Monday Funny
Use mozilla firefox and go to:
https://whitehouse.gov
It gives you an Untrusted Error...
No shit Sherlock!
Marco
--
Marco C. Coelho
Argon Technologies Inc.
POB 875
Greenville, TX 75403-0875
903-455-5036
Haha - too funny!!
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Marco Coelho
Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 9:16 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] Funny Website Error
Monday Funny
Use mozilla firefox and go to:
Even the computers know
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Jason Hensley ja...@jaggartech.com wrote:
Haha - too funny!!
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Marco Coelho
Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 9:16 AM
To:
Scary thought isn’t it. Lol
-DJ
*From:* wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] *On
Behalf Of *Cameron Crum
*Sent:* Monday, August 30, 2010 10:27 AM
*To:* WISPA General List
*Subject:* Re: [WISPA] Funny Website Error
Even the computers know
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010
They forgot to redirect to match their cert.
Greg
On Aug 30, 2010, at 9:56 AM, Cameron Crum wrote:
Even the computers know
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Jason Hensley ja...@jaggartech.com wrote:
Haha - too funny!!
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org
Need something that will go a very short distance (less than 150') with
power that's able to adjust down to where it doesn't burn up radios. Has to
mount outside, and no, there's no way to run Ethernet or fiber in this
situation. Bandwidth is not that big of a deal - 3-6meg will be more than
Whats the IP's to block so my customers can't use Netflix and Hulu.
Kurt Fankhauser
WAVELINC
P.O. Box 126
Bucyrus, OH 44820
419-562-6405
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 11:07, Kurt Fankhauser k...@wavelinc.com wrote:
Whats the IP’s to block so my customers can’t use Netflix and Hulu.
It would be just about impossible to do. Netflix uses Akamai, and Hulu uses
a mixture of Akamai and Limelight for content delivery services. These are
On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 12:07 -0400, Kurt Fankhauser wrote:
Whats the IP’s to block so my customers can’t use Netflix
and Hulu.
Blocking netflix by IP will block a LOT more than just netflix because
their content is not coming from just their servers. Hulu uses a
Macromedia Flash port (TCP
Yeah. And don't fear. The Cyber Security Agency is going to keep the
world safe..
Too Funny
-B-
Greg Ihnen wrote:
They forgot to redirect to match their cert.
Greg
On Aug 30, 2010, at 9:56 AM, Cameron Crum wrote:
Even the computers know
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 9:20 AM,
You didnt mention if clear LOS or not. If so, Nanostation2.
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Jason Hensley ja...@jaggartech.comwrote:
Need something that will go a very short distance (less than 150’) with
power that’s able to adjust down to where it doesn’t burn up radios. Has to
mount
Anyone here going to this show?
http://www.ftthconference.com/FTTH10/public/enter.aspx
Still deciding whether I should go or not.
Matt Larsen
vistabeam.com
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
150'? Would't the Loco be better? It's a little less sensitive too on RX which
might help prevent picking up interference, reflections etc.
Greg
On Aug 30, 2010, at 12:08 PM, RickG wrote:
You didnt mention if clear LOS or not. If so, Nanostation2.
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Jason
Yes, clear LOS. Considered the Nanostations. Prefer a Mikrotik solution
though.
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of RickG
Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 11:38 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Close range radio
I shot you some prices, that was RouterOS. ;)
---
Dennis Burgess, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik WISP Support Services
Office: 314-735-0270 Website: http://www.linktechs.net
http://www.linktechs.net/
LIVE
Mikrotik would work too...worst case you put them off center a bit to
help degrade signal if they are too hot.
On 08/30/2010 12:43 PM, Jason Hensley wrote:
Yes, clear LOS. Considered the Nanostations. Prefer a Mikrotik
solution though.
*From:* wireless-boun...@wispa.org
Ya, but I like the extra bells whistles on the NS2.
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Greg Ihnen os10ru...@gmail.com wrote:
150'? Would't the Loco be better? It's a little less sensitive too on RX
which might help prevent picking up interference, reflections etc.
Greg
On Aug 30, 2010, at
Whats your thoughts on blocking limelight IP's just for the customers that
are abusing the service.
Kurt Fankhauser
WAVELINC
P.O. Box 126
Bucyrus, OH 44820
419-562-6405
_
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of David E. Smith
Sent:
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 11:47, Kurt Fankhauser k...@wavelinc.com wrote:
Whats your thoughts on blocking limelight IP’s just for the customers
that are abusing the service.
If you mean that they're abusing your service, you'll have to clarify what
that means - the customer pays for bits to be
Never used the Loco's or Nano's, so forgive me for my ignorance on this, but
will the power on these go down to something like 5db or so? Have run into
a challenge on some other radios that won't go below 17db, and that level
would be WAY too hot for this distance.
Thanks!
Yes. All the Ubiquiti stuff will.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 12:53 PM, Jason Hensley ja...@jaggartech.com wrote:
Never used the Loco’s or Nano’s, so forgive me for my ignorance on this, but
will the
Just contact Akamai, and give them your AS #, if you are using any
amount of bandwidth they will colocate in your facilities (for free), so
you can serve much of the Akamai content locally.
Regards
Michael Baird
Whats your thoughts on blocking limelight IP's just for the customers
that are
What are you guys charging in MTU installations?
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
On 8/28/2010 1:41 AM, Mike Hammett wrote:
Do Comcast, ATT, etc. charge for setup\install on business lines? I
got MRCs off their web sites, but not NRCs.
I have
I just learned that with new firmware, UBNT just added support for multiple IP
addresses on an interface. We were wanting that alot...
- Original Message -
From: RickG
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 9:47 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Close range radio
The Nanos have a hard time adjusting power down that far, though.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
On 8/30/2010 11:38 AM, RickG wrote:
You didnt mention if clear LOS or not. If so, Nanostation2.
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Jason Hensley
Interesting, whats an AS# ?
Kurt Fankhauser
WAVELINC
P.O. Box 126
Bucyrus, OH 44820
419-562-6405
_
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Michael Baird
Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 12:59 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re:
You need it if you have your own IP space, for BGP. If you don't own your
OWN public IPs, then you don't have one.
- Original Message -
From: Kurt Fankhauser
To: 'WISPA General List'
Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 10:15 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] netflix/hulu IP's
AS # is for BGP advertisements. Akamai has a program for ISPs who use a
good deal of bandwidth to their network.
http://www.akamai.com/html/partners/network_program.html
Basically you give them your AS (you have to be multi homed) and they
see if you meet the minimum bandwidth to their
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autonomous_system_(Internet)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autonomous_system_%28Internet%29
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
On 8/30/2010 12:15 PM, Kurt Fankhauser wrote:
Interesting, whats an AS# ?
Kurt Fankhauser
Then you have to have two, client and ap . if you are only going thru say
one wall, how about a single ruckus, the packman one.
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 10:06 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject:
https://www.arin.net/policy/nrpm.html#five
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
On 8/30/2010 12:15 PM, Kurt Fankhauser wrote:
Interesting, whats an AS# ?
Kurt Fankhauser
WAVELINC
P.O. Box 126
Bucyrus, OH 44820
419-562-6405
Not necessarily. You can do BGP with provider assigned space as
opposed to provider independent space. You need BGP to properly utilize
multiple providers.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
On 8/30/2010 12:15 PM, Mark Nash - Lists wrote:
You need it
Wall shot is not workable either. These are old buildings that 2.4 does not
penetrate at all (and 900 is out of the question) - we've already tried
because the cable runs are just a real big pain!!
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Chuck
Is there Coax or POTS in the building?
A couple of Etherther Extenders can take care of difficult cable runs.
- Jerry
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Jason Hensley
Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 10:30 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re:
Not sure where I heard it (Here I think..) but the magic number is something
like 75Mb/s sustained. So unless you have a few thousand customers, Your most
likely quite below that level.
Blocking a CDN could be a big problem. You never know how much of the worlds
content is CDN based till you do
2 Picos then
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Jason Hensley
Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 10:30 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Close range radio recommendation
Wall shot is not workable either. These are old buildings that
Any feedback on these at 5 Ghz would be appreciated
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
WISPA Wireless List:
You could do thru the window if possible ?
Or.. use the UBNT Loco's... and turn the power down all the way down.
(Loco or LocoM and your favorite frequency )
plus if the signal is too hot, then you can tilt them to face the ground...
Regards.
Faisal Imtiaz
Snappy Internet Telecom
On
Not in this case. Cables are already run so we're good there. Thanks
though!
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Jerry Richardson
Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 12:35 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Close range radio
You could put 100' of cheap RG58 cable between the radio and the antenna... at
5800MHz gives you something like 31dB loss...
- Original Message -
From: Jason Hensley
To: 'WISPA General List'
Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 10:38 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Close range radio
What kind of feed back are you looking for ?
They work great, they have a couple of specifics, listed in the spec
sheets that you should be aware off... but no show stoppers.
(they have built-in electrical downtilt, and the antenna sectors are
speced at 6db, the 90 degree pannels are not
OH NO!
https://foxnews.com
Who are we doing to trust now???
:^)
Matt Larsen
mlar...@vistabeam.com
On 8/30/2010 10:44 AM, Bob Moldashel wrote:
Yeah. And don't fear. The Cyber Security Agency is going to keep the
world safe..
Too Funny
-B-
Greg Ihnen wrote:
They forgot
No kidding...
https://vistabeam.com
-Kristian
On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 12:10 -0600, Matt Larsen - Lists wrote:
OH NO!
https://foxnews.com
Who are we doing to trust now???
:^)
Matt Larsen
mlar...@vistabeam.com
On 8/30/2010 10:44 AM, Bob Moldashel wrote:
Yeah. And don't
I was there last year and you would want to go if you have an interest in
deploying FTTH.
On 2010-08-30, at 12:39 PM, Matt Larsen - Lists wrote:
Anyone here going to this show?
http://www.ftthconference.com/FTTH10/public/enter.aspx
Still deciding whether I should go or not.
Matt
The certificate is not trusted because it is self-signed.
The certificate is only valid for localhost.localdomain
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 2:15 PM, Kristian Hoffmann kh...@fire2wire.com wrote:
No
Does that 75 megabits also apply when you are looking to connect via a
public peering point? Some CDN type networks waive or minimize those
requirements if you connect via a public exchange.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
On 8/30/2010 12:34 PM,
Doh! Okay, I give up.
-Kristian
On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 14:36 -0400, Josh Luthman wrote:
The certificate is not trusted because it is self-signed.
The certificate is only valid for localhost.localdomain
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
It really depends upon the service.
Are they purchasing cable modem / dsl or fiber / t1(+/1) service
The prices quoted by Robert here are true for cable modem stuff DSL
T1 installs can - depending upon location go over 1K
Fiber can be around $2K from Time Warner depending on location
a cert is literally only $20 now-adays just worth spending to get over the
questions imho
On Aug 30, 2010, at 2:36 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
The certificate is not trusted because it is self-signed.
The certificate is only valid for localhost.localdomain
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
http://www.wirelessestimator.com/breaking_news.cfm#Minnesota_Death
The Isanti County Sheriff's Office said that Mark Robert Anderson, 40, was
assisting in the erection of a tower for Genesis Wireless at 3389 Helium St.
NW in Wyanett Township when the Lull Telehandler - with the boom fully
For a single domain. It does not include all subdomains. I think it
is roughly $400 for all subdomains.
IE, $20 for www.google.com and $20 for google.com and another $20 for
mail.google.com
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On
Ralph,
Thank you very much for helping to get the word out about the need
to stay clear of TDWR frequencies. Eliminating TDWR interference
certainly benefits everyone.
Your help is really appreciated.
jack
On 8/29/2010 9:33 AM, Ralph
That's terrible. My thoughts go out to Marks' family.
From the image it appears the soil may have been moist or soft and a wheel
sunk. I can't think of many ways to get a bucket lift to tip over.
- Jerry
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org
I haven't fully worked this lead yet, but there's 145 units and one
said they can only get dialup (I'm assuming T1s as well).
Seems like a pretty ripe place for the picking, but I don't want to be
too out of line for people to request someone else.
It should be fairly easy to wire all 145
I'm doing some path loss estimates in RadioMobile. Mainly 5.8 GHz stuff.
I have a place where I'd like to run a point-to-multipoint sector as
an injection feed to multiple APs in the mesh. This would need to
run AirMax or Nstreme or NV2 in order to manage the traffic, but that
part seems
No clue, Just going from what I vaguely recall someone saying...
Like I said, I think I heard it here, Might have been on NANOG.
Nick Olsen
Network Operations
(321) 205-1100 x106
From: Mike Hammett wispawirel...@ics-il.net
Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010
I contacted Akamai a while back about this program, and yes I believe they also
told me 75mbps was the magic number.
--
Blake Covarrubias
On Aug 30, 2010, at 12:43, Nick Olsen n...@brevardwireless.com wrote:
No clue, Just going from what I vaguely recall someone saying...
Like I said, I
Hi all
I was wondering if directly connecting two wireless cards would burn
them. The point is not the power sent by the two cards, but if the
impedance is not the right one.
Indeed in the normal use with the antenna the impedance is not the
same of using a direct cable from one card to
Why would you do that?
for bench testing I could see using a section of Coax with an attenuator inline.
- Jerry
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Paolo Di Francesco
Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 1:51 PM
To: WISPA
It should all be 50 ohms, but you would need a big attenuator inline.
Cameron
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Paolo Di Francesco
paolo.difrance...@teleinform.com wrote:
Hi all
I was wondering if directly connecting two wireless cards would burn
them. The point is not the power sent by the
The receiver impedance should match the cable impedance (50 ohms) for best
receiver performance which the manufacturers are all trying to get.
Also if the cable has enough attenuation to not burn up the receiver at the far
end then even if there is a mismatch at the receiver on the far end the
well, why not? :)
I don't know if the attenuator would change the impedance story.
Why would you do that?
for bench testing I could see using a section of Coax with an attenuator
inline.
- Jerry
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org
It should all be 50 ohms, but you would need a big attenuator inline.
so, there should not be a impedance problem, right?
a big attenuator...hum...what about a loong cable? ;)
Bye
--
Ing. Paolo Di Francesco
Teleinform s.r.l.
Sede Legale: Via Francesco Paolo Di Blasi 1, 90144 Palermo
I have updated the WISPA Member http://www.wispa.org/?page_id=170 's
Directory Page. I am now keeping a Master Spreadsheet as some companies
have different physical locations than what are entered into our billing
server (which is where I pull the information from). Please check your
company's
I must be missing something. I can't fiure out why you would connect two radios
together for any reason other than to bench test.
- Jerry
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Paolo Di Francesco
Sent: Monday, August 30,
We use the UNAT-30+ from Mini-Circuits (usually 3 stacked together) to
test bad radios that come back, or for PtPs before we send them out.
It has been helpful for tuning/benchmarking MikroTik wirelsss settings
in a closed environment.
well, just using the usual things for non usual situations.
I was considering: if I have to do more than 100 meters ethernet what
would I use? well 100m of LMR400 can be a solution in some cases (yeah I
know fiber, but as I said I was curious about RF cables).
In a previous post I saw somebody
I won't claim any great expertise here, but I have seen the same from RM.
There is some minor thing wrong with the way Fresnel is calculated that
seems to cause this.
If you leave the link right as it is, but change the overall size of your
map, you may find that the odd up and down rssi
The H/V patterns DO NOT PERFECTLY OVERLAP.Duhhh.
Had some strange RSSI anomalies I could not understand until I moved the
antenna. Actually pointing it farther away resulted in better RSSI.
There seem to be some mild nulls at or rather near the edges of the beams,
where the V and H will
Assuming that spectrum (frequencies open) is not a problem, what would you
use in the 5 ghz range to reach 25 miles?Want to do full duplex 100 M
ethernet connection.
++
Neofast, Inc, Making internet easy
541-969-8200 509-386-4589
Proxim, Ubiquiti M...
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 7:18 PM, MDK rea...@muddyfrogwater.us wrote:
Assuming that spectrum (frequencies open) is not a problem, what would you
use in the 5 ghz range to reach
On 08/30/2010 06:39 PM, Paolo Di Francesco wrote:
well, just using the usual things for non usual situations.
I was considering: if I have to do more than 100 meters ethernet what
would I use? well 100m of LMR400 can be a solution in some cases (yeah I
know fiber, but as I said I was
That's horrible. I just sold them a bunch of Trango gear. While I am in no
way making an attempt to be negative about this tragedy, why are they using
a non-man rated piece of equipment with a makeshift man basket roped to
the forklift? (seen here: www.moraminn.com/detail/61845.html) What's
arcnet, dude...
- Original Message -
From: Leon D. Zetekoff wa4...@backwoodswireless.net
To: wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 4:27 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] (DIRECTLY) Connecting two wireless with a RF cable
On 08/30/2010 06:39 PM, Paolo Di Francesco wrote:
well, just
Oh it's a forklift, that's why. Seems obvious to not use that, but when you
need to put food on the table...
Absolutely terrible the son and daughter not only have to go through this,
but live the rest of their lives without their father. It's tough to even
think about it.
On Aug 30, 2010 7:32
Have LOTS of them, both the larger And smaller ones. Work great at line of
site but they don't have much penetration of obstacles at all.
Bob-
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Bob Moldashel
Sent: Monday, August 30,
Sad news but seems like lack of training or not paying attention to the
load limits caused that.
However, the FOLLOWING News story is EPIC! Dudes caught stealing gensets!
Oh HELL YES!
One sad, one glad. I'm now in neutral buoyancy.
-Original Message-
From:
On Aug 30, 2010 2:53 PM, Blake Covarrubias bl...@beamspeed.com wrote:
I contacted Akamai a while back about this program, and yes I believe they
also told me 75mbps was the magic number.
--
Blake Covarrubias
On Aug 30, 2010, at 12:43, Nick Olsen n...@brevardwireless.com wrote:
No clue, Just
Tower thieves.. Can we install spring loaded spikes to impale the
offending party and then leave them impaled on the compound fence as a
warning?
The British did it back in the day, it must be okay.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org
they will give it to you with much less than 75mbps
best just to ask them :-)
On Aug 30, 2010, at 8:07 PM, Jon Auer wrote:
On Aug 30, 2010 2:53 PM, Blake Covarrubias bl...@beamspeed.com wrote:
I contacted Akamai a while back about this program, and yes I believe they
also told me
yup 5ghz and trees don't tend to work well together...
5ghz is a pure LOS in most situations - especially w/ UBNT stuff
On Aug 30, 2010, at 7:53 PM, Robert West wrote:
Have LOTS of them, both the larger And smaller ones. Work great at line of
site but they don't have much penetration of
Now I'm in neutral buoyancy. lolflash from the past in college NAUI
classeshey it was an easy A, errr...at least a couple easy A's!
This is sad news. Using the wrong tool for the job and possibly soft ground
conditions caused this.
Best,
Brad
-Original Message-
From:
A tree or two works fine for me.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 8:27 PM, Glenn Kelley gl...@hostmedic.com wrote:
yup 5ghz and trees don't tend to work well together...
5ghz is a pure LOS in most
I have helped a wisp get this with 700 customers and about 30mbps
I have helped another get one with about 500 customers and about 50mbps
So - just ask
Truth is - they want to put these in - they crave new locations like you would
not believe.
On Aug 30, 2010, at 8:28 PM, Chuck Hogg wrote:
For Full Duplex you are looking at Moto PTP500 or equivalent.
- Jerry
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of MDK
Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 4:19 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] Suggestions for high bandwidth @
Well, more like 10. The inquiry cost nothing, they will look it up and
tell you if they see enough traffic from your AS to justify it or not.
Regards
Michael Baird
On Aug 30, 2010 2:53 PM, Blake Covarrubias bl...@beamspeed.com
mailto:bl...@beamspeed.com wrote:
I contacted Akamai a while
I know at our rental place here, they rent for nearly the same price... It's
also a pretty good sized wisp.
Regards,
Chuck Hogg
Shelby Broadband
502-722-9292
ch...@shelbybb.com
http://www.shelbybb.com
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 7:38 PM, Josh Luthman
j...@imaginenetworksllc.comwrote:
Oh it's
I thought Proxim does this too?
In regards to Ubiquiti you can do 20Mhz channels and two pairs of
radios (you can easily use MT to make it appear to be a layer 2
connection).
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at
I've got 300+Mbps and we don't have thousands of customers...but we do
have 1500+.
Regards,
Chuck
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 8:07 PM, Jon Auer j...@tapodi.net wrote:
On Aug 30, 2010 2:53 PM, Blake Covarrubias bl...@beamspeed.com wrote:
I contacted Akamai a while back about this program, and
Which is why I install low and have lots of AP's in order to peek around
the corners.
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Glenn Kelley
Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 8:28 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti AirMax
OK, now I get what you are after.
75ohm cable will cause an impedance mismatch resulting is much higher losses
that 50 ohm cable of the same length. You can add a transformer that will match
50 Ohm to 75 Ohm cable, here are a couple of examples:
http://www.ham-radio.com/k6sti/match.htm.
You
Ubiquiti M won't do what he's asking, at least not with a single link.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
On 8/30/2010 6:22 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
Proxim, Ubiquiti M...
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite
Right, they are all hdx. That's why you need two :)
On Aug 30, 2010 8:51 PM, Mike Hammett wispawirel...@ics-il.net wrote:
Ubiquiti M won't do what he's asking, at least not with a single link.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
On 8/30/2010 6:22 PM,
If you can do it, look at 6Ghz. We have a Dragonwave Horizon Compact
link going about 34 miles that can push up to 200Mbps full duplex.
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 6:18 PM, MDK rea...@muddyfrogwater.us wrote:
Assuming that spectrum (frequencies open) is not a problem, what would you
use in the 5
Actually, I think it's an innovative use. If you can afford the half duplex
penalty it would be a great way to create a bridge. You could calculate the
loss in 50 ohm coax of any size and length while adjusting the power output
of the radios accordingly. I'd use 50 ohm cable, but even 75 ohm
That's a pretty incredible claim. What sort of reliability are you seeing?
Are you using space diversity and dual links? Phillip without making me
sleuth what is the geography? I would be comfortable doing this in the
desert or from mountaintops, but would worry about ducting and other fading
Well the fun starts with 2 cables and mimo cards, meaning more than
100Mbits at distances much higher than 100m.
In theory it's 300Mbps halfduplex , but I guess it's more like 100Mbps
full duplex.
Ah, the TX card should shoot at power=0 (tx power in the mikrotik winbox).
Not sure anybody tried
I have seen the same, and it goes away (for me) when setting it to
pull the topo data directly from the files instead of memory and
setting the samples to 1000.
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 4:05 PM, MDK rea...@muddyfrogwater.us wrote:
I won't claim any great expertise here, but I have seen the same
Yes, the Proxim GX series will do 100Mbps FDX.
QB is HDX
- Jerry
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 5:42 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Suggestions for high
Sadly no. At half that distance, yes.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 8:48 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Suggestions for high bandwidth @ 25 miles.
1 - 100 of 124 matches
Mail list logo
