[Xpert] xfree86

I have Compaq EVO 300 sistem. I have instaled RedHat8.0 on it. Often the image on screen disappear suddenly. The screen became black. In another case the image is locked . I don't know what is happening. M.Stroe __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus -

Re: [Xpert] Re: [Xpert]XFree86 mailing list consolidation

torsdagen den 9 januari 2003 03.50 skrev Michael Toomim: > I can't find any archives for [EMAIL PROTECTED] Are there no mailing > list archives on purpose, or is this an accident? I've found tons of archives at http://marc.theaimsgroup.com including this list. -- robin _

[Xpert] Re: [Xpert]XFree86 mailing list consolidation

David Dawes wrote: Most of the public XFree86 mailing lists are being consolidated into a single list -- "[EMAIL PROTECTED]". This new list is open for subscription at . Subscriptions from the old lists won't automatically be moved to the new list,

[Xpert]XFree86 mailing list consolidation

Most of the public XFree86 mailing lists are being consolidated into a single list -- "[EMAIL PROTECTED]". This new list is open for subscription at . Subscriptions from the old lists won't automatically be moved to the new list, so people will have

[Xpert]XFree86 4.2.0 for SiS650

I am trying to get a SiS650 video card to work with XFree86 4.2.0 (kernel 2.4.18-6mdk; all from Mandrake 8.2). I recently learned that most recent sis driver (under development by Thomas Winischhofer) supports SiS650, but I am having some trouble getting my hands on the binaries of this driver (I

[Xpert]XFree86 4.2.99 ATI Radeon 9000 Pro interference

Hi I installed the XFree86 packages from RedHat Phoebe distribution recently. Everything appears to be work perfectly -- picture is great except that once every 10 seconds or so some ripples / waves appear from the bottom right of the screen, travel up to the centre (occupying the long diagonal -

Re: [Xpert]XFree86 snapshot 4.2.99.3

Il 00:46, domenica 29 dicembre 2002, Mark Vojkovich ha scritto: > > How about GeForce4 support for PowerPC machines? > > I'm not sure when 4.2.99.3 was cut, but GeForce4 should > work on PPC after Fri Nov 8 22:00:14 2002 UTC. I have an iMac G4 17" widescreen and the graphic card is identified as

Re: [Xpert]XFree86 snapshot 4.2.99.3

On Tue, 24 Dec 2002, Alessandro Astarita wrote: > Il 22:45, martedì 24 dicembre 2002, David Dawes ha scritto: > > 4.2.99.3 has most of the features that will be present in 4.3.0. > > The main exception is several radeon driver updates, which will be > > available in a future snapshot. > > How abo

RE: [Xpert]XFree86 snapshot 4.2.99.3

Wayne Dorn -Original Message- From: David Dawes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 24, 2002 1:45 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Xpert]XFree86 snapshot 4.2.99.3 XFree86 4.3.0 pre-release snapshot 4.2.99.3 was tagged a few days ago. The CVS tag is "xf-4_2

[Xpert]XFree86 4.1: S3 virge driver on linux 2.4.xx at alpha machine: kernel bug?

Hi, Since a year, I used a Elsa Gloria L/MX with the linux 2.4.19 kernel without any trouble. After switching to srm console (alpha specific), the graphics adapter was not longer recognized and I changed the Gloria to an old S3 virge card. I reconfigured X and startet X with startx. All what h

Re: [Xpert]XFree86 snapshot 4.2.99.3

Il 22:45, martedì 24 dicembre 2002, David Dawes ha scritto: > 4.2.99.3 has most of the features that will be present in 4.3.0. > The main exception is several radeon driver updates, which will be > available in a future snapshot. How about GeForce4 support for PowerPC machines? -- Alessandro 'As

[Xpert]XFree86 snapshot 4.2.99.3

XFree86 4.3.0 pre-release snapshot 4.2.99.3 was tagged a few days ago. The CVS tag is "xf-4_2_99_3". Binaries for a few platforms will be available from our public ftp server: Currently Linux-ix86-glibc22 binaries are available.

[Xpert]XFree86 4.1: S3 virge driver on linux 2.4.xx at alpha machine: kernel bug?

Hi, Since a year, I used a Elsa Gloria L/MX with the linux 2.4.19 kernel without any trouble. After switching to srm console (alpha specific), the graphics adapter was not longer recognized and I changed the Gloria to an old S3 virge card. I reconfigured X and startet X with startx. Now, after st

Re: [Xpert]XFree86 -configure fails

sashan wrote: On Sun, 2002-12-08 at 10:31, Mark Vojkovich wrote: On 7 Dec 2002, sashan wrote: Attached are the results of XFree86 -configure (configure.txt), scanpci -v (scanpci.txt) and the log file. Please can someone help or advise how to go about making change

Re: [Xpert]XFree86 -configure fails

On Sun, 2002-12-08 at 10:31, Mark Vojkovich wrote: > On 7 Dec 2002, sashan wrote: > > > Attached are the results of XFree86 -configure (configure.txt), scanpci > > -v (scanpci.txt) and the log file. Please can someone help or advise how > > to go about making changes to the header file mentioned

Re: [Xpert]XFree86 -configure fails

On 7 Dec 2002, sashan wrote: > Attached are the results of XFree86 -configure (configure.txt), scanpci > -v (scanpci.txt) and the log file. Please can someone help or advise how > to go about making changes to the header file mentioned (see > configure.txt) > That card wasn't supported 4.2.0.

Re: [Xpert]XFree86 -configure fails

Dr Andrew C Aitchison wrote: On 7 Dec 2002, sashan wrote: Attached are the results of XFree86 -configure (configure.txt), scanpci -v (scanpci.txt) and the log file. Please can someone help or advise how to go about making changes to the header file mentioned (see configure.txt)

Re: [Xpert]XFree86 -configure fails

On 7 Dec 2002, sashan wrote: > Attached are the results of XFree86 -configure (configure.txt), scanpci > -v (scanpci.txt) and the log file. Please can someone help or advise how > to go about making changes to the header file mentioned (see > configure.txt) The GeForce4 Ti 4400, with that pci id

[Xpert]XFree86 -configure fails

Attached are the results of XFree86 -configure (configure.txt), scanpci -v (scanpci.txt) and the log file. Please can someone help or advise how to go about making changes to the header file mentioned (see configure.txt) pci bus 0x cardnum 0x00 function 0x00: vendor 0x1106 device 0x3099 VI

Re: [Xpert]XFree86's GDI functions

"the arithmetic of Window's [sic] GDI." , that is, how Windows implements DrawPoint(), DrawLine() etc. Best regards! Hua - Original Message - From: "Kurt Wall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 9:58

Re: [Xpert]XFree86's GDI functions

On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, Hua zhang wrote: > Yes. There is a project that needs to study the arithmetic of Window's GDI, but >there is no way to get its source code you know. We hope to study the GDI functions >of Linux first, that is XFree86. It is a huge code package and I have no too much >time t

Re: [Xpert]XFree86's GDI functions

On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 01:59:03PM +0800, Hua zhang wrote: > Yes. There is a project that needs to study the arithmetic of Window's GDI, but >there is no way to get its source code you know. We hope to study the GDI functions >of Linux first, that is XFree86. It is a huge code package and I have

Re: [Xpert]XFree86's GDI functions

y who has stuided or implemented XFree86's GDI functions and friendly enough can give me some useful information on it. Thanks Hua - Original Message - From: "Mark Vojkovich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "xfree86" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, Nov

Re: [Xpert]XFree86's GDI functions

On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, Hua zhang wrote: > Hi all: > >How to find the source code of XFree86's GDI functions, such as XDrawPoint(), >XDrawLine() etc? > Is the file /src/X410src-1/xc/programs/Xserver/Xext/panoramiXprocs.c implements all >of them? > No, that is the Xinerama extension.

[Xpert]XFree86's GDI functions

Hi all: How to find the source code of XFree86's GDI functions, such as XDrawPoint(), XDrawLine() etc? Is the file /src/X410src-1/xc/programs/Xserver/Xext/panoramiXprocs.c implements all of them? Hua Thanks in advance! ___ Xpert mailing list [EMAIL

Re: [Xpert]xfree86 libint10 in non-x86 environments

On Sat, 23 Nov 2002, Egbert Eich wrote: > > However, the ATI rage drivers do not deal well with the lack of > > libint10 and seems to set really bogus video timings as a result > > (there are other bugs I've fixed where the rage driver will crash if > > libint10 is not present). In fact in the

Re: [Xpert]XFree86 ftp and anoncvs server unavailable

On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 10:51:01PM -0500, David Dawes wrote: > On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 12:08:41PM -0500, David Dawes wrote: > >The system that hosts our public ftp and anoncvs servers died yesterday. > >There's currently no ETA for those services being restored, but hopefully > >they'll be availabl

Re: [Xpert]XFree86 ftp and anoncvs server unavailable

On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 12:08:41PM -0500, David Dawes wrote: >The system that hosts our public ftp and anoncvs servers died yesterday. >There's currently no ETA for those services being restored, but hopefully >they'll be available within the next week. The public ftp and anoncvs server is back up

Re: [Xpert]xfree86 libint10 in non-x86 environments

John Dennis writes: John> I'm trying to fix some bugs with XFree86 drivers in an Itanium John> (ia64) environment. ... Egbert> I don't think you need to do too much for ia64. It works Egbert> on all ia64 systems I have tested so far. Unfortunately I have an example where it does

[Xpert]XFree86 ftp and anoncvs server unavailable

The system that hosts our public ftp and anoncvs servers died yesterday. There's currently no ETA for those services being restored, but hopefully they'll be available within the next week. David -- David Dawes Release Engineer/Architect The XFree86 Project www.XFree86.org/~d

Re: [Xpert]xfree86 libint10 in non-x86 environments

John Dennis writes: > John Dennis writes: > > John> I'm trying to fix some bugs with XFree86 drivers in an Itanium > John> (ia64) environment. ... > > Egbert> I don't think you need to do too much for ia64. It works > Egbert> on all ia64 systems I have tested so far. >

Re: [Xpert]xfree86 libint10 in non-x86 environments

John> I'm trying to fix some bugs with XFree86 drivers in an Itanium John> (ia64) environment. ... Egbert> I don't think you need to do too much for ia64. It works Egbert> on all ia64 systems I have tested so far. Unfortunately I have an example where it does not, see below.

[Xpert]XFree86 4.2.1-9 and ATI Radeon Mobility 7500

Hello, Mike A. Harris from Redhat suggests me to write an e-mail to you. I installed Redhat 8.0 on a Compaq EVO N800C with a ATI Radeon Mobility 7500 card. The graphic card is recognized but it seems that the radeon driver is not working well: the image is stripped (kind of vertical bars) and un

[Xpert]xfree86 4.2.0

hi ... just installed mandrake 8.1 and was wondering if this is compatible with 8.1 ... and if it is how to install   thanks  

Re: [Xpert]xfree86 libint10 in non-x86 environments

John Dennis writes: > I'm trying to fix some bugs with XFree86 drivers in an Itanium (ia64) > environment. Many of the drivers seem to have a strong dependency on > libint10 for configuration, especially for getting monitor configuration > information via DDC/VBE which depends on int10. I don'

[Xpert]xfree86 libint10 in non-x86 environments

I'm trying to fix some bugs with XFree86 drivers in an Itanium (ia64) environment. Many of the drivers seem to have a strong dependency on libint10 for configuration, especially for getting monitor configuration information via DDC/VBE which depends on int10. I'll admit libint10 is one area of the

Re: [Xpert]XFree86 "Automatic" generated modelines have a max refreshrate of 85Hz?

On 19 Nov 2002, Gerhard Olsson wrote: > The modelines automatically generated by XFree86 seems to give a refresh > rate of maximum 85 Hz. You have to generate a modeline manually to > achieve a higher refresh rate. Is this intentional? There aren't yet any truly automatic modelines in the server.

[Xpert]XFree86 from cvs fails with Undefined symbol "XextFindDisplay"

Folks, I just grabbed the latest CVS and compiled. When I installed, I'm now getting a lot of applications which are failing with: /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/X11R6/lib/libXrender.so.1: Undefined symbol "XextFindDisplay" Is this a known issue? Randomly having a lot of my X applications goi

[Xpert]XFree86 "Automatic" generated modelines have a max refresh rate of85Hz?

I have been looking for information about this issue, but not found any resources. However, a search on the web indicates that I am not the only one with questions about this... The modelines automatically generated by XFree86 seems to give a refresh rate of maximum 85 Hz. You have to generate a

[Xpert]XFree86 version 4.2.99

i am configuring pc with 82845G/GL graphics controller under RH 7.3 from the readings that i encounter, suggested that a download of version from cvs is more appropriate at this moment. i tried to access via cvs with all the mentioned steps/ways... but failed. i need help. could somebody lend a

[Xpert]XFree86 4.3.0 release plans

The schedule for the 4.3.0 release is starting to take shape. The first part of that is the feature freeze. This is scheduled for 30 November 2002. The feature freeze date is last date that new features intended for the 4.3.0 release may be submitted. The address to send submissions to is [EMAI

Re: [Xpert]XFree86 gdb for Linux PPC?

On Mon, 2002-11-04 at 02:56, Mark Vojkovich wrote: >Is there an XFree86 module-aware version of gdb for Linux PPC > someplace? I'm not aware of any binaries, but the patch for current gdb versions is mostly architecture independent. I hope Mike will manage to get it integrated into stock gdb s

[Xpert]XFree86 gdb for Linux PPC?

Is there an XFree86 module-aware version of gdb for Linux PPC someplace? Mark. ___ Xpert mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xpert

Re: [Xpert]XFree86 and LCd

I found the answer at last. Pressing auto adjust botton(the manual says it automatically adjust the horizontal position, vertical position, phase and clock settting) resolve my problem. Now my X can work well in both 75HZ and 60HZ. The only trouble is when I go back to win2k, I have to let monitor

Re: [Xpert]XFree86 and LCd

My experience with LCD monitor's (especially 17" or greater) is with the analog they have trouble keeping up. If you can decrease your overall speed you will probably decrease the "flickering". Which I think he means is a continous "fuzz" around sharp contrasts. (My two cents) -Gryn (Adam Luter

Re: [Xpert]XFree86 and LCd

On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, Yongming Wei wrote: > My LCD is philips 150S3f. > > accurately, the flickering is not serious, although > characters can be seen a little messed up, I can still > recognize them. > > Now I want inscreasing DotClock to see if it is > because the DotClock is too low. Flic

Re: [Xpert]XFree86 and LCd

My LCD is philips 150S3f. accurately, the flickering is not serious, although characters can be seen a little messed up, I can still recognize them. Now I want inscreasing DotClock to see if it is because the DotClock is too low. --- Mark Vojkovich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 30 Oct

Re: [Xpert]XFree86 and LCd

On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, Yongming Wei wrote: > Thanks, I works after change VertRefresh to 60, but > after that, my monitor begins to flicker, and I found > the dotrate degrade from 75 to 60, maybe it is the > reason of this problem. > > How to avoid it? 60 Hz Is expected to flicker on a CRT, but

Re: [Xpert]XFree86 and LCd

Thanks, I works after change VertRefresh to 60, but after that, my monitor begins to flicker, and I found the dotrate degrade from 75 to 60, maybe it is the reason of this problem. How to avoid it? Regards, --- Mark Vojkovich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Yongming Wei wrote:

Re: [Xpert]XFree86 and LCd

On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Yongming Wei wrote: > I changed my CRT to LCD, it works well in my redhat > 8.0, but I found a problem: the manual for this LCD > says the refresh rate is recommended set to 60HZ at > 1024*768, but XFree86 will automaticly search for the > highest refresh rate possiblely which

[Xpert]XFree86 and LCd

I changed my CRT to LCD, it works well in my redhat 8.0, but I found a problem: the manual for this LCD says the refresh rate is recommended set to 60HZ at 1024*768, but XFree86 will automaticly search for the highest refresh rate possiblely which is 75HZ in my box. Can somebody point me the way t

[Xpert]XFree86 4.2.0 problem

Hello, I am using Solaris 8 Intel 2/02 with XFree86 4.2.0. I have Matrox Millennium G550 graphic card wich is not supported in Solaris 8 Intel 2/02. All work fine but is big problems in colors in Netscape 6.x, in icons. In Netscape 6.x, in viewing icons there is no colors but only strikes. How

Re: [Xpert]XFree86 Bugzilla

On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 04:26:59PM -0700, Andrew P. Lentvorski wrote: >On Mon, 21 Oct 2002, David Dawes wrote: > >> This comes up from time to time. The bottom line is that having an >> XFree86 bug tracking system is of limited use unless the XFree86 developers >> use it. Since that's the group t

Re: [Xpert]XFree86 Bugzilla

On Mon, 21 Oct 2002, David Dawes wrote: > This comes up from time to time. The bottom line is that having an > XFree86 bug tracking system is of limited use unless the XFree86 developers > use it. Since that's the group that it would impact the most, that's > where the motivation for it should c

Re: [Xpert]XFree86 CVS and 1600x1024 (DVI) / Radeon

Wonderful. The reason I never saw the post was that my delivery was disabled for the list. I was wondering why my XFree86 mail folder was rather light lately. :-/ This must automatically happen when my mail server starts bouncing messages when the quota gets exceeded. Anyway, here's answers to

Re: [Xpert]XFree86 Bugzilla

Le mar 22/10/2002 à 00:30, David Dawes a écrit : > On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 03:54:30PM +0200, Erik Moeller wrote: > >Bugzilla is quickly becoming the standard bug tracking system for large > >open software projects. Originally developed by the Mozilla project, it > >is now used by KDE, GNOME, Apache

Re: [Xpert]XFree86 Bugzilla

On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 03:54:30PM +0200, Erik Moeller wrote: >Bugzilla is quickly becoming the standard bug tracking system for large >open software projects. Originally developed by the Mozilla project, it >is now used by KDE, GNOME, Apache, AbiWord, Red Hat Linux, Conectiva >Linux, Gentoo Linux,

[Xpert]XFree86 CVS and 1600x1024 (DVI) / Radeon

I tried to send this a few days ago but it looks like it may not have made it (never saw it come back across the list), so I'll try again. Apologies if it actually made it. With the flurry of commits over the last few weeks, I figured it would be worth installing XFree86 CVS and check out RandR,

Re: [Xpert]XFree86 Bugzilla

On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 03:54:30PM +0200, Erik Moeller wrote: > Bugzilla is quickly becoming the standard bug tracking system for large > open software projects. Originally developed by the Mozilla project, it > is now used by KDE, GNOME, Apache, AbiWord, Red Hat Linux, Conectiva > Linux, Gentoo Li

Re: [Xpert]XFree86 CVS and 1600x1024 (DVI) / Radeon

On Mon, 21 Oct 2002, Jeff Brubaker wrote: > Unfortunately, X comes up with a root window size of 1600x1024 (reported by > xdpyinfo) but is really only outputting 1280x1024 (reported by my SGI > MultiLink adapter). All of this flows through a Radeon VE to my SGI 1600SW > flat panel (DVI). When I

[Xpert]XFree86 Bugzilla

Bugzilla is quickly becoming the standard bug tracking system for large open software projects. Originally developed by the Mozilla project, it is now used by KDE, GNOME, Apache, AbiWord, Red Hat Linux, Conectiva Linux, Gentoo Linux, Ximian, and many many others. XFree86, which is fundamental to an

Re: [Xpert]XFree86 CVS and 1600x1024 (DVI) / Radeon

Around 10 o'clock on Oct 18, Jeff Brubaker wrote: > Unfortunately, X comes up with a root window size of 1600x1024 (reported by > xdpyinfo) but is really only outputting 1280x1024 (reported by my SGI > MultiLink adapter). Hmm. The Radeon driver mode selection code was restructured during the Ra

[Xpert]XFree86 CVS and 1600x1024 (DVI) / Radeon

With the flurry of commits over the last few weeks, I figured it would be worth installing XFree86 CVS and check out RandR, Xcursor and the new ATI acceleration. Unfortunately, X comes up with a root window size of 1600x1024 (reported by xdpyinfo) but is really only outputting 1280x1024 (reported

[Xpert]xfree86 geode driver on freebsd

Hi, this is just to confirm that the new Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/geode driver works for me on a National Semiconductor Centaurus II (Geode GX1+5530A) reference system, running FreeBSD 4.6 (a slightly patched -Stable), with X11 built from a 16-oct-2002 xfree86 cvsup. I generated the XF86Confi

Re: [Xpert]XFree86 on Solaris Sun Blade 100?

On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, Marc Aurele La France wrote: > Please don't post this anymore. I'd rather see the full > /var/log/XFree86.0.log. Ummm, with the exception of the top and bottom boilerplate, I cut and pasted that directly from the /var/log/XFree86.0.log I learned my lesson from the last time

Re: [Xpert]XFree86 on Solaris Sun Blade 100?

On Tue, 8 Oct 2002, Andrew P. Lentvorski wrote: > Well, XFree86 looks like it gets further, but now it has a different > failure message: > XFree86 Version 4.2.99.1 / X Window System > (protocol Version 11, revision 0, vendor release 6600) > Release Date: 26 September 2002 > If the serve

Re: [Xpert]XFree86 on Solaris Sun Blade 100?

Well, XFree86 looks like it gets further, but now it has a different failure message: XFree86 Version 4.2.99.1 / X Window System (protocol Version 11, revision 0, vendor release 6600) Release Date: 26 September 2002 If the server is older than 6-12 months, or if your card is newer

[Xpert]XFree86-4.2.0-8 and SaveUnders

Title: XFree86-4.2.0-8 and SaveUnders What need I do to enable it ? Recompile XFree from sources, get extension, put something in the configuration file, something else ? Thank you. Valery [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Xpert]XFree86 driver work

On ftp://people.redhat.com/alan please find - A Cyrix driver for XFree86 4.2 (CS5520/CS5530) The shipped driver appears to be incomplete, the detection didn't work, mode change didn't work and was done wrongly, palette handling didn't work and a few other th

Re: [Xpert]XFree86 on Solaris Sun Blade 100?

On Mon, 7 Oct 2002, Marc Aurele La France wrote: > I'm now running with an aperture driver generated with gcc 3.2, and have > updated the shell archive for the aperture driver accordingly. Well, "make install" didn't quite do all the required tricks, but I eventually muddled my way through. Nex

Re: [Xpert]XFree86 on Solaris Sun Blade 100?

On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Marc Aurele La France wrote: > On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Joshua Symons wrote: > > gcc 3.2 which happens to actually be quite clean on solaris at this > > point does indeed default to 32 bit, requiring the -m64 switch to > > compile 64 bit code. > OK. I'll verify this and make the

[Xpert]XFree86 on Compaq Evo N1000c laptops

I have sent the following message to first the newbie and then the "Xpert" lists, without any response. I can take constructive criticism... Is there a shortcoming in the format of the message? Cheers, Hi. Any assistance with the following would be appreciated. I have installed XFree86 versi

Re: [Xpert]XFree86 on Solaris Sun Blade 100?

On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Joshua Symons wrote: > > > > This is the problem. Please read point 1. of section 4. in > > > > README.Solaris. You need to install the aperture driver. > > > Argh. Somehow my brain managed to mangle the meaning of the third > > > paragraph. I think it was the mention of

Re: [Xpert]XFree86 on Solaris Sun Blade 100?

ct: Re: [Xpert]XFree86 on Solaris Sun Blade 100? > On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Andrew P. Lentvorski wrote: > > > > This is the problem. Please read point 1. of section 4. in > > > README.Solaris. You need to install the aperture driver. > > > Argh. Somehow my brain man

Re: [Xpert]XFree86 on Solaris Sun Blade 100?

On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Andrew P. Lentvorski wrote: > > This is the problem. Please read point 1. of section 4. in > > README.Solaris. You need to install the aperture driver. > Argh. Somehow my brain managed to mangle the meaning of the third > paragraph. I think it was the mention of "Solaris

Re: [Xpert]XFree86 on Solaris Sun Blade 100?

On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Marc Aurele La France wrote: > This is the problem. Please read point 1. of section 4. in > README.Solaris. You need to install the aperture driver. Argh. Somehow my brain managed to mangle the meaning of the third paragraph. I think it was the mention of "Solaris x86 2.5

Re: [Xpert]XFree86 on Solaris Sun Blade 100?

On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Andrew P. Lentvorski wrote: > > Besides, I see no complaint here about the other drivers that are in the > > same boat (e.g. newport, i740, etc). So, what problem did including i810 > > cause? > Some form of missing header, I think. If I get this all working, I'll go > back

Re: [Xpert]XFree86 on Solaris Sun Blade 100?

On Tue, 1 Oct 2002, Marc Aurele La France wrote: > Besides, I see no complaint here about the other drivers that are in the > same boat (e.g. newport, i740, etc). So, what problem did including i810 > cause? Some form of missing header, I think. If I get this all working, I'll go back to the b

[Xpert]XFree86 on Compaq Evo N1000c laptops

Hi. Any assistance with the following would be appreciated. I have installed XFree86 version 4.2.0 on four Compaq Evo N1000c laptops, (ATI Mobility Radeon 7500 graphics chip) , using Solaris8 x86 release 7/01. I have not created an XF86Config file - the system is using the default /etc/openwin/s

[Xpert]XFree86 4.2.1 & Nvidia driver and TNT2 M64 card

Hello everybody, Some of you will remember me from such shows as "Dave and the TNT2 go head to dual-head", and "When Good Video Cards Go Bad, Roman Numeral 3! (hosted by Sheriff John Burnell)". Let me bring you my latest thrilling installment in the ongoing saga... First of all I thought I had

Re: [Xpert]XFree86 on Solaris Sun Blade 100?

On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, Andrew P. Lentvorski wrote: > After deleting the i810 and i830 drivers (these *really* should be > autodetected as not available when being built under Solaris) from my > setup, XFree86 actually completely builds and installs. I'll assume you've read my cursory comment about

Re: [Xpert]XFree86 on Solaris Sun Blade 100?

After deleting the i810 and i830 drivers (these *really* should be autodetected as not available when being built under Solaris) from my setup, XFree86 actually completely builds and installs. However, it doesn't detect any PCI interface at all. What obvious thing did I miss? -a XFree86 Versio

Re: [Xpert]XFree86 CVS

On Fri, 27 Sep 2002, Kevin Oberman wrote: > I am running the ATI drivers (ati_drv and radeon_drv) from CVS on a > 4.2.1 system and it works fine. I was a bit surprised (but pleased) > that the .o files built for Linux worked flawlessly on my FreeBSD > system. I have not tried the r128_drv, but I

Re: [Xpert]XFree86 CVS

I am running the ATI drivers (ati_drv and radeon_drv) from CVS on a 4.2.1 system and it works fine. I was a bit surprised (but pleased) that the .o files built for Linux worked flawlessly on my FreeBSD system. I have not tried the r128_drv, but I suspect it will work as well. R. Kevin Oberman, Ne

Re: [Xpert]XFree86 CVS

On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 12:43:29PM +0200, Xavier Bestel wrote: > Le ven 27/09/2002 à 12:09, Alexey Dokuchaev a écrit : > > On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 09:03:47PM +0200, Michael wrote: > > > Just out of curiousity i was wondering if anyone knew what features are >currently only in the CVS? > > > > No

Re: [Xpert]XFree86 CVS

Le ven 27/09/2002 à 12:09, Alexey Dokuchaev a écrit : > On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 09:03:47PM +0200, Michael wrote: > > Just out of curiousity i was wondering if anyone knew what features are currently >only in the CVS? > > Not sure whether all of there already were merged, but, anyways, AFAIK, > t

Re: [Xpert]XFree86 CVS

On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 09:03:47PM +0200, Michael wrote: > Just out of curiousity i was wondering if anyone knew what features are currently >only in the CVS? Not sure whether all of there already were merged, but, anyways, AFAIK, the following is in the schedule for 4.3.0: * Xft2 + fon

[Xpert]XFree86 CVS

Just out of curiousity i was wondering if anyone knew what features are currently only in the CVS? ___ Xpert mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xpert

Re: [Xpert]XFree86 on Solaris Sun Blade 100?

On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, Andrew P. Lentvorski wrote: > Has anyone managed to get XFree86 to work on a Sun Blade > 100/150/1000/2000 running Solaris? > It doesn't necessarily need to work with a Sun graphics card; I would > happily go get even a reasonably expensive ATI or nVidia card (which would >

[Xpert]XFree86 on Solaris Sun Blade 100?

Has anyone managed to get XFree86 to work on a Sun Blade 100/150/1000/2000 running Solaris? It doesn't necessarily need to work with a Sun graphics card; I would happily go get even a reasonably expensive ATI or nVidia card (which would *still* be much cheaper than anything from Sun). -a __

Re: [Xpert]XFree86 dies early without error

Matthieu Herrb wrote: > Do the PAX patches allow mprotect() calls to make the allocated pages > executable ? > > The XFree86 ELF loader currently miss a few mprotect() calls, but I've > a patch that adds the missing calls and make the loader happy again on > OpenBSD architectures that have non-e

Re: [Xpert]XFree86 dies early without error

Markus Gutschke wrote (in a message from Monday 9) > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Sep 9 18:36:13 [kernel] PAX: terminating task: > > /usr/X11R6/bin/XFree86(XFree86):23363, uid/euid: 0/0, EIP: 08247BB8, ESP: > > BFF31D0C > > o > > > > So it IS the kernel's fault. Google says PAX controls s

[Xpert]XFree86 3.3.6 module to 4.2.0

Hi, I picked up a web pad (a ProGear) that had Xfree86 3.3.6 on it. They had a roll-your-own touchscreen solution that was partially based around the MuTouch drivers. The MuTouch drivers are actually functional, but can't be calibrated correctly - there's always some misalignment near th

Re: [Xpert]XFree86 dies early without error

This absolutely fixes the problem. Thanks a lot. On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, Markus Gutschke wrote: > + in a program. This will also break programs that rely on the > + old behaviour and expect that dynamically allocated memory via > + the malloc() family of functions is executable (which it is not)

Re: [Xpert]XFree86 dies early without error

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Sep 9 18:36:13 [kernel] PAX: terminating task: > /usr/X11R6/bin/XFree86(XFree86):23363, uid/euid: 0/0, EIP: 08247BB8, ESP: > BFF31D0C > o > > So it IS the kernel's fault. Google says PAX controls security. I have > someplace to start now, but feel free to shout out the

Re: [Xpert]XFree86 dies early without error

On Mon, 9 Sep 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, Mark Vojkovich wrote: > > >Any kernel /var/log/messages about the kill. > > > >Does something like "XFree86 -probeonly" even work? > > No, -probeonly fails in exactly the same way. But I hit paydirt in the > kernel logs:

Re: [Xpert]XFree86 dies early without error

On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, Mark Vojkovich wrote: >Any kernel /var/log/messages about the kill. > >Does something like "XFree86 -probeonly" even work? No, -probeonly fails in exactly the same way. But I hit paydirt in the kernel logs: Sep 9 18:30:53 [kernel] PAX: terminating task: /usr/X11R6/b

Re: [Xpert]XFree86 dies early without error

On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, Mark Vojkovich wrote: > On Mon, 9 Sep 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > I would think it wasn't an out-of-memory error. Before running XFree86, > > free says: > > > > total used free sharedbuffers cached > > Mem:515100 31892

Re: [Xpert]XFree86 dies early without error

On Mon, 9 Sep 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I would think it wasn't an out-of-memory error. Before running XFree86, > free says: > > total used free sharedbuffers cached > Mem:515100 31892 483208 0 2476 17904 > -/+ buffe

Re: [Xpert]XFree86 dies early without error

On Mon, 9 Sep 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I would think it wasn't an out-of-memory error. Before running XFree86, > free says: > > total used free sharedbuffers cached > Mem:515100 31892 483208 0 2476 17904 > -/+ buffe

  1   2   3   >