On Monday 03 March 2008, Divya Sampath wrote: [snip] > wanted to come back to the point about the absence of > a uniform civil code/ the existence of a bunch of > antiquated personal laws based on various religions.
I agree that a UCC is required, totally. What I am worried about is who gets to decide what goes into it. What process would you recommend for finding what is generally acceptable? Is it enough to appease the largest majority in the country? Also, how do we do this and not end up with a mess like France? -Taj.
