I think I may have it!    WHich is it?
I found two different versions of the compare;

1.  mine
--------------------------------------------------------------
         <mailet match="CompareNumericHeaderValue=X-MessageIsSpamProbability
> 0.9" class="SetMailAttribute" onMatchException="noMatch">
            <isSpam>true</isSpam>
         </mailet>

         <mailet match="CompareNumericHeaderValue=X-MessageIsSpamProbability
> 0.9" class="SetMimeHeader" onMatchException="noMatch">
            <name>X-MessageIsSpam</name>
            <value>true</value>
         </mailet>

2. Official james site
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
         <mailet match="CompareNumericHeaderValue=X-MessageIsSpamProbability
> 0.90" class="AddHeader" onMatchException="noMatch">
            <name>X-MessageIsSpam</name>
            <value>true</value>
         </mailet>

         <mailet match="CompareNumericHeaderValue=X-MessageIsSpamProbability
> 0.99" class="ToProcessor" onMatchException="noMatch">
            <processor> spam </processor>
            <notice>Spam not accepted</notice>
         </mailet>





jbi joe wrote:
> 
> ALL messages contain these tags.  The emails are a mixture.  Some are 
> plain test and some html.  There are some that come through with
> pictures,attachments,
> and the stnadard hoopla.   I must have something wrong in my config.xml.
> Why would the NaN always show up.
> 
> 
> 
> David Legg wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>> Here is what I see as well;  ( on ALL messages)
>>>
>>> X-MessageIsSpamProbability: NaN
>>> X-MessageIsSpam: true
>>>   
>> 
>> Mmm... Ok.  Well, as you may know 'NaN' is short for 'Not a Number' in 
>> floating point speak.  So something has caused the spam probability 
>> value to be such a large or small number that Java can't represent it.
>> 
>> I've seen one or two of my own messages with this value... but not all 
>> of them.
>> 
>> Tell me... do your emails contain lots of images?  I've noticed in the 
>> past that the Bayesian filter will quite happily chomp its way through 
>> all the image data and treat it as if it were text.  If you had lots of 
>> this type of email I could believe it might effectively poison the
>> corpus.
>> 
>> I'm beginning to clutch at straws now as I don't know what else to 
>> suggest...  Anybody else got any ideas?
>> 
>> Regards,
>> David Legg
>> 
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/How-do-I-reduce-SPAM-tp21763054p21943233.html
Sent from the James - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to