On 20 Dec 2006, at 16:10, Jim Thomas wrote: > Section 4.5 of WS-Addressing, Endpoint Unavailable would provide an > interface to implementation of that capability. it would if anyone could agree what that means or planned to implement it. As it was it narrowly escaped being pulled following lack of demonstrable support during CR.
> If a transaction > context existed, there are also some items within WS-Transaction that > would apply. right, I wonder how many people are building public Web services which use Transactions. -- http://blog.whatfettle.com
