On Tuesday 27 Mar 2012 1:49:54 pm Deepa Mohan wrote:
>  Saritha Rai's  new fortnightly column in the New York Times online-
> http://india.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/03/27/when-daycare-slips-into-night-car
> e /
> 
> How do you all feel about it?
> 
> Deepa.

For the heck of it I post a slightly edited version of something I said 
elsewhere. The language was designed to trigger particular switches in the 
target audience :D

Children need mummies and daddies to grow up as healthy well adjusted 
individuals. The institution of marriage evolved for just this purpose and it 
was aided by joint families. The institution of marriage unfortunately 
trampled on women's freedom and rights.

The women's rights movement and the desire to "set free" female sexuality from 
the burden of childbirth led to the development of contraception and laws that 
dissolved marriage more easily. That in turn led to societies in which 
multiple sexual partners for male and female became easier as part of freedom. 
Single mothers by choice also became more common without having to face 
criticism from society for having a baby outside of marriage. But children are 
themselves an economic burden and a restriction of freedom as is marriage. So 
couples without marriage and without kids are the ultimate in financial and 
physical happiness. This is the ultimate freedom. Marriage and children are 
bonds that reduce physical, emotional and financial freedom. Freedom from these 
bonds constitutes modernity. 

Archaic and oudated societies such as Hindu society encourage freedom 
restricting ideas like "Dharma". Dharma demands the bondage of marriage and 
children as a duty. Dharma restricts freedom and by insisting that couples 
have children. This is a disaster for individual freedom and wealth.

I am sure the state can look after children as happens in advanced countries 
and old people can go to old age homes courtesy the state. This gives people a 
lot more freedom. Sexual freedom. Financial freedom. Freedom to travel. etc. 
Every individual has to decide for himself what he wants. You could choose the 
route of bondage and outdated laws and restriction of freedom. Or you could 
choose a free society. The former conforms to dharma, the latter is adharma.

shiv

Reply via email to