The Policy-SIG is also open to anyone where as the consensus at the AMM is members only. It also seemed like it gave people a time to get additional input/feedback between the Policy-SIG and the AMM.
-- Dean Pemberton Technical Policy Advisor InternetNZ +64 21 920 363 (mob) d...@internetnz.net.nz To promote the Internet's benefits and uses, and protect its potential. On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 11:36 AM, Aftab Siddiqui <aftab.siddi...@gmail.com> wrote: > What I can recall, the objection was more members join AMM rather > Policy-SIG therefore the consensus at Policy-SIG is not actual consensus of > the members at the event. I hope secretariat can suggest what other issues > were registered. > > Regards, > > Aftab A. Siddiqui > > On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 7:31 AM, Skeeve Stevens <ske...@v4now.com> wrote: > >> Let's try again? What were the objections last time? >> >> >> ...Skeeve >> >> *Skeeve Stevens - Senior IP Broker* >> *v4Now - *an eintellego Networks service >> ske...@v4now.com ; www.v4now.com >> >> Phone: 1300 239 038; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve >> >> facebook.com/v4now ; <http://twitter.com/networkceoau> >> linkedin.com/in/skeeve >> >> twitter.com/theispguy ; blog: www.theispguy.com >> >> >> IP Address Brokering - Introducing sellers and buyers >> >> On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 11:29 AM, Dean Pemberton <d...@internetnz.net.nz> >> wrote: >> >>> I agree. Thats why I was in favour of abandoning the AMM consensus. >>> Unfortunately the policy failed. >>> -- >>> Dean Pemberton >>> >>> Technical Policy Advisor >>> InternetNZ >>> +64 21 920 363 (mob) >>> d...@internetnz.net.nz >>> >>> To promote the Internet's benefits and uses, and protect its potential. >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 6:25 PM, Izumi Okutani <iz...@nic.ad.jp> wrote: >>> > Great to know this Philip. >>> > >>> > We had simliar issue last year, where we discussed about the proposal >>> on >>> > reserving a space for DNS anycast, and due to parallel session, some >>> > operators could not attend. It got rediscussed at the AMM and the >>> > consensus at Policy SIG got reverted. I think it's not efficient that >>> > consensus decisions needs to be rediscussed due to parallel sessions >>> and >>> > not everyone could participate at Policy SIG. >>> > >>> > I provided input to an APNIC staff after the session last year and >>> would >>> > like to raise this again. >>> > >>> > >>> > Thanks, >>> > Izumi >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > On 2015/03/02 12:07, Philip Smith wrote: >>> >> FWIW, a few years ago we did have at least two APRICOTs where there >>> was >>> >> nothing in parallel with the Thursday Policy SIG. It meant that the >>> >> technical/ops part of the conference finished on Wednesday. APRICOT >>> 2009 >>> >> was one example - for reference. (And tech/ops people left on >>> Wednesday >>> >> night.) >>> >> >>> >> But we reverted to putting regular conference content in parallel with >>> >> the Policy SIG following requests and feedback for that. >>> >> >>> >> And yes, if there is clear desire from the Policy SIG to be >>> standalone, >>> >> the APRICOT PC will pay very close attention to that desire. :-) >>> >> >>> >> philip >>> >> -- >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> Skeeve Stevens wrote on 2/03/2015 12:04 : >>> >>> OK... so a year in the future... that should easily be dealt with >>> by >>> >>> talking to the Apricot Program Committee... as it is a very >>> reasonable >>> >>> and obvious thing to do. >>> >>> >>> >>> Is it possible for this meeting? Competing event for Policy means >>> there >>> >>> will be little reason to entice people to come . >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ...Skeeve >>> >>> >>> >>> *Skeeve Stevens - Senior IP Broker* >>> >>> *v4Now - *an eintellego Networks service >>> >>> ske...@v4now.com <mailto:ske...@v4now.com> ; www.v4now.com >>> >>> <http://www.v4now.com/> >>> >>> >>> >>> Phone: 1300 239 038; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve >>> >>> >>> >>> facebook.com/v4now >>> >>> <http://facebook.com/v4now> ; <http://twitter.com/networkceoau> >>> linkedin.com/in/skeeve >>> >>> <http://linkedin.com/in/skeeve> >>> >>> >>> >>> twitter.com/theispguy <http://twitter.com/theispguy> ; >>> >>> blog: www.theispguy.com <http://www.theispguy.com/> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> IP Address Brokering - Introducing sellers and buyers >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Masato Yamanishi < >>> myama...@gmail.com >>> >>> <mailto:myama...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> Skeeve, >>> >>> >>> >>> Unfortunately, I don't think we can change the schedule in this >>> meeting. >>> >>> I'm asking about future meetings. >>> >>> >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Masato >>> >>> >>> >>> 2015-03-01 18:46 GMT-08:00 Skeeve Stevens <ske...@v4now.com >>> >>> <mailto:ske...@v4now.com>>: >>> >>> >>> >>> Masato-san, >>> >>> >>> >>> Are you suggesting that we are able to change either Policy >>> or >>> >>> Lightening talks for this event? I would love to go to >>> both. >>> >>> >>> >>> I think this is only really a problem at Apricot events, not >>> >>> APNIC events. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ...Skeeve >>> >>> >>> >>> *Skeeve Stevens - Senior IP Broker* >>> >>> *v4Now - *an eintellego Networks service >>> >>> ske...@v4now.com <mailto:ske...@v4now.com> ; www.v4now.com >>> >>> <http://www.v4now.com/> >>> >>> >>> >>> Phone: 1300 239 038; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 >>> >>> <tel:%2B61%20%280%29414%20753%20383> ; skype://skeeve >>> >>> >>> >>> facebook.com/v4now >>> >>> <http://facebook.com/v4now> ; < >>> http://twitter.com/networkceoau>linkedin.com/in/skeeve >>> >>> <http://linkedin.com/in/skeeve> >>> >>> >>> >>> twitter.com/theispguy <http://twitter.com/theispguy> ; >>> >>> blog: www.theispguy.com <http://www.theispguy.com/> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> IP Address Brokering - Introducing sellers and buyers >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 11:18 AM, Masato Yamanishi >>> >>> <myama...@gmail.com <mailto:myama...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> Dear All, >>> >>> >>> >>> While this point was raised by Jessica, Skeeve, and Dean >>> >>> during the ML discussion, >>> >>> it is also big question for me, which day and time-slot >>> is >>> >>> best for Policy SIG. >>> >>> >>> >>> Historically, we have SIG session somewhere in Thu. >>> >>> However, do you think it is a barrier for wider >>> participation? >>> >>> (e.g. many operators are leaving in Thu PM?) >>> >>> >>> >>> Also, which session should not be in parallel with >>> Policy SIG? >>> >>> (I also don't want to miss Lightning talks as Skeeve >>> mentioned) >>> >>> >>> >>> Please share your thoughts on this list and/or offline >>> in >>> >>> Fukuoka. >>> >>> >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Masato Yamanishi >>> >>> APNIC Policy SIG Chair (Acting) >>> >>> >>> >>> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource >>> management >>> >>> policy * >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> >>> sig-policy mailing list >>> >>> sig-policy@lists.apnic.net <mailto: >>> sig-policy@lists.apnic.net> >>> >>> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy >>> * >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> >>> sig-policy mailing list >>> >>> sig-policy@lists.apnic.net >>> >>> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy >>> >>> >>> >> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy >>> * >>> >> _______________________________________________ >>> >> sig-policy mailing list >>> >> sig-policy@lists.apnic.net >>> >> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy >>> >> >>> > >>> > * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy >>> * >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > sig-policy mailing list >>> > sig-policy@lists.apnic.net >>> > http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy >>> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy >>> * >>> _______________________________________________ >>> sig-policy mailing list >>> sig-policy@lists.apnic.net >>> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy >>> >> >> >> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy >> * >> _______________________________________________ >> sig-policy mailing list >> sig-policy@lists.apnic.net >> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy >> >> >
* sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy * _______________________________________________ sig-policy mailing list sig-policy@lists.apnic.net http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
