Change log:
Version 1.3.1Monday July 28, 2003 12:43:58 AM
Bug: Corrected invalid prodcedure call error seen when installing for the
first time.
Anyone installing this for the first time should not use 1.3 and
should use this version 1.3.1
---
avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean.
At 00:23 7/28/2003, Rob Arends wrote:
The big difference here, is that Outlook's block sender, still requires you
to download the mail. If Xmail blocks the mail, then the sender gets a
non-delivery report (and hopefully ceases sending) and the user does not
download (perhaps over 56k) the mail.
Hi!
Just my 2 cents:
I havent as much as looked at your app, but from your description of it, =
I think it could come in handy some time.
I think i'll download it, next time i have to use the xmail logs...
Best regards
S=F8ren Knudsen
My point exactly we are talking here about mail
I just loaded it this morning. I find it useful already for verifying what
has occurred in the logs. Some overall statistics would be nice to have
displayed (usage graphs and totals). It would also be nice to be able to
sort by any column just by clicking on the column header..
David Byte
Hi
This was me, sorry for the delay...
I was just going through a few motions... would you like some help? etc?
- Original Message -
From: Mircea Ciocan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 3:12 PM
Subject: [xmail] Dovecot IMAP server, any success
I have loaded it and noticed the close/exit issue is still there. It keeps
in the kernal task by closeing the X exit. (W2K Box).
To trace the IP, since the spammers are all over the world, ARIN is not able
to trace the other regions. Would you please chnage the ARIN/INTERNIC option
to a pulldown
Not sure I understand what you mean about the E log not traceable. you mean
the black listed entries in the log?? Give me an example of what you mean.
I will check into the close with X problem and change the lookups to a pull
down list with an option to type in manually. On the exit problem
--- =?iso-8859-1?Q?S=F8ren_Knudsen?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
Just my 2 cents:
I havent as much as looked at your app, but from your description of it, =
I think it could come in handy some time.
I think i'll download it, next time i have to use the xmail logs...
Best regards
--- David Byte [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just loaded it this morning. I find it useful already for verifying what
has occurred in the logs. Some overall statistics would be nice to have
displayed (usage graphs and totals). It would also be nice to be able to
sort by any column just by
Is anyone using XScanner with XMail 1.15? I have not heard back from the
developer yet on how the Retcode is defined in the .DAT file and my attempts
have not succeeded.
It successfully catches emails in the .DAT file but it does not remove
them from the que, they reach the inbox as if no
At 13:07 7/28/2003, William wrote:
In the filters dir, my domain.tab file contains the correct:
c:\xscanner\xscanner.exe c:\xscanner @@FILE @@FROM @@RCPT
Retcode
Um... Did you consider replacing Retcode with the actual value you want
return (ie: 97)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the
At 13:51 7/28/2003, William wrote:
Um... Did you consider replacing Retcode with the actual value you want
return (ie: 97)
Well, that is actually the proper entry. The filter itself is supposed to
contain the Retcode, I have tried 3 things:
1) example string#97
2) 97#example string
3) example
I hate to appear to be contrary, but I just downloaded the file and had a
look at the source code included, and as near as I can tell, the 5th
argument (where you have Retcode) should be a string representation of
the numeric return code you want to use for rejecting messages (ie. 97).
Here is
c:\xscanner\xscanner.exe c:\xscanner @@FILE @@FROM @@RCPT 97
Well sunnuva gun, it works! Trapped my test email and kept it in the KEEP
dir
Mucho appreciado, thanks!
Wonder how long it would have taken me to figure that out (dont even try to
guess...)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the
At 14:10 7/28/2003, William wrote:
c:\xscanner\xscanner.exe c:\xscanner @@FILE @@FROM @@RCPT 97
Well sunnuva gun, it works! Trapped my test email and kept it in the KEEP
dir
Make sure that you use the return code that is appropriate for your
situation - 97 is just the first one that came to
Hi
Can i do this in xmail:
In the filter folder eg: c:\mailroot\filters - can i here create a file =
named:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
With this contens:
redirect[tab][EMAIL PROTECTED]
Why i want to do this, is because i have to recreate about 5000 users =
email addresses, and i still want them to
At 14:56 7/28/2003, Kenneth Mogensen wrote:
Why i want to do this, is because i have to recreate about 5000 users =
email addresses, and i still want them to receive mail from there old =
addresses, both the username and domain portion is altered.
I'm assuming you have a list of the old addresses
It s not in the same e-mail system, we are running for our main e-mail, =
calendar, workgroup, booking and so on, are we running Novells GroupWise. =
But the alias function in that product does not fullfill our needs; So we =
wanted to set xmail in between the ingoing mails, so that the users
functionally a very minor issue, but toward the squashing of future bugs =
and making the code more bulletproof, I'd like to suggest a
change to the handling of the first line of smtp message files. This =
suggestion also applies to other places where strtok() is
used.
SMTPSubmitPackedFile()
At 15:18 7/28/2003, Kenneth Mogensen wrote:
It s not in the same e-mail system, we are running for our main e-mail, =
calendar, workgroup, booking and so on, are we running Novells GroupWise. =
But the alias function in that product does not fullfill our needs; So we =
wanted to set xmail in
GroupWise has an odd way to handle aliases - and i works very wiered some =
times =20
The trick is here that both the username and subdomain are altered .. that =
will say the following:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
And so on ... And so on
I'm trying to migrate XMail from version 1.12 (older filter structure) to
version 1.17 (new filter structure).
I changed all my filter scripts to reflect the new return codes BUT for some
reason when XMail calls the filter, it stays in memory.
After 5 minutes, dozens of filters are in memory just
At 16:06 7/28/2003, Kenneth Mogensen wrote:
GroupWise has an odd way to handle aliases - and i works very wiered some =
times =20
The trick is here that both the username and subdomain are altered .. that =
will say the following:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Richard Mayhew wrote:
Hi
This was me, sorry for the delay...
I was just going through a few motions... would you like some help? etc?
Hi Richard and thank you for your quick reply,
Here are my questions:
1) How did integrate authorisation with XMail ??
When the IP is in the blacklist (spammers.tab) the log returns E code, i.e. EIPSPAM,
ERELAY in theory they are blocked by the blacklist so nobody gets the junk mail,
but it would be nice to be able to trace the source of spammers, if there are a lot of
same IP in the logs. In your program I
After some tests running XMail locally I could see that @@FILE is returning:
In version 1.12:
C:\MailRoot\spool\5\19\mess\1059437227441.3144.NBNOLVER
But, in version 1.17
\\?\C:\MailRoot\spool\5\19\mess\1059437227441.3144.NBNOLVER
Is this correct? Is there something wrong in server.tab?
that is a valid path; using that \\? business enables some path-handling extensions in
the OS, (super-long paths for one, as I
recall)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Edinilson J. Santos
Sent: Monday 28 July 2003 7:13 PM
To: [EMAIL
I'm using Windows 2000 not *nix and some file functions (in windows
scripting host) returns that the file doesn't exist with the \\?\ preceding
the path.
But no problems. If this is normal for XMail 1.15 or above I will remove the
\\?\ and then verify if the file exists.
Thank you
Edinilson
All Win32 api functions in windows will work with \\?\. However non of the
C-Runtime functions will work well with it. My suggestion, switch to using
Win32 API (CreateFile)
Shawn
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Edinilson J. Santos
yes, my response applied only to Windows. Is is indeed invalid on UNIX but valid on
Windows. In windows, it enables Unicode
support. See
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/fileio/base/naming_a_file.asp
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Another thing that I notice was (in the filters/domain.tab file):
In version 1.12:
C:\winnt\system32\cscript.exe D:\mailroot\filters\catcher.js @@FILE
@@FROM @@RRCPT
In version 1.17
cscript.exe D:\mailroot\filters\catcher.js @@FILE @@FROM @@RRCPT
Without this change the filter wasn't called
I think you will need to setup Xmail with local users and redirect them.
Which is not as hard as it might sound.
Assuming the Xmail server handles the old domain and would forward mail to
the server handling the new domain (GroupWise). Further to this assumption,
if all the Xmail server is doing
Any reason why I would be getting duplicate messages? It doesn't happen all the time
but every once and awhile I will get duplicates of whatever messages that are on the
server. I have setup 3 xmail servers... 1 personal, 1 for another company, and 1 for
another company and it seems to
- Original Message -
From: Benny [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 8:05 PM
Subject: [xmail] duplicates
Any reason why I would be getting duplicate messages? It doesn't happen
all the time but every once and awhile I will get duplicates of whatever
I had...
One time at a week ago. All users on my server was receiving duplicated
messages.
I don't know what happened, but I just restart the server to correct the
problem.
Running on a FreeBSD 5.0 with XMail 1.17pre03
Thanks
On Mon, 28 Jul 2003, Benny wrote:
Any reason why I would be
No problem. I am trying to convert every thing over to a new grid control
that will have alot more flexability as the one I am using now is very
limited so updates may take a few days.
On the spammers.tab thing, when a ip is in the spammers.tab doesnt it still
get a listing in the logs that is
36 matches
Mail list logo
