Re: [wsjt-devel] [Wsjt-x-improved-community] MINT 22 no audio cards detected

.net When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of wsjt-devel digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: [Wsjt-x-improved-community] MINT 22 no audio cards detected (Adrian) -

Re: [wsjt-devel] [Wsjt-x-improved-community] MINT 22 no audio cards detected

Run the real thing ; Debian On 29/8/24 01:33, Pino Zollo wrote: I just made a fresh installation of Mint 22 MATE Then I have compiled both WSJT-X 2.7.0-rc6 and wsjt-x improved 2.7.1 version 240814. Both present the same problem the list of audio devices is empty so none can be sele

Re: [wsjt-devel] [wsjtgroup] Wall to wall callers at CY9C

It would be SFF at their end yes ? I left FB a while back, if you have another link for the pic ? Or copy pic here ? Thankyou. 73 vk4tux On 28/8/24 03:47, Charles Suckling via groups.io wrote: Hi All If you were wondering what SFH looks like at SF end, check out their Facebook page! They

Re: [wsjt-devel] [wsjtgroup] CY9C

Took about 5 attempts to work them on 30m today, with them not seeming to copy Rxx report to return RR73 Also noticed same on 17m, My time sync is perfect on time.is ; 081215 Tx 1109 ~ CY9C VK4TUX QG62 081300 -12 0.4 755 ~ VK4TUX CY9C -11 081315 Tx 1109 ~ CY9C VK4TUX R-12 081330 -12 0.4 75

Re: [wsjt-devel] SuperFox Testing - Timor-Leste/4W

Will look out for you Alan, will you use the same SF frequencies as K8K ? I imagine you just need the Fox Id. regards Adrian ... vk4tux On 3/8/24 11:37, Alan McDonald via wsjt-devel wrote: I will be in Timor-Leste end August and as I usually do, try to run some radio. I always attract a

Re: [wsjt-devel] ALSA sound

"CARD:" On 24/7/24 02:00, Black Michael via wsjt-devel wrote: Those don't have "CODE:" in there -- we're talking an exact match to those 5 characterscolon included... It's being implemented in WSJT-X improved and will both sort entries and remove the CODE: ones -- there are two checkboxes f

Re: [wsjt-devel] ALSA sound

On Monday, July 22, 2024 at 10:56:48 PM CDT, Black Michael wrote: Oops...brain freeze...yes "CARD=". On Monday, July 22, 2024 at 10:53:39 PM CDT, Adrian wrote: I thought you said ' CARD' 73 vk4tux On 23/7/24 13:41, Black Michael wrote: I'm onl

Re: [wsjt-devel] ALSA sound

I thought you said ' CARD' 73 vk4tux On 23/7/24 13:41, Black Michael wrote: I'm only looking for anybody using a sound device with "CODE:" in the name. Mike W9MDB ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.source

Re: [wsjt-devel] ALSA sound

For Pipewire Also ; adrian@debian:~$ pw-cli list-objects | grep card    device.name = "alsa_card.pci-_01_00.1"    device.name = "alsa_card.usb-C-Media_Electronics_Inc._USB_Audio_Device-00"    device.name = "alsa_card.pci-0

Re: [wsjt-devel] [wsjtgroup] ALSA sound

Cannot get a screenshot of those in wsjtx settings, however adrian@debian:~$ arecord -l List of CAPTURE Hardware Devices card 0: PCH [HDA Intel PCH], device 0: ALC3220 Analog [ALC3220 Analog]  Subdevices: 1/1  Subdevice #0: subdevice #0 card 2: Device [USB Audio Device], device 0: USB

Re: [wsjt-devel] [wsjtgroup] ALSA sound

Mike W9MDB On Monday, July 22, 2024 at 04:35:24 PM CDT, Adrian Fewster wrote: I do  ; Hopefully the alsa def will be retained. Debian Trixie 73 vk4tux On 23/7/24 07:29, Mike Black W9MDB via groups.io wrote:   On Linux or any other Unix flavor Does anybody use the

Re: [wsjt-devel] [wsjtgroup] ALSA sound

I do  ; Hopefully the alsa def will be retained. Debian Trixie 73 vk4tux On 23/7/24 07:29, Mike Black W9MDB via groups.io wrote: On Linux or any other Unix flavor Does anybody use the ALSA sound devices for their rig interface? We're trying to minimize the listed sound devices and wa

Re: [wsjt-devel] crash on Apple MAC with M1 Processor

Thanks Kari I will try this, I did ; “ High-Sierra-10-13-6:MacOS user$ ls cablog jt4code rigctlcom-wsjtx echosim jt65coderigctld-wsjtx fcaljt9 sfrx fmeasurejt9code

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X v2.7.1-devel 240712 improved widescreen PLUS => Crash in SuperHound mode

Sillanmäki wrote: TNX Adrian, but those files are already in place ls -l yhteensä 768 -rwxr-xr-x 1 joe joe 10160 18. 6. 11:59 foxchk -rwxr-xr-x 1 joe joe 287728 18. 6. 11:59 sfrx -rwxr-xr-x 1 joe joe 255944 18. 6. 11:59 sftx $ ls -l /usr/bin/foxchk /usr/bin/sfrx /usr/bin/sftx -rwxr-xr-x 1 root

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X v2.7.1-devel 240712 improved widescreen PLUS => Crash in SuperHound mode

If you compiled from source ; In your wsjtx-2.7.0/wsjtx-prefix/src/wsjtx/lib path, copy the superfox/arm (or whatever matches your OS) in superfox folder sub OS type folder section files (3) to the other wsjtx program executable's path, eg where wsjtx is... usually these will be foxchk sfr

Re: [wsjt-devel] Adjustable frequency shift for split operation?

, causing the issue ? 73 Adrian ... vk4tux On 7/7/24 11:04, Richard Shaw wrote: That doesn't appear to be the case. at around 1500Hz I get ALC just over S9 which is about 50% of the meter reading. The operating manual suggests this is fine. If I choose a TX frequency close to 2000Hz the

[wsjt-devel] Fwd: Adjustable frequency shift for split operation?

d the modulated power very even across the 3KHz pan used for TX. Do you have another txcr you can test with the same software ? 73 Adrian ... vk4tux On 7/7/24 11:04, Richard Shaw wrote: On Sat, Jul 6, 2024 at 7:49 PM Adrian wrote: Richard, Can you tell us the alc meter indication on ea

Re: [wsjt-devel] Adjustable frequency shift for split operation?

d the modulated power very even across the 3KHz pan used for TX. Do you have another txcr you can test with the same software ? 73 Adrian ... vk4tux On 7/7/24 11:04, Richard Shaw wrote: On Sat, Jul 6, 2024 at 7:49 PM Adrian wrote: Richard, Can you tell us the alc meter indication on ea

Re: [wsjt-devel] Adjustable frequency shift for split operation?

Richard, Can you tell us the alc meter indication on each of these 1500 -1999 power levels that you describe ? The alc indication, may provide clues as to whether audio(modulation) level is a factor ? 73 vk4tux On 7/7/24 03:50, Richard Shaw via wsjt-devel wrote: On Sat, Jul 6, 2024 at 12:

Re: [wsjt-devel] Adjustable frequency shift for split operation?

Just regarding my last post 1 is clearly a typo and should read 1999. Thankyou 73 vk4tux On 7/7/24 03:32, Reino Talarmo via wsjt-devel wrote: >This does make me wonder though, why only jump in 0.5KHz increments? Not that the logic is difficult but wouldn't it be simpler to just allow

Re: [wsjt-devel] Adjustable frequency shift for split operation?

I think Richard does understand that, and is asking for a tighter audio frequency control window to maintain his tested & expected power output. The weird thing here is how he sees such differrence over a 500Hz audio range. I would be connecting a calibrated constant level audio generator fee

Re: [wsjt-devel] Release Candidate WSJT-X 2.7.0-rc5

Built fine here on latest Debian. I keep the build simple & executed from build folder, as I use different versions. I did get a sfrx missing & Fortran cmd error, and had to manually copy wsjtx-prefix/src/wsjtx/lib/superfox/linux/sfrx to wsjtx-prefix/src/wsjtx-build/sfrx for it to play nic

Re: [wsjt-devel] Question about transmit hazard via mouse wheel

No, frequency change whilst in ptt, was the option. Looks ok rhen. I use that. 73 vk4tux On 2/6/24 14:47, Black Michael via wsjt-devel wrote: This only disables PTT on band change.  Are you saying you need cross-band continuous PTT? On Saturday, June 1, 2024 at 11:16:14 PM CDT, J

Re: [wsjt-devel] xmit problem with WSJTX

Also try a terminal aplay list > aplay -l adrian@debian:~$ aplay -l List of PLAYBACK Hardware Devices card 0: PCH [HDA Intel PCH], device 0: ALC3220 Analog [ALC3220 Analog]  Subdevices: 0/1  Subdevice #0: subdevice #0 card 1: HDMI [HDA ATI HDMI], device 3: HDMI 0 [HDMI 0]  Subdevi

Re: [wsjt-devel] xmit problem with WSJTX

Also set the output device whilst sending a test from wsjtx, It only shows in Volume control (pavucontrol) when active sending then you can set device and level. On 18/5/24 01:12, Adrian wrote: sudo apt install pavucontrol if you don't have it already ? See https://forums.linuxmin

Re: [wsjt-devel] xmit problem with WSJTX

sudo apt install pavucontrol if you don't have it already ? See https://forums.linuxmint.com/viewtopic.php?t=327359 i run the same interface on Debian here. Use pulse in wsjtx audio select choices and then select the wsjtx assigned audio in pavucontrol (Volume Control) for pulseaudio. It

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X v 2.7.0-rc4/hamlib bug report; CAT failure casues hung process

Usually on click ok, the Config pane pops up on radio tab so you can reconfigure , so you don't see that then, ok ? It would be interesting to confirm a program interface like FLrig, Commander or HRD works, or rigctld/Hamlib interface , rather than actual radio choice. 73 vk4tux On 21/3/2

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X v 2.7.0-rc4/hamlib bug report; CAT failure casues hung process

Re below ; If you click 'ok', and then are shown the wsjtx radio settings tab, does 'Test CAT' restore the cat connection ? 73 vk4tux On 21/3/24 09:52, Scott Armstrong via wsjt-devel wrote: The Rig Control Error pop-up message is not raised. image.png When CAT is restored by turning on th

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 2.7.0-rc4

It did show that many differrent linux as well as main Debian advanced flavours were affected. Some source code errors may only affect a limited number of branches, this showed it as widespread. 73 vk4tux On 13/3/24 00:43, Joe Taylor via wsjt-devel wrote: Hi all, On 3/11/2024 11:02 PM,

Re: [wsjt-devel] Release Candidate WSJT-X 2.7.0-rc4

Building on Debian Trixie ; Error:Symbol ‘ncand’ at (1)is USE associated from module ‘q65’ and cannot occur in COMMON /home/adrian/Downloads/wsjtx-2.7.0/build/wsjtx-prefix/src/wsjtx/qmap/libqmap/q65c.f90:93:3: build abort at 95% 73 vk4tux

Re: [wsjt-devel] Another fun hash collision P97USI

The new code number system send at set period/timestamps by H40WA on FT8 verified at website, looks good for the job. 73 vk4tux On 27/2/24 23:33, Joe Taylor via wsjt-devel wrote: Hi Jon, On 2/26/2024 7:50 PM, Jon Anhold KM8V via wsjt-devel wrote: 231900 16 0.4 909 ~ BG2AUE -25 Aruba 2325

Re: [wsjt-devel] Polling Disable

/Users/[username]/Library/Preferences Restart WSJT-X and duplicate the problem. Shut down WSJT-X Then send me the WSJT-X_RigControl.log file Mike W9MDB Mike W9MDB On Monday, January 29, 2024 at 01:44:48 AM CST, Adrian wrote: Is there  a way to disable cat polling in wsjtx

Re: [wsjt-devel] Polling Disable

Is there  a way to disable cat polling in wsjtx config ini file etc? This is on a Catalina Macbook. I have a FT-747GX that poll reads +08 tail to set frequency > red freq band shows OOB etc but sets fine, basically the poll read frequency adds 08 to the tail of the number. 28.074 000  become

Re: [wsjt-devel] Strange problem with the RC's

Check RTS is not set high in program comport settings ? 73 vk4tux On 27/1/24 01:59, kgross jensalt.com via wsjt-devel wrote: I’m very confused.  I have 2 different XGGcoms digimode 4’s for two different models of Kenwoods. They work fine with the GA version but with 2.7.0RC as soon as th

Re: [wsjt-devel] wsjt-devel Digest, Vol 119, Issue 45

I saw a call from North Korea from the same locator tonight. Someone playing silly games perhaps with MW DXCC. 73 vk4tux On 27/1/24 03:32, Reino Talarmo via wsjt-devel wrote: Hi Glenn, congrats about a nice false decode. The 'a3' tells that the decoder tried as the known information your ca

Re: [wsjt-devel] No audio output on raspberry pi

dicated by a sudden alc indicator increase and power drop in wsjtx outgoing corrupted signal , when a 2nd sound source is active This # stops interference with wsjx audio (QTPulseAudio plugin) tested here on a pure pipewire system wth Debian Trixie. adrian@debian:/usr/share/doc/pipewir

Re: [wsjt-devel] No audio output on raspberry pi

See  https://wiki.debian.org/PipeWire 73 vk4tux ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

[wsjt-devel] Feature Request. Timeslot detector Interlock

Saw mention of this issue, with newbies calling a DX target on same timeslot by just enabling a call without clicking a received report from the target. If a sent call can be detected in software to be on same timeslot as the target, then could a auto stop possibly  with error message be iss

Re: [wsjt-devel] Callsign Security

I accept it is not practical regarding the relevant coding team response. However it is not as trivial as below. In VK 60m operation is not legal. Another hams callsign used for operation on 60m and then reported by another for illegal operation is a bit beyond 'hurt feelings' 73 On 10/10/2

Re: [wsjt-devel] Callsign Security

improve it to some extent. 73 vk4tux On 5/10/23 19:28, Barry Jackson via wsjt-devel wrote: On 05/10/2023 09:33, Adrian via wsjt-devel wrote: of a digital Mode database setup & registered to , with license proof etc, similar to QRZ. Hmm... Nice idea. Are you going to set up, main

[wsjt-devel] Callsign Security

As a victim of another local foundation ham (caught) unlawfully using my callsign on 20m FT8 recently, and reports heard of other fake and unauthorized callsign use, I wonder about the possibility of a digital Mode database setup & registered to , with license proof etc, similar to QRZ. A

Re: [wsjt-devel] Split

I disagree with the progam/documentation change request. Split is the radio function invoked for 'rig split', and it is documented well online, how the system uses rig split to control the audio frequency best use window. I feel; 'TX Shift' would cause more confusion, as it still does not

Re: [wsjt-devel] "U.S.A" displayed as "U.S.A. of America"

Well it is not a bad thing, USA does not own 'America' and only part of it. 73 vk4tux On 17/5/23 19:09, Uwe, DG2YCB via wsjt-devel wrote: Hi all, Some users complain that "U.S.A." is displayed as "U.S.A. of America". The reason for this is that the maintainers of the CTY.DAT file have sud

Re: [wsjt-devel] Hamlib Beta Testing Group needed

I agree on Uwes position over '''Rejnos, certainty... On 13/5/23 22:59, Tom M0LTE via wsjt-devel wrote: Hey Reino I fully understand your concerns. Clearly this idea has been considered. Conceptually I believe a slightly different approach might overcome some of those difficulties, however I

Re: [wsjt-devel] Candidate Release WSJT-X 2.7.0-rc1

Hope you have had your vaccine boosters and get well soon Joe. We all make mistakes,  just some do not admit to them. Thankyou & the team for the new development work 73 Adrian Fewster vk4tux On 13/5/23 03:15, Joe Taylor via wsjt-devel wrote: Too many mistakes, this morning. At

Re: [wsjt-devel] Fwd: Enhancement suggestion - 30 second cycles

Reino failed to supply an accurate factual answer to Allan, perhaps it is not 'so funny' now, however ; " *On 20m at 400 TX marker, my FTDX101MP in 'rig split' has TX Sub vfo set (by wsjtx) at 14.072.500, and uses an audio frequency of 1900Hz (1500 -2000 Hz being the target passband window) *

Re: [wsjt-devel] Fwd: Enhancement suggestion - 30 second cycles

Obviously The concept is not simple enough to grasp for any licensed amateur. Many do not understand the shift of CP VFO frequency to cater for a passband friendly audio frequency to comply for TX marker set. The split function is activated in the radio via wsjtx CAT control The wsjtx progra

Re: [wsjt-devel] Fwd: Enhancement suggestion - 30 second cycles

On 9/5/23 02:49, Jim Brown via wsjt-devel wrote: #1 is hardly a benefit, Why not, utilizing a gap at 100Hz or 2900Hz is very useful and effective with split. #3 is bogus. How would you know ? You lack the technical ability.. #2 is a side benefit, but VERY secondary, and not the fund

Re: [wsjt-devel] [wsjtgroup] Enhancement suggestion - 30 second cycles

10:51:17 AM CDT, Adrian via wsjt-devel wrote: No, leave the split rig/fake checkpoints, as is, but place within a field/box titled 'Signal Optimization' , which should be an easy ui update ? No need to remove rig split or fake split, because that is what is activated via CAT.

Re: [wsjt-devel] Fwd: Enhancement suggestion - 30 second cycles

The RX frequency = Set band frequency & pan marker sent > received. If I send you a 1900Hz audio modulated signal at split Sub TX vfo set 14.072.500 = 14.074.400 usb freq, Your RX on 14.074.00 band standard RX will see it at 400Hz marker. 73 vk4tux On 9/5/23 01:46, Alan via wsjt-devel wrot

Re: [wsjt-devel] Fwd: Enhancement suggestion - 30 second cycles

Reino,  "Signal Optimization" is a better field name , we control the audio passband frequency window for the best modulation results = Signal. 73 vk4tux Sam just sent his proposal how to remove the split word in the relation of the local split usage. There may be no need for a 'two level'

Re: [wsjt-devel] [wsjtgroup] Enhancement suggestion - 30 second cycles

I think I suggested something similar much earlier in the thread. However with that new name rig and fake it don't mean anything so I'd suggest change to hardware and software respectively. Alan G0TLK, sent from my mobile device On 8 May 2023 16:37:35 Adrian via wsjt-devel wrote:

Re: [wsjt-devel] [wsjtgroup] Enhancement suggestion - 30 second cycles

ng the use of the word SPLIT. 73, Sam W2JDB -Original Message----- From: Adrian via wsjt-devel To: WSJT software development Cc: Adrian Sent: Mon, May 8, 2023 10:17 am Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Fwd: Enhancement suggestion - 30 second cycles Consistent TX level control, making alc m

Re: [wsjt-devel] Fwd: Enhancement suggestion - 30 second cycles

Consistent TX level control, making alc minimum set easier for whole pan TX usage. 73 vk4tux On 9/5/23 00:08, Björn Ekelund via wsjt-devel wrote: So what more does it do? Björn SM7IUN On Mon, May 8, 2023 at 3:43 PM Black Michael wrote: That's not the only thing it does so that's not

Re: [wsjt-devel] Enhancement suggestion - 30 second cycles

On 8/5/23 17:00, Reino Talarmo wrote: Sent: sunnuntai 7. toukokuuta 2023 23.29 Why would i talk about non wsjtx usage on a wsjtx group ? It is important to use commonly used words in the same meaning in the ham community. There are many radio amateurs that have used other modes, some even ten

Re: [wsjt-devel] Fwd: Enhancement suggestion - 30 second cycles

Certainly, but did you test the quality of the signal ? On 7/5/23 18:19, alan2--- via wsjt-devel wrote: The indicated frequency on a counter will not change as you are transmitting a 50Hz wide signal within a frequency range defined by the upper sideband width.  The position of your 50Hz wide t

Re: [wsjt-devel] Fwd: Enhancement suggestion - 30 second cycles

wide transmission will vary within that sideband width but you will need a good spectrum analyser to see it. Alan G0TLK On 07/05/2023 04:35, Adrian via wsjt-devel wrote: But the one you tune in by moving green marker is your receiving frequency. Same way you tune your transmitter by moving red

Re: [wsjt-devel] Fwd: Enhancement suggestion - 30 second cycles

The fact that you try to compare a voice split qso to a FT 8 qso is stupid.. You look for the vacant slot in the pan and then select that, of not easy then look for a gap irrelevant of width. 73 vk4tux On 7/5/23 15:41, Reino Talarmo via wsjt-devel wrote: Hi Adrian, This start to be

Re: [wsjt-devel] Fwd: Enhancement suggestion - 30 second cycles

Also on the subject of "split" The radio CP frequency point change on the vfo display is required, to obtain the best pass-band frequency required to suit and sum to the tx marker set. The radio is shifting its CP frequency between TX and RX to achieve this. In "rig splt" the 'split' radi

Re: [wsjt-devel] Fwd: Enhancement suggestion - 30 second cycles

Reino, Your comments are not addressing mine, but rather what you assume. The decoder decodes the entire pan RX bandwith, the green marker filter just separates that traffic within that mark, for separate "visual" display,, there is no difference in sensitivity other than the radio RX perform

Re: [wsjt-devel] Fwd: Enhancement suggestion - 30 second cycles

But the one you tune in by moving green marker is your receiving frequency. Same way you tune your transmitter by moving red marker. *No, The green marker is just a decode filter for that mark to place that traffic in the right pane for view.The receive frequency covers the whole 3 -4 KHz ba

Re: [wsjt-devel] Fwd: Enhancement suggestion - 30 second cycles

On 2/5/23 23:33, Sam W2JDB via wsjt-devel wrote: Hi, Having followed this thread from the beginning and being a small part of it (in the beginning) I do have some questions regarding the use of the word SPLIT as it pertains to WSJT-X versus its classical meaning on the HF Bands in CW and SSB

Re: [wsjt-devel] Fwd: Enhancement suggestion - 30 second cycles

Experts ? On 2/5/23 15:13, Reino Talarmo via wsjt-devel wrote: Jim, Mike and all experts, ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Re: [wsjt-devel] Fwd: Enhancement suggestion - 30 second cycles

mobile device On 1 May 2023 12:18:59 Adrian via wsjt-devel wrote: Too funny, as the rx of both stations covers the entire pan bandwidth, the fact they are transmitting on a different pan slice within, does not qualify as 'audio split' in my book. If both were running 300Hz

Re: [wsjt-devel] Fwd: Enhancement suggestion - 30 second cycles

rmonics.  WA1SXK and I have been on the warpath for over 3 years helping clean up all these harmonic generators...it's pretty rare to see them now as we have contacted hundreds of operators and have a paper on my QRZ page explaining how to set up your audio to avoid it. Mike W9MDB On

Re: [wsjt-devel] Fwd: Enhancement suggestion - 30 second cycles

All the online definitions I find for 'split' operation are ; Split means transmitting on one frequency and listening on another. referring to your own station, without reference to anyone else. FT8 is not a 'listening' mode. It is visual receiving 3 - 4 Khz wide including wherever you are TX.

Re: [wsjt-devel] Fwd: Enhancement suggestion - 30 second cycles

On Mon, 1 May 2023 15:58:55 +1000 Adrian wrote: There is no 'audio split' in WSJTX'  TX audio is determined by mode, RF frequency and the TX marker. RX audio decode covers the pan bandwidth, with the RX marker filtered for the right pane display. vk4tux On 1/5/23 14:45, J

Re: [wsjt-devel] Fwd: Enhancement suggestion - 30 second cycles

There is no 'audio split' in WSJTX'  TX audio is determined by mode, RF frequency and the TX marker. RX audio decode covers the pan bandwidth, with the RX marker filtered for the right pane display. vk4tux On 1/5/23 14:45, Jim Shorney via wsjt-devel wrote: audio split in WSJTX _

Re: [wsjt-devel] Fwd: Enhancement suggestion - 30 second cycles

of split so are rig split and audio split in WSJTX. If anything this just shows that it needs to be clarified in the documentation so it is easy for newbies to understand. Then you can work on getting them to actually read the manual. :) 73 -Jim NU0C On Mon, 1 May 2023 14:21:03 +1000 Adria

Re: [wsjt-devel] Fwd: Enhancement suggestion - 30 second cycles

vk4tux On 1/5/23 13:55, Jim Brown via wsjt-devel wrote: On 4/30/2023 4:30 PM, Adrian via wsjt-devel wrote: Reino, this is where we disagree, as my point is if the vfo frequency changes, then the 'radio frequency' which I consider the same also changes. Adrian, Reino is right

Re: [wsjt-devel] Fwd: Enhancement suggestion - 30 second cycles

Reino, this is where we disagree, as my point is if the vfo frequency changes, then the 'radio frequency' which I consider the same also changes. We do not see the vfo frequency display in sync variance with the modulation frequency. It remains static at the carrier point, which I consider the

Re: [wsjt-devel] Fwd: Enhancement suggestion - 30 second cycles

Setting a fixed TX mark should be default behavior in wsjtx. Having default set users jumping on the target mark together with their TX is not beneficial, rather than spaced tx calls forming a better decoded cue for the target to then work. TXing on a clear space and RX the target on the targe

Re: [wsjt-devel] Fwd: Enhancement suggestion - 30 second cycles

I disagree with below. Sam explained it well. Keeping the same Pan TX location the RF frequency is shifted to maintain and audio frequency suitable for the best passband performance and level continuity. It is split. The TX VFO adjust to 500, 1000 below the RX RX VFO frequency when pan TX ma

Re: [wsjt-devel] Fwd: Enhancement suggestion - 30 second cycles

I find below statement odd. as the  Pan audio mark is sent exactly as you set it. Only the RF frequency shifts to suit the audio > bandpass sweetspot. It is indicative that you do not realize how it works. 73 vk4tux On the other hand I don’t support of the idea that WSJT-X would randomly

Re: [wsjt-devel] Windows 10 24 bit audio rx + split code into twoprojects?

I recommend someone sane start a new wsjtx group and we all migrate. 73 vk4tux On 24/4/23 22:36, K9RX via wsjt-devel wrote: Not to belabor the point…. I too was rejected although I’m still able to see posts – just can’t respond. My failing? I posted a comment saying how I had 92 decodes i

Re: [wsjt-devel] Windows 10 24 bit audio rx + split code into two projects?

The moderator there 'Roger' is a control freak, and very self sensitive. Last week a poster had trouble decoding, and I referred him to time.is , however Roger completely misunderstood the relevance and arrogantly told me to try the website  myself, if i wanted to know what result it gave

Re: [wsjt-devel] "Failed to access lock file" in wsjt-x 2.6.0 rc4

adrian@debian:~$ ps ax | grep wsjt  57603 ?    Sl 1:11 /usr/bin/wsjtx  62851 pts/3    S+ 0:00 grep wsjt adrian@debian:~$ sudo pkill wsjtx adrian@debian:~$ ps ax | grep wsjt  63624 pts/3    S+ 0:00 grep wsjt adrian@debian:~$ It is process wsjtx rather than wsjt, but your grep

Re: [wsjt-devel] "Failed to access lock file" in wsjt-x 2.6.0 rc4

I see this from time to time, rectified with 'sudo pkill wsjtx' and then no problem to start a new session.. If linux > wsjtx ran a startup script killing first, then there would never be an issue. 73 Adrian Fewster On 5/11/22 22:56, leo bistmans via wsjt-devel wrote: Via

Re: [wsjt-devel] pskreporter.de

Thanks Mike, No this site ; https://www.pskreporter.de/ which I used to see who copied my or others callsigns on FT8 etc. I found it very useful to judge band conditions. Is there another site that does the same ? 73 Adrian ... vk4tux On 20/9/22 14:09, Black Michael via wsjt-devel wrote

[wsjt-devel] pskreporter.de

I noticed pskreporter.de was down for a long time with a database issue. Now it requires a login ? Is it now a subscriber service, I see no info on that site, as any associated url needs auth access ? Thankyou for any info. 73 vk4tux ___ wsj

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X close the QSO unilaterally (?)

Most issues are with strong nearby stations , The station having issue to get through, should move tx to any vacant pan space on the fly, and the rx station should stop and wait. Quite often stopping enables better rx, than cycling while waiting. 73 Adrian /The /|/RR73/|/ message should

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X close the QSO unilaterally (?)

They should do, the ones i queried via eqsl rejections said they did not receive my RR73, and then moved on to another station. Bad op practice by them , I agree, instead of trying or perhaps they did with no luck on RX, but sometimes a cheap txcr with poor blocking gets smothered by closed

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X close the QSO unilaterally (?)

That may have been a flyover comment for you, but in anycase it get the ones that you don't hear and really want using 0.12uV sensitivity. Have worked an amazing amount of DXpeditions in the last 2 months, it has been great. Yaesu got it right. 73 vk4tux Wow, I would hope a $5K radio isn

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X close the QSO unilaterally (?)

t to me the software does exactly what it should do. Have a good evening. Fred N2XK On Jul 15, 2022 6:04 AM, Adrian via wsjt-devel wrote: On 15/7/22 18:03, Fred Price wrote: >  This also might be a good idea as you stated you have a little station. Can you point out where I

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X close the QSO unilaterally (?)

On 15/7/22 18:03, Fred Price wrote:  This also might be a good idea as you stated you have a little station. Can you point out where I stated what you claim above ? My method of using FT8 is fine & effective, and I have method for repeat RR calls. My point is that the final 73 comes after

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X close the QSO unilaterally (?)

When you send a RR73 and get nothing back, then wsjtx has logged the call, but you don't know if your RR73 was received, or if the other party logged you. Making the log work only on 73 sent or received instead of RR73, confirms the sig report both ways and the qso both ways. if the program

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X close the QSO unilaterally (?)

It is a good point, wsjtx should not auto log until the 73 is received, not RR73 sent. Case in point is the rejected eqsl's from stations in my log, but I am not in theirs. This would save that problem. In the meantime, in those situation's, my TX is set free to change, and I click a vaca

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT-857 rig control bug in WSJT-X 2.6.0-rc1

explains the other gentleman's results? 73 Adrian On 11/7/22 14:04, Black Michael wrote: Does your PTT work in both USB and Data/Packet mode? Mike W9MDB ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT-857 rig control bug in WSJT-X 2.6.0-rc1

nd mode as Data\Pkt. Here is the error in RC1 when using VOX: *From:* Adrian *Sent:* Sunday, July 10, 2022 11:30 AM *To:* WSJT software development *Cc:* Nigel Haynes *Subject:* Re: [wsjt-devel] FT-857 rig control bug in WSJT-X 2.6.0-rc1 This guy is also using CAT ptt and using rear data por

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT-857 rig control bug in WSJT-X 2.6.0-rc1

This guy is also using CAT ptt and using rear data port audio as I do ; https://km1ndy.com/how-to-program-yaesu-ft857d-for-ft8-and-wsjtx/ On 11/7/22 00:22, Nigel Haynes via wsjt-devel wrote: I have been using the WSJT-X 2.6.0-rc1 without issue on several rigs, but when I tried to setup an FT

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT-857 rig control bug in WSJT-X 2.6.0-rc1

ere; Mine uses the data jack audio as setup above with both my 857 and 897 (same electronically), and have never needed to use vox. Do you have rear audio source selected like above ? vk4tux *From:* Adrian *Sent:* Sunday, July 10, 2022 10:31 AM *To:* WSJT software development *Cc:* Ni

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT-857 rig control bug in WSJT-X 2.6.0-rc1

The cat port doesn't have any audio connections. The signal-link should be using the data port. Do you have a cat cable fitted as well ? I have 897/857 setup for wsjtx with no need for vox using cat ptt, but I do have both CAT and data(sndcd) lines fitte

Re: [wsjt-devel] Connecting the Yaesu FTdx10

OK on that link, however with the CP2105 comports it is best to wsjtx select the standard comport instead of CAT for PTT, and use RTS as KI5GFU has RPTT set. RPORT gain is better at 7 to 10 rather than 25, as this allows better wsjtx 'TX pwr' linear control, where small adjustments result in a

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-x doesn't install on 64 bit Raspberry Pi

You may have to update your apt sources.list to a version covering/containing packages version nominated for install, Follow ; experimental (libs): GNU C Library: Shared libraries 2.34-0experimental4: amd64 arm64 armel armhf i386 m68k ppc64 pp

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-x doesn't install on 64 bit Raspberry Pi

Did you try ; |sudo apt-get install -f or | sudo apt install ./wsjtx_2.5.4_arm64.deb 73 Adrian On 5/5/22 11:26, Rob Robinett via wsjt-devel wrote: WSJT-x-arm64 package___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https

Re: [wsjt-devel] Question, FT8

right one. So far at the end of the qso my WSJTX sends RR73, I didn't understand how it could default to RRR for somebody. 73's PY1ZRJ Scarica Outlook per Android <https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg> -------- *Da:* Adria

Re: [wsjt-devel] Question, FT8

If you really want to send a 73, you can, you select the call , enable TX and select TX5. Manual sends like this are doable, after the auto sequencing has finished. vk4tux On 4/10/21 12:08 pm, Andrew Neumeier via wsjt-devel wrote: Thanks to all who responded to my question. I suspected that

Re: [wsjt-devel] Question, FT8

Use RR73 instead of RRR and there is no issue, with one side saying RR with 73, and the other then 73. It is all there, I do not see the issue. vk4tux On 4/10/21 9:17 am, Allan Downie via wsjt-devel wrote: Hi Andy...Yes it happens all the time..BY DESIGN, apparently. I find it most frustrati

Re: [wsjt-devel] Problem with WSJS-X

One of my stations on linux here uses this exact same setup. I have best results running HRD as the rig select interface ( I run HRD under Crossover) I found the direct FT-897 rig selection unreliable. 4800 bps via the AT-897 plus. Manual full tune done on each band change before operation.

Re: [wsjt-devel] Idea for "frequency hopping" FT8 to reduce collisions

Probably in future more 3KHz slots will be allocated, with the user relying on spot reports to hone into signals desired. It is the law of the jungle now, with experienced operators looking for clear space to hold TX. RX performance is paramount, and I find myself using separate tx/rx antenn

  1   2   >