Masato-san, Are you suggesting that we are able to change either Policy or Lightening talks for this event? I would love to go to both.
I think this is only really a problem at Apricot events, not APNIC events. ...Skeeve *Skeeve Stevens - Senior IP Broker* *v4Now - *an eintellego Networks service ske...@v4now.com ; www.v4now.com Phone: 1300 239 038; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve facebook.com/v4now ; <http://twitter.com/networkceoau> linkedin.com/in/skeeve twitter.com/theispguy ; blog: www.theispguy.com IP Address Brokering - Introducing sellers and buyers On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 11:18 AM, Masato Yamanishi <myama...@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear All, > > While this point was raised by Jessica, Skeeve, and Dean during the ML > discussion, > it is also big question for me, which day and time-slot is best for Policy > SIG. > > Historically, we have SIG session somewhere in Thu. > However, do you think it is a barrier for wider participation? > (e.g. many operators are leaving in Thu PM?) > > Also, which session should not be in parallel with Policy SIG? > (I also don't want to miss Lightning talks as Skeeve mentioned) > > Please share your thoughts on this list and/or offline in Fukuoka. > > Regards, > Masato Yamanishi > APNIC Policy SIG Chair (Acting) > > * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy > * > _______________________________________________ > sig-policy mailing list > sig-policy@lists.apnic.net > http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy > >
* sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy * _______________________________________________ sig-policy mailing list sig-policy@lists.apnic.net http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
