A rubber clock feature would also be very helpful in situations where there
is no internet connection available. Was one of the main reasons why I was
using JT65-HF Comfort in earlier days.
73 de DG2YCB,
Uwe
Am 15. Mai 2018 18:19:31 schrieb Rich - K1HTV :
Notifying a
Ahh ok..
I didn’t realise that it will switch to the appropriate branch and start
over.,
Megan
On Wed, 16 May 2018 at 2:53 pm, Greg Beam wrote:
> Hello All,
>
>
>
> First, there’s been little to know development effort on WSJT in a good
> while (2yrs or more maybe?).
There is if you build it yourselfotherwise you have to wait until the next
release.
de Mike W9MDB
On Tuesday, May 15, 2018, 3:17:56 PM CDT, Steve Sacco NN4X
wrote:
Joe -
Sorry about that - running 1.9.0-rc4 r8642...was not aware there was an
update.
On
Hi Dave,
On 5/14/2018 5:19 AM, David Birnbaum K2LYV wrote:
... IIRC with multiple
channels the amplitudes do not add directly but in quadrature since they
are not phase coherent. Others on this list are bettervequipped to answer.
No, that's not correct. As explained in the FT8 DXpedition
Joe -
Sorry about that - running 1.9.0-rc4 r8642...was not aware there was an
update.
On 5/15/2018 3:44 PM, Joe Taylor wrote:
Steve --
You don't mention what code revision you are running. This bug was
(supposedly?) fixed in code revision r8646.
-- 73, Joe, K1JT
On 5/15/2018 3:30
On 5/15/2018 3:45 PM, Steve Sacco NN4X wrote:
I guess the problem is pretty obvious - the forward slash after
"\WSJT-X" in the file name... :-)
"...ocal\Temp\WSJT-X/houndcallers.txt'?
No. Again: this bug was fixed several weeks ago, in r8646.
I guess the problem is
pretty obvious - the forward slash after "\WSJT-X" in the file name...
:-)
"...ocal\Temp\WSJT-X/houndcallers.txt'?
73,
Steve
On 5/15/2018 3:30 PM, Steve Sacco NN4X
wrote:
Greetings, all.
You don't say what version your are using but there was a probable fix in r8646
de Mike W9MDB
On Tuesday, May 15, 2018, 2:32:30 PM CDT, Steve Sacco NN4X
wrote:
Greetings, all.
This fired again. Once again, I was away from the rig, and let WSJT-X continue
That's because it's a concatenation of a Window's environment variable and a
suffix added to it.
The forward or backslash doesn't matter. They both work under Windows from an
application.
de Mike W9MDB
On Tuesday, May 15, 2018, 2:40:53 PM CDT, Greg Beam
wrote:
Steve --
You don't mention what code revision you are running. This bug was
(supposedly?) fixed in code revision r8646.
-- 73, Joe, K1JT
On 5/15/2018 3:30 PM, Steve Sacco NN4X wrote:
Greetings, all.
This fired again. Once again, I was away from the rig, and let WSJT-X
continue
Hi Steve,
Not sure if the is on point or not, but, the path to the file is a bit wonky:
'C:\Users\Steve\AppData\Local\Temp\WSJT-X/houndcallers.txt'
Note the forward slash before houdcallers.txt.
Could be something, or nothing. Just an observation.
73’s
Greg, KI7MT
From:
Greetings, all.
This fired again. Once again, I was away from the rig, and let
WSJT-X continue running, so I do not know what it was seeing when
this occurred:
Details:
-
Running: C:\WSJT\wsjtx\bin\jt9 -s WSJT-X -w 1 -m 3 -e
If they use JTAlert, you can send them a text message.
Dave
Sent from my waxed string and tin cans.
On May 15, 2018, at 12:17 PM, Rich - K1HTV
> wrote:
Notifying a station whose timing is at the edge of decoding limits is
problematic because once
Notifying a station whose timing is at the edge of decoding limits is
problematic because once his timing slips past the max tolerable limit, no
helpful messages about his clock will be decoded by the station you are trying
to alert.
If WSJT-X had a rubber clock feature which would
On Tue, 2018-05-15 at 11:43 +0100, Mark Turner via wsjt-devel wrote:
> Having just watched another station sending a "CHK TIMING" message
> in
> FT8, which is obviously not likely to succeed...
>
> I was wondering if a non-timing-critical "message" could be added to
> the
> protocol, e.g. four
Hi Take,
Thanks again for sharing your opinions. Perhaps your ideas for a
single-carrier OFDM mode for high capacity (more than 10x) FOX station
(and a congestion control mechanism applicable for emergency and
disaster communication) will become part of some program in the future.
Hi Dick and all,
On 5/12/2018 12:51 PM, Dick Hale W7PP wrote:
The test went fine here but. I connected with the fox
sending a -17 signal report without problem. The fox set me the RR73 and
the program logged the contact... Then, and I don't know why, the
program sent another -17
The test went fine here but. I connected with the fox
sending a -17 signal report without problem. The fox set me the RR73 and
the program logged the contact... Then, and I don't know why, the
program sent another -17 report and the fox sent me another RR73 and the
program logged
This would be quite useful based on my recent observations on 6m. We all
suffer when someone inadvertently transmits across two periods. I have
on occasion sent something like
PA0XX CLOCK or indeed DL0XX, ON0XX and G0XXX of course :-)
It normally works but it feels wrong because the station
Having just watched another station sending a "CHK TIMING" message in
FT8, which is obviously not likely to succeed...
I was wondering if a non-timing-critical "message" could be added to the
protocol, e.g. four continuous tones - or some such combination that is
unlikely to happen randomly,
Hi Joe,
Thank you for providing your comments.
My “development schedule is controlled by DXCC marketers” comes from Bill’s (I
am sorry not to mention as Bill in my previous memo. It is my typo.) comment,
i.e. “but overall under time pressure to get the mode working” and your
February 02 First
21 matches
Mail list logo