On 5/30/2018 6:30 PM, Ned wrote:
This happened to me at the most inopportune time. I was sending a signal
report to DS4AOW for a ATNO on 6m and it sent a NA Contest TX3 exchange
instead of what was expected. The only way I could clear the problem was
to change the mode to to anything other
I saw the same thing. I clicked thru the nag box asking me to go to contest
mode and worked the JA anyway.
6M open to JA is sweet!!
Ted
K9IMM
From: Ned [mailto:a...@cox.net]
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2018 8:49 PM
To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] working
Jay,
No...the VHF/UHF features not enabled. No box to check or not check in
FT8 mode. I also failed to mention that this was using v1.9.0 r8731.
Ned / AA7A
On 5/31/2018 1:41 AM, Jay Hainline wrote:
Hi Ned. I was wondering if you have VHF/UHF features enabled in the
settings? I wonder if
Hi Ned. I was wondering if you have VHF/UHF features enabled in the settings? I
wonder if this issue exists if that box is unchecked?
Sorry about the DS. I was able to work 17 JA's but never saw him.
73 Jay KA9CFD
Sent from my U.S.Cellular© Smartphone
Original message From:
Jay,
This happened to me at the most inopportune time. I was sending a signal
report to DS4AOW for a ATNO on 6m and it sent a NA Contest TX3 exchange
instead of what was expected. The only way I could clear the problem was
to change the mode to to anything other than FT8 and then back to get
We had a big opening to JA today on 6m. Some of the contacts were over
10,000 km and I have heard some ops report their WSJT-X software would hang
up asking if they want to switch to contest mode. Apparently the program
sees the grid from JA and thinks they are in contest mode? I don't have much
The notice on the development version said I agreed to report problems.
Perhaps there is a place I could not find where I could report this problem
without needing to join a list.
Thank you ALL for WSJT and WSJT-X
73,
Pat W5THT
--
On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 8:38 AM, Claude Frantz wrote:
> On 05/30/2018 02:06 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> Hi Bob & Saku,
>
> > I know it takes a few days to a week but sometimes it's best to wait for
> > the official packages to work through the release system :)
>
> Is no source rpm package
Hello WSJT-X developers. Philip Gladstone from PSKReporter suggested that I
contact you about an idea we thought would be very helpful for many
amateurs using your modes.
At present, WSPR is the only practical one-way mode that you provide -- and
it's awesome. However, for flexibility, it would
Hi Neil, John, and all,
On 5/30/2018 10:39 AM, Neil Zampella KN3ILZ wrote:
Not really, the release version is 1.9.0 ... all the previous versions
were release candidates, nothing more.
Neil, KN3ILZ
On 5/30/2018 8:49 AM, John wrote:
Hi Bill,
The release note needs a minor fix:
Not really, the release version is 1.9.0 ... all the previous versions
were release candidates, nothing more.
Neil, KN3ILZ
On 5/30/2018 8:49 AM, John wrote:
Hi Bill,
The release note needs a minor fix:
Release: WSJT-X Version 1.9.0
June 1, 2018
On 05/30/2018 12:58 PM, Bill Somerville wrote:
Hi Bill,
> I build the PDF manuals on an Ubuntu system and have not tried on Fedora
> recently. I will give it a try and see if I can find out what is needed
> to fix it.
I have just tried again using the following command:
/usr/bin/a2x -v -d book
On 05/30/2018 02:06 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
Hi Bob & Saku,
> I know it takes a few days to a week but sometimes it's best to wait for
> the official packages to work through the release system :)
Is no source rpm package available ?
Best wishes,
Claude (DJ0OT)
Hi Bill,
The release note needs a minor fix:
Release: WSJT-X Version 1.9.0
June 1, 2018
-
Should be Version 1.9.1
— John G4KLA
Hi Bill!
Yep. I guessed that (because of conversations here). I can compile from
source but I assume there might be one or several other F27 users out
somewhere who can not.
And because there is no mention about that rpm is only for F28 (just:
Fedora, RedHat, ... (64-bit): at Joe's page)
On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 3:32 AM, Saku wrote:
> One problem:
>
> 1.9.0 does not install to Fedora 27 (that is still valid release) from
> 64bit rpm ( https://physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/k1jt/wsjtx-1.9.0.x86_
> 64.rpm )
>
> Using
>
> *rpm -Uvh *[saku@hamtpad ~]$ sudo rpm -Uvh
>
On 30/05/2018 09:30, Claude Frantz wrote:
In the past, I was able to build the manual using the "asciidoctor-pdf"
package. It was the only way I had found which was successful. Now, on
Fedora 28, I'm not more able to install this package because of package
conflicts. If I remember well,
On 30/05/2018 09:32, Saku wrote:
One problem:
1.9.0 does not install to Fedora 27 (that is still valid release) from
64bit rpm (
https://physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/k1jt/wsjtx-1.9.0.x86_64.rpm )
Hi Saku,
the package was built on a fully updated Fedora 28 system (see the text
at the
On 05/30/2018 10:32 AM, Saku wrote:
Hi Saku & All,
> Or using *dnf install *still makes error
>
> [saku@hamtpad src]$ sudo dnf install
> /home/saku/Lataukset/wsjtx-1.9.0.x86_64.rpm
> Viimeinen metatiedon vanhenemistarkistus : 1:02:33 sitten, ajankohta ke
> 30. toukokuuta 2018 10.14.44. *(last
Hi All,
In the past, I was able to build the manual using the "asciidoctor-pdf"
package. It was the only way I had found which was successful. Now, on
Fedora 28, I'm not more able to install this package because of package
conflicts. If I remember well, "asciidoctor-pdf" is still in the alpha
20 matches
Mail list logo
