Great to know this Philip. We had simliar issue last year, where we discussed about the proposal on reserving a space for DNS anycast, and due to parallel session, some operators could not attend. It got rediscussed at the AMM and the consensus at Policy SIG got reverted. I think it's not efficient that consensus decisions needs to be rediscussed due to parallel sessions and not everyone could participate at Policy SIG.
I provided input to an APNIC staff after the session last year and would like to raise this again. Thanks, Izumi On 2015/03/02 12:07, Philip Smith wrote: > FWIW, a few years ago we did have at least two APRICOTs where there was > nothing in parallel with the Thursday Policy SIG. It meant that the > technical/ops part of the conference finished on Wednesday. APRICOT 2009 > was one example - for reference. (And tech/ops people left on Wednesday > night.) > > But we reverted to putting regular conference content in parallel with > the Policy SIG following requests and feedback for that. > > And yes, if there is clear desire from the Policy SIG to be standalone, > the APRICOT PC will pay very close attention to that desire. :-) > > philip > -- > > > Skeeve Stevens wrote on 2/03/2015 12:04 : >> OK... so a year in the future... that should easily be dealt with by >> talking to the Apricot Program Committee... as it is a very reasonable >> and obvious thing to do. >> >> Is it possible for this meeting? Competing event for Policy means there >> will be little reason to entice people to come . >> >> >> ...Skeeve >> >> *Skeeve Stevens - Senior IP Broker* >> *v4Now - *an eintellego Networks service >> ske...@v4now.com <mailto:ske...@v4now.com> ; www.v4now.com >> <http://www.v4now.com/> >> >> Phone: 1300 239 038; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve >> >> facebook.com/v4now >> <http://facebook.com/v4now> ; >> <http://twitter.com/networkceoau>linkedin.com/in/skeeve >> <http://linkedin.com/in/skeeve> >> >> twitter.com/theispguy <http://twitter.com/theispguy> ; >> blog: www.theispguy.com <http://www.theispguy.com/> >> >> >> IP Address Brokering - Introducing sellers and buyers >> >> On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Masato Yamanishi <myama...@gmail.com >> <mailto:myama...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> Skeeve, >> >> Unfortunately, I don't think we can change the schedule in this meeting. >> I'm asking about future meetings. >> >> Regards, >> Masato >> >> 2015-03-01 18:46 GMT-08:00 Skeeve Stevens <ske...@v4now.com >> <mailto:ske...@v4now.com>>: >> >> Masato-san, >> >> Are you suggesting that we are able to change either Policy or >> Lightening talks for this event? I would love to go to both. >> >> I think this is only really a problem at Apricot events, not >> APNIC events. >> >> >> ...Skeeve >> >> *Skeeve Stevens - Senior IP Broker* >> *v4Now - *an eintellego Networks service >> ske...@v4now.com <mailto:ske...@v4now.com> ; www.v4now.com >> <http://www.v4now.com/> >> >> Phone: 1300 239 038; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 >> <tel:%2B61%20%280%29414%20753%20383> ; skype://skeeve >> >> facebook.com/v4now >> <http://facebook.com/v4now> ; >> <http://twitter.com/networkceoau>linkedin.com/in/skeeve >> <http://linkedin.com/in/skeeve> >> >> twitter.com/theispguy <http://twitter.com/theispguy> ; >> blog: www.theispguy.com <http://www.theispguy.com/> >> >> >> IP Address Brokering - Introducing sellers and buyers >> >> On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 11:18 AM, Masato Yamanishi >> <myama...@gmail.com <mailto:myama...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> Dear All, >> >> While this point was raised by Jessica, Skeeve, and Dean >> during the ML discussion, >> it is also big question for me, which day and time-slot is >> best for Policy SIG. >> >> Historically, we have SIG session somewhere in Thu. >> However, do you think it is a barrier for wider participation? >> (e.g. many operators are leaving in Thu PM?) >> >> Also, which session should not be in parallel with Policy SIG? >> (I also don't want to miss Lightning talks as Skeeve mentioned) >> >> Please share your thoughts on this list and/or offline in >> Fukuoka. >> >> Regards, >> Masato Yamanishi >> APNIC Policy SIG Chair (Acting) >> >> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management >> policy * >> _______________________________________________ >> sig-policy mailing list >> sig-policy@lists.apnic.net <mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net> >> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy >> >> >> >> >> >> >> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy >> * >> _______________________________________________ >> sig-policy mailing list >> sig-policy@lists.apnic.net >> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy >> > * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy > * > _______________________________________________ > sig-policy mailing list > sig-policy@lists.apnic.net > http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy > * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy * _______________________________________________ sig-policy mailing list sig-policy@lists.apnic.net http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
