You changed topics on me a little. You implied that a project-oriented approach was a pure IT phenomena. I queried about the typical approach of other groups in a company, which I contend are largely project-oriented as well.
The merits and characteristics of programme vs. project is a different discussion. -Rob --- In [email protected], Michael Poulin <m3pou...@...> wrote: > > Not necessary, some methodics require programme view while others (with less > inter-dependencies and emphasis on collaboration) can still be project-based > - Michael > > > > ________________________________ > From: Rob Eamon <rea...@...> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 4:28:51 AM > Subject: [service-orientated-architecture] Re: Anne again on SOA's Mortality > > > > > > --- In service-orientated- architecture@ yahoogroups. com, Michael Poulin > <m3poulin@ .> wrote: > > > > To make SO successful, IT should stop doing Projects and shift onto > > doing Programmes. > > Would you agree this implies that the entire company should stop being > project-oriented. The IT group and its behavior is largely a reflection of > the company culture. > > -Rob >
