Thanks Ivan - well said. :) Kevin Nolan
----- Original Message ----- From: "I Anderson" <i...@win.co.nz> To: <silver-list@eskimo.com> Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2002 3:10 PM Subject: RE: CS>Polarity Switch Experiment > Sorry Kevin, > > You did indeed say: > "...a much higher ratio of true CS to ionic silver for the polarity > switched case. Given your faint tyndal effect observations in both > cases, that possibility seems to be ruled out." > which is the opposite to what I said you said. > > Ivan. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Kevin Nolan [mailto:ken...@optusnet.com.au] > > Sent: Sunday, 20 January 2002 2:45 p.m. > > To: silver-list@eskimo.com > > Subject: Re: CS>Polarity Switch Experiment > > > > > > With all respect, Ivan, I think you should read again what I > > actually said. > > > > regards, Kevin Nolan > > > > Ivan wrote: > > "Well it is not the voltage that indicates the rate of silver > > dissolution. The current dip and restoration will be more > indicative, > > and as Kevin mentioned, some of the energy will used in undoing what > > was done in the last cycle, and as he mentioned later, it is likely > > that a higher proportion of metallic colloid particles are produced. > A > > test of total silver content for both runs would be very > interesting." > > > > > > > > -- > > The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of > > colloidal silver. > > > > To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail > > message to: > > silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com -or- > silver-digest-requ...@eskimo.com > > with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line. > > > > To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com > > Silver-list archive: > http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html > List maintainer: Mike Devour <mdev...@eskimo.com> >
