General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT Nano5M Secondary RJ45 Port PoE Burnout!
input power in the secondary port and use the main port to power the
second radio
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 8:39 PM, Robert West robert.w...@just-micro.com
wrote:
Eh? What ya mean???
-Original Message
Yeah, I've seen funny browser stuff too, so I tried all three below.
Browsers: Safari 5.0.2, Firefox 3.6.10, Chrome 6.0.427.63. (all under Mac OS X)
I have Win XP and 7 so I could try IE if you think that would help. I kind of
doubt it after already trying 3.
I'll try 5.2.1. Thanks!
Greg
On
: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT Nano5M Secondary RJ45 Port PoE Burnout!
Two quick points, I have seen something like this due to browser.what
browser are u usingdid you try a different browser.
Also, 5.2.1 full has been released...try that as well...
Faisal
On Sep 26
...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Faisal Imtiaz
Sent: Sunday, September 26, 2010 10:30 AM
To: WISPA General List
Cc: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT Nano5M Secondary RJ45 Port PoE Burnout!
Two quick points, I have seen something like this due
, 2010 6:57 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT Nano5M Secondary RJ45 Port PoE Burnout!
I just upgraded my units to 5.2.1. In the GUI the passthrough checkbox is
unchecked even though it's passing through. I checked the box, applied, and
it's still unchecked but passing through
Of Philip Dorr
Sent: Friday, September 24, 2010 9:14 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT Nano5M Secondary RJ45 Port PoE Burnout!
It works perfectly fine if you power through the secondary port.
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 8:05 PM, RickG rgunder...@gmail.com wrote:
I was skeptical
: [WISPA] UBNT Nano5M Secondary RJ45 Port PoE Burnout!
It works perfectly fine if you power through the secondary port.
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 8:05 PM, RickG rgunder...@gmail.com wrote:
I was skeptical of the poe passthrough sicne I first saw it and this is why.
On repeaters, it would be so
24, 2010 9:14 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT Nano5M Secondary RJ45 Port PoE Burnout!
It works perfectly fine if you power through the secondary port.
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 8:05 PM, RickG rgunder...@gmail.com wrote:
I was skeptical of the poe passthrough sicne I first
What ya mean???
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Philip Dorr
Sent: Friday, September 24, 2010 9:14 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT Nano5M Secondary RJ45 Port PoE Burnout!
It works perfectly fine
What ya mean???
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Philip Dorr
Sent: Friday, September 24, 2010 9:14 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT Nano5M Secondary RJ45 Port PoE Burnout!
It works perfectly fine if you
] On
Behalf Of Philip Dorr
Sent: Friday, September 24, 2010 9:14 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT Nano5M Secondary RJ45 Port PoE Burnout!
It works perfectly fine if you power through the secondary port.
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 8:05 PM, RickGrgunder...@gmail.com wrote:
I
Secondary RJ45 Port PoE Burnout!
It works perfectly fine if you power through the secondary port.
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 8:05 PM, RickGrgunder...@gmail.com wrote:
I was skeptical of the poe passthrough sicne I first saw it and this is
why.
On repeaters, it would be so tempting to just run one
Ah! I'll give that a shot.
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Philip Dorr
Sent: Saturday, September 25, 2010 9:38 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT Nano5M Secondary RJ45 Port PoE Burnout
-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Philip Dorr
Sent: Friday, September 24, 2010 9:14 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT Nano5M Secondary RJ45 Port PoE Burnout!
It works perfectly fine if you power through the secondary port
Not according to Garp!
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 9:14 PM, Philip Dorr
wirel...@judgementgaming.comwrote:
It works perfectly fine if you power through the secondary port.
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 8:05 PM, RickG rgunder...@gmail.com wrote:
I was skeptical of the poe passthrough sicne I first saw
]
On Behalf Of Philip Dorr
Sent: Friday, September 24, 2010 9:14 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT Nano5M Secondary RJ45 Port PoE Burnout!
It works perfectly fine if you power through the secondary port.
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 8:05 PM, RickG rgunder...@gmail.com wrote:
I
???
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org
[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Philip Dorr
Sent: Friday, September 24, 2010 9:14 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT Nano5M Secondary RJ45 Port PoE Burnout!
It works perfectly fine if you power
GARP!
I see we have a reader here...
Oldie but a goodie.
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of RickG
Sent: Saturday, September 25, 2010 1:53 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT Nano5M Secondary RJ45 Port PoE Burnout
[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
On Behalf Of Philip Dorr
Sent: Friday, September 24, 2010 9:14 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT Nano5M Secondary RJ45 Port PoE Burnout!
It works perfectly fine if you power through the secondary port.
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 8:05 PM, RickG
Yep. Secondary port.. Bullshit.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Greg Ihnen
Sent: Sunday, September 26, 2010 12:36 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT Nano5M Secondary RJ45 Port PoE Burnout
General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT Nano5M Secondary RJ45 Port PoE Burnout!
I had some trouble with an NS5M running 5.2.1 RC2.
Short version:
I had some weirdness tonight. I was looking at network traffic with
Wireshark and noticed CDP - Cisco Discovery Protocol (UBNT calls it extra
:36 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT Nano5M Secondary RJ45 Port PoE Burnout!
I had some trouble with an NS5M running 5.2.1 RC2.
Short version:
I had some weirdness tonight. I was looking at network traffic with
Wireshark and noticed CDP - Cisco Discovery Protocol (UBNT
Today I finally figured out an Issue I've been having with a NanoStation5M.
I have a customer who wanted service, was in trees but had a hot signal
out at the road. Dug a 4 foot hole, put in 2 10 foot sections of rigid
conduit and 5 bags of concrete. Ran an underground line of Cat5e, double
I was skeptical of the poe passthrough sicne I first saw it and this is why.
On repeaters, it would be so tempting to just run one wire but I've stuck
with two. It will be interesting to see if it gets fixed. Thanks for
sharing!
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 8:50 PM, Robert West
It works perfectly fine if you power through the secondary port.
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 8:05 PM, RickG rgunder...@gmail.com wrote:
I was skeptical of the poe passthrough sicne I first saw it and this is why.
On repeaters, it would be so tempting to just run one wire but I've stuck
with two.
Been there. But mine finally died and the hard reset is now no more.
Sucks.
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Greg Ihnen
Sent: Friday, September 24, 2010 9:13 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT Nano5M Secondary
Eh? What ya mean???
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Philip Dorr
Sent: Friday, September 24, 2010 9:14 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT Nano5M Secondary RJ45 Port PoE Burnout!
It works perfectly
27 matches
Mail list logo
