Thanks!
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 4:17 PM, Alan D. Cabrera <[email protected]> wrote: > Done. > > > Regards, > Alan > > On Dec 18, 2009, at 1:06 PM, Les Hazlewood wrote: > >> In light of this, could you please resolve the following issue? >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SHIRO-41 >> >> Thanks, >> >> Les >> >> On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 11:16 AM, Alan D. Cabrera <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> For artwork it can get complicated but only if you received stipulations >>> on >>> its usage; it doesn't seem that there is any. I think we're good here. >>> >>> >>> Regards, >>> Alan >>> >>> On Dec 16, 2009, at 7:33 AM, Les Hazlewood wrote: >>> >>>> There is one minor thing I forgot to mention: Jeremy's friend created >>>> the old JSecurity shield/lock logo for us. He did the logo for us in >>>> return for free website hosting on one of our servers. This is >>>> payment for services rendered (he payed us by doing the logo work, the >>>> services rendered were the website hosting), so I don't think that we >>>> need a CLA/sign-off from him. >>>> >>>> As I understand it, the shield/lock logo is our intellectual property >>>> due to this agreement and we don't need to involve him. IANAL, but I >>>> think we're ok. >>>> >>>> - Les >>>> >>>> On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 10:26 AM, Les Hazlewood <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Yep, it did. Just for clarity's sake: every contributor on the old >>>>> JSecurity project came over as a committer to Apache and each also >>>>> sent the re-licensing agreement/affirmation at that time. >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> >>>>> Les >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Alan D. Cabrera >>>>> <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> So, back in July Craig sent out a set of emails from committers in the >>>>>> project stating that re-licensing for ASF. What I am not sure of is >>>>>> that >>>>>> this covers *all* the original authors from the JSecurity project >>>>>> before >>>>>> it >>>>>> arrived at the Incubator. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> Alan >>>>>> >>>>>> On Dec 8, 2009, at 6:42 AM, Les Hazlewood wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Craig, can you please just confirm this so we have a clear record of >>>>>>> it? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Les >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 9:26 AM, Alan D. Cabrera >>>>>>> <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If Craig has confirmed that all the original authors from JSecurity >>>>>>>> have >>>>>>>> filed a license agreement then I think we're good. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>> Alan >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Dec 7, 2009, at 4:58 PM, Les Hazlewood wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Yep, we're covered. All people who contributed previously to >>>>>>>>> JSecurity became committers to Shiro. Before joining the >>>>>>>>> incubator, >>>>>>>>> we all formally (each) agreed to the transfer. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> HTH, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Les >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Alan D. Cabrera >>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I recall that agreements were forwarded by current project >>>>>>>>>> members. >>>>>>>>>> I'm >>>>>>>>>> not >>>>>>>>>> certain that we covered all the people who contributed to the >>>>>>>>>> original >>>>>>>>>> project. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>> Alan >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Dec 7, 2009, at 11:40 AM, Les Hazlewood wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> To the best of my knowledge this is all finished - Craig helped >>>>>>>>>>> out >>>>>>>>>>> with it. I forwarded all the formal statements from all previous >>>>>>>>>>> committers that they fully agree and support of transferring all >>>>>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>>>> their work to the ASF 2.0 license. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Craig, could you please clarify if there's anything else that >>>>>>>>>>> needs >>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>>>>> done? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Les >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 1:31 PM, Alan D. Cabrera >>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 7, 2009, at 7:44 AM, Les Hazlewood wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I think most people in the Shiro community would agree that >>>>>>>>>>>>> we're >>>>>>>>>>>>> long >>>>>>>>>>>>> overdue for our first release ;) >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> So, to that end, and unless anyone objects, I'm going to take a >>>>>>>>>>>>> crack >>>>>>>>>>>>> at tagging only what I feel are the most important issues that >>>>>>>>>>>>> absolutely must be in to 1.0. When I'm done with that, I'd >>>>>>>>>>>>> like >>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>> post to this list again to allow people the opportunity to >>>>>>>>>>>>> speak-up >>>>>>>>>>>>> if >>>>>>>>>>>>> they see something that they think should be included but I >>>>>>>>>>>>> missed. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm doing this to help us get a little focus on what should >>>>>>>>>>>>> concretely >>>>>>>>>>>>> define our first release, and to get it out as soon as possible >>>>>>>>>>>>> from >>>>>>>>>>>>> now. Just my opinion, but I think it'd be great if we can >>>>>>>>>>>>> finish >>>>>>>>>>>>> all >>>>>>>>>>>>> the 1.0 issues (if not actually release) by 1 January. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Please let me know if anyone does not agree with this, >>>>>>>>>>>>> otherwise, >>>>>>>>>>>>> I'll >>>>>>>>>>>>> get started as soon as possible organizing the existing issues. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Sounds great! >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The only thing that's hazy in my mind is the LGPL vetting. I >>>>>>>>>>>> recall >>>>>>>>>>>> an >>>>>>>>>>>> effort to obtain permission to relicense the code from the >>>>>>>>>>>> original >>>>>>>>>>>> authors >>>>>>>>>>>> but am not sure if it was completed and all the requisite >>>>>>>>>>>> permissions >>>>>>>>>>>> were >>>>>>>>>>>> properly filed. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>> Alan >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> > >
