Why not say, "What is good for the Goose is good for the Gander?"
Where Goose = Big Pharma
and
Gander = Mercola and other Alternatives
What you say may be possible, but I got pretty irritated with Mercola's
huckstering.
That goes for Jonathan Wright MD too.
Dan
________________________________
From: Nenah Sylver [mailto:nenahsyl...@cox.net]
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 1:37 PM
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: CS>Soy Products, Some of the Greatest Foods in the
World
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dan Nave" <dan.n...@nilfisk-advance.com
<mailto:dan.n...@nilfisk-advance.com> >
To: <silver-list@eskimo.com <mailto:silver-list@eskimo.com> >
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 12:22 PM
Subject: RE: CS>Soy Products, Some of the Greatest Foods in the
World
Also, using the "follow the money" mantra used by many, Mercola
sells an
awful lot of this stuff. Is he not subject to conflict of
interest?
=====================
Why not say:
Mercola is selling certain products because he believes in them
and has seen the good that they can do.
AND
For a long time, Mercola had a wealth of valuable information
for free, available to anyone who logged on. Why not sell products,
after the many years of offering free information?
Just a different way of looking at things.
Nenah
