I definitely agree - there are a few critical issues that I'd like to see if we can resolve:
- The RememberMeManager acquires the HttpServletRequest/Response pair from the ThreadLocal - I was thinking that might require an API change to the RememberMeManager to accept it as a method argument or in the Subject context map. - 'Run As' is about 50% done. It shouldn't take much longer to finish - As Brian suggested, his patches would be a nice edition for the 1.0 release. I agree that most of the other issues won't be done for the 1.0 release, but that's ok - that's what 1.1 will be for or 1.2 or whatever. It's definitely a good idea to get 1.0 out now to service the community's needs. We're definitely close! Cheers, Les On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 10:54 PM, Kalle Korhonen <[email protected]> wrote: > I think it's a high time to do our first release. There's quite a few > smallish organizational and/or configuration items we need to do > before a release, most of them nicely tracked at > http://incubator.apache.org/clutch.html. Color-wise, we are not doing > that bad but we could do better. Don't care about the all green much > but the page is tracking the right items, so I just picked up the > hammer and I'll start swinging. I'll be updating the progress here and > in case I run into issues. I'll first create the distribution area and > publish our site docs there. If there are any open issues any of you > would like to get closed before 1.0.0 better start working on them > now.. I don't think we are going to wait for all of the issues > currently scheduled for 1.0 > (https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&mode=hide&sorter/order=DESC&sorter/field=priority&resolution=-1&pid=12310950&fixfor=12314078) > to be completed unless they are critical/blocker. We'll just schedule > them for a later point release if not done until we are otherwise > ready for 1.0.0. Agree? > > Kalle > > > On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 1:19 PM, Les Hazlewood <[email protected]> wrote: >> Thanks! >> >> On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 4:17 PM, Alan D. Cabrera <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> Done. >>> >>> >>> Regards, >>> Alan >>> >>> On Dec 18, 2009, at 1:06 PM, Les Hazlewood wrote: >>> >>>> In light of this, could you please resolve the following issue? >>>> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SHIRO-41 >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> Les >>>> >>>> On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 11:16 AM, Alan D. Cabrera <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> For artwork it can get complicated but only if you received stipulations >>>>> on >>>>> its usage; it doesn't seem that there is any. I think we're good here. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Alan >>>>> >>>>> On Dec 16, 2009, at 7:33 AM, Les Hazlewood wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> There is one minor thing I forgot to mention: Jeremy's friend created >>>>>> the old JSecurity shield/lock logo for us. He did the logo for us in >>>>>> return for free website hosting on one of our servers. This is >>>>>> payment for services rendered (he payed us by doing the logo work, the >>>>>> services rendered were the website hosting), so I don't think that we >>>>>> need a CLA/sign-off from him. >>>>>> >>>>>> As I understand it, the shield/lock logo is our intellectual property >>>>>> due to this agreement and we don't need to involve him. IANAL, but I >>>>>> think we're ok. >>>>>> >>>>>> - Les >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 10:26 AM, Les Hazlewood <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yep, it did. Just for clarity's sake: every contributor on the old >>>>>>> JSecurity project came over as a committer to Apache and each also >>>>>>> sent the re-licensing agreement/affirmation at that time. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Les >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Alan D. Cabrera >>>>>>> <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> So, back in July Craig sent out a set of emails from committers in the >>>>>>>> project stating that re-licensing for ASF. What I am not sure of is >>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>> this covers *all* the original authors from the JSecurity project >>>>>>>> before >>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>> arrived at the Incubator. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>> Alan >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Dec 8, 2009, at 6:42 AM, Les Hazlewood wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Craig, can you please just confirm this so we have a clear record of >>>>>>>>> it? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Les >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 9:26 AM, Alan D. Cabrera >>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> If Craig has confirmed that all the original authors from JSecurity >>>>>>>>>> have >>>>>>>>>> filed a license agreement then I think we're good. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>> Alan >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Dec 7, 2009, at 4:58 PM, Les Hazlewood wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Yep, we're covered. All people who contributed previously to >>>>>>>>>>> JSecurity became committers to Shiro. Before joining the >>>>>>>>>>> incubator, >>>>>>>>>>> we all formally (each) agreed to the transfer. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> HTH, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Les >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Alan D. Cabrera >>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I recall that agreements were forwarded by current project >>>>>>>>>>>> members. >>>>>>>>>>>> I'm >>>>>>>>>>>> not >>>>>>>>>>>> certain that we covered all the people who contributed to the >>>>>>>>>>>> original >>>>>>>>>>>> project. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>> Alan >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 7, 2009, at 11:40 AM, Les Hazlewood wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> To the best of my knowledge this is all finished - Craig helped >>>>>>>>>>>>> out >>>>>>>>>>>>> with it. I forwarded all the formal statements from all previous >>>>>>>>>>>>> committers that they fully agree and support of transferring all >>>>>>>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>>>>>> their work to the ASF 2.0 license. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Craig, could you please clarify if there's anything else that >>>>>>>>>>>>> needs >>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>>>>>>> done? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Les >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 1:31 PM, Alan D. Cabrera >>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 7, 2009, at 7:44 AM, Les Hazlewood wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think most people in the Shiro community would agree that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we're >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> long >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> overdue for our first release ;) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, to that end, and unless anyone objects, I'm going to take a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> crack >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at tagging only what I feel are the most important issues that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> absolutely must be in to 1.0. When I'm done with that, I'd >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> like >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> post to this list again to allow people the opportunity to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> speak-up >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they see something that they think should be included but I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> missed. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm doing this to help us get a little focus on what should >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> concretely >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> define our first release, and to get it out as soon as possible >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> now. Just my opinion, but I think it'd be great if we can >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> finish >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the 1.0 issues (if not actually release) by 1 January. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please let me know if anyone does not agree with this, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> otherwise, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'll >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> get started as soon as possible organizing the existing issues. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sounds great! >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The only thing that's hazy in my mind is the LGPL vetting. I >>>>>>>>>>>>>> recall >>>>>>>>>>>>>> an >>>>>>>>>>>>>> effort to obtain permission to relicense the code from the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> original >>>>>>>>>>>>>> authors >>>>>>>>>>>>>> but am not sure if it was completed and all the requisite >>>>>>>>>>>>>> permissions >>>>>>>>>>>>>> were >>>>>>>>>>>>>> properly filed. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alan >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> >> >
