A judge ordered the FCC to issue a decision on the intercarrier compensation
reform. Not sure the docket number, but they have to issue something in
November. There is a date certain. They can decide to not change anything.
Or they can decide to radically reform the whole works. If they do t
Nope, but I know plenty of consultants.
- Original Message -
From: "Marlon K. Schafer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2008 9:53 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] gotta love USF
> Splitting hairs Chuck.
>
> If it'
Yes, the normal float voltage for flooded cell batts is 2.25 VPC. For a 48
Volt battery that is 24 cells x 2.25 = 54 volts. Some folks charge at 55
volts.
Then during discharge, some consider 1.8 VPC to be the lower limit. 24 x 1.
= 43.2 volts. I personally like 44 volts as the lower limit.
tracts to a monopoly provider.
>>
>> I have personally built and tested many analog phones for the federal
>> government that sold for $1000 each in some cases; the company I was
>> working for that had this contract had bid against AT&T to get it. If
>> the p
Re: [WISPA] gotta love USF
> Universal Service Reform and Universal Broadband:
> http://www.benton.org/node/8969
>
> Scottie
>
> -- Original Message --
> From: Cliff LeBoeuf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: WISPA General List
>
years
later the investigation was done and nothing was amiss. Do you think I want
to risk doing the perp walk?
- Original Message -
From: "Cliff LeBoeuf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2008 11:07 AM
Subject: Re: [WISP
It is private enterprise socialism administered by the federal govt.
- Original Message -
From: "Randy Cosby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2008 10:24 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] gotta love USF
> Chuck,
>
> Mo
>
> Scottie
>
> -- Original Message --
> From: "Marlon K. Schafer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: WISPA General List
> Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 07:57:59 -0700
>
>>Just because the government will pay for it in no way makes it a good idea
>>:
ROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2008 10:27 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] gotta love USF
> Chuck, I was speaking about more recent times, not the origination of
> the system and it's beginnings. What I am referring to is exactly what
> yo
--- Original Message -
>> From: "Brian Rohrbacher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: "WISPA General List"
>> Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2008 9:23 AM
>> Subject: Re: [WISPA] gotta love USF
>>
>>
>>> If you are running a hundred mile
inal Message -
From: "RickG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2008 10:04 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] gotta love USF
> Chuck, so your definition of a "tax" is if you are forced to pay?
> Keeping in mind that the ph
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2008 9:52 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] gotta love USF
> Tacking a fee on my telephone bill is a form of taxation. -RickG
>
> On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 11:34 AM, Chuck McCown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro
The current USF audits by USAC are turning up collusion between school
districts (the principle is the brother of the local ISP) and provider of
goods and services of E-rate funded projects. The audits have not shown any
telephone company to be misusing this money.
And I want to repeat, this i
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2008 8:57 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] gotta love USF
> Just because the government will pay for it in no way makes it a good idea
> :-).
>
> Chuck is good at working the system as it exists for
lon K. Schafer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2008 8:50 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] gotta love USF
> In all honesty, it's turned into quite a scam hasn't it. About is rampant
> from what I see.
> marlon
>
>
It is a cost recovery mechanism. I got audited by USAC this year to prove
that the USF we receive is to cover the costs of providing the service. But
think how expensive it is to run a hundred miles of fiber and put in a class
5 switch to serve 30 or 50 customers.
You are right, I do love USF
WOW! Marlon, hire David, He gets results, fast !
Chuck Profito
209-988-7388
CV-ACCESS, INC
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Providing High Speed Broadband
to Rural Central California
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Hardy
Sent: Tuesday, October 07
Vector Network Analyzer. Anritsu makes a nice one. Plus some test
antennas. But you will be spending $6K and above.
- Original Message -
From: "Rogelio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Sunday, October 05, 2008 4:33 PM
Subject: [WISPA] small RF testing device?
> Is
ts
>> >> >> modified to be DP. I'd be intereted
>> in what percentage of a single
>> >> >> pol
>> >> >> antenna cost is for the above 4 things
>> compared to the element itself.
>> >> >>
>> >> >
A dual pol panel antenna can be an order of magnitude more difficult to make
than a single linear polarized antenna. Almost all panel antennas are
either an array of patches or an array of butterfly dipole elements over a
ground plane. Most designers are trying to put as much gain in the area
One of the quickest and easiest ways is the Wilife system. I think Logitech
owns the company now. It has relatively inexpensive but very smart cameras
and some stealth cameras (clock radio camera) etc. It communicates with the
computer via the power line (homeplug). Very simple to install.
-
At 2000 feet a paper clip would work.
- Original Message -
From: Blair Davis
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2008 7:41 PM
Subject: [WISPA] Dual Pol Antennas
All this talk about Dual Pol feedhorns has got me curious
I'm looking for a dual pol ant
Even if Powercode was a vendor sponsor of WISPA (not sure one way or the
other), openly hawking product on the general WISPA list seems to be frowned
upon.
- Original Message -
From: "Austin Wright" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'WISPA General List'"
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2008 3:47
That is included in the 5.4 band.
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Delp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'WISPA General List'"
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2008 10:33 AM
Subject: [WISPA] Part 15 Frequency Chart
>I am looking for an up to date chart with all of the unlicensed frequencies
> cov
rs for $100
installed and encrypted, these for $200.
Travis, try one of these in a difficult spot, I'm sure you will like it.
$139.00
Chuck Profito
209-988-7388
CV-ACCESS, INC
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Providing High Speed Broadband
to Rural Central California
-Original Message-
From: [E
Ruckus media flex
Chuck Profito
209-988-7388
CV-ACCESS, INC
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Providing High Speed Broadband
to Rural Central California
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of RickG
Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2008 5:54 PM
To: WISPA General
Huge diff between SA and Nigeria...
- Original Message -
From: "John Scrivner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "WISPA General List"
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 9:16 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] your thoughts on opps in Africa?
> In the case of South Africa I know what is
Unlicensed 24 GHz has so little power that it is only good for a mile or
two. Is that still an attractive thing?
- Original Message -
From: "John Scrivner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 7:37 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] frequency converters
Sometimes. A NECA ILEC has the choice.
- Original Message -
From: "RickG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 8:11 PM
Subject: [WISPA] DSL Tariffed
> I'm losing a business customer to DSL. They offered them a price much
> below
> what they ad
PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] your thoughts on opps in Africa?
>I have heard of that happening on native lands here in the US too. I have
>nothing to confirm that though.
>
> ryan
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Chuck McCown - 3 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday,
x27;s an "In mother Russia" joke in here some where...
>
>
> Chuck McCown - 3 wrote:
>> Russia, the New Soviet Union.
>> - Original Message -
>> From: "3-dB Networks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: "'WISPA General List'
a Soviet Union thing or a Russia thing... but
> come to think of it I think I did hear something about Russia doing that a
> few years back
>
> Daniel White
> 3-dB Networks
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf O
u with Marathon Oil? When I worked for them, they were part of the
> consortium developing Sakhalin.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Chuck McCown - 3
> Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 2:51 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECT
Couple of years ago.
- Original Message -
From: "3-dB Networks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'WISPA General List'"
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 12:54 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] your thoughts on opps in Africa?
> Ouch! When did that happen
We were in Sakhalin Island in Russia. The government just up and decided to
take over everything. Booted out the oil companies and said "finders
keepers" to everyone. I will never do any intl work again without full
money up front.
- Original Message -
From: "Rogelio" <[EMAIL PROTEC
The good ones are always in Nigeria...
- Original Message -
From: "Rogelio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 12:19 PM
Subject: [WISPA] your thoughts on opps in Africa?
> Is it just me, or do African wireless opportunities rarely materialize?
We are a general contractor with 10 million I think. That much insurance is
not all that expensive.
Any general contractor should be able to buy a one time rider to their
policy to bump up the coverage.
- Original Message -
From: "Randy Cosby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, Sept
I fully expect them to run into the same brick wall the prevents reverse
time travel.
- Original Message -
From: "Charles Wyble" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2008 10:04 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Satellite internet
> Forrest W. Christian wrote:
If you had a really tiny monkey with really tiny hands and had them actually
grab one of the entangled photons, bring it to a rest and then shake it in
the opposite polarization, will the other monkey holding the other photo
feel the change?
- Original Message -
From: "Forrest W. Christ
ss the street. At which point, the ISP's will be the people with a
> BIG warehouse somewhere holding one end of each entangled particle pair
> and routing between them.
>
> Until then, I'll be happy to take the bet right alongside Chuck that any
> geostationary b
com
>
> Introducing Efficiency to Business since 1986.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Chuck McCown - 3
> Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2008 6:05 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List
> Sub
They all suck for latency.
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2008 3:52 PM
Subject: [WISPA] Satellite internet
>I have a customer looking for "enterprise quality" ( his words) satellite
>service. Money is not really a
Canopy NAT and bootP filtering works like a champ to stop the mistake from
causing problems upstream.
- Original Message -
From: "Charles Wyble" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2008 8:49 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Preventing backwards router probl
God bless Mac. There will be prayers.
- Original Message -
From: "Mac Dearman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'WISPA General List'"
Sent: Saturday, August 30, 2008 2:35 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Good Golly Gustav
>
>
> Well - - - here we (Louisiana) are again in the eye of a hurricane with
>
sday, August 27, 2008 5:20 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Will Canopy Surge work with 48v Redline?
> how much?
>
> On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 6:04 PM, Chuck McCown - 3 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>> Our 333ss has leds for monitoring voltage and current. But the circuit
>
: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 5:00 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Will Canopy Surge work with 48v Redline?
> They use the PowerDsine midspan poe...not sure
>
> On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 5:58 PM, Chuck McCown - 3 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>>
I guess I could reverse the polarity of a 333SS. Do you know how much
current the POE would be drawing?
- Original Message -
From: "John McDowell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Motorola Canopy User Group" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "WISPA General List"
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 4:38 PM
Sub
mbers
> No doubt I should have picked this up before Chuck, but what is the
> "animal
> farm" event?
>
> Yes if I can contibute and work it out with my schedule, what ever it is.
>
> Ron
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:
mmodate your specific need as a customer. We appreciate your business.
You can call the office and ask for me directly at 256/638-2144, or you may
speak to any of our CSRs at the same number.
Sincerely,
Chris Townson
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 6:12 PM, Chu
t;
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Matt Liotta
> Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2008 4:15 PM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] I want to port their numbers
>
>
>
> Yes, but you pro
I don't think that exemption applied to LNP. It did for a while to keep
CLECs out of the rural areas but that has now sunset.
- Original Message -
From: "Anthony Will" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2008 3:17 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] I want to por
But if you are selling voip, you want the local ILEC customer to be able to
keep their number.
In that case the ILEC has involvement.
- Original Message -
From: "cw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2008 3:09 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] I want to port th
I am a rural telecom, one of the most rural in the nation. And I wasn't
exempt at all.
- Original Message -
From: "Jeromie Reeves" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2008 1:45 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] I want to port their numbers
> If it is a Ru
ireless.Com
574-233-7170
"Lose the wires, discover the speed, enjoy the freedom!"
*US Distributor for www.itelite.net Antennas*
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Chuck McCown
> Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2008 11:54 A
mmett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> http://www.ics-il.com
>
>
>
> --
> From: "Chuck McCown - 3" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2008 10:25 PM
> To: "WISPA General List"
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Fw: [WIS
Do you really think the FCC has specified P-15 to the be the official
conduit for status reports?
- Original Message -
From: "Marlon K. Schafer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2008 9:19 PM
Subject: [WISPA] Fw: [WISP] Emergency FCC Information - Flo
Used to be 200 kbps and above. But now everybody has to file.
- Original Message -
From: "Jason Hodge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List" ; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, August 23, 2008 1:07 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Reminder
> Please define broadband.
>
> I
If that is what it cost me, I would never be able to afford it.
Good thing it only costs me about $1K per sub.
- Original Message -
From: "Tom DeReggi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2008 1:59 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Fiber Costs
Interesting arcti
situation occured
> to
> a small company, I'd bet that 99% of the employers would be forced to
> settle
> out of court early, and payoff the employee, because the cost to defend
> the
> case would far outway the benefit, and getting compensation from the
> employee for
obvious lack of experience. I was simply trying
> to lighten the mood. Thus the parenthetical statement.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Bob Moldashel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Chuck McCown - 3" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "WISPA General List&quo
We make 'em sign a statement saying they have read the employee handbook.
- Original Message -
From: "Dennis Burgess" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2008 5:39 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Employee Tracking Program
> In Missouri its only illegal if yo
We can buy the ONT for $375.
The COE per sub works out to about another $200.
So $500 plus the strand of fiber. Drop fiber can be had for 25 cents per
foot.
Contractors can put it in for a buck a foot. Including cleanup.
In a subdivision, I can do FTTH for less than $1K per sub.
And my arpu fo
Not true. Employers own the content of all correspondence, whether
electronic or otherwise.
That has been time tested.
Plus, in this state we can record the phone calls. We can record you on the
phone without even notifying you if we call you or if you call us.
- Original Message -
Fr
Star cpes
Chuck Profito
209-988-7388
CV-ACCESS, INC
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Providing High Speed Broadband
to Rural Central California
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2008 8:37 AM
To: WISPA General
130 feet on 5.8 through LMR 900 = serving about 20% of the area you could
serve if the coax was not in place.
I guess it depends on what folks call "working".
- Original Message -
From: "Chuck McCown - 3" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "
> Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
>
> -Original Message-
> From: "Chuck McCown - 3" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 22:49:24
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] coax cables
>
>
> Elliptical waveguide wi
Elliptical waveguide will lose 3 dB in 250 feet.
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Brownson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 10:33 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] coax cables
> To give you the facts. You can use just about any coax you want. But you
I would never use coax for 5.8 period. Not unless you are only going a few
feet.
LMR900 can be used for up to 50 feet. It is better than 1/2 heliax. But
really, you gotta use waveguide if you are going any distance at all.
- Original Message -
From: "Matt Jenkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
YES, But how are you setting the rate for the interconnect or vlan to
connect customers sites together over your network or between your towers.
Do you base it on the cost of lease lines, fractional t-1's, etc.
Chuck Profito
209-988-7388
CV-ACCESS, INC
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Providing High
That is near muddy frog's territory.
- Original Message -
From: "Marlon K. Schafer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2008 9:30 AM
Subject: [WISPA] Anyone service Pasco Wa.?
> We're at 2731 Birch Rd., Pasco.
>
> Customer is
Note that in Section 332 unlicensed services is explicitly mentioned and
included in the definition of "personal wireless services".
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--
SEC. 253. [47 U.S.C. 253] REMOVAL OF BARRIERS TO ENTRY.
(a) IN GENERAL.--No State or local statute or regulation, or other State or
local legal requirement, may prohibit or have the effect of prohibiting the
ability of
any entity to provide any interstate or intrastate telecommunications service.
Telecommunications Act of 1996 on Zoning for Mobile Communications
Telecommunications Act of 1996 (S.652)
Section 704
FACILITIES SITING;
RADIO FREQUENCY EMISSION STANDARDS.
(a) NATIONAL WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS SITING POLICY- Section 332(c) (47
U.S.C. 332(c)) is amended by adding at the end
A General List"
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2008 2:45 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC geographic search
> Chuck,
> What exactly are you having problems with? Any FCC ULS searches have been
> a
> crap shoot for me. Much of the time I find that for any queries to work
> well, you need to b
Don't call me an idiot you imbecile, I am an moron.
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Hammett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2008 5:55 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Tower site licensing problem
>A requirement, yes. A burden, no. Just about any idiot
Anyone else having trouble using the FCC geographic search feature?
I called tech support and they said there were known issues. But nothing
further.
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
ce premiums. It's not
>> an
>> issue until it becomes one. Then you have one heck of a mess to clean
>> up.
>>
>> Joe
>>
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
>> Behalf
12, 2008 9:07 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Tower site licensing problem
> OTARD and PRB1 do not pertain to AP or backhaul locations
> Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
>
> -Original Message-
> From: "Chuck McCown - 3" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Dat
lied. Strictly HAM radio
> stuff, non-commercial.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Chuck McCown - 3" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "WISPA General List"
> Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2008 9:38 AM
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Tower site licensing proble
work, and
> a financial argument won't stand up.
>
> Case in point,
>
> http://tinyurl.com/5clfkt
>
>
>
> Don't take your organs to heaven,
> heaven knows we need them down here!
> Be an organ donor, sign your donor card today.
>
> - Origin
Good bunch of info here. Almost all of can be applied to us.
http://www.arrl.org/FandES/field/regulations/local/prb-1_program.html
- Original Message -
From: "Joe Fiero" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'WISPA General List'"
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2008 8:34 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Tower site
application.
Let them school me for a while. After I get a relationship started, I try
to gently inform them that there are some federal preemptions but they don't
need to be too concerned about that.
- Original Message -
From: "Chuck McCown - 3" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To
st'
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Tower site licensing problem
>
> Clear as day in the ordinance.
>
> I agree, but there goes another $10 grand to challenge that provision of
> the
> ordinance.
>
> Joe
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto
They cannot require colocation, that is considered a "taking".
- Original Message -
From: "Joe Fiero" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'WISPA General List'"
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2008 7:30 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Tower site licensing problem
> My first question is, where is this taking pla
You gotta get a better lawyer. Some of this stuff, especially RF emissions
are federally regulated and wholly prempts local officials. It is actually
easier if you call your facility cellular like in most cases because federal
code can get most of this off your back. The building code/engineer
There are about 4 parts of federal code that allows the use, but it does not
get you out of the process. Planning cannot deny you but you still have to
apply for the conditional use permit. They will have a hearing for the
public to have a chance to comment, but at the end of the day you will
With this as well as many other issues that WISPA is trying to do, you might
look at USTA and OPASTCO as a templates. They do for the small telcos what
WISPA is trying to do for us.
- Original Message -
From: "George Rogato" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "WISPA General L
ccessfully.
>>
>> -Matt
>>
>> On Aug 10, 2008, at 9:22 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
>>
>>> Fax machines don't run over VoIP either. They just don't, T.38
>>> doesn't
>>> really work.
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>
They just don't, T.38 doesn't
> really work.
>
>
> --
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> http://www.ics-il.com
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Chuck McCown - 3" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
Businesses cannot run on cell phones. Nor can fax machines.
Voip is cheaper than cell service. The quality is better. People like
their old numbers and don't want to port them to cell.
Voip does not run out of batteries or fade in and out if you go to the
basement. Voip doesn't have the argua
Not sure if we are offering intl. I think we decided to sell them phone
cards if they want intl.
- Original Message -
From: "Jeremy Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'WISPA General List'"
Sent: Saturday, August 09, 2008 4:32 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] VoIP DeploymentsI'm serious
>> Who
Whoever it is we are using charges extra for the intl calls.
- Original Message -
From: "Jeremy Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'WISPA General List'"
Sent: Saturday, August 09, 2008 2:13 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] VoIP DeploymentsI'm serious
>> We don't care about CDRs as we give an al
The following link has contact info for all the GFRs. Contact the GFR in
your area to see if Crossroads Wireless is trying to get loans or grants to
serve areas you already serve. The GFRs need to know you. Who knows, they
might even have some money for you.
http://www.usda.gov/rus/telecom/st
We don't care about CDRs as we give an all you can eat long distance
feature. We will look at the totals month by month to see if we are making
out OK or loosing our shirt.
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Hammett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Saturday, August 09,
We use a hybrid approach, asterisk for many things, and a Vox like company
(it may even be Vox, not sure as I just approve the payments, Bryan is the
one that vetted the company). Our VoiP system is form fit and function
equivalent to a wired telephone from Qwest. We even port their Qwest numb
>
> Who is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> Mac
>
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
>> Behalf Of Chuck McCown - 3
>> Sent: Friday, August 08, 2008 1:06 PM
>> To: WISPA General List
>> Subject: Re: [W
Which Chuck are you addressing here?
- Original Message -
From: "Mac Dearman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'WISPA General List'"
Sent: Friday, August 08, 2008 12:01 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] MT Nstreme
> Chuck,
>
> That was neither neighborly
With that much power on UHF TV a rusty nail in a fence could be mixing that
channel with some other broadcast frequency and making a signal on your
frequency. Anything is possible when you get close to high power RF. Can
you drive a quarter mile away and get a good signal? Try to see if the
Anyone can apply for a rural broadband grant from the RUS. The RUS has a
person assigned to each geographical area called a GFR (government field
rep) and the GFR is supposed to investigate the area to make sure it is
unserved prior to awarding a grant. We have seen several companies pull the
I'll take a copy of your excel file Charles.
;-)
- Original Message -
From: "Charles Wu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2008 9:24 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Pathloss 4
Hi Michael,
All Pathloss basically does is calculate Vigants-Barnett and/or ITU
1101 - 1200 of 1649 matches
Mail list logo
