Paula writes: > I am completely puzzled by your utter reliance on a test (salt test) > that is so completely subjective and not at all measured, controlled, > or precise and your attitude towards ole Bob's lab equipment and > multiple cross checks and tests by others (real lab tests, real > calibrated equipment, much more repeatable even if somewhat variable). > And your reliance on calculations and equations that as far as I can > tell from your posts do not make any allowance for any variables in > the distilled water. You amaze me.
Hehe. Personalities are the *fun* part of all this, dontcha know? <GRIN> Seriously, Paula highlights for me the one objection Mike M. has made to the others' efforts that I have not yet seen a solid answer to, and I'd *like* to see that answer. I'm talking about his contention that some of Bob's samples show higher silver content than is "theoretically" possible from the number of Coulombs of electrons passed through the cell. So far the only answer has been, "We've made hundreds of measurements and cross checked with each other." Now that is a good enough answer as far as it goes, and I do not believe that Bob and the others are wrong. But *somebody* had better figure out just what's being missed. What assumptions are wrong behind Mike's calculations? What part of the computation is wrong. Or what part of the data? Or assumption behind all of the measurements? What say ye, oh silvan sayers of sooth? Be well, Mike D. (who's signed his posts 'Mike D.' since the last time another 'Mike' was active on the forum...) [Mike Devour, Citizen, Patriot, Libertarian] [mdev...@eskimo.com ] [Speaking only for myself... ] -- The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html List maintainer: Mike Devour <mdev...@eskimo.com>
