Deborah Gerard, on 10/27/2007 9:44 PM, said the following:
*Why did they start to pasteurize years ago wasn't there some kind of risk of a bacteria or something then?...
Yes, there was a bacteria problem - caused by laziness in the form of poor sanitation in the production processes. This could have easily been handled by - gasp - holding producers accountable for their actions, in the form of civil, and possibly in some cases, criminal (if the evidence supported such) prosecutions for negligence. But no, the - large, corporate - milk producers rallied around a bill to allow them to minimize liability and be even LAZIER in their sanitation practices, by simply introducing 'pasteurization' at the end of the process as some kind of 'cure-all'. All they had to do was implement the use of hydrogen peroxide and/or CS at different stages of the production process - in other words, enforce CLEANLINESS. But no, this would not have been as 'convenient', nor would it have provided liability protection. Of course, since anyone can sue anyone/thing anytime for anything (pretty much), there is no such thing as total liability protection... but as long as these producers follow the proper guidelines for pasteurization, they are relatively safe from effective lawsuits for poor milk quality and/or contaminants. -- The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver. Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down... List maintainer: Mike Devour <mdev...@eskimo.com>
