Public? Intranet? At a high level, you are dealing with ownership boundaries. Depending on the culture of the Enterprise in question, those ownership boundaries may very well be Business Units within the Company. In another one it could very well be another Company. The issues of governance, motivators/de-motivators, control would be very similar in both entities.
Regards, - Anil -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] On Behalf Of Jim Thomas Sent: Saturday, December 23, 2006 10:32 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [service-orientated-architecture] Re: The end of SOAP You should check the topic of this group, the significant majority of SOA web services won't be public but used within an intranet. --- In [email protected], Paul Downey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 20 Dec 2006, at 16:10, Jim Thomas wrote: > > > Section 4.5 of WS-Addressing, Endpoint Unavailable would provide an > > interface to implementation of that capability. > it would if anyone could agree what that means or planned to implement > it. As it was it narrowly escaped being pulled following lack of > demonstrable support during CR. > > > If a transaction > > context existed, there are also some items within WS-Transaction > > that would apply. > right, I wonder how many people are building public Web services which > use Transactions. > > -- > http://blog.whatfettle.com >
