, AppDB should gather enough information form the user to assign
the rating automatically. For example, answering "no" for "Installs?"
should automatically lower the rating. "Runs?" might be a bit too is
a bit too ambiguous. More over, the ratings should not be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
17.05.2012 17:05, Jari Vetoniemi wrote:
> This is unless the appdb will allow us to filter out test results that were
> either done with patched wine, or some unsupported variant like POL or
> such.
>
That's is exactly the same visi
lf to
check if it's working and only then accepted the test results. You could read
some info about that downwards in the comments section of AppDB D3 page.
- --
Best regards,
Alexey Loukianov mailto:mooro...@mail.ru
System Engineer,
On Thu, 17 May 2012 16:05:35 +0300
Jari Vetoniemi wrote:
> http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=version&iId=24699&iTestingId=70104
> The above example shows only the results from,
> unpatched wine. While the howto section informs
> about patch that can potentially solve all issues,
>
I think the test results should be only from vanilla wine.
While the additional information which can be provided,
should be used to inform about patches and their
affection to the particular application with wine.
This is unless the appdb will allow us to filter out
test results that were either
Class=version&iId=25953&iTestingId
> th=71519
>
They shouldn't have been accepted. There are lots of things in the AppDB that
shouldn't be there.
> Also, if patched wine isn't accepted in AppDb ratings, the app entry
> would likely be marked as Garbage, and most p
<<
A "runs well with patched wine" checkbox might be useful, but would be
very confusing.
Maybe if it forced the rating to be garbage that would be ok.
>>
If it was possible my preference would be to be able to see separate
rating per vanilla and per non vanilla.
The per vanilla should be first
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 10:48 PM, Rosanne DiMesio wrote:
> On Wed, 16 May 2012 13:16:11 -0700
> Dan Kegel wrote:
>
>>
>> Really? IMHO they should still be silver. Patches are very hard for the
>> average user to deploy without a third party front end like POL,
&g
ilable through PlayOnLinux. Do you want to open the AppDB to
test reports using POL? If no, what is the rationale for keeping them out if
test reports for patched versions are allowed? If yes, what about all the other
third party apps out there?
BTW, I'm not necessarily arguing ag
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 1:50 PM, Alexey Loukianov wrote:
>> Really? IMHO they should still be silver. Patches are very hard for the
>> average user to deploy without a third party front end like POL, and appdb
>> is not about POL. - Dan
>
> I thinks that using silv
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Rosanne DiMesio wrote:
> On Wed, 16 May 2012 13:16:11 -0700
> Dan Kegel wrote:
>
>>
>> Really? IMHO they should still be silver. Patches are very hard for the
>> average user to deploy without a third party front end like POL,
&g
settings or
> third party software.
>
> Really? IMHO they should still be silver. Patches are very hard for the
> average user to deploy without a third party front end like POL, and appdb
> is not about POL. - Dan
>
I thinks that using silver won't be correct here
On Wed, 16 May 2012 13:16:11 -0700
Dan Kegel wrote:
>
> Really? IMHO they should still be silver. Patches are very hard for the
> average user to deploy without a third party front end like POL,
> and appdb is not about POL.
>
AppDB test reports are supposed to reflect the per
hard for the
average user to deploy without a third party front end like POL,
and appdb is not about POL.
- Dan
On Wed, 16 May 2012 12:56:00 -0500
Austin English wrote:
>
> Copying an install form windows is unsupported and should be treated as such.
>
The AppDB form has the option "No, but has a workaround" on the dropdown list
for "Installs?" IMO, copying a Windows inst
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 5:14 AM, Alexey Loukianov wrote:
> With the recent release of Diablo III we're are at the same spot: game
> installer auto-installs vcrun2008 redist as a part of installation process, so
> end-user experience is like this game "works out of a box". Problem is that D3
> inst
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
16.05.2012 18:08, Rosanne DiMesio wrote:
>> Is it the official position that have been agreed throughout Wine
>> devteam and AppDB maintainers?
>
> It's the way I've been handling things as an admin. It's real
On Wed, 16 May 2012 17:48:28 +0400
Alexey Loukianov wrote:
> Is it the official position that have been agreed throughout Wine devteam and
> AppDB maintainers?
It's the way I've been handling things as an admin. It's really the only way I
can handle it, because as an adm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
16.05.2012 17:56, Dan Kegel wrote:
> 16.05.2012 17:34, Rosanne DiMesio wrote:
>> If the user didn't have to manually do anything, it should be rated
>> platinum.
>
> Agreed.
>
OK then, it would simplify my work significantly - now it wouldn't be re
16.05.2012 17:34, Rosanne DiMesio wrote:
> If the user didn't have to manually do anything, it should be rated
> platinum.
Agreed.
appdb ratings are from the point of view of someone who simply
uses their linux distro to install wine, and then tries to install a
game. If no fiddling
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
16.05.2012 17:34, Rosanne DiMesio wrote:
> If the user didn't have to manually do anything, it should be rated
> platinum.
Is it the official position that have been agreed throughout Wine devteam and
AppDB maintainers? Because years ag
"Gold", as native dll
> override is required for app to function - Wine's stubbed xaudio2
> implementation is obviously not enough for game to work.
>
If the user didn't have to manually do anything, it should be rated platinum.
>
> P.S. Aside from that, I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Good day to all subscribers of this list,
I've got a small decision trouble I have to deal with as an AppDB maintainer.
I know that years ago there had been discussion on this topic, but I want to
bring this once on a surface once again so we
it's not there nor in the bug link queue. so it seems someone got to it
already :)
2011/6/18
>
> Hi,
>
> by mistake i linked a wrong bug to FAR Manager:
>
> http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=version&iId=15928
>
> Could someone remove a link from FAR to bug 27406, please?
>
>
> Tha
Hi,
by mistake i linked a wrong bug to FAR Manager:
http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=version&iId=15928
Could someone remove a link from FAR to bug 27406, please?
Thanks, W.
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 17:57:01 -0700
Jeremy Nowka wrote:
> "Barnes And Noble EReader" v2.5 and "Nook for PC" are the same program. I
> feel that the two AppDB entries should be combined for easier access by the
> general public. I feel that the information shoul
"Barnes And Noble EReader" v2.5 and "Nook for PC" are the same program. I
feel that the two AppDB entries should be combined for easier access by the
general public. I feel that the information should be merged to "Nook for
PC" because this is the common name for ve
On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 16:09:30 -0600
Erich Hoover wrote:
> Account named "AnnaT":
> http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=version&iId=7440#Comment-67977
I've deleted the comment and the user.
--
Rosanne DiMesio
Account named "AnnaT":
http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=version&iId=7440#Comment-67977
With the release of 1.3.14, the current stable release has dropped off the list
of versions for which users can submit AppDB test reports, though 1.0.0 and
1.0.1 remain on the list. Can someone please fix this?
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24763
--
Rosanne DiMesio
On Tue, 11 Jan 2011 19:18:17 +0100
André Hentschel wrote:
>
> AppDB should represent the actual state of an App, so game menus, installer
> screenshots and graphical glitches are ok IMO.
> Of course the graphical glitch should have a bug filed and should not only
> lay aroun
Am 11.01.2011 18:54, schrieb Rosanne DiMesio:
> On Tue, 11 Jan 2011 18:07:48 +0100
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> the AppDB screenshot submission pages mentions this rule
>> - Do not upload screenshots of error messages, installers, game menus
>> yet it is contin
On Tue, 11 Jan 2011 18:07:48 +0100
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the AppDB screenshot submission pages mentions this rule
> - Do not upload screenshots of error messages, installers, game menus
> yet it is continuously violated and e.g. screenshots of game
> menus are accepted, including
Hi,
the AppDB screenshot submission pages mentions this rule
- Do not upload screenshots of error messages, installers, game menus
yet it is continuously violated and e.g. screenshots of game
menus are accepted, including recently.
Is it still a useful rule?
If yes, should matching screenshots
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 3:57 PM, James Mckenzie
wrote:
> Yaron Shahrabani wrote:
> >
> >On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 6:48 AM, James McKenzie
> >wrote:
> >
> [snip]
> >So you mean you have got to get some input and there's no other way of
> >getting input from the users without typing...
> >Do you feel
Yaron Shahrabani wrote:
>
>On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 6:48 AM, James McKenzie
>wrote:
>
[snip]
>So you mean you have got to get some input and there's no other way of
>getting input from the users without typing...
>Do you feel like you get enough feedback or that automating parts of the
>reporting s
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 6:48 AM, James McKenzie
wrote:
> On 10/19/10 10:20 AM, Yaron Shahrabani wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 5:16 PM, Rosanne DiMesio
> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 19 Oct 2010 12:12:33 +0200
>> Yaron Shahrabani wrote:
>>
>> > I see but I had another idea in mind...
>> > I was th
On 10/19/10 10:20 AM, Yaron Shahrabani wrote:
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 5:16 PM, Rosanne DiMesio
mailto:dime...@earthlink.net>> wrote:
On Tue, 19 Oct 2010 12:12:33 +0200
Yaron Shahrabani mailto:sh.ya...@gmail.com>>
wrote:
> I see but I had another idea in mind...
> I was thi
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 5:16 PM, Rosanne DiMesio wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Oct 2010 12:12:33 +0200
> Yaron Shahrabani wrote:
>
> > I see but I had another idea in mind...
> > I was thinking about having the possibility to rate and report but
> without
> > any way to comment, I mean that you cannot comm
On Tue, 19 Oct 2010 12:12:33 +0200
Yaron Shahrabani wrote:
> I see but I had another idea in mind...
> I was thinking about having the possibility to rate and report but without
> any way to comment, I mean that you cannot comment in foreign languages but
> you can vote and report (any operation
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 12:40 AM, Austin English wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 3:59 AM, Yaron Shahrabani
> wrote:
> > Is there any way to localize the AppDB?
> > The Israeli community assumes that having a Hebrew system will make more
> > users report issues.
>
>
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 3:59 AM, Yaron Shahrabani wrote:
> Is there any way to localize the AppDB?
> The Israeli community assumes that having a Hebrew system will make more
> users report issues.
It seems unlikely. There are many different languages used by wine's
users, and Engli
Is there any way to localize the AppDB?
The Israeli community assumes that having a Hebrew system will make more
users report issues.
Kind regards,
Yaron Shahrabani
Mandag 21. juni 2010 22.40.22 skrev Alexandru Băluț :
> Hi Alexander,
>
> On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 21:52, Alexander Nicolaysen Sørnes <
>
> a...@thehandofagony.com> wrote:
> > Mandag 21. juni 2010 20.52.20 skrev Alexandru Băluț :
> > > Updated test_appData, because using downloadurl objects does
Hi Alexander,
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 21:52, Alexander Nicolaysen Sørnes <
a...@thehandofagony.com> wrote:
> Mandag 21. juni 2010 20.52.20 skrev Alexandru Băluț :
> > Updated test_appData, because using downloadurl objects does not work
> > anymore, because appData.listSubmittedBy() ignores queu
Mandag 21. juni 2010 20.52.20 skrev Alexandru Băluț :
> Updated test_appData, because using downloadurl objects does not work
> anymore, because appData.listSubmittedBy() ignores queued downloadurls.
> I also fixed a bug in url.php: after creating an Url, the create function
> does not update the
They are wrapper classes for submitting and processing new entries to the
AppDB.
When submitting an entry, such as a version, we also need a testData entry,
maybe also a maintainer, downloadurl, monitor, or distribution entry. This is
handled in the _queue clases.
Alexander N. Sørnes
Hi,
Why exactly are these AppDB files needed?
./include/testData_queue.php
./include/version_queue.php
./include/application_queue.php
Thanks,
Alex
2010/6/16 :
>
> Hi, i just made a mistake and linked bug 9264 with
> http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=version&iId=20179.
>
> But i wanted to link 19264 instead of 9264. What are the correct steps
> to fix this mistake?
Looks like it already is fixed.
--
-Austin
Hi, i just made a mistake and linked bug 9264 with
http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=version&iId=20179.
But i wanted to link 19264 instead of 9264. What are the correct steps
to fix this mistake?
--
Kaspersky Internet Security 2010 + Kaspersky Mobile Security jen za 1199,-Kč.
Hi,
I think the AppDB pages look bad, and I want to spend some time to make them
look better. For example:
- In the page that shows a version of an application, the background color
in the list of test results depends on the rating of each test result, and
it looks very messy, that rating color
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 17:29, Rosanne DiMesio wrote:
>
> 32 and 64 bit should be listed as separate versions of the app.
>
>
This should be clearly stated in AppDB submission forms using big red
capital letters to be effective.
--
Best regards,
Danila Sentiabov aka dsent
On Mon, 31 May 2010 15:05:01 +0200
André Hentschel wrote:
> Hi,
> what about an AppDB input in test reports to mention if the test were made
> with the 32 or 64 bit version of the app?
> --
>
32 and 64 bit should be listed as separate versions of the app.
--
Rosanne DiMesio
Hi,
what about an AppDB input in test reports to mention if the test were made with
the 32 or 64 bit version of the app?
--
Best Regards, André Hentschel
Hello,
I must have overlooked your previous submission; I'm not used to people
sending in AppDB patches.
That being said, it's really nice to have other people working on the code. :)
I'll review it and commit in the next few days.
Alexander
Søndag 16. mai 2010 18.26.15
Hi,
Is anyone reviewing patches for AppDB?
Thanks,
Alex
-- Forwarded message --
From: Alexandru Balut
Date: Sat, May 1, 2010 at 17:29
Subject: [AppDB] patch: Request for UTF8-encoded results from MySQL
when querying the bugs DB.
To: wine-patc...@winehq.org
Resending because
On 16 February 2010 23:25, David Gerard wrote:
> 2010/2/16 Dan Kegel :
>
>> I have a prototype of how this (and other) info might be used at
>> http://wiki.winehq.org/GameChecklist
>> I think this kind of dashboard would be quite handy.
>
>
> Are there other game-specific encyclopedias that might
2010/2/16 Dan Kegel :
> I have a prototype of how this (and other) info might be used at
> http://wiki.winehq.org/GameChecklist
> I think this kind of dashboard would be quite handy.
Are there other game-specific encyclopedias that might be useful, for
those games not notorious to make Wikipedia
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 3:57 AM, Alexander Nicolaysen Sørnes
wrote:
>> > Dan Kegel wrote:
>> >> I often want to learn more about an app while
>> >> I'm in the appdb, and particularly, I want to know
>> >> whether it has a good reputation. Wik
1 - 100 of 1105 matches
Mail list logo
