|
I wouldn't say that Web Services are limiting choices. Right now, Web Services are simply another choice today, although it's certainly true that vendors are rallying around Web Services resulting in a reduction in the number of choices. Many enterprises view this as a good thing as they strive to consolidate and manage their systems. The more important thing you mention, which I agree with wholeheartedly, is that choices have to be made with more consideration than price and interoperability. Decisions regarding solutions are a very complicated process, and an organization has to define and communicate its principles associated with those decisions. A very simple example that organizations have is build versus buy. There is no right answer for all, each organization will have different priorities that the principles must uphold. -tb On Oct 10, 2006, at 9:46 AM, Gregg Wonderly wrote:
|
- Re: [service-orientated-architecture... Keith Harrison-Broninski
- Re: [service-orientated-architec... Steve Jones
- Re: [service-orientated-arc... Ashley at Metamaxim
- Re: [service-orientated... Steve Jones
- Re: [service-orientated... Ashley at Metamaxim
- [service-orientated-arc... Naren Chawla
- Re: [service-orientated... Steve Jones
- Re: [service-orientated... Anne Thomas Manes
- Re: [service-orientated... Todd Biske
- Re: [service-orientated... Gregg Wonderly
- Re: [service-orientated... Todd Biske
- [service-orientated-architecture] An... Keith Harrison-Broninski
- Re: [service-orientated-architec... Hitoshi Ozawa
- RE: [service-orientated-architecture] Re... Guy Crets
- Re: [service-orientated-architecture] Re... Jan Algermissen
- Re: [service-orientated-architecture... Dan Creswell
- Re: [service-orientated-architecture... Keith Harrison-Broninski
- [service-orientated-architecture... Gervas Douglas
- Re: [service-orientated-architecture] Re: Keith o... Eric Newcomer
- Re: [service-orientated-architecture] Re: Keith o... Eric Newcomer
