Re: [WSG] discussion at juicy studio: It's all in the MIME

2004-11-10 Thread Roger Johansson
On 11 nov 2004, at 01.40, Jason Foss wrote: Is anyone aware of a good reference on configuring Apache to serve the files as the correct MIME type? Something in English would be good - a system administrator I'm not! Does it need to be set up in a per-site basis (as they're all set up as Virtual Hos

RE: [WSG] discussion at juicy studio: It's all in the MIME

2004-11-10 Thread Brett Walsh
ssage- From: Richard Czeiger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thu 11-Nov-04 11:34 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: Re: [WSG] discussion at juicy studio: It's all in the MIME Aha! NOW i get it! Thanks Patrick. I guess with people telling you to put inline scripts as &qu

Re: [WSG] discussion at juicy studio: It's all in the MIME

2004-11-10 Thread Patrick H. Lauke
Jason Foss wrote: Is anyone aware of a good reference on configuring Apache to serve the files as the correct MIME type? Something in English would be good - a system administrator I'm not! Does it need to be set up in a per-site basis (as they're all set up as Virtual Hosts.) I'm assuming this can

Re: [WSG] discussion at juicy studio: It's all in the MIME

2004-11-10 Thread Jeroen Visser [ vizi ]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have been following this discussion (belatedly) It's all in the MIME http://www.juicystudio.com/all-in-the-mime.asp first paragraph: " There have been a lot of articles recently about web standards; in particular, using XHTML and serving it as text/html. Personally, I'm

Re: [WSG] discussion at juicy studio: It's all in the MIME

2004-11-10 Thread Patrick H. Lauke
Richard Czeiger wrote: Thanks Patrick. I guess with people telling you to put inline scripts as "text/JavaScript" and CSS as "text/css" I just assumed that the meta would take care of it A similar problem can be seen when CSS is erroneously sent as text/plain or text/html by some badly configu

RE: [WSG] discussion at juicy studio: It's all in the MIME

2004-11-10 Thread Joshua Street
ECTED] Sent: Thu 11-Nov-04 11:34 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject:Re: [WSG] discussion at juicy studio: It's all in the MIME Aha! NOW i get it! Thanks Patrick. I guess with people telling you to put inline scripts as "text/JavaScript" and CSS as "text/css"

Re: [WSG] discussion at juicy studio: It's all in the MIME

2004-11-10 Thread Jason Foss
Is anyone aware of a good reference on configuring Apache to serve the files as the correct MIME type? Something in English would be good - a system administrator I'm not! Does it need to be set up in a per-site basis (as they're all set up as Virtual Hosts.) I'm assuming this can be done with .hta

Re: [WSG] discussion at juicy studio: It's all in the MIME

2004-11-10 Thread Richard Czeiger
CTED]> Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2004 11:15 AM Subject: Re: [WSG] discussion at juicy studio: It's all in the MIME Richard Czeiger wrote: > According to W3C, 'application/xhtml+xml' is the MIME type to use. > I've put it pages and seen it not only validate, but als

Re: [WSG] discussion at juicy studio: It's all in the MIME

2004-11-10 Thread Julián Landerreche
After reading this (http://www.juicystudio.com/all-in-the-mime.asp) my beliefs in XHTML has been shaked. What is this all about? Is it a bad practice to serve XHTML as text/html? is it harmful? what are the disvantages? The thuth is I cant understand what is this all about, and I didnt really

Re: [WSG] discussion at juicy studio: It's all in the MIME

2004-11-10 Thread Patrick H. Lauke
Richard Czeiger wrote: According to W3C, 'application/xhtml+xml' is the MIME type to use. I've put it pages and seen it not only validate, but also display correctly in IE5.0 and IE6. If IE displayed the page, rather than prompt you to download/save the file, then you're *not* really sending it as

RE: [WSG] discussion at juicy studio: It's all in the MIME

2004-11-10 Thread Paul Farrell
> I have been following this discussion (belatedly) > > It's all in the MIME > http://www.juicystudio.com/all-in-the-mime.asp > > first paragraph: > " There have been a lot of articles recently about web > standards; in particular, using XHTML and serving it as > text/html. Personally, I'm not

Re: [WSG] discussion at juicy studio: It's all in the MIME

2004-11-10 Thread Richard Czeiger
PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2004 9:54 AM Subject: Re: [WSG] discussion at juicy studio: It's all in the MIME Well.. the standards are pretty clear on this subject: http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-media-types/xhtml-media-types.html#media-types http://www.w3.org/International/article

Re: [WSG] discussion at juicy studio: It's all in the MIME

2004-11-10 Thread Steven . Faulkner
MAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [WSG] discussion at juicy studio: It's all in the MIME

Re: [WSG] discussion at juicy studio: It's all in the MIME

2004-11-10 Thread Susan R. Grossman
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 09:23:43 +1100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I don't agree > with people encouraging content developers to deliver XHTML as text/html. " > > I wondered what other memebrs on the list thought about it and its > implications? The problem from my point is the la

Re: [WSG] discussion at juicy studio: It's all in the MIME

2004-11-10 Thread Christian Sonne
Well.. the standards are pretty clear on this subject: http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-media-types/xhtml-media-types.html#media-types http://www.w3.org/International/articles/serving-xhtml/ http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/REC-xhtml1-20020801/#guidelines among I can quote stuff like this: "XHTML documents se

[WSG] discussion at juicy studio: It's all in the MIME

2004-11-10 Thread Steven . Faulkner
I have been following this discussion (belatedly) It's all in the MIME http://www.juicystudio.com/all-in-the-mime.asp first paragraph: " There have been a lot of articles recently about web standards; in particular, using XHTML and serving it as text/html. Personally, I'm not that bothered wheth