Tedd I thought I had sent you a revised fitting for you based on what I found concerning the toe up toe down deflection affect on the fit chip readings. I posted that to Dave yesterday but find it must not have gone through, probably because I had put a explanation of the results of comparing the FitChip and Shaft-Lab tests on Dave that resulted in the above findings as an enclosure. I will copy that explanation into a new e-mail to Dave so you can see the reason for the change. The system now recommends your driver at 263 CPM and a slope of 1.35 CPM per club.
llhack ----- Original Message ----- From: "Childers, Tedd A" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 8:21 AM Subject: RE: ShopTalk: History of Frequency > Dave, > > As you know, I also tried the FitChip and was not satisfied with the fitting > recommendations. To Lloyd's credit, he really went out of his way to try > and make the system work for me, but it simply did not produce results that > were superior to my current clubs in either length or accuracy. I will > admit that according to FitChip, I have a swing with a VERY late to > non-existent release, which resulted in a recommendation of the stiffest > shaft possible. I was able to hit the shafts that FitChip and Lloyd > recommended better than I expected, but they felt very harsh and resulted in > a loss of distance, with no gain in accuracy. Just my experience for what > its worth. > > Tedd > > -----Original Message----- > From: Dave Tutelman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 6:00 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: ShopTalk: History of Frequency > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Lloyd Hackman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Sunday, September 15, 2002 11:07 AM > > > Lloyd>>>But the same frequency in either shaft will match the players swing > frequency. > > Bernie>> Are you referring to frequency analysis as a fitting tool with > your timing chip? Only if you believe you can do that satisfactorily. There > are many who don't believe you can. The evidence that I've seen on this > forum suggests to me that it's still a crap shoot. > > Lloyd> *** Those who believe I cann't have not tried it and I have many > more that have tried it and know it can. You ought to try it. > > There is at least one counterexample. Me. > > I tried it. You fitted me yourself. The recommendation was wrong to the > point of ridiculous. > > I have correspondence from a few others with similar experience, but if I > posted that it would be hearsay. Suffice it to say your categorical > statement above is wrong. > > DaveT > > > > LEGAL NOTICE > Unless expressly stated otherwise, this message is confidential and may be privileged. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. Access to this E-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not an addressee, any disclosure or copying of the contents of this E-mail or any action taken (or not taken) in reliance on it is unauthorized and may be unlawful. If you are not an addressee, please inform the sender immediately.
