-Message d'origine-
De : Rob Arends [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : jeudi 1 septembre 2005 14:51
À : xmail@xmailserver.org
Objet : [xmail] Re: messages to yahoo and or hotmail does not get
delivered
Francis, this also true for me:
Yes
The problem is EXACTLY 'XMAIL
-Message d'origine-
De : Edinilson J. Santos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : jeudi 1 septembre 2005 20:37
À : xmail@xmailserver.org
Objet : [xmail] Re: messages to yahoo and or hotmail does not get
delivered
I'm with the same problem since 1.21 but, because we are a
-Message d'origine-
De : Leonardo Fogel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : jeudi 1 septembre 2005 23:50
À : xmail@xmailserver.org
Objet : [xmail] Re: messages to yahoo and or hotmail does not get
delivered
Although yahoo.com has 4 mx records and each mx record
has 4 A
-Message d'origine-
De : John Kielkopf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : vendredi 2 septembre 2005 07:47
À : xmail@xmailserver.org
Objet : [xmail] Re: messages to yahoo and or hotmail does not get
delivered
Davide Libenzi wrote:
greenbaycc.org. 86400 IN
The other windows 2000 server with CDONTS is exactly configured in the same
way the xmail's server is.
In the server with microsoft smtp server messages to hotmail.com and msn.com
aren't queued. They were delivered in the first try.
But, with XMail, messages to hotmail.com and msn.com are
-Message d'origine-
De : Edinilson J. Santos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : vendredi 2 septembre 2005 15:02
À : xmail@xmailserver.org
Objet : [xmail] Re: messages to yahoo and or hotmail does not get
delivered
..
..
..
I'm discarding DNS problems.
Thanks
Edinilson
On Fri, 2 Sep 2005, CLEMENT Francis wrote:
Even if John's initial problems are due to 'very badly' destination dns
zones setup, for hotmail.com dns report is CLEAN and OK !!
(seems $soft is not allways bad :-) )
So why xmail 'sometimes' use the domain A record even if resolving the =
mx is
Davide Wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dig intergraonline.com. mx +trace
snip
intergraonline.com. 172800 IN NS ns1.qsrch.net.
intergraonline.com. 172800 IN NS ns2.qsrch.net.
intergraonline.com. 172800 IN NS ns3.qsrch.net.
intergraonline.com. 172800
Hmmm - so far, you two are the only ones that are verified as having the
exact same problem sending to Yahoo and Hotmail - there may be others,
but we haven't verified that, is that correct? You both have the same
configuration (exactly, as Edinilson pointed out). So what do we know
so far?
On Friday 02 September 2005 11:32, Rob Arends wrote:
Davide Wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] davide]$ dig greenbaycc.org. ns +trace
greenbaycc.org. 86400 IN NS taadns02.taiasp.net.
greenbaycc.org. 86400 IN NS taadns01.taiasp.net.
;; Received 88 bytes from
On 02.09.2005 17:07, Davide Libenzi wrote:
In the hotmail case, that sure has DNS configured like it should, the MX
resolution is not a problem (like you can see from the logs posted). The
End of stream data error, is something you linked to problem in the link
between XMail and the
On Fri, 2 Sep 2005, Sönke Ruempler wrote:
On 02.09.2005 17:07, Davide Libenzi wrote:
In the hotmail case, that sure has DNS configured like it should, the MX
resolution is not a problem (like you can see from the logs posted). The
End of stream data error, is something you linked to problem
What would you look for in a tcpdump like this? I am technical (years
of c/c++/PHP/Perl programming) but I am clueless about tcpdumps...
pardon my ignorance!
Jeff
Sönke Ruempler wrote:
On 02.09.2005 17:07, Davide Libenzi wrote:
In the hotmail case, that sure has DNS configured like it
On 02.09.2005 19:13, Jeff Buehler wrote:
What would you look for in a tcpdump like this? I am technical (years
of c/c++/PHP/Perl programming) but I am clueless about tcpdumps...
pardon my ignorance!
You can see where the tcp traffic breaks. Maybe special characters
involve that (think of
Davide, just to refresh your memory:
Received: from x35.xmailserver.org ([69.30.125.51]:54412)
by mailserver with [XMail 1.21 ESMTP Server]
id SB3ECD for edinilson@atinet.com.br from
[EMAIL PROTECTED];
Fri, 8 Apr 2005 11:36:26 -0300
Received: from x35.xmailserver.org ([127.0.0.1]:54410)
by
Our firewall gateway is a freebsd.
Which level of tcpdump do you want?
I can send you everything that you want, just tell me what.
Edinilson
-
ATINET-Professional Web Hosting
Tel Voz: (0xx11) 4412-0876
http://www.atinet.com.br
-
XMail become strange after hotmail.com put the following big header:
220 mc10-f3.hotmail.com Sending unsolicited commercial or bulk e-mail to
Microsoft's computer network is prohibited. Other restrictions are found at
http://priv
acy.msn.com/Anti-spam/. Violations will result in use of
It sounds like first the dump of XMail communications running under Win
2000, to see exactly where the time out or break occurs, and possibly
also a dump of the FreeBSD firewall might help to see if that is part of
the problem. Coordinating them might be a good idea so you can see the
same
On Fri, 2 Sep 2005, John Kielkopf wrote:
Davide Libenzi wrote:
greenbaycc.org. 86400 IN NS taadns02.taiasp.net.
greenbaycc.org. 86400 IN NS taadns01.taiasp.net.
;; Received 88 bytes from 204.74.112.1#53(TLD1.ULTRADNS.NET) in 58 ms
greenbaycc.org.
On Fri, 2 Sep 2005, Edinilson J. Santos wrote:
XMail become strange after hotmail.com put the following big header:
220 mc10-f3.hotmail.com Sending unsolicited commercial or bulk e-mail to
Microsoft's computer network is prohibited. Other restrictions are found at
http://priv
I really do not want to nag, but I am curious how the development of XMail
2.0 with IMAP support is coming. Any news?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
On Fri, 2 Sep 2005, Jeff Buehler wrote:
It sounds like first the dump of XMail communications running under Win
2000, to see exactly where the time out or break occurs, and possibly
also a dump of the FreeBSD firewall might help to see if that is part of
the problem. Coordinating them might
Hi Davide,
Looks like all instances of -lc_r have to be replaced by -lpthread for
proper compilation on OpenBSD.
meanwhile I ran into some instability issue:
- A sudden coredump after setting up some filters and doing some
KILL/restarts in between. This might be neglectable. I rebooted the
On Fri, 2 Sep 2005, Harald Schneider wrote:
Do you think replacing -lpthread with one of these:
-Kthread -kthread -pthread -pthreads -mthreads --thread-safe -mt
might be worth testing ?
Dunno, but according to the link, the -pthread option trigger some special
flag in the linking
OK .. I 'll run some test after I'm back from vacations :)
Thanks so far,
Harald
Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Fri, 2 Sep 2005, Harald Schneider wrote:
Do you think replacing -lpthread with one of these:
-Kthread -kthread -pthread -pthreads -mthreads --thread-safe -mt
might be worth testing
25 matches
Mail list logo
