Anyone have a copy of the PDF I have to configure FMP for this and I need
the document.
--
Dan Stein
FileMaker 7 Certified Developer
Digital Software Solutions
799 Evergreen Circle
Telford PA 18969
Land: 215-799-0192
Cell: 610-256-2843
Fax 413-410-9682
FMP, WiTango, EDI,SQL 2000, MySQL, CWP
[EMAIL
What behavior is meant by 'was working'?
Behavior depends on the request type per RFC 2616:
If the 302 status code is received in response to a request other
than GET or HEAD, the user agent MUST NOT automatically redirect the
request unless it can be confirmed by the user, since this m
<@ASSIGN request$httpHeader "HTTP/1.0 302 Moved<@CRLF>Location: http://<@domain><@VAR user$last_page_visited ><@CRLF><@CRLF>">
This
works fine. Note to self. Read debug better.
TO UNSUBSCRIBE: Go to h
<@ASSIGN request$httpHeader "HTTP/1.0 302 Moved<@CRLF>Location: http://<@domain><@VAR user$last_page_visited ><@CRLF><@CRLF>">
This
was working but now seems to be rejected by IE. Works fine on Foxfire and on
all Mac Browsers but IE 6 and 7 both seem to ignore this. Any ideas?
_
Hi Dan,
If you have Workstation then you don't need Player.
If you need any tips let me know. The first time you build a Virtual Machine is
an interesting experience.
If building WinXP I recommend using "Bridged" networking, allocate about 4.0G
for your harddrive, and a minimum of 256mb of RAM
Not trying to save money or get it for free the $189 seems reasonable
especially if I can use it to setup on a few workstations and use player to
run them.
I will use the trial for a few weeks and then decide.
on 5/29/06 17:00, Scott Cadillac at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> I've neve
Hi Dan,
I've never checked out Parallels, but VMWare is what I recommend.
VMWare is a more mature product than Virtual PC, and much more straightforward
to use then Virtual PC. I also have some licenses of Virtual PC with my MS
subscription, but prefer VMWare.
VMWare Workstation costs more, bu
oh, you will need a full license SP2 Windows XP CD,
Ben
On May 29, 2006, at 1:47 PM, Ben Johansen wrote:
go to parallels.com
it is 10 bucks off during beta, but beta is solid
Ben
On May 29, 2006, at 1:30 PM, Dan Stein wrote:
So it seems I should go ahead and get some VM software for at leas
go to parallels.com
it is 10 bucks off during beta, but beta is solid
Ben
On May 29, 2006, at 1:30 PM, Dan Stein wrote:
So it seems I should go ahead and get some VM software for at least
one of
my workstations. I need to keep checking back on the IE 7 beta for
instance
and it makes sense
So it seems I should go ahead and get some VM software for at least one of
my workstations. I need to keep checking back on the IE 7 beta for instance
and it makes sense for FMP betas or new releases also.
So what is the best way to go.
Virtual PC comes with my subscription pack from NS.
Vmware
Yes, I run my License of the Dev Studio under the VM run XP Pro.
I have experienced almost no crashing now that I have move my email
to using the Mac Email client. What I found with experience was that
my crashes of Witango were exactly as Outlook was checking and
downloading large content
Its hard at first, but after a while, you get used to what techniques
work on all 3, and you stick to em, and your testing is more just a
matter of double checking yourself.
--
Robert Garcia
President - BigHead Technology
VP Application Development - eventpix.com
13653 West Park Dr
Magalia,
Yes, I must agree, I LOVE that toolbar. But I don't do much web dev
anymore like i used to. I mostly build frameworks and webservices, or
test concepts, and then pass to others to make to do all of the
testing and browser compatibility.
But you are correct, FF with that toolbar, is a web de
Thanks Robert,
Yes, I'm also checking out Konqueror on Kubuntu Linux for the KHTML engine, as
my fallback for not having Safari available.
There is no end to testing...
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert Garcia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, May 29, 2006 11:59 AM
> To: wit
But the FF web developer toolbar is SO handy! I find it especially useful for
solving cross-browser css issues, using the outliner to show me the
problematic sections (which are never problematic in FF, but can be in MacIE,
for example). I'm always using the html and css validation tools.
And th
Thanks Dan,
I understand Safari is more stable than when it first appeared.
I've got MSIE 7 beta 2 running. It runs much better than the first beta.
Here's a tip, if installing MSIE 7 beta, it'll remove your previous version of
MSIE - which makes it very annoying if a website doesn't recognize
The latest FF is universal, and I have not experienced any issues.
But since the intel machines, I almost never use it anymore, cuz
safari on the intel machines (compared to ppc), is like taking car
and putting a rocket engine in it. Safari used to hang and slow down
all the time, and I had
For the most part, just testing with firefox, as a windows developer,
will help alot, but like all the other browsers, Safari has a few
things unique to it. Also, another option, but still not 100%, the
safari renderer is open source, it is based off of the KHTML engine,
and Apple does comm
Check the list archives, as Phil had posted a lengthy reply about which
versions of X were actually supported and why.
If you're running an intel Mac, you could virtualize with parallels and run a
redhat distro, under which Witango has been very reliable for three years,
over which we have run Red
Scoot,
I have found these latest builds of safari seem to have many less problems
then earlier ones. I am running
Version 2.0.3 (417.9.3)
I have not run not the same volume of JS errors as in the past.
Unfortunately I am not finding FireFox for Mac to be as stable as the
windows version.
Hopefu
Thank you Steve,
I appreciate your words.
Actually I've wanted to do this for years, but the demand just wasn't there,
considering I have in the past spent most of my time building intranet-style
business applications. I have yet to encounter a large corporation that uses
Mac workstations.
B
Well as long as you are testing with Mac OS which of course was the original point of this thread. I'm sure the other Mac users would agree, we absolutely hate those Windows developers that are so narrow minded as to only test with the latest and greatest and expect everyone else to spend as much t
Trying to setup a test server on my OSX 10.4.6 desktop I get the
following:
2006-05-29 09:41:38 RUNTIMEFATALCaught fatal signal 10
(SIGBUS); thread id = 25778688; code: 1; address: ; value:
; errno: 0; status: 0;
Any ideas?
_
23 matches
Mail list logo
