It starts with Z, which makes it the one of the last to be considered if
it's listed alphabetically?
Nathan.
Rahul wrote:
> hi
> can you give some disadvantages of the ZFS file system??
>
> plzz its urgent...
>
> help me.
>
>
> This message posted from opensolaris.org
> __
Rahul wrote:
> hi
> can you give some disadvantages of the ZFS file system??
>
Yes, it's too easy to administer.
This makes it rough to charge a lot as a sysadmin.
All the problems, manual decisions during fsck and data recovery,
head-aches after a power failure or getting disk drives mixed up
On Sun, 3 Aug 2008, Rahul wrote:
> hi
> can you give some disadvantages of the ZFS file system??
Yes. It provides very poor performance for large-file random-access
read/write of 128 bytes at a time. Is that enough info?
ZFS is great but it is not perfect in every regard.
It is easy to build
On Sun, 2008-08-03 at 20:46 -0700, Rahul wrote:
> hi
> can you give some disadvantages of the ZFS file system??
In what context ? Relative to what ?
Bob
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/l
hi
can you give some disadvantages of the ZFS file system??
plzz its urgent...
help me.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
there are two disks in one ZFS pool used as mirror. So we all know that there
are the same date on the two disks. I want to know, how can migrate them into
two separate pools, so I can later read & write them separately.( just as in
UFS mirror, we can mount each separately).
thanks.
This m
Malachi de Ælfweald wrote:
> I have to say, looking at that confuses me a little. How can the two
> disks be mirrored when the partition tables don't match?
Welcome to ZFS! In traditional disk mirrors,
disk A block 0 == disk B block 0
disk A block 1 == disk B block 1
...
disk A b
Jens wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I am currently evaluating OpenSolaris as a replacement for my linux
> installations. I installed it as a xen domU, so there is a remote chance,
> that my observations are caused by xen.
>
> First, my understanding of "zpool [i]scrub[/i]" is "Ok, go ahead, and rewrite
Richard Elling wrote:
> Matt Harrison wrote:
>> Aug 2 14:46:06 exodus Error for Command: read_defect_data
>> Error Level: Informational
>>
>
> key here: "Informational"
>
>> Aug 2 14:46:06 exodus scsi: [ID 107833 kern.notice]Requested
>> Block: 0 Error B
Johan Hartzenberg wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 8:48 PM, Matt Harrison
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
>> Miles Nordin wrote:
"mh" == Matt Harrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> mh> I'm worried about is if the entire batch is failing slowly
>>> mh> and will all die at the same
Matt Harrison wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I've been running a zfs fileserver for about a month now (on snv_91) and
> it's all working really well. I'm scrubbing once a week and nothing has
> come up as a problem yet.
>
> I'm a little worried as I've just noticed these messages in
> /var/adm/messag
Todd E. Moore wrote:
> I'm working with a group that wants to commit all the way to disk
> every single write - flushing or bypassing all the caches each time.
> The fsync() call will flush the ZIL. As for the disk's cache, if
> given the entire disk, ZFS enables its cache by default. Rather
On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 8:48 PM, Matt Harrison
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Miles Nordin wrote:
> >> "mh" == Matt Harrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > mh> I'm worried about is if the entire batch is failing slowly
> > mh> and will all die at the same time.
> >
>
Matt, can you
Hi there,
I am currently evaluating OpenSolaris as a replacement for my linux
installations. I installed it as a xen domU, so there is a remote chance, that
my observations are caused by xen.
First, my understanding of "zpool [i]scrub[/i]" is "Ok, go ahead, and rewrite
[b]each block of each de
Miles Nordin wrote:
>> "mh" == Matt Harrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> mh> I'm worried about is if the entire batch is failing slowly
> mh> and will all die at the same time.
>
> If you can download smartctl, you can use the approach described here:
>
> http://web.Ivy.NET/~ca
Hi Matt,
If it's all 3 disks, I wouldn't have thought it likely to be disk errors, and I
don't think it's a ZFS fault as such. You might be better posting the question
in the storage or help forums to see if anybody there can shed more light on
this.
Ross
> Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2008 16:48:03 +
Hi
I have 2 Servers with zones. I have LUNs on a SAN that will contain application
data which will be switched from zone A on Server 1 to zone A-failover on
Server 2.
What is the best way to set this up?
I think that it should work if i create a zpool and use legacy mountpoints. I
have to do
On Sun, 2008-08-03 at 11:42 -0500, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> Zfs makes human error really easy. For example
>
>$ zpool destroy mypool
Note that "zpool destroy" can be undone by "zpool import -D" (if you get
to it before the disks are overwritten).
According to the hard disk drive guide at
http://www.storagereview.com/guide2000/ref/hdd/index.html, a wopping
36% of data loss is due to human error. 49% of data loss was due to
hardware or system malfunction. With proper pool design, zfs
addresses most of the 49% of data loss due to hardwar
> "mh" == Matt Harrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
mh> I'm worried about is if the entire batch is failing slowly
mh> and will all die at the same time.
If you can download smartctl, you can use the approach described here:
http://web.Ivy.NET/~carton/rant/ml/raid-findingBadDisks-0
On Thu, 31 Jul 2008, Paul Fisher wrote:
>>
> Syslog is funny in that it does a lot of open/write/close cycles so that
> rotate can work trivially. Those are meta-data updates and on NFS each
> implies a COMMIT. This leads us back to the old "solaris nfs over zfs
> is slow" discussion, where we ta
Ross wrote:
> Hi,
>
> First of all, I really should warn you that I'm very new to Solaris, I'll
> happily share my thoughts but be aware that there's not a lot of experience
> backing them up.
>
>>From what you've said, and the logs you've posted I suspect you're hitting
>>recoverable read err
I have to say, looking at that confuses me a little. How can the two disks
be mirrored when the partition tables don't match?
On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 6:00 AM, andrew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK, I've put up some screenshots and a copy of my menu.lst to clarify my
> setup:
>
> http://sites.goog
OK, I've put up some screenshots and a copy of my menu.lst to clarify my setup:
http://sites.google.com/site/solarium/zfs-screenshots
Cheers
Andrew.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
h
Hi Tim,
> So, I've got a pretty basic solution:
>
> Every time the service starts, we check for the existence of a snapshot
> [...] - if one doesn't exist, then we take a snapshot under the policy set
> down by that instance.
This does sound like a valid alternative solution for this requiremen
My previous reply via email did not get linked to this post, so let me resend
it:
can roles run cron jobs ?),
>>> No. You need a user who can take on the role.
>> Darn, back to the drawing board.
> I don't have all the context on this but Solaris RBAC roles *can* run cron
> jobs. Roles don
The second disk doesn't have the root pool on slice 2 - it is on slice 0 as
with the first disk. All I did differently was to create a slice 2 covering the
whole Solaris FDISK primary partition. If you then issue this command as before:
installgrub /boot/grub/stage1 /boot/grub/stage2 /dev/dsk/c5
Hi,
First of all, I really should warn you that I'm very new to Solaris, I'll
happily share my thoughts but be aware that there's not a lot of experience
backing them up.
>From what you've said, and the logs you've posted I suspect you're hitting
>recoverable read errors. ZFS wouldn't flag th
On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 9:31 AM, Rahul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can u site the differences b/w ZFS and FAT filesystems??
>
Assuming you are serious, the technical bits can be found here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_file_systems
But there is a bigger, fundamental difference bet
Rahul wrote:
> Can u site the differences b/w ZFS and FAT filesystems??
>
>
You are joking, aren't you?
Have you read any of the ZFS documentation?
Ian
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/lis
Can u site the differences b/w ZFS and FAT filesystems??
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
31 matches
Mail list logo
