admit that I used to think in complete agreement with your line
of argument when I was much younger. I don't know whether you're younger than
me or the same age, but for me 30 yrs in industry changed many of my
perspectives! :-)
- Original Message -
From: wispa
To: WISPA
On Sat, 3 Mar 2007 14:01:32 -0600, Rich Comroe wrote
> >Sort of off topic, to be sure, but, exactly what does having a universal
> >standard do for us?
>
> Aren't all the toilet paper rolls the same width for your roller?
> Donn't all the toilets mount in the same size base fitting? :-)
Actua
7;re boring
others maybe we should continue any follow-up off-line.
cheers,
Rich
- Original Message -
From: wispa
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2007 1:43 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Some "unlicensed" history
On Fri, 2 Mar 2007 17:31:23 -0600,
On Sat, 03 Mar 2007 07:39:06 -0500, Carl A jeptha wrote
> Now I have to ask seeing that we are talking about rear-ends, isn't
> that paper for the printer a little tough on the behind, not a place
> to have a paper-cut you know.
>
> You have a Good Day now,
>
> Carl A Jeptha
> http://www.airnet
On Sat, 03 Mar 2007 00:04:51 -0800, George Rogato wrote
> wispa wrote:
>
> >
> > So, who set the "standard" for toilet paper roll size?
> >
>
> Actually Mark, as far as I can tell there is a standard for toilet
> paper rolls
But you can buy TP in a wide variety of sizes, density, etc.
Now I have to ask seeing that we are talking about rear-ends, isn't that
paper for the printer a little tough on the behind, not a place to have
a paper-cut you know.
You have a Good Day now,
Carl A Jeptha
http://www.airnet.ca
Office Phone: 905 349-2084
Office Hours: 9:00am - 5:00pm
skype caj
wispa wrote:
So, who set the "standard" for toilet paper roll size?
Actually Mark, as far as I can tell there is a standard for toilet paper
rolls
Same for paper towel rolls and even paper 8.5 x 11
Kind of makes it easy to use in printers from all manufacturers.
You asked :)
On Fri, 2 Mar 2007 17:31:23 -0600, Rich Comroe wrote
> We don't have to agree. I certainly respect differing opinions as
> long as their from people that seem to know the field.
>
> I thought the switch to 2nd gen "put up whatever you want" was a
> departure from earlier FCC stand ... when all
On Fri, 2 Mar 2007 17:31:23 -0600, Rich Comroe wrote
> We don't have to agree. I certainly respect differing opinions as
> long as their from people that seem to know the field.
>
> I thought the switch to 2nd gen "put up whatever you want" was a
> departure from earlier FCC stand ... when all
Rich,
That was an excellent explanation.
And now I understand why my cell phone service is poor and not likely to
get better any time soon.
George
Rich Comroe wrote:
We don't have to agree. I certainly respect differing opinions as
long as their from people that seem to know the field.
that the wisps would collectively have benefitted were
some minimum media access procedures common across all these devices.
Anyways, I appreciate your thoughts and enjoy comparing differing opinions.
peace,
Rich
- Original Message -
From: wispa
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Frida
.
o: 650.314.2628
c: 760.580.0080
Vonage: 650.641.1243
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of wispa
Sent: Friday, March 02, 2007 1:22 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Some "unlicensed" history
On Fri,
On Fri, 2 Mar 2007 13:56:40 -0600, Rich Comroe wrote
> Scriv-
>
> Mark-
>
> IMO the FCC has certainly been just responding to the market over
> the last 15yrs (as you advocate).
Actually, I disagree. I think the FCC was attempting to create a market on
their own. Cellular type service
my best interests ...
and not as a revenue generator for the federal budget.
Rich
- Original Message -
From: John Scrivner
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Friday, March 02, 2007 1:14 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Some "unlicensed" history
Brilliant - standards building as a me
On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 01:14:25 -0600, John Scrivner wrote
> Brilliant - standards building as a means of disabling US access to
> technology innovation. Wow. I certainly hope you have vision enough
> to see and thwart this type of activity in the future. I have heard
> you have the intellectual kn
Message -
From: wispa
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2007 8:53 PM
Subject: [WISPA] Some "unlicensed" history
In the early 90's the FCC set about to create additional unlicensed and
licensed spectrum. This was specifically for "PCS", o
ispa
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2007 8:53 PM
Subject: [WISPA] Some "unlicensed" history
In the early 90's the FCC set about to create additional unlicensed and
licensed spectrum. This was specifically for "PCS", or "personal
co
In the early 90's the FCC set about to create additional unlicensed and
licensed spectrum. This was specifically for "PCS", or "personal
communications services".
UTAM was created and tasked with the job of migrating what was then a large
network of terrestrial microwave networks to other f
18 matches
Mail list logo
