Hello Gino,
You would really be doing yourself a favor to skim through the manual and
then start asking more specific questions, but here's a rundown from memory
on critical configuration points:
(1) Enter configuration mode by typing con and enter password
(2) odup on this turns on power to
As a rule, we give leaving residentials 30 days on their email.
We often get them back within that time.
RickG wrote:
OK guys. I've never had this happen before so I'm not usre what to do.
I've got a long time customer that has fallen for the AT&T DSL
giveaway package and is switching. He
Personally without an internet package I'd do 10 or 15
On 11/6/08, Jerry Richardson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> $5/month per address
>
>
>
>
> __
> Jerry Richardson
> airCloud Communications
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PR
Easiest $5/mth I have ever made. We have dial-up customers that have switched
to other companies DSL that can not get our wireless ad keep thier email with
us for $60/year. I have one customer that has done it for over 3 years now.
Scottie
-- Original Message ---
Gino,
This is from memory about a month ago... but here ya go (the commands
may not be exact, but should be close):
1. turn the power to the ODU on (odupower on)
2. set the frequency (freq 19000)
3. turn the oduagc off
4. set the ip address (ip config 192.168.100.100 255.255.255.0)
5. set the mo
$5/month per address
__
Jerry Richardson
airCloud Communications
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chuck McCown - 3
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 7:18 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA
I charge $5 per month for email only. Many use the service. I would not give
this away for free. If we had something we could monetize for ads on our web
based mail then we would probably give email away for free but I do not know
how to do that. Anyone have luck making money from ads on web based
Yep. Thats why many folks use a lower gain for their sectors and omnis.
- Original Message -
From: "Marlon K. Schafer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 8:26 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Theoretical TVWS coverage
> 16dB by 120* won't have much o
I agree on the possibility of them coming back and will probably do it
for him but I hate to use resources for someone using the competition
no matter how small. While email calls are not high on the list, they
do call. In fact, the ones using other networks to get to the email
call the most.
Thank
If you allow established communications but not new communications before
your blocks then your users will never know that you are blocking all new
communications from those IP spaces because when they request communication
to one of those IPs they will get the responds back.
/ Eje
CTO
WISP-Route
A few weeks ago we has a DOS attack from an Asian network. I quickly
blocked the whole range addresses and the issue went away. Apparently,
the range contained some web hosts with sites that are visited by one
of my customers. I found this out when they asked for assistance. I
unblocked the range a
Im going to do this early am tomorrow,
Could you send me a checklist of items to configure?
Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel 787.273.4143 fax 787.273.4145
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Brad
Don't bother with the web interface. Skim through the manual and do all
configuration and management from the CLI.
As for the not accepting the freq/channel...you either don't have the ODU
powered up or you are trying to set a freq the ODU doesn't support.
I can be available if you are still hav
anyone can provide me with a list of basic setup for the Gigalinks?
for some reason its not accpeting my rf configuration ( freq and channel
size)
I also just discovered i needed to turn on the odu via CLI ...
Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel 787.2
We have a $25 per year email only option. They can keep their email address
forever for all I care.
AND, this makes it all that much easier for them to come back to use
someday.
marlon
- Original Message -
From: "RickG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Wednesday, No
That's going to depend totally on where you are at. There are LOTS of
options out here. But I don't have any towers strong enough to hold them
up. Can't use it.
marlon
- Original Message -
From: "Brad Belton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'WISPA General List'"
Sent: Wednesday, November 0
16dB by 120* won't have much of a vertical pattern will it? I'd guess less
than 10*.
marlon
- Original Message -
From: "Chuck McCown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 10:43 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Theoretical TVWS coverage
> No but they
Since we run our own e-mail server the cost is minimal. But we still charge
$5/mo for e-mail only (we offer web mail, imap, pop3, spam filtering (user
controlled) as well virus filtering, web calendar with option for calendar &
contacts syncing with Outlook, Windows Mobile devices and Blackberries)
We offer a e-mail forwarding service, however this can be a problem,
unless you check mail before forward, you will also forward all the spam
to the new provider and this can sometimes lead to getting blocked by the
new host which in turn could screw up your other users.
-Cam
> OK guys. I've neve
I hope this is all done at low power and indoors!
Go get a couple of western multiplex tsunami radios. I think there are only
three channel plans for you to have to deal with.
Should be plenty of them out there these days. The cell companies are
upgrading to licensed like crazy around here.
m
I think we keep it alive for $5/month.
- Original Message -
From: "RickG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 8:12 PM
Subject: [WISPA] cancelled customer email
> OK guys. I've never had this happen before so I'm not usre what to do.
> I've go
OK guys. I've never had this happen before so I'm not usre what to do.
I've got a long time customer that has fallen for the AT&T DSL
giveaway package and is switching. He asked if he could pay a small
monthly rate to keep his email addresses for a few months until he
gets the word out. My first re
A few years ago, Mikrotik's routerboard 500 units, when running off 48v
PoE, would generate a +30db noise between 140-149mhz. The regional 911
uses that frequency for dispatch and communication. They were not
impressed, and neither were we.
Mikrotik never acknowledged the problem (and even dele
?
- Original Message -
From: Travis Johnson
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 7:51 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] My favorite quotes from the FCC TVWS meeting today...
We brought down E911 service on a tower 100ft away from our tower with a $150
Mikrotik b
Harris Constellation full hot standby with space diversity is spendy.
Does any of the Trango stuff do OC-3 or DS-3 native?
We cannot put SS7 A links on IP based technology.
- Original Message -
From: Travis Johnson
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 7:49 PM
We brought down E911 service on a tower 100ft away from our tower with
a $150 Mikrotik board... so that isn't much of a reason either.
Travis
Microserv
Chuck McCown - 3 wrote:
So I guess satellite earth station minimum size requirements would really
make a barrier to entry.
I think we had
I believe all of Trango's licensed equipment (6ghz, 11ghz, 18ghz,
23ghz) is the same price.
Travis
Microserv
Chuck McCown - 3 wrote:
Moreover, 6 GHz hardware is my most expensive stuff. I can get 11 GHz
dragonwave at a much lower cost and it will do more than 6 GHz for most
applications
Oh, and don't discount the on line day traders, poker players and ebayers
that are losing those thousands and thousands.
I openly laughed at one day trader that complained, this was back in the
early days of our venture and he said he had already lost $2600 that
morning. I told him to go lease
We actually (used to ) address this very subject in a faq page about our
service where we say we will be unmoved by tearful pleas and threats about
how much the outage is costing them. We also tell them if it that
important, they need to be on some other type of infrastructure, perhaps
with ro
On Wed, 5 Nov 2008, Chuck McCown - 3 wrote:
>Shouldn't the standard for critical life safety infrastructure be a
>bit higher than that used to surf porn?
If you've ever manned the phones during an outage, you'd understand
that internet access IS that critical. Either a customer is paying
$29.
Moreover, 6 GHz hardware is my most expensive stuff. I can get 11 GHz
dragonwave at a much lower cost and it will do more than 6 GHz for most
applications. Plus have all the perqs of license and exclusivity etc.
- Original Message -
From: "Brad Belton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'WISPA
Tom,
Off the top of my head my guess is the difference is going to be much
greater than 1* between 3' and 6' antennas. Probably two to three times
that and yes, that does make a big difference.
While the 11Ghz "secondary" license is available it would probably never be
allowed on our network.
So I guess satellite earth station minimum size requirements would really
make a barrier to entry.
I think we had to have a 21 foot dish minimum for an inmarsat uplink...
By the same logic should I be pissed at that requirement?
If you interfere with my 6 GHz system, E-911 links die, critical air
Interesting Why a FCC attorney instead of the typical Freq Coordination
Engineering companies?
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: "Chuck McCown - 3" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Wednesday, Novem
> Tom... isn't putting a barrier to entry the point?
No. Not when I'm the one that gets prevented from using the spectrum due to
the barrier to entry.
> Telco's (like Chuck) use
> 6GHz all the time because they own the towers and build them to support
> the
> dishes.
Thats great for him. But
We make and sell the aluminum ones. Hit me off list if you need more info.
Thanks,
Mike Goicoechea
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Travis Johnson
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 5:45 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List
I like the plastic feet sold by Streakwave, Titan Wireless, etc
On 11/5/08, Travis Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Where is everyone getting metal standoffs for mounting Routerboards on
> the backplates? We would prefer metal ones, with nuts on the back and
> then machine threaded scr
Yes. was a short from a nut to the backplate.
Doug Ratcliffe wrote:
We're a computer store so we have zillions of those little threaded metal
standoffs used for computer motherboards. I believe Cyberguys sells them in
bulk as well, and we just buy the nuts for them from a local hardware
we use 4-40 machine screws with 2 nuts and a nylon spacer.
screw
backplate
nut
nylon spacer
board
nut
works well. locktite the nut on the backplate
I like your idea a bit better, but I've not had the time to dig for
them and what we have works well.
Travis Johnson wrote:
Hi,
Where is
I had a computer motherboard do that to me...
It was a grounding issue of some sort I later figured out
Daniel White
3-dB Networks
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Doug Ratcliffe
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 4:52 PM
To: WISPA General
We have an FCC attorney in Virginia do it for us.
- Original Message -
From: "Randy Cosby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 4:25 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] My favorite quotes from the FCC TVWS meeting today...
> Speaking of that, who do you us
We're a computer store so we have zillions of those little threaded metal
standoffs used for computer motherboards. I believe Cyberguys sells them in
bulk as well, and we just buy the nuts for them from a local hardware store.
Just do a search for "standoff".
Anyone seen a case where routerboa
Hi,
Where is everyone getting metal standoffs for mounting Routerboards on
the backplates? We would prefer metal ones, with nuts on the back and
then machine threaded screws.
Or, if there is something better, let me know.
thanks,
Travis
Microserv
---
Tom... isn't putting a barrier to entry the point? Telco's (like Chuck) use
6GHz all the time because they own the towers and build them to support the
dishes. Didn't At&T almost exclusively use 6GHz for most of their towers?
I know the reason the 11GHz rules were relaxed was because the smaller
Speaking of that, who do you use for your FCC licensing/coordination on
these links, or do you do it in-house?
Randy
Chuck McCown - 2 wrote:
> There is a ton of licensed 6 GHz systems already deployed. They make you
> use a larger antenna so the beamwidth is narrower. I allows more frequency
There is a ton of licensed 6 GHz systems already deployed. They make you
use a larger antenna so the beamwidth is narrower. I allows more frequency
reuse due to lower sidelobes and less footprint. We are in a rural area and
sometimes they have a hard time finding us a pair of 50 MHz channels
Ok, that opens up a useful conversation.
Why is that?
11Ghz and 18Ghz have plenty of free channels with 2-4ft antennas.allowed.
I don't see anywhere near as many 6ft antennas hanging on towers as I do
2-4ft antennas, inferring that the concept of larger antenna is not
translating to larger d
As much as I'd love to be able to use smaller antennas than 6' with 6GHz
that is a real bad idea. It's hard enough finding an available 6GHz freq
pair in some areas today. Allowing smaller antennas would likely mean even
fewer available freq pairs.
Best,
Brad
-Original Message-
From:
That's my point, the noise will be much lower in these bands if things are
deployed in a sane way. Wimax gear has receive sensitivity in the -93 to -98
range and from the reports I have heard, works very well at those levels.
While a WISP may be trying to set a network up for max modulation, the FC
Yes. A bettter use of time and spectrum is to fight for smaller antennas to
be allowed on 6Ghz.
Sorta like what was jsut done to 11Ghz.
The 6ft requirement is a preventer for many. But that argument doesn;t hold
for Whitespace as Whitespace antennas would be bigger..
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL & Wire
> I would say that -90 should be a safe signal
> level to use and still have good modulation rates.
I'm a little confused on that statement.
With our Aperto live testing a few years back (pre-wimax), the best
modulation we could get was qam16 at the -85 levels.
And that was before considering th
To use this alignment mode on a ptp link would you do that on ap or
station side?
Brian
Butch Evans wrote:
On Wed, 5 Nov 2008, Jon Langeler wrote:
1. Anyone know a good way (maybe using linux, windows, or Mikrotik
software) to get the cards to transmit fairly constant without
Hi,
Does anyone know at what signal level and SR2 card would become
"overloaded" on the receiver? I can't find that spec on their datasheet.
We have a customer on an AP that has a -27 RSSI and this AP is acting
very strange. It's been this way for over a month with no issues, but
the weather j
I would suggest a noise generator. Here is an article on a do it yourself
unit.
http://www.ham-radio.com/sbms/sd/nfsource.htm
Using a noise generator that is pretty flat and a spectrum analyzer is one
of the easiest ways to tune filters if you don't have a sweep generator.
- Original Messag
No but they will be about 20 feet high for an H pol 600 MHz slotted
waveguide 16 dBi 120 degree sector.
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Hammett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 8:36 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Theoretical TVWS coverage
>I c
If we could get a "cisco-like" restore-from-text-file system it would be
perfect!
ryan
Scott Reed wrote:
> Backup does require nearly identical equipment.
> I have some scripts that I use to export the parts that change, rather
> than the entire configuration.
> The problem with export is that
Rick Harnish wrote:
> http://www.wispa.org/?p=311
>
Does anyone have a link to the report and order?
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
---
Scott Reed wrote:
> Backup does require nearly identical equipment.
Not a problem; we really only use two or three boards here, and spares
generally are readily available.
The problem is, I want to make this simple enough for the receptionist
to do. "Go edit a bunch of MAC addresses from this 5
Backup does require nearly identical equipment.
I have some scripts that I use to export the parts that change, rather
than the entire configuration.
The problem with export is that it saves MAC addresses on interfaces.
If you just delete the mac=xxx part of the interfaces, you can
usually
My network has a couple dozen RouterOS systems (mostly small
RouterBoards) doing a number of jobs, from "simple routing and DHCP
server" to "this is a vital backhaul link." I kinda know my way around
networking concepts, so should a board fail, replacing it is easy
enough. And none of our confi
On Wed, 5 Nov 2008, Jon Langeler wrote:
>1. Anyone know a good way (maybe using linux, windows, or Mikrotik
>software) to get the cards to transmit fairly constant without
>having to have them connect to an SM/AP?
You can use alignment mode in Mikrotik. Just set up the MT as the
transmitter s
On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 06:50:45AM -0800, Marlon K. Schafer wrote:
> Hmmm
>
> Just for fun I ran the numbers at 600mhz.
>
> 20 dB tx from the radio, 16dB tx antenna (probably not at all reasonable due
> to size and small 50ish* coverage) to a 10 dB cpe antenna. -80 at 50 miles!
>
> Same thing
I could see 16 dB sectors. Of course they will be large, but that's what it
takes at these frequencies. We'll have antennas the same size as the
broadcast TV antennas are now (I've seen some over 40' tall). Hopefully a
manufacturer can work something out with regards to not having to have 4x
AT&T to start trialing bit caps. Maybe this will give us some leverage
in DSL saturated markets.
http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/153301/atandt_trialing_dsl
_bandwidth_caps.html
__
Patrick Nix, Jr.,
csweb.net
(918) 235-0414
htt
We're in need of a 5-6GHz signal generator to simultaneously span a
large portion of the 5GHz band to roughly tune some RF filters. Right
now we're using some 802.11a cards we're having to link them up and do
bandwidth tests to get them to 'fill up' on a Rhode&Swartz SA (I suppose
it's an expec
Hmmm
Just for fun I ran the numbers at 600mhz.
20 dB tx from the radio, 16dB tx antenna (probably not at all reasonable due
to size and small 50ish* coverage) to a 10 dB cpe antenna. -80 at 50 miles!
Same thing with an 8dB (say omni) would be 20 miles at -80.
The sad part though? We can do t
Obviously we are still speculating here because the rules are certainly
not
clear. With technology development and the results I am hearing from those
who are using WiMax equipment, I would say that -90 should be a safe signal
level to use and still have good modulation rates. To assume T
11/4/08
FCC Adopts Rules For Unlicensed Use of Television White Spaces.
News Release: Word | Acrobat
Martin Statement: Word | Acrobat
Copps Statement: Word | Acrobat
Adelstein Statement: Word | Acrobat
Tate Statement: Word | Acrobat
McDowell Statement: Word | Acrobat
--
Mike Hammett
Intel
That's because of the Atheros chipset at heart. The SR and CM9 cards use
the 5004 chipset, the XR and other radios such as the R52 use the 5006
chipset.
--
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
--
From: "cw
I chose -80 because in current operations, anything less isn't really
utilizing the available spectrum. I try to engineer all of my links for
full modulation. Anything less is a waste. I know -80 isn't full
modulation, but it's not far away. Perhaps with more clean spectrum,
receivers will
(Possibly correcting things I said earlier.) The only official mention of
power limits is 40 mW for adjacent channel use and higher power in
non-adjacent channels. This on Page 2 of Commissioner Tate's statements.
--
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
I would imagine you will be able to have receive signals down to almost -95
or -98 dBm. Remember this should be relatively clean spectrum (and hopefully
stay that way). According to Sascha the current white space devices that
were in testing were supposed to receive signals 30 db below the signal
r
I can't understand why there's all this discussion of PtP... aren't there
already MANY bands established for PtP, including some (6 GHz) that have
quite some range to them?
--
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
Based on TV antenna, it looks like the largest gain CPE will be around 10 dB
for all but the lowest of frequencies.
I just ran a Radio Mobile coverage area using a guesstimate at a white spaces
system... EIRP of 20 dBm, 16 dBi sector, 10 dBi CPE, -80 dBm minimum allowed
receive. The range was
I really like the mangle and queue tree idea, too. My template is a bit
different (as is everyones =) but the principle remains.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
Those who don't understand UNIX are condemned to reinvent it, poorly.
--
75 matches
Mail list logo
