The following four WISPA members have volunteered to serve on WISPA's
Nominating Committee.
Scott Reed
Jerry Richardson
Tim Harris (Tim also served during the last election)
Paul McCall
The WISPA Board appreciates the willingness of these four members to
help their fellow WISPs and to assure t
We've had other issues with the latest firmware, we mostly use Cisco
APs, after a fw 4.0.2 radio associates, it will take anywhere from 2-10
minutes before the radio can pass any traffic, this issue wasn't present
in 3.6.7.
Their new management VLAN tagging feature only works with Tranzeo APs,
H, I've not upgraded many of the CPQ's to 4.0.2. I've not noticed what
you're talking about. I tend to only update firmware when something's not
working though, so I may not have noticed for a while.
laters,
marlon
- Original Message -
From: "Kurt Fankhauser"
To: "'WISPA General
I think I learned in high school business law class that payment of a bill
constitutes agreement with a contract.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
--
From: "RickG"
Sent: Monday, June 08, 2009 9:47 PM
To:
I would like to use MikroTik to create a fdx link that's going across a
stadium (that's a bit more then 100 yards). I'm thinking about looking for
some small dual pol antennas best case or the ARC ones worst case (as
they're monstrous).
I'll probably end up using the Compex wlm54ag at 5ghz cards
Yep..
Dual r52N cards in a Dual-Pol Arc Enclosure. We can build, test and
even put a base configuration on it for you if you wish. Just plug them
in and aim them at each other :)
* ---
Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Traine
I was hoping there was a better dual pol antenna then the ARC ones, actually
=/
They're a good 2 feet tall IIRC.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
"When you have eliminated the impossible, that which remains, however
improbable, must b
You won't find dual pol smaller than 2'
If you do I would like to see it
-B-
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
-Original Message-
From: Josh Luthman
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 11:42:21
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] Indoor fdx link antennas
I would like to use MikroTik to
Dropping you an off-list response with much more detail. But also
posting here to report that we are seeing a very similar problem. We
are seeing the Tranzeo units fail to sustain downloads after two to five
minutes when they are in router mode performing NAT. Tranzeo is blaming
Mikrotik. H
For how long? 1 year or for life?
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 11:11 AM, Mike Hammett wrote:
> I think I learned in high school business law class that payment of a bill
> constitutes agreement with a contract.
>
>
> -
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> http://www.ics-il.com
>
>
>
>
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 11:42 -0400, Josh Luthman wrote:
> I would like to use MikroTik to create a fdx link that's going across a
> stadium (that's a bit more then 100 yards). I'm thinking about looking for
> some small dual pol antennas best case or the ARC ones worst case (as
> they're monstrous)
Our contract has the number of months and the start date at the top.
I would imagine as long as you're paying, you're in contract and must abide
by the terms and conditions.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
"When you have eliminated t
Can you show me an example of range extender antennas?
Top of the stadium on both sides, we'll be fine =)
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
"When you have eliminated the impossible, that which remains, however
improbable, must be the t
MTI has a dual-pol 23dBi panel as well.
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 12:18 PM, Butch Evans wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 11:42 -0400, Josh Luthman wrote:
>> I would like to use MikroTik to create a fdx link that's going across a
>> stadium (that's a bit more then 100 yards). I'm thinking about looking
For a .06 mile link (that is 100 yards) using the 5.8 GHz 60% of the first
fresnel zone at its widest point (middle of the path) is: 2.19997703749772
feet.
We're clear on the Fresnel zone =)
MTI's dual pol 23dbi panels are 14.6 inches square. Yay! Thanks Paul!
Now to find a good enclosure meth
Thats fine in paper form. How about electronic? (i.e website signup). -RickG
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Josh
Luthman wrote:
> Our contract has the number of months and the start date at the top.
>
> I would imagine as long as you're paying, you're in contract and must abide
> by the terms an
Anything that states by signing up here you have to agree to this 24
month contract or whatever.
Kind of like those sites that say click agree if you're 18 or older -
that keeps them from legal trouble.
On 6/9/09, RickG wrote:
> Thats fine in paper form. How about electronic? (i.e website signup
"Tranzeo informed me yesterday that they will not support Mikrotik related
problems."
HA! This is funny because back in the Tranzeo/MT disconnect days of last
summer wasn't the problem traced to Tranzeo firmware not following 802.11
spec? And tranzeo still wouldn't fix it so Mikrotik jumped in and
Marlon,
I would stongly advise against doing any firmware upgrades to 4.0.2 for the
sake of your customers. We almost lost ours last year with the Tranzeo
re-asocciation issues last time around
Kurt Fankhauser
WAVELINC
P.O. Box 126
Bucyrus, OH 44820
419-562-6405
www.wavelinc.com
-Or
Wasn't Tranzeo that diagnosed the disconnect problem?
On 6/9/09, Kurt Fankhauser wrote:
>
> Marlon,
>
> I would stongly advise against doing any firmware upgrades to 4.0.2 for the
> sake of your customers. We almost lost ours last year with the Tranzeo
> re-asocciation issues last time around
Well I thought that it happened this way, I may be wrong,
- Tranzeo didn't want to look at the problem and somebody on the list did
some packet sniffing and the Tranzeo's were randomly sending a bunch of
"0o0o0o0o0's" and the Mikrotik didn't know how to interpret that so it
dropped all the clients
http://www.tranzeofaq.com/oct102008.html
ryan
Kurt Fankhauser wrote:
> Well I thought that it happened this way, I may be wrong,
>
> - Tranzeo didn't want to look at the problem and somebody on the list did
> some packet sniffing and the Tranzeo's were randomly sending a bunch of
> "0o0o0o0o0's"
Anyone available for some BGP support?
Im providing Internet service to another ISP, they are prepending some
routes to favor our link, still my router doesnt acknoledge it
Gino A. Villarini
g...@aeronetpr.com
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel 787.273.4143 fax 787.273.4145
---
I recommend Tony Mattke for dynamic routing work.
t...@mattke.net
Regards,
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Gino Villarini
Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 2:22 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] Need BGP Supp
Kevin Lamothe wrote:
> We've had other issues with the latest firmware, we mostly use Cisco
> APs, after a fw 4.0.2 radio associates, it will take anywhere from 2-10
> minutes before the radio can pass any traffic, this issue wasn't present
> in 3.6.7.
>
> Their new management VLAN tagging featu
Did you notify your upstream that you be advertising your customers routes?
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 2:24 PM, Jeff Broadwick wrote:
> I recommend Tony Mattke for dynamic routing work.
>
> t...@mattke.net
>
> Regards,
>
> Jeff
>
> -Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:
I've got about 50 or 60 CPQ's and SL2's out there, as well as a dozen or
so 6000's, some for up to 4 or 5 years.
I've never had a single problem with any of them failing to pass traffic
as mentioned in the thread. I just upgraded one small town to 4.0.2, a
couple 6000's and a couple dozen CPE'
Kurt Fankhauser wrote:
> "Tranzeo informed me yesterday that they will not support Mikrotik related
> problems."
>
Dude, I have this network problem, on my network, and because you are on
this list, I want you to fix it for me... at your cost. OH! and it
requires replacing a tower, please pay
Why you would route AT the AP boggles my mind... Routing Before the AP
is the way to go.
Why add additional load on an AP when it should be working on sending
and receiving wireless data.
ryan
Rick Kunze wrote:
> I've got about 50 or 60 CPQ's and SL2's out there, as well as a dozen or
> so 60
What are you using for an AP? Tranzeo or Mikrotik?
Kurt Fankhauser
WAVELINC
P.O. Box 126
Bucyrus, OH 44820
419-562-6405
www.wavelinc.com
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Rick Kunze
Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 2:36 PM
yeah
Gino A. Villarini
g...@aeronetpr.com
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel 787.273.4143 fax 787.273.4145
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of can...@believewireless.net
Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 2:36 PM
To: WIS
You mean prepending AS numbers, not routes. Prepending will also
lengthen the the calculation, so if they are prepending to you, this
would the route through your link less favorable to the outside world.
Are you seeing the prepend coming from their routers? On a cisco it
would be show ip neigh
Should I not prepend to favor our link?
Gino A. Villarini
g...@aeronetpr.com
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel 787.273.4143 fax 787.273.4145
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Michael Baird
Sent: Tuesday, June 09,
Whatever the contract states.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
--
From: "RickG"
Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 11:15 AM
To: "WISPA General List"
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Electronic Signatures
> For how long? 1
On Jun 9, 2009, at 3:02 PM, David wrote:
> You prepend the link you want to disfavor. The more you prepend the
> longer
> a route will look.
>
Assuming your upstream didn't increase your local preference, which is
normally the case these days. AS prepending is no longer the ideal
methodolo
I route at every device. ;-) Well, at least at every location.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
--
From: "D. Ryan Spott"
Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 1:38 PM
To: ; "WISPA General List"
Subject: Re: [WIS
Exactly,
The problem is not for own ip space, its for a downstream customer ips
space, they have several providers and want to favor our link for some
ip ranges. They are prepending such ranges to the other providers to
favor our link.
Gino A. Villarini
g...@aeronetpr.com
Aeronet Wireless B
You prepend the link you want to disfavor. The more you prepend the longer
a route will look.
David
> -Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of Gino Villarini
> Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 12:57 PM
> To: WISPA General List;
If you provide the prefixes in question it would be easier. You may
want to have your customer check with their other upstreams to see
what communities they support. BGP communities that adjust local
preference are preferred over prepending. See http://www.onesc.net/communities/
for a list
Right! At every location is GREAT! but if you have 3 APs at the top of a
tower, you don't route on each AP, you route at the bottom of the tower
right?
ryan
Mike Hammett wrote:
> I route at every device. ;-) Well, at least at every location.
>
>
> -
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing
In our case we are using staros APs. We like to have the CPE set to
router mode so we don't have to deal with any of the client equipment
on their side of our unit at their place. That way we don't care if
they change out a piece of equipment.
We are having no problem with any Tranzeo equi
Do you have any ethreal data you can share?
ryan
Steve Smith wrote:
> In our case we are using staros APs. We like to have the CPE set to
> router mode so we don't have to deal with any of the client equipment
> on their side of our unit at their place. That way we don't care if
> they chang
Right now every location is a single unit, so it's the same either way. I'm
migrating one tower over to separate RBs for each sector with a central RB
routing.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
--
From: "
I do. I will drop it to you offlist.
D. Ryan Spott wrote:
Do you have any ethreal data you can share?
ryan
Steve Smith wrote:
In our case we are using staros APs. We like to have the CPE set to
router mode so we don't have to deal with any of the client equipment
on their s
FYI:
Found a cable that is indoor/ourdoor/uv/db rated.
CM 1202L5DB -
http://www.contractorswire.com/CatalogProducts.asp?nProductsID=134
Has a dual jacket that has a powder gel barrier which seals against
moisture. Outer jacket is UV/DB, inner jacket is CL. Only comes in
black. I think we pai
http://telephonyonline.com/global/news/cisco-ip-traffic-0609/
These wireless MfG's better be getting us something that will work for this.
Scottie
Wireless High Speed Broadband service from Info-Ed, Inc. as low as $30.00/mth.
Check out www.info-ed.com/wireless.html for information.
---
46 matches
Mail list logo
