hecking his end as well, but I don't see any
indication in the logs that anything "special" is happening, will I?
Thoughts?
Bart Mortelmans wrote:
On 15-dec-09, at 21:13, Dale wrote:
I haven't actually implemented it. The problem is that I'm not sure
where to put
i wrote:
On Tue, 15 Dec 2009, Dale wrote:
I was hoping you could read my mind.
I'm not sure how to actually configure the TLS at all. I was hoping for a
copy of a working server.tab that
someone wouldn't mind sharing. Is it ONLY setup in the server.tab? It
appears that the
here you set it specifically for a single
receiving domain.
Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Tue, 15 Dec 2009, Dale wrote:
I'm looking for an example of implementing tls (smtp side). I've googled and
found info, checked the config docs at
http://www.xmailserver.org/Readme.html#ssl_confi
ne.key and mine.cert
the peer smtp server is using scott.key and scott.cert (if this matters).
Thanks much!
Dale
___
xmail mailing list
xmail@xmailserver.org
http://xmailserver.org/mailman/listinfo/xmail
Hehe, yep. That would be a bad thing.
Thanks Davide!
Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009, Dale wrote:
Interesting. The flexibility of XMail never ceases to amaze me.
Final question:
I assume the .tab file need to have forwarding info in it. Or does it just
need to exist.Â
"[TAB]"theinternalipaddressofmymailserver" with a [newline] after it
in the davidel.tab file
Thanks again Davide!
Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009, Dale wrote:
Does this apply to customdomains? The docs don't specify it.
Given the following:
custdomain (doing an smtprelay) of bob.
Does this apply to customdomains? The docs don't specify it.
Given the following:
custdomain (doing an smtprelay) of bob.com
bob.com.tab exists in /MailRoot/custdomains/
The docs say that a directory will be created in cmdaliases but that
isn't the case here.
***SNIP***
For every handled doma
lter that check destination emails from a list could do the
job.
Francis
-Message d'origine-
De : xmail-boun...@xmailserver.org
[mailto:xmail-boun...@xmailserver.org]de la part de Dale
Envoyé : mercredi 21 octobre 2009 17:36
À : xmail@xmailserver.org
Objet : [xmail] valid recipient list w
If I have a server running (1.26) that simply does smtprelay, can I
place a user list somewhere so it will simply drop messages to users NOT
in the list? Dictionary attacks are killing me.
There isn't anything in MailRoot/custdomains except for the tab file for
the relay. It doesn't appear t
I dunno...
Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Thu, 4 Jun 2009, Dale wrote:
It's actually that the xmail server accepts the connection but give a "user not
available" response causing
the message to fail. Here's a snippet (the names have been changed to protect
the semi-inno
H. Is that in the docs somewhere? I'm going to go lookin'! That
would be perfect!
Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Thu, 4 Jun 2009, Dale wrote:
Just as I figured. Can the file be copied nightly to other servers and be
utilized on those boxes?
Ideally, you want to have
Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Thu, 4 Jun 2009, Dale wrote:
I've found that when the root partition runs out of space that xmail still
answers smtp connections but since there isn't space it rejects the message.
Because the smtp conversation is accepted but the recipient is reject
Just as I figured. Can the file be copied nightly to other servers and
be utilized on those boxes?
Thanks Davide!
Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Thu, 4 Jun 2009, Dale wrote:
Is it possible for multiple servers to share glst.dbm files? I'm guessing
that it is not but it would be great
's the logs that are killing me so I just wrote a script to
purge all logs over 30 days so this should cure the problem but, if it
happens again it won't be the logs that did it and I'll be hosed again.
TIA!
Dale
___
xmail mail
Is it possible for multiple servers to share glst.dbm files? I'm
guessing that it is not but it would be great if it were to allow for
several boxes to read and update a single database.
___
xmail mailing list
xmail@xmailserver.org
http://xmailserver.
I'm using UMPL for Xmailserver ( http://dev.waaf.net/xmail/ ) the link
is on xmailserver.org as well. In another location I'm using UebiMiau (
http://www.uebimiau.org/ )
I like the UMPL much better.
Filip Supera wrote:
Edmonds, J.B. :
Probably asked 100 times but I need a decent webmail prod
I'll be darned. I just turned on the logs and did a quick test and the
logging works fine. I can't believe I never knew that was there...
These logs could have helped me several times.
The database on one server was 21MB. I do a "--cleanup" once a day,
maybe I'll do that a bit more often. A
It took 10 hours (as the sending server only resends every 2 hours) for
this message to get accepted. Any thoughts??
I'm have to pull glst back out for now, it's delaying our mail
way too much.
In the logs below I have only changed the "mydomain.com" address.
Everything else is exact
te:
>> -Message d'origine-
>> De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Dale Qualls
>> Envoy=E9 : mercredi 30 avril 2008 04:09
>> =C0 : xmail@xmailserver.org
>> Objet : [xmail] glst issue with trips not being recognized
>>
>>
Davide (or anyone):
First of all, thanks in advance for any help I can get on this.
I'm using glst (and love it) and have now run into my first (and
hopefully my last :-) problem. I'm just looking for an explanation as
it doesn't make sense to me. Messages from the below listed
"clientdomai
put glst back into service. Over a 4 hour
period last evening we only had 185 inbound messages. After taking out
glst we racked up over 2000 in 5 minutes. It's definitely going back in
as soon as I teak it as best as I can.
Thanks for another great product Davide!
Davide Libenzi wrote:
Okay, I got around the mkdep issue with:
touch /usr/local/bin/mkdep
chmod a+x /usr/local/mkdep
I'm about ready to start testing glst but I'm concerned about the mnet
info for gmail. I found this on the web but I'm unable to find the mask
for the gmail entries.
Does anyone have a glst.conf they
Davide (or anyone)
I'm trying to compile the glst executables and keep getting this:
vmhost1:/usr/src/glst-0.26 # vmhost1:/usr/src/glst-0.26 # make -f
Makefile.unx
-bash: vmhost1:/usr/src/glst-0.26: No such file or directory
mkdep -f .depend -I. -DUNIX -DLINUX ./glst.c ./dbdump.c ./dbload.c
vmho
000 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 scsi_eh_0
809 root 10 -5 000 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.06 reiserfs/0
Thanks Davide.
Dale Qualls wrote:
> I had attempted with the file system before, there just wasn't a slog file.
> I followed your directions below but lo and behold
" "RLYS"
"10.5.10.3" "2007-11-20 16:24:16"*
MX2:/var/MailRoot/logs #
I'll let it run for a bit and try again. Maybe when the spools get
loaded up it gets freaky? I really doubt if that is the case as XMail
runs pretty damned clean and fast. I s
" "RLYS"
"10.5.10.3" "2007-11-20 16:24:16"*
MX2:/var/MailRoot/logs #
I'll let it run for a bit and try again. Maybe when the spools get
loaded up it gets freaky? I really doubt if that is the case as XMail
runs pretty damned clean and fast. I s
Strange. I flushed the queue, using Haralds manager, and it shot the
message right through.
Davide Libenzi wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Nov 2007, Dale Qualls wrote:
>
>
>> Hello all, I've got a bit of a head scratcher here.
>>
>> I have a couple of XMail boxes setup to
Shall I bounce the box to see if things begin moving?
Davide Libenzi wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Nov 2007, Dale Qualls wrote:
>
>
>> Hello all, I've got a bit of a head scratcher here.
>>
>> I have a couple of XMail boxes setup to do relaying (no filtering of any
>
Hello all, I've got a bit of a head scratcher here.
I have a couple of XMail boxes setup to do relaying (no filtering of any
kind) as backup MX servers and I've never really paid much attention but
it appears that they relay received messages about 2-4 hours after it is
received. I had someone
My xmail servers are only pass through boxes for redundancy and virus
scanning (and yes, my retry is 1 day so having a 2 day purge is perfect
in my scenario).
The only things that ever stay in my spool are ndr's back to spammers.
Thanks!
Davide Libenzi wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Dal
As my spool gets inundated with junk, I run this command every day at
11:30 p.m. via a cron job.
find /var/MailRoot/spool -depth -name *.MX2 -ctime 1 -delete
MX2 is the name of one of my xmail boxes so all files in the spool have
it appended to the end of the filename by default.
Works like a
Ahhh, the mnets thing might be an issue. We get many messages from big
virtual servers such as that... It could be an issue if messages get
dropped due to that.
Thanks for the info, it is much appreciated!
TheOldFellow wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 14:05:04 -0500
> Dale Qualls &
What are you using for timing settings for unknown triplets? I'm
considering 10 minutes for the --time0 parameter.
What rejerr are you using?
I'm glad to hear you're using it. I'm heavily contemplating it.
Thanks!!
TheOldFellow wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 07:40
ail).
I didn't mean to offend, I was simply wondering if it was beyond needing
anything done, again, based on the functionality of what it does and if
anyone was using it so that I could get some real world information
regarding it.
My apologies.
Davide Libenzi wrote:
>
Davide:
Freshmeat.net shows no activity for 19 months, is it a mature product
that needs no development (based on the functionality)?
Anyone using it? I'm seriously considering it (or maia, something to GL).
Thx!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body
which
in reality I don't care to see.
I'm hoping that I'm explaining it correctly, it's kind of confusing I guess.
Davide Libenzi wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Mar 2007, Dale Qualls wrote:
>
>
>> But is there anyway to dump them? What if I (against the RFC) get rid
>&
But is there anyway to dump them? What if I (against the RFC) get rid
of the postmaster account, will they just get dropped and not fill up
the spool?
Davide Libenzi wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Mar 2007, Dale Qualls wrote:
>
>
>> I've got an xmail box acting as a secondary MX and
Hmmm, I'm running 1.23.
Francesco Vertova wrote:
> At 23.43 05/03/07, you wrote:
>
>
>> Also, my spool is loaded with messages that xmail keeps trying to
>> deliver to obviously bad addresses.
>>
>
> This has been mostly cured with XMail >= 1.23. Which version are you running?
>
> Ciao, F
tion 1 would be the fastest as it would be compiled, but option 2
> would be easier to implement.
>
> Is this something that anyone else out there has done before?
>
>
> Dale Qualls wrote:
>
>> I've got an xmail box acting as a secondary MX and a custdom
I've got an xmail box acting as a secondary MX and a custdomain simply
re-directing the mail to our primary MX.
Whenever there is a non-deliverable (dictionary attack), the secondary
sends an NDR to the spammer address and then has to accept a NDR back
when the receiving "spoofed" server sends
I use both ClamAV and F-Prot, every message gets scanned twice.
Brian wrote:
> Any opinions on using ClamAV with XMail?
> How good is ClamAV and is it secure / stable?
>
> Jason
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
> the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Darn.
Okay, thanks!
--
later,
Dale
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wednesday, March 29, 2006, 12:37:10 AM, you wrote:
> Hello,
>> Is there a webmin module for xmail? I've done some searching
>> and haven't come across one but I can&
Is there a webmin module for xmail? I've done some searching and haven't come
across one but I can't believe that it doesn't already exist...
TIA!
--
later,
Dale
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line &q
Hiya!
Trust me, I'm not blaming xmail, I'm blaming the OpenSuse. xmail runs
beautifully on everything I've had it on (RH and Mandrake).
No disrespect meant towards the xmail product or you Davide.
--
later,
Dale
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
S
--
later,
Dale
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sunday, March 12, 2006, 8:13:34 AM, you wrote:
> On Sunday 12 March 2006 08:02, Dale Qualls wrote:
>> Any horror stories about running xmail on FC4?
>>
>> I've given up on running it on Op
Any horror stories about running xmail on FC4?
I've given up on running it on Open Suse 10, it just doesn't like the
hardware I guess (it's a strong running Dell but OpenSuse just drags
on it. Stopping xmail takes forever, and eventually the processes are
stopped but the "/etc/init.d/xmail stop"
Hiya!
Yes. Actually, I installed xmail then copied my backup over the top
of the fresh install so that all of my pathing and executables would
be in the exact same place (/var/MailRoot).
Dang.
--
later,
Dale
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tuesday, March 7
I
already have QT 600 on the command line.
Thanks Sonke!
--
later,
Dale
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tuesday, March 7, 2006, 2:53:19 AM, you wrote:
> On 06.03.2006 14:56, Dale Qualls wrote:
>> All I could find on the 'net had to do with possible
failure such as this).
For grins I was going to bump up the SA version on the RH box to 3.0.4
to see if it caused the same problems but figured I'd post a quick
question first.
TIA
--
later,
Dale
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send
Yet.
:)
Monday, January 23, 2006, 9:45:32 PM, you wrote:
> XMail doesn't support IMAP.
> - Original Message -
> From: "Erwin Meulensteen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 11:12 AM
> Subject: [xmail] imap
>> Hello,
>> can anyone tell me how to setup imap o
Thanks for the info, I'll check out the clamdscan and see how it works
for us (I prefer to have 2 levels of av scanning).
Have a great holiday!
--
later,
Dale
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wednesday, December 14, 2005, 1:38:26 PM, you wrote:
> They s
reads :)
--
later,
Dale
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wednesday, December 14, 2005, 8:25:04 AM, you wrote:
> Hey Dale,
> One problem with filtering in filters.in.tab, is that you'll end up
> scanning the message once for every recipient on the list...
Hiya!
Thanks, I'll give it a shot.
I too used it for a very long time without issues, then this just
sprung up, I blame it on the AV, not the filter.
Have a great holiday!
--
later,
Dale
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tuesday, December 13, 2005, 6:08:49 PM
gives us 2 different scanners.
So, apparently clamav is to blame. We running the latest version of
clamav and it's fully up to date.
Anyone else seeing any clamav issues???
--
later,
Dale
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sunday, December 11, 2005, 5:04:58 PM, you wr
Hiya!
I'll try replacing the files with empty files and see if that makes a
difference. I had commented the filters out before with no change.
--
later,
Dale
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sunday, December 11, 2005, 2:26:30 PM, you wrote:
> On Sat, 10
uot;0.0.0.0/0" "av-filter.tab"
I've tried commenting out all of them with no change (see my original
post). I'll try actually renaming these and replacing them with empty files
and see if
that makes a difference.
--
later,
Dale
mail
Hiya!
Thanks, it's whacked, isn't it?
--
later,
Dale
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Saturday, December 10, 2005, 1:50:56 AM, you wrote:
> You said:
>>smtp does show all addresses, and funny, it always shows the last
>>address as being sent
Hiya!
Well, it was a good thought, but no dice, it's still happening.
--
later,
Dale
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thursday, December 8, 2005, 3:41:18 PM, you wrote:
> On 08.12.2005 05:07, Dale Qualls wrote:
>> My brother posted this question a
It's strange too, the number of messages delivered isn't always the
same.
Thanks for looking at this!
--
later,
Dale
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thursday, December 8, 2005, 9:46:15 AM, you wrote:
> What is the following command-line option
Tracy:
You might want to upgrade to 1.22, IIRC there was some kind of obscure
security bug fix in 1.22 that was supposedly exploitable in 1.21.
--
later,
Dale
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wednesday, December 7, 2005, 8:44:39 PM, you wrote:
> I ended up going
reply!!
--
later,
Dale
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thursday, December 8, 2005, 1:55:09 AM, you wrote:
>> -Message d'origine-----
>> De : Dale Qualls [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Envoy=E9 : jeudi 8 d=E9cembre 2005 05:07
>> =C0 : xmail
Hiya!
Nope, it's not running.
Thanks for the reply!!
--
later,
Dale
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thursday, December 8, 2005, 4:01:50 AM, you wrote:
> Dale Qualls wrote:
>> Hi gang:
>>
>> My brother posted this question a while ago
ogs do not appear to give any clues.
Suggestions? Troubleshooting tips? This is killing my brothers
office.
Is there any possibility that it could be the OS?
I was thinking
about taking this box up to SUSE 9.3 or OpenSuse 10, anyone have any
experience with these flavors?
Thanks!
Dale
Hiya!
Since the docs show "cram-md5" in lower case I'd suggest doing it
exactly as Francis suggested:
"cram-md5"[tab]"foo"[tab]"foobar"
--
later,
Dale
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Friday, October 28, 2005, 11:4
Hiya!
Thanks Sonke!
--
later,
Dale
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Friday, October 14, 2005, 9:42:28 AM, you wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <> wrote on Friday, October 14, 2005 3:29 PM:
>> So I'm assuming (forgive my ignorance, I haven't been
Hiya!
So I'm assuming (forgive my ignorance, I haven't been following the
list for a while) 1.22 has been deemed "solid"?
Thanks for the quick response Davide!!!
--
later,
Dale
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Friday, October 14, 2005, 2:33:24
Standard ports:
SMTP 25
POP 110
If you'll be doing any management I think it uses telnet on port 6017 for CTRL.
If you use the XQMWIN (xmail queue manager which if you're not using you
should be), the default is 8000 but is configurable.
You could not open up 6017 and use the CTRL via an ss
I'm hoping not :)
I just remember the RH8 v RH9 gotcha that requied a tweak (albeit a very minor
tweak).
Thx!
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 7/5/2005 3:35:07 PM >>>
On 05.07.2005 21:57, Dale Qualls wrote:
> Anyone running 1.21 (or any flavor I guess) on Suse Pro 9.3? Any
Anyone running 1.21 (or any flavor I guess) on Suse Pro 9.3? Any gotchas (as
in the RH8 v RH9 gotchas)?
thx!
**
The preceding message and any attachments may contain confidential
information protected by the attorney
Great, thanks!
>>> friggstadk@ironsolutions.com 6/28/2005 10:19 AM >>>
Hi Dale:
We've been using the workstation version of f-prot along with Peter
Lindeman's AV filter for quite some time now (looks like since late 2003),
and I haven't had any major problems wi
Long time no post (all has been running great, knock on wood).
Is anyone using FSI's f-prot along with Pete Lindemann's (sp?) av filter? Are
you happy with it? Are you using a workstation or server version and does it
really matter which you use?
Any/all information is welcome.
Thanks!
Sweet, that was exactly where it can be found/altered.
Thanks Jeff!
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3/3/2005 9:22 AM >>>
I think that can be fiound in /inc/config.php $quota_limit= xxx
Jeff
Dale Qualls wrote:
>Ditto, I like Uebimiau as well.
>
>My only issue with Uebimi
Cool, thanks!
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3/3/2005 9:22:11 AM >>>
I think that can be fiound in /inc/config.php $quota_limit= xxx
Jeff
Dale Qualls wrote:
>Ditto, I like Uebimiau as well.
>
>My only issue with Uebimiau is that if there is more than 10MB in the
>mailbo
Ditto, I like Uebimiau as well.
My only issue with Uebimiau is that if there is more than 10MB in the
mailbox you can't view a message - I know this has to be a config
setting somewhere but I never could find the darned thing. Anybody know
where I can tweak that setting??
Dale
>&
I'll give it a shot this weekend and try again in RL3.
Thanks!
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2/14/2005 2:05 PM >>>
On Monday, February 14, 2005 8:58 PM [GMT+1=CET],
Dale Qualls < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> s43xmail is in both rc3.d and rc5.d, s80sendmail only shows u
I'll check 'em out, thanks Soenke!
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2/14/2005 1:14:43 PM >>>
On Monday, February 14, 2005 7:25 PM [GMT+1=CET],
Dale Qualls < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> Okay, here's a strange one that doesn't make sense to me.
>
>
PM >>>
Are you sure XMail is running in runlevel 3? Sendmail could be running
instead. Did you copy the startup script to /etc/rc3.d/ ?
-Don
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dale Qualls
Sent: Monday, February 14, 2005 12:26 PM
To
Okay, question #2.
The SMTP log isn't rolling/rotating. All of the other logs are fine.
The SMTP log has been gathering data since January 27th.
Here's the CMD_LINE from /etc/rc.d/init.d/xmail (and yes, the "l"
characters are lower case "L"s):
XMAIL_CMD_LINE="-Qt 600 -Qi 0 -Qr 672 -Ql -Pl -Mr
Okay, here's a strange one that doesn't make sense to me.
RH8.0, XMail 1.21, ClamAV, Pete's AV filter, SA3.02, modified SA
filter.
Changing inittab runlevel to "3" from "5" to save resources from X
starting up hoses the box (default font not found errors). Changing GDM
startup in the gui from
I'd suggest installing one of the many webmail programs that work with
xmail. I use UebiMiau and it is perfect.
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2/4/2005 3:02 AM >>>
Bill Healy wrote:
> Why do you want the mail to go to /var/spool/mail/fbiondi???
>
> Bill
Our goal (or better, what my chief wants) is to u
Are you guys ready for this?
After uninstalling and re-installing so many times that my face turned
blue, I believe it's now fixed. I'll keep an eye on it for a while to
be sure.
Here's what I did. I went and looked at the spamd and it had paths in
it to /usr/share/spamassassin which is the o
First of all, thanks for the help, this is what I've found.
The bsa_filter has "#!/usr/bin/perl"
perl -V gives only 5.8.6 info (as far as I can tell, it output a bunch
of stuff)
spamassassin -V gives: Spamassassin version 3.0.2 running on Perl
version 5.8.6
Your script (thanks much) gives:
when I get home though.
Thanks for the input!!
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1/13/2005 5:13 PM >>>
try upgrading via CPAN
Dario
-Messaggio originale-
Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] conto di Dale Qualls
Inviato: giovedì 13 gennaio 2005 23.45
A: xmail@xmailserver
nd it
didn't help.
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1/13/2005 3:20 PM >>>
Did you restart spamd?
Dale Qualls said the following on 01/13/2005 04:11 PM:
> I just upgraded to SA 3.02 and have a bad issue. If I manually run
SA
> as a test (spamassassin -D -t < testfile.tx
I just upgraded to SA 3.02 and have a bad issue. If I manually run SA
as a test (spamassassin -D -t < testfile.txt > output.txt) the proper
version of SA (3.02) is used. If SA is run by my bsa_filter.pl then
it's showing that the old version that I replaced (SA 2.61) is being
used.
I've tried d
I put it on this a.m., we'll keep an eye on it.
Thanks!
>>> davidel@xmailserver.org 1/6/2005 2:30 PM >>>
On Thu, 6 Jan 2005, Dale Qualls wrote:
> I'm seeing this error (filter error (-5)) in the /var/log/messages
log
> on many messages. When this happens
I'm seeing this error (filter error (-5)) in the /var/log/messages log
on many messages. When this happens the server locks up and we have to
reboot it, quickly ssh into it, kill xmail and spamd.
spamd is running with an rss of 86M, seems kinda high to me.
xmail 1.18
sa 2.63
clamav
Pete Lindem
Davide:
Should I try going up to 1.20? Could something have gotten hosed in my
xMail?
Can I simply run the install as normal without it hosing my domains,
users, filters etc?? How do I grab the executables only and drop them
into /MailRoot/bin?
Strange, I don't get the normal info when I telnet to 66.147.129.196 on
port 25.
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 12/17 11:51 AM >>>
On Fri, 17 Dec 2004, Dale Qualls wrote:
> Davide:
>
> Thank goodness you're on.
>
> The .txt files are attached.
It seems ever
ROTECTED] 12/17 11:51 AM >>>
On Fri, 17 Dec 2004, Dale Qualls wrote:
> Davide:
>
> Thank goodness you're on.
>
> The .txt files are attached.
It seems everything normal. You system is basically idle and XMail
connections are there. Also, there's no unsual o
Davide:
Thank goodness you're on.
The .txt files are attached.
Thanks!
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 12/17 11:34 AM >>>
On Fri, 17 Dec 2004, Dale Qualls wrote:
> RH8
> Xmail 1.17 (I know it's old but it's always ran beautifully)
> bsa_filter.pl
> Pe
s "cur", "new" and "tmp" folder and nothing shows
up). Outbound messages appear to be sending but they're not getting
outside of the box either.
I've done a "ls -R" in the /spool but
Go to www.xmailserver.org, there are two that should run fine since
you're probably running Perl for Win as well. I've used them both but
currently use the bsa_filter.pl so forwarding/deleting can be done.
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/3/2004 11:16:17 AM >>>
Does any one have a working SpamAssassin fil
LOL, heck, I'm still running 1.7 on the xMail server that I help
administer. 1.8 kept dying so I never went up from there :)
I'm waiting for the long-awaited IMAP version (which I know is in
production, I'm not trying to push it).
Thanks Davide for all of your hard work!
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Without grabbing and checking the manual for switches, those "l"'s are
lowercase "L"'s, right?
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/2/2004 11:51:53 PM >>>
Can anyone suggest any ideas to determine why XMail is not writing any
log files? The xmail command line, as pasted from xmail executable in
/etc/rc.d/init.
Hi gang!
I thought I had a perfectly working xmail system until I started
looking at the logs. Apparently none of my filters were working (using
Pete Lindemans AV w/clam and Beau Cox's version of Drake's spamassassin
filter). I've got the AV working now, but not the SA filter but that's
not my
Heck, I thought it was supposed to be there :)
I'll remove it now, thanks much!!
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 7/8/2004 2:17:25 PM >>>
On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, Dale Qualls wrote:
> Yep, HeloDomain is set in server.tab
You should be just fine if you remove it.
- Davide
-
To
Yep, HeloDomain is set in server.tab
I'll check the PTR records, but I think they should be fine.
Thanks Davide!!
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 7/8/2004 1:51:03 PM >>>
On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, Dale Qualls wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I've gotten this reply back a couple
Are you using [EMAIL PROTECTED] for your username? X-mail likes
it that way.
Beau: Please contact me off-list if you can, I have a question about
your spam filter.
Thanks!
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 7/8/2004 12:21:41 PM >>>
Hi -
I am running 1.20 on Linux, and I have a problem.
I get '-ERR Pass
Hi all!
I've gotten this reply back a couple of times from various recipients
of messages that my users have sent. I'm not sure where they are
getting the idea that my IP address may be forged. I see the mail for
the recipient is being passed through securemail.forward.net, so maybe
the easy an
1 - 100 of 189 matches
Mail list logo
