Sorry Kevin, You did indeed say: "...a much higher ratio of true CS to ionic silver for the polarity switched case. Given your faint tyndal effect observations in both cases, that possibility seems to be ruled out." which is the opposite to what I said you said.
Ivan. > -----Original Message----- > From: Kevin Nolan [mailto:ken...@optusnet.com.au] > Sent: Sunday, 20 January 2002 2:45 p.m. > To: silver-list@eskimo.com > Subject: Re: CS>Polarity Switch Experiment > > > With all respect, Ivan, I think you should read again what I > actually said. > > regards, Kevin Nolan > > Ivan wrote: > "Well it is not the voltage that indicates the rate of silver > dissolution. The current dip and restoration will be more indicative, > and as Kevin mentioned, some of the energy will used in undoing what > was done in the last cycle, and as he mentioned later, it is likely > that a higher proportion of metallic colloid particles are produced. A > test of total silver content for both runs would be very interesting." > > > > -- > The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of > colloidal silver. > > To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail > message to: > silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com -or- silver-digest-requ...@eskimo.com > with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line. > > To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com > Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html List maintainer: Mike Devour <mdev...@eskimo.com>
