> RE: CS>MultiMeter Question
> From: David Bearrow
> Date: Wed, 7 May 2003 05:22:54

  > I use an LM317. It provides smaller current than the 117.

  You may  have  found   one   that   works,   but   if  you  read the
  specification, the  minimum  load  current for  the  LM317  with 40V
  differential is 3.5 to 10mA, and the LM117 is 3.5 to 5mA.  The LM117
  is better  than the LM317, but neither device is guaranteed  to work
  outside the specifications.

    See http://www.national.com/ds.cgi/LM/LM117.pdf

  > I have been able to consistently get the current limited  to 1.7ma
  > with the LM317 using a 1K feedback resister at 38V supply.

  The equation for setting the current is R = 1.25 / I

  For 1.7mA, the resistor would be 1.25 / 1.7e-3 = 735 ohms. Since you
  need a 1k resistor, this shows the device is not  operating properly
  and it is doubtful it is operating very well as a current regulator.
  Have you plotted the current-vs-time curve? I'll bet it changes with
  temperature.

  The LM117/LM317 reduces the available voltage by 3V, so you are only
  supplying 35V to the electrodes at power on. This will  increase the
  initial current  compared to 27 volts from three  9V  batteries, but
  not enough to make much difference.

  Unless you have a very large surface area for your  electrodes. even
  with a  properly-functioning  current  regulator,  you  are probably
  operating in the exponential portion of the curve as shown in Fig. 1
  on my  web page. This means your results are subject  to  the normal
  process variations  in  purity of the distilled  water,  ion channel
  formation, and hydrogen bubbles at the cathode reducing  the surface
  area.

  I had all the same problems and found the only way to solve  them is
  to go  to  a  higher voltage. The voltage that  is  needed  could be
  lethal if the circuit is not designed properly, and two  people have
  recently posted  discussions  on  using the  raw  110VAC  without an
  isolation tranformer. That is why I posted the 130V design.

  > The TO-92  package is easy to work with as well, it  looks  like a
  > small transistor.  And  the cost is excellent.  Only  50  cents at
  > Digikey. I  can  post my schematic and parts list  on  the  web if
  > anyone is interested.

  The schematic is one component and one resistor, and is shown in the
  datasheet along with the device specifications.

  > I designed  it based on the best advice I gleaned from  Bob, Trem,
  > and Jason  on  this list. It uses a small motor with  a  straw for
  > constant stirring. If you mount the whole thing on a plastic mason
  > jar lid with your screw type connectors pointing down it  makes it
  > a lot  easier.  Just  put your silver wire  on  the  connector. (I
  > prefer silver  ribbon,  you get more  surface  area  and increases
  > capacitance between electrodes)

  The ribbon  increases  the surface area,  which  lowers  the current
  density for  the  same  supply current. I'll  bet  they  are  fun to
  clean:)

  Even with  a dielectric constant of 81 due to  the  distilled water,
  the capacitance  between the electrodes is still negligible.  It has
  no bearing at DC.

  No doubt you are making cs, since you are applying current. But many
  people have  posted  discussions  on  the  unrepeatability  of their
  process, and some even think the phase of the moon has some effect.

  I think  a  lot  of problems people  have  been  having,  aside from
  variations in the purity of the distilled water, is the  low voltage
  normally used,  and  unreliable   current  regulation.  Your circuit
  certainly falls in this category.

Best Regards, 

Mike Monett


--
The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html

List maintainer: Mike Devour <mdev...@eskimo.com>