I was working with the Eades' Protien Power Life Plan. Similar, but a
bit less restrictive than Atkins, from my understanding.
Knowing all this, I was struck by the claim in the "Master Cleanse"
literature that it would burn fat. Made no sense. Thus my question.
Got ya, I wasn't following the early part of this thread. Sorry.
It does seem strange, yet not logically but intuitively it feels right
to me that you could go into ketosis that way - different mechanism than
simply lowering the carbs; but still seems right to me. I have a friend
who lost a lot of weight by going on a chocolate diet to get into
ketosis. She loved chocolate, couldn't do without it, so she ate
nithing but chocolate - tons of it, for ten days at a time, then did a
week of as sensible, balanced, but calorie limited eating as she could,
then went back on ten days of the chocolate. She did go into ketosis.
It wasn't that healthy a diet, but it was what she could do. Today she
could do atkins using sugar free chocolate, but this was years ago
before there was such a thing. Doesn't make logical sense, but it worked.
I'd like to bomb the parasites and do the liver cleanses, then move
back toward Atkins', Eades', or Faigan's programs, and see if it's
easier to do with a healthier body to begin with.
Makes sense to me. Even though I've been on the clark stuff for years,
I redid the full parasite cleanse, kidney cleanse, and liver cleanse
right before starting on Atkins, for the same reason. This diet can be
hard on the kidneys especially - though drinking plenty of fluid - in my
case, 14 glasses a day of it - groan - helps. Joy
--
The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.
Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org
To post, address your message to: [email protected]
Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html
List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
