I think it's a high time to do our first release. There's quite a few smallish organizational and/or configuration items we need to do before a release, most of them nicely tracked at http://incubator.apache.org/clutch.html. Color-wise, we are not doing that bad but we could do better. Don't care about the all green much but the page is tracking the right items, so I just picked up the hammer and I'll start swinging. I'll be updating the progress here and in case I run into issues. I'll first create the distribution area and publish our site docs there. If there are any open issues any of you would like to get closed before 1.0.0 better start working on them now.. I don't think we are going to wait for all of the issues currently scheduled for 1.0 (https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&mode=hide&sorter/order=DESC&sorter/field=priority&resolution=-1&pid=12310950&fixfor=12314078) to be completed unless they are critical/blocker. We'll just schedule them for a later point release if not done until we are otherwise ready for 1.0.0. Agree?
Kalle On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 1:19 PM, Les Hazlewood <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks! > > On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 4:17 PM, Alan D. Cabrera <[email protected]> wrote: >> Done. >> >> >> Regards, >> Alan >> >> On Dec 18, 2009, at 1:06 PM, Les Hazlewood wrote: >> >>> In light of this, could you please resolve the following issue? >>> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SHIRO-41 >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Les >>> >>> On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 11:16 AM, Alan D. Cabrera <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> For artwork it can get complicated but only if you received stipulations >>>> on >>>> its usage; it doesn't seem that there is any. I think we're good here. >>>> >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Alan >>>> >>>> On Dec 16, 2009, at 7:33 AM, Les Hazlewood wrote: >>>> >>>>> There is one minor thing I forgot to mention: Jeremy's friend created >>>>> the old JSecurity shield/lock logo for us. He did the logo for us in >>>>> return for free website hosting on one of our servers. This is >>>>> payment for services rendered (he payed us by doing the logo work, the >>>>> services rendered were the website hosting), so I don't think that we >>>>> need a CLA/sign-off from him. >>>>> >>>>> As I understand it, the shield/lock logo is our intellectual property >>>>> due to this agreement and we don't need to involve him. IANAL, but I >>>>> think we're ok. >>>>> >>>>> - Les >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 10:26 AM, Les Hazlewood <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Yep, it did. Just for clarity's sake: every contributor on the old >>>>>> JSecurity project came over as a committer to Apache and each also >>>>>> sent the re-licensing agreement/affirmation at that time. >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>> >>>>>> Les >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Alan D. Cabrera >>>>>> <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So, back in July Craig sent out a set of emails from committers in the >>>>>>> project stating that re-licensing for ASF. What I am not sure of is >>>>>>> that >>>>>>> this covers *all* the original authors from the JSecurity project >>>>>>> before >>>>>>> it >>>>>>> arrived at the Incubator. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>> Alan >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Dec 8, 2009, at 6:42 AM, Les Hazlewood wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Craig, can you please just confirm this so we have a clear record of >>>>>>>> it? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Les >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 9:26 AM, Alan D. Cabrera >>>>>>>> <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> If Craig has confirmed that all the original authors from JSecurity >>>>>>>>> have >>>>>>>>> filed a license agreement then I think we're good. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>> Alan >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Dec 7, 2009, at 4:58 PM, Les Hazlewood wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Yep, we're covered. All people who contributed previously to >>>>>>>>>> JSecurity became committers to Shiro. Before joining the >>>>>>>>>> incubator, >>>>>>>>>> we all formally (each) agreed to the transfer. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> HTH, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Les >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Alan D. Cabrera >>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I recall that agreements were forwarded by current project >>>>>>>>>>> members. >>>>>>>>>>> I'm >>>>>>>>>>> not >>>>>>>>>>> certain that we covered all the people who contributed to the >>>>>>>>>>> original >>>>>>>>>>> project. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>> Alan >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 7, 2009, at 11:40 AM, Les Hazlewood wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> To the best of my knowledge this is all finished - Craig helped >>>>>>>>>>>> out >>>>>>>>>>>> with it. I forwarded all the formal statements from all previous >>>>>>>>>>>> committers that they fully agree and support of transferring all >>>>>>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>>>>> their work to the ASF 2.0 license. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Craig, could you please clarify if there's anything else that >>>>>>>>>>>> needs >>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>>>>>> done? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Les >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 1:31 PM, Alan D. Cabrera >>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 7, 2009, at 7:44 AM, Les Hazlewood wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think most people in the Shiro community would agree that >>>>>>>>>>>>>> we're >>>>>>>>>>>>>> long >>>>>>>>>>>>>> overdue for our first release ;) >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, to that end, and unless anyone objects, I'm going to take a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> crack >>>>>>>>>>>>>> at tagging only what I feel are the most important issues that >>>>>>>>>>>>>> absolutely must be in to 1.0. When I'm done with that, I'd >>>>>>>>>>>>>> like >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> post to this list again to allow people the opportunity to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> speak-up >>>>>>>>>>>>>> if >>>>>>>>>>>>>> they see something that they think should be included but I >>>>>>>>>>>>>> missed. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm doing this to help us get a little focus on what should >>>>>>>>>>>>>> concretely >>>>>>>>>>>>>> define our first release, and to get it out as soon as possible >>>>>>>>>>>>>> from >>>>>>>>>>>>>> now. Just my opinion, but I think it'd be great if we can >>>>>>>>>>>>>> finish >>>>>>>>>>>>>> all >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the 1.0 issues (if not actually release) by 1 January. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please let me know if anyone does not agree with this, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> otherwise, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'll >>>>>>>>>>>>>> get started as soon as possible organizing the existing issues. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Sounds great! >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The only thing that's hazy in my mind is the LGPL vetting. I >>>>>>>>>>>>> recall >>>>>>>>>>>>> an >>>>>>>>>>>>> effort to obtain permission to relicense the code from the >>>>>>>>>>>>> original >>>>>>>>>>>>> authors >>>>>>>>>>>>> but am not sure if it was completed and all the requisite >>>>>>>>>>>>> permissions >>>>>>>>>>>>> were >>>>>>>>>>>>> properly filed. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>> Alan >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>> >> >> >
